Build: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Solr-3.x/336/
No tests ran.
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 15149 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands,
Build: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/7433/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.collation.TestCollationKeyAnalyzer.testThreadSafe
Error Message:
Java heap space
Stack Trace:
java.lang.OutOfMemoryError: Java heap space
at
Build: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Solr-trunk/1487/
All tests passed
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 17528 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2995?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025147#comment-13025147
]
Dawid Weiss commented on LUCENE-2995:
-
The patch probably won't apply after I added
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3041?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025155#comment-13025155
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-3041:
-
Hey chris,
I have some comments on
This was OOME. We need to get to the root cause of why/which tests
are using so much RAM I think we should turn on heap dump on OOME,
but then we need to delete these massive heap files at some point.
Mike
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 10:52 PM, Apache Jenkins
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3041?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025173#comment-13025173
]
Chris Male commented on LUCENE-3041:
bq. Regarding sharing the map, I think you
Build: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-Maven-3.x/104/
No tests ran.
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 9921 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3023?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025185#comment-13025185
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-3023:
-
bq. mike I committed your patch to the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025198#comment-13025198
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-2272:
---
So you just totally ignore 2 objections from other
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-412?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025204#comment-13025204
]
Digy commented on LUCENENET-412:
Hi All,
I prepared a primitive test case where 6
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025212#comment-13025212
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2272:
---
Great - that's the path you want to take on this?
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025230#comment-13025230
]
Simon Willnauer commented on SOLR-2272:
---
{quote}
Final location of code is not a good
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2215?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025236#comment-13025236
]
javi commented on LUCENE-2215:
--
Itamar, in case it's helpful for you: my code is not in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025238#comment-13025238
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2272:
---
bq. are you really thinking this is gonna happen...
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025248#comment-13025248
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2272:
---
I suspected, and now think more strongly, that there
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025254#comment-13025254
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-2272:
---
I've reverted until there is consensus on this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025259#comment-13025259
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2272:
---
Hey Robert,
A revert is historically considered a
hey I wonder how this TEST_MIN_ITER feature works though...
I expect that if I set -Dtests.iter.min=1 -Dtests.iter=10 and I fail
in any of those iterations that the the runner stops immediately and
prints a failure. Is that correct?
if so I don't understand this code:
if (testsFailed) {
We have LowerCaseFilter... any reason not to have UpperCaseFilter?
ryan
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@lucene.apache.org
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025278#comment-13025278
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-2272:
---
Hi Mark, my objections (Simon also voiced concerns)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025280#comment-13025280
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2272:
---
You misunderstand. Because a revert is a big deal,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3041?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025283#comment-13025283
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-3041:
-
{quote}
I don't quite follow you.
DocumentObjectBinder.toSolrInputDocument not processing the dynamic field
values.
-
Key: SOLR-2478
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2478
Project: Solr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025287#comment-13025287
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2272:
---
bq. My reasons are technical, in that code is not
TestIndexWriter#testCommitThreadSafety fails on realtime_search branch
--
Key: LUCENE-3046
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3046
Project: Lucene - Java
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3046?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer resolved LUCENE-3046.
-
Resolution: Duplicate
duplicate of LUCENE-3035
TestIndexWriter#testCommitThreadSafety
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3046?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Simon Willnauer reassigned LUCENE-3046:
---
Assignee: Simon Willnauer
TestIndexWriter#testCommitThreadSafety fails on
I think you're right Simon !
Obviously I didn't test it with that scenario in mind :).
Shai
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Simon Willnauer
simon.willna...@googlemail.com wrote:
hey I wonder how this TEST_MIN_ITER feature works though...
I expect that if I set -Dtests.iter.min=1
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025310#comment-13025310
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-2272:
---
ok, here is my formal veto:
-1: The way in which we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2995?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025315#comment-13025315
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2995:
--
-1 to this for now.
The interpretation of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-236?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025329#comment-13025329
]
Matthias Otto commented on SOLR-236:
Am I right that trunk is 4.0? What is the newest
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025333#comment-13025333
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2272:
---
And so I will argue that your veto is invalid. I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3018?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Varun Thacker updated LUCENE-3018:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-3018.patch
I guess this works for both 32 bit and 64 bit instruction set.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3018?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025336#comment-13025336
]
Varun Thacker edited comment on LUCENE-3018 at 4/26/11 5:21 PM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025340#comment-13025340
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2272:
---
bq. Instead, I would encourage you to raise your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025342#comment-13025342
]
Michael McCandless commented on SOLR-2272:
--
bq. Now that you have thrown down the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025346#comment-13025346
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-2272:
Sorry, I can't entertain this nonsense.
Lucene and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025357#comment-13025357
]
Steven Rowe commented on SOLR-2272:
---
Mike M. wrote:
bq. for healthy Apache projects,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-319?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Otis Gospodnetic updated SOLR-319:
--
Summary: changes SynonymFilterFactory to Analyze synonyms file (was:
changes
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-319?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025361#comment-13025361
]
Otis Gospodnetic commented on SOLR-319:
---
Btw., I noticed this functionality is really
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025367#comment-13025367
]
Michael McCandless commented on SOLR-2272:
--
bq. But if this is true, then it must
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025379#comment-13025379
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-2272:
Robert reverted my last commit again.
This is
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025413#comment-13025413
]
Greg Stein commented on SOLR-2272:
--
You guys need to fix yourself. And I'm not sure the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025418#comment-13025418
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2272:
---
bq. You guys need to fix yourself.
Thats some
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025417#comment-13025417
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2272:
---
bq. You guys need to fix yourself.
Thats some
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Mark Miller updated SOLR-2272:
--
Comment: was deleted
(was: bq. You guys need to fix yourself.
Thats some useful advice right there...)
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025420#comment-13025420
]
Greg Stein commented on SOLR-2272:
--
(stupid thing ended that comment early)
First: you
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2995?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025421#comment-13025421
]
Greg Stein commented on LUCENE-2995:
Yonik: that is an improper veto, and does not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2995?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025423#comment-13025423
]
Steven Rowe commented on LUCENE-2995:
-
bq. Yonik: that is an improper veto, and does
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2995?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025427#comment-13025427
]
Yonik Seeley commented on LUCENE-2995:
--
I understand Greg's objection - given that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025430#comment-13025430
]
Greg Stein commented on SOLR-2272:
--
Personally, without my Director's hat on, I would
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025432#comment-13025432
]
Chris A. Mattmann commented on SOLR-2272:
-
Big +1 on CTR - if you're a commiter
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025434#comment-13025434
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2272:
---
Greg -
Actually, we are officially
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025435#comment-13025435
]
Chris A. Mattmann commented on SOLR-2272:
-
Offically Lucene/Solr may be CTR but not
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025440#comment-13025440
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2272:
---
I think you are confused - it's CTR for committers
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025442#comment-13025442
]
Chris A. Mattmann commented on SOLR-2272:
-
Actually no it's the opposite. Your
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025448#comment-13025448
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2272:
---
lets agree to be confused you mean?
Join
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025458#comment-13025458
]
Greg Stein commented on SOLR-2272:
--
How about getting back to the issue at hand: improper
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025462#comment-13025462
]
Greg Stein commented on SOLR-2272:
--
Rather than discuss this in JIRA, I've started a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2949?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025478#comment-13025478
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on LUCENE-2949:
-
I haven't looked at the patch yet, but
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025479#comment-13025479
]
Jonathan Rochkind commented on SOLR-2272:
-
This is a feature that would be very
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025486#comment-13025486
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2272:
---
Thanks Jonathan - very useful feedback. Appreciate
Hi everyone,
It seems my project was accepted, I am looking forward to start coding for
Lucene.
Thanks!
-
Phillipe Ramalho
-- Forwarded message --
From: no-re...@socghop.appspotmail.com
Date: Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 2:48 PM
Subject: Congratulations!
To:
Congrats Phillipe! We are very excited to have you! Your proposal sounds great.
- Mark
On Apr 26, 2011, at 8:31 PM, Phillipe Ramalho wrote:
Hi everyone,
It seems my project was accepted, I am looking forward to start coding for
Lucene.
Thanks!
-
Phillipe Ramalho
--
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025544#comment-13025544
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-2272:
---
{quote}
I'd really like to see it go in there, to be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025552#comment-13025552
]
Greg Stein commented on SOLR-2272:
--
The PMC should have stood up at that time and shut
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025559#comment-13025559
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-2272:
---
There are technical reasons, and they aren't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025561#comment-13025561
]
Mark Miller commented on SOLR-2272:
---
Some background:
bq. The PMC should have stood up
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025564#comment-13025564
]
Greg Stein commented on SOLR-2272:
--
Grant: what glass house am I in? And when did this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025567#comment-13025567
]
Greg Stein commented on SOLR-2272:
--
Oh, and as for bullshit vetoes. Yeah. Look at Yonik's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025569#comment-13025569
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-2272:
---
Hi Mark, there is at least one other comment on the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025571#comment-13025571
]
Yonik Seeley commented on SOLR-2272:
bq. Theoretically refactorings are the kinds of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025571#comment-13025571
]
Yonik Seeley edited comment on SOLR-2272 at 4/27/11 2:25 AM:
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025573#comment-13025573
]
Robert Muir commented on SOLR-2272:
---
Its the same argument we have here, all over again.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025574#comment-13025574
]
Grant Ingersoll commented on SOLR-2272:
---
I'm not saying it was right to revert etc
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3045?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adriano Crestani resolved LUCENE-3045.
--
Resolution: Fixed
fixed on r1096983
I also added a junit so we make sure the problem
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13025577#comment-13025577
]
Greg Stein commented on SOLR-2272:
--
The only technical reason to revert somebody else's
Hi,
It appears there are some problems with modularization of the code,
especially between lucene and solr, so I would like for us to have a
discussion on this thread.
The two sides/takes seem to be (with some example reasons):
1. pro: for example, modularization can expose features that were
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:07 PM, Robert Muir rcm...@gmail.com wrote:
It appears there are some problems with modularization of the code,
especially between lucene and solr, so I would like for us to have a
discussion on this thread.
The specifics of each case matter of course.
As a general
On Apr 26, 2011, at 10:07 PM, Robert Muir wrote:
Hi,
It appears there are some problems with modularization of the code,
especially between lucene and solr, so I would like for us to have a
discussion on this thread.
+1
The two sides/takes seem to be (with some example reasons):
1.
The two sides/takes seem to be (with some example reasons):
1. pro: for example, modularization can expose features that were
traditionally in solr to lucene users.
Some other Pros:
Easier to test individual pieces. Easier to benchmark.
More usage == more/better features/functionality
On Tue, Apr 26, 2011 at 11:41 PM, Grant Ingersoll gsing...@apache.org wrote:
I think this needs a bit more explanation. AIUI, the primary cause for
concern is that by making something a module, you are taking a private,
internal API of Solr's and now making it a public API that must be
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2478?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nagarajan Shanmugam updated SOLR-2478:
--
Description:
When i tried to add a bean using SolrServer.addBean(). It is actually not
84 matches
Mail list logo
