Re: mod_proxy_hcheck backport

Seems like adding that directly to the module itself makes the most sense. Later versions will allow for using Provider API to make it easier to add various checks, On 2016-05-17 05:17, Stefan Eissing wrote: > Jim, > > how do you see the possibility of other

Re: mod_proxy_hcheck backport

Jim, how do you see the possibility of other proxy modules providing their own hc? HTTP/2 has this nice PING frame that is intended for exactly this. Cheers, Stefan PS. Btw. it's accepted for backport, left the actual work for you... > Am 17.05.2016 um 12:41 schrieb Jim Jagielski

Re: mod_proxy_hcheck backport

> On May 16, 2016, at 3:37 PM, Daniel Ruggeri wrote: > > On 5/16/2016 8:19 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> THANKS! This feature seemed to cause a lot of buzz @ ApacheCon so >> would be > > I believe I heard and/or used the term "sexy" at least once to describe > it ;-) > >

Re: mod_proxy_hcheck backport

On 5/16/2016 8:19 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > THANKS! This feature seemed to cause a lot of buzz @ ApacheCon so > would be I believe I heard and/or used the term "sexy" at least once to describe it ;-) On 5/16/2016 8:19 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote: > Hmmm... The balancer-manager page does display

Re: mod_proxy_hcheck backport

> On May 14, 2016, at 9:28 PM, drugg...@primary.net wrote: > > On 2016-05-12 16:33, Jim Jagielski wrote: >> Looking, begging, pleading for tests and votes :) > > Yup! You got mine. THANKS! This feature seemed to cause a lot of buzz @ ApacheCon so would be very very nice to have in 2.4.21. >

Re: mod_proxy_hcheck backport

On 2016-05-12 16:33, Jim Jagielski wrote: Looking, begging, pleading for tests and votes :) Yup! You got mine. Side question that popped into my mind as I was reviewing the code... Would it make sense to have a "transitional" status for the time between 0 failures and when hcfails threshold