Re: mod_proxy Cache-Control: no-cache=directive support Apache 1.3

2002-02-27 Thread Eli Marmor
Let me try to contribute my $0.02 to the discussion: [Like Graham, I prefer to ignore the word 1.3 in the subject line...] Originally, there was a need to INTEGRATE two modules in order to enjoy the features of both. Later, thanks to the filtering infrastructure, it is possible to do without a

Re: mod_proxy Cache-Control: no-cache=directive support Apache 1.3

2002-02-26 Thread Joseph Wayne Norton
Graham - At Wed, 27 Feb 2002 06:36:45 +0200, Graham Leggett wrote: [1 text/plain; us-ascii (7bit)] Joseph Wayne Norton wrote: In conjunction with mod_rewrite as url filter, I would like to be able to use mod_accel as a proxy for only the http request portion of a client request and

Re: mod_proxy Cache-Control: no-cache=directive support Apache 1.3

2002-02-21 Thread Joseph Wayne Norton
Igor - After I read your posting, I downloaded but haven't tried to install the mod_accel. From you description, it looks like a very, powerful module with pretty much the features that I have been looking for. Can mod_accel work with the mod_rewrite module (in a fashion similar? In

RE: mod_proxy Cache-Control: no-cache=directive support Apache 1.3

2002-02-19 Thread Fowler, Brian
Cache-Control: no-cache=directive support Apache 1.3 Fowler, Brian wrote: Due to a requirement on a project we are currently working on involving using Apache as a caching reverse proxy server to WebLogic. We are considering implementing the Cache-Control: no-cache=directive

Re: mod_proxy Cache-Control: no-cache=directive support Apache 1.3

2002-02-19 Thread Graham Leggett
Fowler, Brian wrote: I don't think mod_proxy does currently conform to RFC2616 in respect of Cache-Control: no-cache=directive I just checked - a small note in my copy of RFC2616 says not done yet.. doh...! The relevant part of the HTTP spec I think is no-cache [snip] If the