Hello sebb,
Regarding:
> I've just realised there is a reason why the Context was being cached.
>
> The Context holds execution context, so needs to be maintained between
> samplers in the same thread.
If it was the case then there was an issue in this, because 2 threads could
share the same Conte
Ok, I Will revert back this Evening .
Regards
Philippe
On Wednesday, October 19, 2011, sebb wrote:
> On 18 October 2011 22:21, sebb wrote:
>> On 18 October 2011 19:50, Philippe Mouawad
>> wrote:
>>> Hello Sebb, Milamber , All,
>>> I investigated this issue, particularly this part of issue
>>>
On 18 October 2011 22:21, sebb wrote:
> On 18 October 2011 19:50, Philippe Mouawad
> wrote:
>> Hello Sebb, Milamber , All,
>> I investigated this issue, particularly this part of issue
>>
>>> stramge error for "JMS Subscriber - 001" - Response message:
>>> javax.naming.NamingException: Something
On 18 October 2011 19:50, Philippe Mouawad
wrote:
> Hello Sebb, Milamber , All,
> I investigated this issue, particularly this part of issue
>
>> stramge error for "JMS Subscriber - 001" - Response message:
>> javax.naming.NamingException: Something already bound at Elite_To_MorphoTrak;
>
> I crea
Hello Sebb, Milamber , All,
I investigated this issue, particularly this part of issue
> stramge error for "JMS Subscriber - 001" - Response message:
> javax.naming.NamingException: Something already bound at Elite_To_MorphoTrak;
I created a simple test case and tried not to cache Context and it
