Hi Graham,
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:30:37 UTC, Graham Leggett minf...@sharp.fm
wrote:
This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format.
Paul Smedley wrote:
Sorry for the late response, but if there is no current OS/2
maintainer for APR and httpd - I'm happy to take on that
Hi,
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:43:08 UTC, Nick Kew n...@webthing.com wrote:
Guenter Knauf wrote:
Jeff Trawick schrieb:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Paul Smedley
pauldes...@despamsmedley.id.au mailto:pauldes...@despamsmedley.id.au
wrote:
Sorry for the late response, but if there is
Hi Brian,
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 21:12:11 UTC, Brian Havard
brian.hav...@gmail.com wrote:
Nick Kew wrote:
Paul Smedley wrote:
[ ] yank BeOS MPM from trunk
[ ] yank OS/2 MPM from trunk
(I'm +1 on both votes)
Sorry for the late response, but if there is no current OS/2
maintainer
Hi Guys,
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:36:29 UTC, traw...@gmail.com wrote:
* The last OS/2-specific MPM change I can find was in 2003
(http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrevision=101826).
Votes:
[ ] yank BeOS MPM from trunk
[ ] yank OS/2 MPM from trunk
(I'm +1 on both votes)
Sorry for
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Paul Smedley
pauldes...@despamsmedley.id.au wrote:
Hi Guys,
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:36:29 UTC, traw...@gmail.com wrote:
* The last OS/2-specific MPM change I can find was in 2003
(http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrevision=101826).
Votes:
[ ]
Hi Jeff,
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009 13:09:13 UTC, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Paul Smedley
pauldes...@despamsmedley.id.au wrote:
Hi Guys,
On Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:36:29 UTC, traw...@gmail.com wrote:
* The last OS/2-specific MPM change I can find
Paul Smedley wrote:
[ ] yank BeOS MPM from trunk
[ ] yank OS/2 MPM from trunk
(I'm +1 on both votes)
Sorry for the late response, but if there is no current OS/2
maintainer for APR and httpd - I'm happy to take on that role.
I've been building Apache2 on OS/2 for the last 4 years or so, I
Paul Smedley wrote:
Sorry for the late response, but if there is no current OS/2
maintainer for APR and httpd - I'm happy to take on that role.
I've been building Apache2 on OS/2 for the last 4 years or so, I just
enver got around to submitting patches. If the support is pulled, it
Hi Paul,
Paul Smedley schrieb:
I hope you've noticed that the OS/2 MPM is gone from trunk ;)
Actually no, as I just build from the tar.bz2 on each release :)
hehe, our snapshots are stalled for the last 15 months - so either
checkout from SVN, or get snapshots from my home:
Jeff Trawick schrieb:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Paul Smedley
pauldes...@despamsmedley.id.au mailto:pauldes...@despamsmedley.id.au
wrote:
Sorry for the late response, but if there is no current OS/2
maintainer for APR and httpd - I'm happy to take on that role.
I hope
Guenter Knauf wrote:
Jeff Trawick schrieb:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Paul Smedley
pauldes...@despamsmedley.id.au mailto:pauldes...@despamsmedley.id.au
wrote:
Sorry for the late response, but if there is no current OS/2
maintainer for APR and httpd - I'm happy to take on that
Nick Kew wrote:
Paul Smedley wrote:
[ ] yank BeOS MPM from trunk
[ ] yank OS/2 MPM from trunk
(I'm +1 on both votes)
Sorry for the late response, but if there is no current OS/2
maintainer for APR and httpd - I'm happy to take on that role.
I've been building Apache2 on OS/2 for the
Brian Havard wrote:
I know I've been absent for a long time but I once again have a bit of
spare time so I can review, test commit patches from Paul. Does anyone
object if I start by bringing the OS/2 MPM back from the dead?
Specifically, reversing r758899?
+1, go ahead.
Regards,
Graham
--
2009/3/27 William A. Rowe, Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net:
abandoned, but in theory might work for 90% of the cases. Do we work
to preserve them, or work to recover them if we break them, or do we
truly bother either way?
I wouldn't bother - older versions would work just fine. But, maybe
it'd
On 26.03.2009 09:04, Jeff Trawick wrote:
[ ] MPM from trunk wouldn't build/serve a page on Linux prior to changes
for MPM DSO support[ ] MPM from last 2.2.x release wouldn't build/serve a
page on Linux
[ ] Brad/Brian/David speak up regarding the several non-Unix MPMs
[ ] ???
If
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 9:18 AM, Ruediger Pluem rpl...@apache.org wrote:
We should axe
leader
perchild
threadpool
immediately in trunk as IMHO they are not maintained for years.
I am not quite sure how much care the platform specific MPMs for OS2 and
BEOS get. Novell seems to be still
On 26 Mar 2009, at 08:18, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
We should axe
leader
perchild
threadpool
Criterion: those MPMs that pre-date 2.2 but are not included in it
need to be shoved away in a dusty attic.
Looks like the above list.
--
Nick Kew
2009/3/26 Ruediger Pluem rpl...@apache.org:
We should axe
leader
perchild
threadpool
immediately in trunk as IMHO they are not maintained for years.
+1. -- justin
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 11:04 AM, Justin Erenkrantz
jus...@erenkrantz.comwrote:
2009/3/26 Ruediger Pluem rpl...@apache.org:
We should axe
leader
perchild
threadpool
immediately in trunk as IMHO they are not maintained for years.
+1. -- justin
I'm working on removing these
On Mar 26, 2009, at 4:18 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 26.03.2009 09:04, Jeff Trawick wrote:
[ ] MPM from trunk wouldn't build/serve a page on Linux prior to
changes
for MPM DSO support[ ] MPM from last 2.2.x release wouldn't build/
serve a
page on Linux
[ ] Brad/Brian/David speak up
On Mar 26, 2009 11:49am, Jim Jagielski j...@jagunet.com wrote:
On Mar 26, 2009, at 4:18 AM, Ruediger Pluem wrote:
On 26.03.2009 09:04, Jeff Trawick wrote:
[ ] MPM from trunk wouldn't build/serve a page on Linux prior to changes
for MPM DSO support[ ] MPM from last 2.2.x release
On 26.03.2009 15:36, traw...@gmail.com wrote:
Votes:
[ ] yank BeOS MPM from trunk
[ ] yank OS/2 MPM from trunk
(I'm +1 on both votes)
+1 on both. The stay in svn and can resurrect if somebody really cares.
Regards
Rüdiger
traw...@gmail.com wrote:
Votes:
[+1] yank BeOS MPM from trunk
[+1] yank OS/2 MPM from trunk
and for completeness
[+1] yank Netware from trunk
Netware is 'done' - surely some will use it for another 5 years
but not for 'new software'. Their 2.2 build is sufficient IMHO.
A totally
On 3/26/2009 at 11:14 AM, in message 49cbb7d9.80...@rowe-clan.net,
William
A. Rowe, Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
traw...@gmail.com wrote:
Votes:
[+1] yank BeOS MPM from trunk
[+1] yank OS/2 MPM from trunk
and for completeness
[+1] yank Netware from trunk
Netware is 'done' -
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 6:55 PM, Brad Nicholes bnicho...@novell.com wrote:
On 3/26/2009 at 11:14 AM, in message 49cbb7d9.80...@rowe-clan.net,
William
A. Rowe, Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
traw...@gmail.com wrote:
Votes:
[+1] yank BeOS MPM from trunk
[+1] yank OS/2 MPM from trunk
On 3/26/2009 at 11:55 AM, in message
49cb6d2b02ac0003c...@lucius.provo.novell.com, Brad Nicholes
bnicho...@novell.com wrote:
On 3/26/2009 at 11:14 AM, in message 49cbb7d9.80...@rowe-clan.net,
William
A. Rowe, Jr. wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
traw...@gmail.com wrote:
Votes:
[+1] yank
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Brad Nicholes bnicho...@novell.com wrote:
On 3/26/2009 at 11:55 AM, in message
49cb6d2b02ac0003c...@lucius.provo.novell.com, Brad Nicholes
bnicho...@novell.com wrote:
On 3/26/2009 at 11:14 AM, in message 49cbb7d9.80...@rowe-clan.net,
William
A. Rowe,
On 3/26/2009 at 12:07 PM, in message
cc67648e0903261107l1302f629k95494e01834c6...@mail.gmail.com, Jeff Trawick
traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 26, 2009 at 7:05 PM, Brad Nicholes bnicho...@novell.com wrote:
On 3/26/2009 at 11:55 AM, in message
On 26.03.2009 19:25, Brad Nicholes wrote:
Pull it.
It's been a good run and I really had a lot of fun porting and maintaining
Apache for NetWare.
But I guess it's time to say goodbye (to Apache for NetWare, not me ;) I will
try to hang
around and maintain the older versions, if
Ruediger Pluem wrote:
Whichever way this goes, a big thanks for all your work on Netware.
+1 and a huge 'wish you were here' Brad!!!
I'm not pushing to 'break' netware, but rather, deciding to do once it
is broken. The situation is very similar to Wk2 and NT4SP6 which are
abandoned, but in
30 matches
Mail list logo
