The node table is same design but uses binary encoding of the nodes (RDF
Thrift).
Andy
On 17/01/17 16:48, A. Soroka wrote:
This is cool, Andy. Hey, if you got the bits, use 'em! :grin: Is the node table
itself basically similar to TDB (obviously modulo the change to node IDs)?
---
Andy Seaborne created JENA-1281:
---
Summary: JsonLDReader: possibility to override the @context
Key: JENA-1281
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1281
Project: Apache Jena
Issue
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne updated JENA-1280:
Summary: JoinClassifer is too cautious with EXISTS variables. (was:
JoinClassifer is too cautious
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/203
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1281?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne resolved JENA-1281.
-
Resolution: Done
> JsonLDReader: possibility to override the @context
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1281?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Seaborne updated JENA-1281:
Description: Records PR#203.
> JsonLDReader: possibility to override the @context
>
Committed, thanks!
---
A. Soroka
The University of Virginia Library
> On Jan 17, 2017, at 10:00 AM, Kim Ahlstrøm wrote:
>
> Clone URL (Committers only):
>
Github user ajs6f commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/204
Yeah, judging by the general silence in response to my question about "Does
anyone have other use cases for this kind of thing?" I'm not going to push on
that I'm happy for it to be helpful to the LDP
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1281?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15826324#comment-15826324
]
ASF subversion and git services commented on JENA-1281:
---
Commit
Corrected, thanks!
---
A. Soroka
The University of Virginia Library
> On Jan 17, 2017, at 10:38 AM, Kim Ahlstrøm wrote:
>
> Clone URL (Committers only):
>
Hang on, I think I mis-wrote-- I meant the dictionary in which IDs are looked
up, not the tables that hold rows of IDs. In TDB it's NodeTable vs
NodeTupleTable, I mean NodeTable. It looks like NodeTable in TDB2 is pretty
much the same? But NodeTupleTable is what is now using Thrift underneath?
NodeTable holds the RDF terms. It is indexed by position. it is the
dictionary interface.
The one used is:
https://github.com/afs/mantis/blob/master/tdb2/src/main/java/org/seaborne/tdb2/store/nodetable/NodeTableTRDF.java
and there is a stack of them above this to cache and inline.
Github user afs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/204
Possible naming approaches:
1. "Small things" being curated go into a general
`jena-extras`/`jena-wip`/`jena-labs`/`jena-optional` module with the idea that
that is just while they mature,
Additional feature:
TDB2 now supports xsd:doubles as inline values.
Like over inline values, it does this if and only if the value fits,
otherwise it uses the node table.
In the case of xsd:doubles, there 62 bits to store them. xsd:doubles
(as of XSD 1.1) are very similar to IEEE-754-2008
This is cool, Andy. Hey, if you got the bits, use 'em! :grin: Is the node table
itself basically similar to TDB (obviously modulo the change to node IDs)?
---
A. Soroka
The University of Virginia Library
> On Jan 17, 2017, at 11:44 AM, Andy Seaborne wrote:
>
> Additional
As someone that has been lurking on this list for a long time, I just want
to come out of the woodwork and say I really appreciate this work.
I look forward to using it.
~Andy
On Jan 17, 2017 11:44, "Andy Seaborne" wrote:
> Additional feature:
>
> TDB2 now supports xsd:doubles
Ah, okay, cool, so both the dictionary and the table are using Thrift, that's
nice to see because it should make it a little easier to "tinker" with the
innards. Thanks for the pointer, Andy!
Yeah, I'm not complaining about not having to deal with any of the complexities
of representation in
Github user osma commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/205
@ajs6f I'm not sure whether you can use ORDER BY in a case like this. It
would need a SPARQL function for calculating distances between coordinates, so
you could say, in effect, "order by distance from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15825969#comment-15825969
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1277:
--
Github user osma commented on the issue:
Clone URL (Committers only):
https://cms.apache.org/redirect?new=anonymous;action=diff;uri=http://jena.apache.org/documentation%2Fquery%2Falgebra.mdtext
Kim Ahlstrøm
Index: trunk/content/documentation/query/algebra.mdtext
===
---
Clone URL (Committers only):
https://cms.apache.org/redirect?new=anonymous;action=diff;uri=http://jena.apache.org/documentation%2Fquery%2Farq-query-eval.mdtext
Kim Ahlstrøm
Index: trunk/content/documentation/query/arq-query-eval.mdtext
Github user ajs6f commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/205
@osma Yeah, that's what I meant tho'-- use a calculation (via `BIND`, I
guess?) of the distance (and we have [â available to
use](https://jena.apache.org/documentation/query/library-function.html))
Github user osma commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/205
@ajs6f It takes [a bit
more](http://www.movable-type.co.uk/scripts/latlong.html) than just sqrt() to
calculate great-circle distances between coordinates even within the same
coordinate system, e.g.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15826124#comment-15826124
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1277:
--
Github user osma commented on the issue:
Github user ajs6f commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/jena/pull/205
Sure, so my claims are 1) this is a good PR :) and 2) if we want to offer
the kind of functionality that you are removing, that's cool, but we should do
it in some appropriate, public, maintainable way
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/JENA-1277?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel=15826126#comment-15826126
]
ASF GitHub Bot commented on JENA-1277:
--
Github user ajs6f commented on the issue:
26 matches
Mail list logo