Re: 1.0.0 KIPs Update

The code freeze is 3rd of October, but the last week is only for bug fixes typically. Ismael On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 11:16 AM, Guozhang Wang wrote: > Note that the code freeze date is Oct.3, so people will have about two > weeks for that. > > > Guozhang > > On Thu, Sep 21,

Re: 1.0.0 KIPs Update

Note that the code freeze date is Oct.3, so people will have about two weeks for that. Guozhang On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 7:46 AM, Ismael Juma wrote: > Yes, although it would have to be reviewed and merged by next Wednesday. > > Ismael > > On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 12:17 AM,

Re: 1.0.0 KIPs Update

Yes, although it would have to be reviewed and merged by next Wednesday. Ismael On Thu, Sep 21, 2017 at 12:17 AM, James Cheng wrote: > Thanks Ismael. Yes, you're right, PR 3799 is purely a refactoring. > > There are new subtasks of

Re: 1.0.0 KIPs Update

Thanks Ismael. Yes, you're right, PR 3799 is purely a refactoring. There are new subtasks of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3480 that I haven't yet filed, that I want to work on. They will add auto generation of metrics

Re: 1.0.0 KIPs Update

Hi James, Isn't PR 3799 purely a code refactoring (i.e. no change in behaviour)? If so, it would probably land in trunk only after today. If it's new functionality, then it depends on size, risk and importance. If you think it's important and should target 1.0.0, feel free to make your case in

Re: 1.0.0 KIPs Update

Hi. I'm a little unclear on what types of things are subject to the "Feature Freeze" today (Sept 20th). For changes such as https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/3799 and https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/KAFKA-3480

Re: 1.0.0 KIPs Update

Sure! Please feel free to update the wiki. Guozhang On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 9:28 AM, Rajini Sivaram wrote: > Hi Guozhang, > > Can KIP-188 be added to the list, please? The vote has passed and PR should > be ready soon. > > Thank you, > > Rajini > > On Thu, Sep 7, 2017

Re: 1.0.0 KIPs Update

Hi Guozhang, Can KIP-188 be added to the list, please? The vote has passed and PR should be ready soon. Thank you, Rajini On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 10:28 PM, Guozhang Wang wrote: > Actually my bad, there is already a voting thread and you asked people to > recast a vote on a

Re: 1.0.0 KIPs Update

Actually my bad, there is already a voting thread and you asked people to recast a vote on a small change. On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 2:27 PM, Guozhang Wang wrote: > Hi Tom, > > It seems KIP-183 is still in the discussion phase, and voting has not been > started? > > > Guozhang

Re: 1.0.0 KIPs Update

Hi Tom, It seems KIP-183 is still in the discussion phase, and voting has not been started? Guozhang On Thu, Sep 7, 2017 at 1:13 AM, Tom Bentley wrote: > Would it be possible to add KIP-183 to the list too, please? > > Thanks, > > Tom > > On 6 September 2017 at 22:04,

Re: 1.0.0 KIPs Update

Would it be possible to add KIP-183 to the list too, please? Thanks, Tom On 6 September 2017 at 22:04, Guozhang Wang wrote: > Hi Vahid, > > Yes I have just added it while sending this email :) > > > Guozhang > > On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Vahid S Hashemian < >

Re: 1.0.0 KIPs Update

Hi Vahid, Yes I have just added it while sending this email :) Guozhang On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 1:54 PM, Vahid S Hashemian wrote: > Hi Guozhang, > > Thanks for the heads-up. > > Can KIP-163 be added to the list? > The proposal for this KIP is accepted, and the PR

Re: 1.0.0 KIPs Update

Hi Guozhang, Thanks for the heads-up. Can KIP-163 be added to the list? The proposal for this KIP is accepted, and the PR is ready for review. Thanks. --Vahid From: Guozhang Wang To: "dev@kafka.apache.org" Date: 09/06/2017 01:45 PM Subject: