On 7/7/2011 3:39 AM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
I have an error log full of these;
[Thu Jul 07 00:15:58.010625 2011] [mpm_winnt:warn] [pid 2840:tid 1572] (OS
64)The
specified network name is no longer available. : winnt_accept: Asynchronous
AcceptEx failed.
Greg... were you using
Bill,
I was using nothing, so by docs, the default is/was data.
XP SP3, IPv6 Proto loaded
Yes, APR_HAVE_IPV6 ==1
NVIDIA nForce 10/100/1000 v. 67.8.9.0 8/1/2008
This box originally came with Symantic, and I would assume it was able
to sniff, but that was removed and it is just MSSE now,
On 9/29/2011 7:30 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
This is well past the point where one needs to know the Listen
configuration, exact problem symptom, etc. ;) Either way it seems
that there were some oddities around the presence/absence of
IPV6_V6ONLY. In its absence APR should have been returning
On 9/29/2011 2:41 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
I took a look at this in the AM, and it looks like the acceptfilter
none path is relying on data set only by AcceptEX (context-buffer) to
fill in context-sa_server (child.c:590). In 2.2 the context-buffer
is seeded by the 9x specific code.
Seems
Precisely. As we have context-buff allocated for all AcceptFilter
schemes, I added the appropriate queries into that buffer in r1181140,
and the world seems at peace again for just this short moment.
Trying to fully resolve the 2.3 accptex thread -- Should I add a
note about
Note:
With 2.2.x not a single issue reported here with
Win32DisableAcceptEx, with ipv6 and/or ip4.
Idea to revert 2.3 back to the old behaviour ?
On Monday 10/10/2011 at 21:23, Eric Covener wrote:
Precisely. As we have context-buff allocated for all AcceptFilter
schemes, I added the
On 10/10/2011 2:34 PM, Steffen wrote:
Note:
With 2.2.x not a single issue reported here with Win32DisableAcceptEx, with
ipv6 and/or ip4.
Idea to revert 2.3 back to the old behaviour ?
Nope, absolutely not. The old behavior had way too much distinct
code between the 9x and nt code
On 10/10/2011 2:22 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
Precisely. As we have context-buff allocated for all AcceptFilter
schemes, I added the appropriate queries into that buffer in r1181140,
and the world seems at peace again for just this short moment.
Trying to fully resolve the 2.3 accptex thread
On Monday 10 October 2011, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 10/10/2011 2:22 PM, Eric Covener wrote:
Trying to fully resolve the 2.3 accptex thread -- Should I add a
note about Win32DisableAcceptEx to mpm_winnt doc? Or even add
it back in as a directive to point to AcceptFilter?
Add at least
On 9/29/2011 7:30 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
This is well past the point where one needs to know the Listen
configuration, exact problem symptom, etc. ;) Either way it seems
that there were some oddities around the presence/absence of
IPV6_V6ONLY. In its absence APR should have been returning
On 7/7/2011 3:39 AM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
I have an error log full of these;
[Thu Jul 07 00:15:58.010625 2011] [mpm_winnt:warn] [pid 2840:tid 1572] (OS
64)The
specified network name is no longer available. : winnt_accept: Asynchronous
AcceptEx failed.
This might be
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 2:58 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 7/7/2011 3:39 AM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
I have an error log full of these;
[Thu Jul 07 00:15:58.010625 2011] [mpm_winnt:warn] [pid 2840:tid 1572] (OS
64)The
specified network name is no longer available. :
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 2:58 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 7/7/2011 3:39 AM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
I have an error log full of these;
[Thu Jul 07 00:15:58.010625 2011] [mpm_winnt:warn] [pid 2840:tid 1572] (OS
64)The
specified network name is no longer available. :
On 9/29/2011 2:22 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 2:58 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 7/7/2011 3:39 AM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
I have an error log full of these;
[Thu Jul 07 00:15:58.010625 2011] [mpm_winnt:warn] [pid 2840:tid 1572] (OS
64)The
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 5:00 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 9/29/2011 2:22 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 2:58 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 7/7/2011 3:39 AM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
I have an error log full of these;
[Thu Jul 07
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 8:02 PM, Jeff Trawick traw...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 5:00 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 9/29/2011 2:22 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 2:58 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
wr...@rowe-clan.net wrote:
On 7/7/2011 3:39
Bill,
I think it's been realized that the APR/IPv6 has no bearing on this but
I can confirm that
2.3.15-dev at r1177210 with apr 1.4.2 and ipv6 set to 0 does the exact
same thing.
Cheers,
Gregg
On 9/29/2011 11:58 AM, William A. Rowe Jr. wrote:
On 7/7/2011 3:39 AM, Gregg L. Smith wrote:
I
Hi,
I have an error log full of these;
[Thu Jul 07 00:15:58.010625 2011] [mpm_winnt:warn] [pid 2840:tid 1572]
(OS 64)The specified network name is no longer available. :
winnt_accept: Asynchronous AcceptEx failed.
Thanks to Steffen's bringing this up, I now know how I should be fixing
The widely used Win32DisableAcceptEx is not anymore in 2.3.
Can someone confirm that this has the same effect:
AcceptFilter http none
AcceptFilter https none
Maybe an idea to update the upgrading docu on this subject ?
Steffen
On 7/4/2011 9:46 AM, Steffen wrote:
The widely used Win32DisableAcceptEx is not anymore in 2.3.
Can someone confirm that this has the same effect:
AcceptFilter http none
AcceptFilter https none
Maybe an idea to update the upgrading docu on this subject ?
20 matches
Mail list logo
