Thanks Jakub,
Can we set a Centralized analytics node. (ex for 5 Contrail instances
with 1 single Analytics node)
Pavani
From: Jakub Pavlik
To: Pavani Addanki
Cc: Edgar Magana ,
"dev@lists.opencontrail.org"
Date: 10/11/2016 12:59
No we cannot. I will also not recommend analytics having its own zookeeper.
Regards
-Harshad
> On Oct 12, 2016, at 12:53 AM, Pavani Addanki wrote:
>
> Thanks Jakub,
>
> Can we set a Centralized analytics node. (ex for 5 Contrail instances with 1
> single Analytics node)
>
> Pavani
>
>
Harshad,
Could you explain why you'd recommend a Zookeeper cluster for analytics ?
Thanks,
Foucault
2016-10-12 15:39 GMT+02:00 Harshad Nakil :
> No we cannot. I will also not recommend analytics having its own
> zookeeper.
>
> Regards
> -Harshad
>
>
> On Oct 12, 2016, at 12:53 AM, Pavani Addank
I am not recommending. It was suggested in email below. I am against that
recommendation.
Regards
-Harshad
> On Oct 12, 2016, at 7:21 AM, Foucault de Bonneval
> wrote:
>
> Harshad,
>
> Could you explain why you'd recommend a Zookeeper cluster for analytics ?
>
> Thanks,
> Foucault
>
> 2
Sorry, missed the "not" :p
Foucault
2016-10-12 16:39 GMT+02:00 Harshad Nakil :
> I am not recommending. It was suggested in email below. I am against that
> recommendation.
>
> Regards
> -Harshad
>
>
> On Oct 12, 2016, at 7:21 AM, Foucault de Bonneval
> wrote:
>
> Harshad,
>
> Could you explain
Let me ask why does it make sense to you?
Zookeeper is used to implement distributed locking or unique ID allocation.
Pattern of use is exactly same in config and analytics. It does not make sense
to operate two clusters.
This is not same with Cassandra, pattern of use and Cassandra tuning ma
It did not make sense to me to have two separate clusters in the same
deployment.
A I thought you said it was, I asked for details.
But I was wrong.
So we agree it makes no sense.
Foucault
2016-10-12 16:48 GMT+02:00 Harshad Nakil :
> Let me ask why does it make sense to you?
>
> Zookeeper is use
