Re: Vote for KIP-393 (Fix time windowed serde to deserialize changelog topic)

2019-01-04 Thread Shawn Nguyen
Thanks Guozhang and Matthias! https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/5307 is merged now. We can close this thread now since we have a total of 3 binding votes (and 3 additional non-binding votes). On Fri, Jan 4, 2019 at 11:59 AM Guozhang Wang wrote: > Hello Shawn, > > Could you close this voting

Re: Vote for KIP-393 (Fix time windowed serde to deserialize changelog topic)

2019-01-04 Thread Guozhang Wang
Hello Shawn, Could you close this voting thread with a tally on the votes (you can search for other voting threads as a reference)? Guozhang On Wed, Dec 19, 2018 at 1:15 AM Matthias J. Sax wrote: > Sorry for the delay. Needed to read the KIP and code multiple times to > wrap my head around

Re: Vote for KIP-393 (Fix time windowed serde to deserialize changelog topic)

2018-12-19 Thread Matthias J. Sax
Sorry for the delay. Needed to read the KIP and code multiple times to wrap my head around it. Thanks for the KIP. +1 (binding) -Matthias On 12/13/18 1:19 PM, Damian Guy wrote: > +1 (binding) > > On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 at 13:27, Adam Bellemare > wrote: > >> +1 (non-binding) from me. Looks

Re: Vote for KIP-393 (Fix time windowed serde to deserialize changelog topic)

2018-12-13 Thread Damian Guy
+1 (binding) On Wed, 12 Dec 2018 at 13:27, Adam Bellemare wrote: > +1 (non-binding) from me. Looks like a pretty clear-cut case. > > > > On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 1:11 AM Shawn Nguyen > wrote: > > > Thanks for the feedback Guozhang! I updated the KIP. > > > > In the meantime, could I ask for

Re: Vote for KIP-393 (Fix time windowed serde to deserialize changelog topic)

2018-12-12 Thread Adam Bellemare
+1 (non-binding) from me. Looks like a pretty clear-cut case. On Tue, Dec 11, 2018 at 1:11 AM Shawn Nguyen wrote: > Thanks for the feedback Guozhang! I updated the KIP. > > In the meantime, could I ask for additional binding votes/approval on this > KIP proposal? > > Shawn > > On Thu, Dec 6,

Re: Vote for KIP-393 (Fix time windowed serde to deserialize changelog topic)

2018-12-10 Thread Shawn Nguyen
Thanks for the feedback Guozhang! I updated the KIP. In the meantime, could I ask for additional binding votes/approval on this KIP proposal? Shawn On Thu, Dec 6, 2018 at 1:22 PM Liquan Pei wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 4:51 PM Guozhang Wang wrote: > >> Hello Shawn, >>

Re: Vote for KIP-393 (Fix time windowed serde to deserialize changelog topic)

2018-12-08 Thread Boyang Chen
for KIP-393 (Fix time windowed serde to deserialize changelog topic) +1 (non-binding) On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 4:51 PM Guozhang Wang wrote: > Hello Shawn, > > Thanks for the writeup. I've made a pass over it and here are some minor > comments: > > 1) As we discussed in the PR

Re: Vote for KIP-393 (Fix time windowed serde to deserialize changelog topic)

2018-12-06 Thread Liquan Pei
+1 (non-binding) On Wed, Dec 5, 2018 at 4:51 PM Guozhang Wang wrote: > Hello Shawn, > > Thanks for the writeup. I've made a pass over it and here are some minor > comments: > > 1) As we discussed in the PR: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/5307, > the public APIs that we will add is > > In

Re: Vote for KIP-393 (Fix time windowed serde to deserialize changelog topic)

2018-12-05 Thread Guozhang Wang
Hello Shawn, Thanks for the writeup. I've made a pass over it and here are some minor comments: 1) As we discussed in the PR: https://github.com/apache/kafka/pull/5307, the public APIs that we will add is In WindowedSerdes: ``` static public Serde> timeWindowedChangelogSerdeFrom(final Class