Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server eoc_bucket.c Makefile.in connection.c core.c

2004-03-09 Thread Bill Stoddard
André Malo wrote: * Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 08:32:30PM +0100, André Malo wrote: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * include/http_connection.h: Declare eoc bucket interface. Shouldn't this be a minor MMN bump? I dunno, I don't really see the point in bumping the

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server eoc_bucket.c Makefile.in connection.c core.c

2004-03-09 Thread Joe Orton
On Tue, Mar 09, 2004 at 07:38:48AM +0100, André Malo wrote: * Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 08:32:30PM +0100, André Malo wrote: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * include/http_connection.h: Declare eoc bucket interface. Shouldn't this be a minor MMN

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server eoc_bucket.c Makefile.in connection.c core.c

2004-03-08 Thread Andr Malo
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * include/http_connection.h: Declare eoc bucket interface. Shouldn't this be a minor MMN bump? nd

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server eoc_bucket.c Makefile.in connection.c core.c

2004-03-08 Thread Joe Orton
On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 08:32:30PM +0100, André Malo wrote: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * include/http_connection.h: Declare eoc bucket interface. Shouldn't this be a minor MMN bump? I dunno, I don't really see the point in bumping the minor MMN more than once between releases and it's

Re: cvs commit: httpd-2.0/server eoc_bucket.c Makefile.in connection.c core.c

2004-03-08 Thread Andr Malo
* Joe Orton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Mar 08, 2004 at 08:32:30PM +0100, André Malo wrote: * [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * include/http_connection.h: Declare eoc bucket interface. Shouldn't this be a minor MMN bump? I dunno, I don't really see the point in bumping the minor