You're right; it shouldn't be shoved in at the last second -- I didn't mean
to imply that. It should be committed and then we'll give it a comfortable
amount of time. When that time is up, and if v3.2 waits for it, then 3.2
will probably be at about the 3-month mark since the last release -- in
Build: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/8478/
No tests ran.
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 86 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 2:14 AM, David Smiley (@MITRE.org)
dsmi...@mitre.org wrote:
Releasing too fast / too infrequent aside, I think a X.X release should have
a notable feature (or a huge performance improvement), and 3.2 doesn't
without result grouping, IMO. It's got plumbing and bug fixes.
Build: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/8479/
No tests ran.
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 36 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For
Hi David,
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 11:14 PM, David Smiley (@MITRE.org)
dsmi...@mitre.org wrote:
You're right; it shouldn't be shoved in at the last second -- I didn't mean
to imply that. It should be committed and then we'll give it a comfortable
amount of time. When that time is up, and if
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 3:27 AM, Simon Willnauer
simon.willna...@googlemail.com wrote:
and we
the lucene PMC agreed on the fact that a release doesn't need to have
large features. We simply don't want to let folks wait for years
anymore.
I think its a lot more than this really... I think we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2834?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-2834:
---
Fix Version/s: 3.3
Assignee: Michael McCandless
don't spawn thread
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2834?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-2834.
Resolution: Fixed
don't spawn thread statically in FSDirectory on Mac OS X
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated SOLR-2519:
-
Attachment: SOLR-2519.patch
New patch attached. Only change vs last patch is to remove
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13040774#comment-13040774
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3147:
{quote}
bq. But: why do we ever
Welcome!
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 10:39 PM, Erick Erickson erickerick...@gmail.comwrote:
Congrats!
On Mon, May 23, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Chris Male gento...@gmail.com wrote:
Thanks everybody.
On Tue, May 24, 2011 at 5:20 AM, Shai Erera ser...@gmail.com wrote:
Welcome!
Shai
On
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved SOLR-2519.
--
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks everyone!
Robert, can you open followon issues for your other
Build: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-Maven-3.x/137/
1 tests failed.
FAILED: org.apache.lucene.index.TestCheckIndex.testLuceneConstantVersion
Error Message:
Invalid version: 3.2-SNAPSHOT
Stack Trace:
java.lang.AssertionError: Invalid version: 3.2-SNAPSHOT
at
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13040789#comment-13040789
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-2762:
Could this be related to all the leaked handles
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3150?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13040791#comment-13040791
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-3150:
We can fix IOUtils to do that -- now that we
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera updated LUCENE-3147:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-3147-3x.patch
Changes backported from trunk.
I think I found another leak in
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13040794#comment-13040794
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3147:
Nice catch in closeMergeReaders
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2762?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13040795#comment-13040795
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-2762:
bq. Could this be related to all
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13040797#comment-13040797
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3140:
Committed to 3.x. I still need
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2524?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13040798#comment-13040798
]
Michael McCandless commented on SOLR-2524:
--
bq. I was using this patch last week
I know we discussed that this was an easy fix to the shell script...
but did anyone make the change?
Ie, so that we catch JS warnings in the while(true) build, not just
nightly/POM builds.
Mike
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
-
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless resolved LUCENE-3140.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 4.0
Backport FSTs to 3.x
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3140?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-3140:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.2)
3.3
Backport FSTs to 3.x
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2519?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated SOLR-2519:
-
Fix Version/s: (was: 3.2)
3.3
Improve the defaults for the text
From my blog:
http://www.koch.ro/blog/index.php?/archives/150-Keysigning-Berlin-
Buzzwords.html
Whenever you download some software from the Apache Software Foundation, there
is a small .asc file besides every software release. This tiny file is a
cryptographic signature to protect you from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13040805#comment-13040805
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-3147:
Also, why do we call checkpoint() only if
I checked what it would take to test all of the javadocs on trunk, and found
that there is no one target to call. To cover all javadocs:
cd lucene ; ant javadocs-all javadocs-test-framework
cd ../modules ; ant javadocs
cd ../solr ; ant javadoc-all javadoc-test-framework
I think for Solr it's actually ant javadocs (confusingly!). This
seems to subsume javadoc-all?
Also, I don't think I'm getting javadoc warnings for Solr? (I do get
lots of compilation warnings). If you introduce a javadoc warning it
fails the build...
I agree it'd be great if we could gen the
OK I think this should do it? I'll commit shortly if nobody objects...:
Index: hudson-lusolr-tests-trunk.sh
===
--- hudson-lusolr-tests-trunk.sh(revision 1128882)
+++ hudson-lusolr-tests-trunk.sh(working copy)
@@
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13040809#comment-13040809
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3147:
bq. Also, why do we call
OK I committed that.
I also committed this, to hopefully fix the broken 3.x Maven build:
Index: hudson-lucene-solr-maven-3.x.sh
===
--- hudson-lucene-solr-maven-3.x.sh (revision 1128882)
+++ hudson-lucene-solr-maven-3.x.sh
Build: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/8493/
All tests passed
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 14096 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@lucene.apache.org
For
My bad -- just committed another fix.
Mike
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 12:12 PM, Apache Jenkins Server
hud...@hudson.apache.org wrote:
Build: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-3.x/8493/
All tests passed
Build Log (for compile errors):
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13040819#comment-13040819
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-3147:
ok I removed the call to checkpoint(), and do
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Michael McCandless updated LUCENE-3099:
---
Attachment: LUCENE-3099.patch
Attached patch, with a possible more minimal approach
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13040823#comment-13040823
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-3147:
Hmm ... I think checkpoint() is needed after
RandomSortField values are cached in the FieldCache
---
Key: SOLR-2554
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2554
Project: Solr
Issue Type: Bug
Components: search
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13040824#comment-13040824
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3099:
That patch is totally untested,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13040828#comment-13040828
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3147:
Ahh OK it is in fact necessary.
Build:
https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-docvalues-branch/1200/
All tests passed
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 10582 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13040831#comment-13040831
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-3147:
I prefer that it's always called outside of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13040833#comment-13040833
]
Michael McCandless commented on LUCENE-3147:
Well... the problem is,
Build: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/8493/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION: org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriter.testNoWaitClose
Error Message:
IndexFileDeleter doesn't know about file _d3_1.del
Stack Trace:
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13040837#comment-13040837
]
Michael McCandless commented on SOLR-2553:
--
I think to represent this returned
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2553?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13040838#comment-13040838
]
Michael McCandless commented on SOLR-2553:
--
The CachingCollector should reduce the
This is due to the latest commit on LUCENE-3147. I will commit a fix
shortly.
Shai
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 8:44 PM, Apache Jenkins Server
hud...@hudson.apache.org wrote:
Build:
https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/8493/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Varun Thacker updated LUCENE-2793:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-2793.patch
I have made a class IOContext and added a IOContext object to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13040845#comment-13040845
]
Jason Rutherglen commented on LUCENE-2793:
--
I already posted a patch to this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3147?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Shai Erera resolved LUCENE-3147.
Resolution: Fixed
Backported to 3x from trunk.
I decided to keep IW.closeMergeReaders as it is.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3152?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13040848#comment-13040848
]
Shai Erera commented on LUCENE-3152:
Robert, can we close this now that LUCENE-3147
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13040850#comment-13040850
]
Varun Thacker commented on LUCENE-2793:
---
I should have seen the patch! I have taken
Build: https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-trunk/8497/
1 tests failed.
REGRESSION:
org.apache.lucene.index.TestIndexWriterWithThreads.testCloseWithThreads
Error Message:
MockDirectoryWrapper: cannot close: there are still open files: {_s.fdt=1,
_s.tvx=1, _s.tvf=1,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martijn van Groningen updated LUCENE-3099:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-3099.patch
Attached a new patch that is based on Mike's
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13040870#comment-13040870
]
Martijn van Groningen commented on LUCENE-3099:
---
{quote}
Separately, we
Build:
https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-docvalues-branch/1201/
All tests passed
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 10572 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
it seems like there is a race in IW#closeInternal() that allows a
incoming thread to index a document into a DWPT that was empty (0
docs) when the supposed to be last flush kicked in. I will commit a
fix for it in a minute. I added an assert which I tripped immediately
while I wasn't able to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Martijn van Groningen updated LUCENE-3099:
--
Attachment: LUCENE-3099.patch
Attached an updated patch.
I'm currently busy
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-3099?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13040893#comment-13040893
]
Martijn van Groningen commented on LUCENE-3099:
---
I think the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13040906#comment-13040906
]
Simon Willnauer commented on LUCENE-2793:
-
bq. I already posted a patch to this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2793?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13040906#comment-13040906
]
Simon Willnauer edited comment on LUCENE-2793 at 5/30/11 12:19 AM:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13040969#comment-13040969
]
Liam O'Boyle commented on SOLR-2424:
Hi, sorry for the slow response, I don't seem to
Build:
https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-docvalues-branch/1202/
All tests passed
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 10565 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
I committed a fix for those javadoc links
simon
On Sun, May 29, 2011 at 6:56 PM, Apache Jenkins Server
hud...@hudson.apache.org wrote:
Build:
https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-docvalues-branch/1202/
All tests passed
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SOLR-2463?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13040973#comment-13040973
]
Lance Norskog commented on SOLR-2463:
-
How many Evaluators are there? I confess I have
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1768?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Vinicius Barros updated LUCENE-1768:
Attachment: week1.patch
This patch includes the work I did this first week. I started
Build:
https://builds.apache.org/hudson/job/Lucene-Solr-tests-only-docvalues-branch/1203/
All tests passed
Build Log (for compile errors):
[...truncated 12990 lines...]
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENENET-420?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13040780#comment-13040780
]
Niels Kühnel commented on LUCENENET-420:
I think that the
67 matches
Mail list logo
