[VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-5

2009-11-23 Thread Benjamin Bentmann
Hi, We solved some more issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=14952 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=10500status=1 Staging repo:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-5

2009-11-23 Thread Jason van Zyl
+1 On 2009-11-23, at 11:33 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Hi, We solved some more issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=14952 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-5

2009-11-23 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
+1 Arnaud Héritier Software Factory Manager eXo platform - http://www.exoplatform.com --- http://www.aheritier.net On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Jason van Zyl ja...@maven.org wrote: +1 On 2009-11-23, at 11:33 AM, Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Hi, We solved some more issues:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-5

2009-11-23 Thread nicolas de loof
+1 2009/11/23 Arnaud HERITIER aherit...@gmail.com +1 Arnaud Héritier Software Factory Manager eXo platform - http://www.exoplatform.com --- http://www.aheritier.net On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Jason van Zyl ja...@maven.org wrote: +1 On 2009-11-23, at 11:33 AM, Benjamin

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-5

2009-11-23 Thread Stephen Connolly
+1 2009/11/23 nicolas de loof nicolas.del...@gmail.com: +1 2009/11/23 Arnaud HERITIER aherit...@gmail.com +1 Arnaud Héritier Software Factory Manager eXo platform - http://www.exoplatform.com --- http://www.aheritier.net On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 5:38 PM, Jason van Zyl ja...@maven.org

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-5

2009-11-23 Thread Paul Gier
I wonder if we really need a full vote for every alpha. Especially if this is going to happen every two weeks. Why not just vote for a 2 week alpha release schedule and then don't do another vote until it's time for beta 1? Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Hi, We solved some more issues:

Re: MNG-3004/MNG-2802 - Achieving massive parallelity - Proposal

2009-11-23 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
I have tried to summarize the discussion/results of this topic so far. I was not able to write to the wiki (user krosenvold), but if someone with permissions would consider uploading this http://gist.github.com/241344 to the wiki (it's confluence format), It'd bring the process one step forward.

The Maven web site has the wrong skin

2009-11-23 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hi It seems that someone has problems with their local environment/repository. For the second time in a week the Maven site has been published with maven-default-skin instead of maven-stylus-skin that is specified in maven-parent. I'm not sure why this is happening, but we need to get to the

Re: The Maven web site has the wrong skin

2009-11-23 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
Hi, This is probably me. Can someone fix it? I deployed it today after adding my book on the list. I did it several days ago after updating the plugins list to add versions and animal sniffer from mojo. Is there someone who can help me to analyze the problem ? I'm not sure to have many times

Re: The Maven web site has the wrong skin

2009-11-23 Thread Brett Porter
What version of Maven are you building it with? I suggest always doing a sanity check with mvn site before deploying something. - Brett On 24/11/2009, at 8:16 AM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: Hi, This is probably me. Can someone fix it? I deployed it today after adding my book on the list. I

Re: svn commit: r881151 - in /maven/site/trunk: ./ src/site/ src/site/apt/ src/site/apt/developers/release/ src/site/apt/docs/ src/site/apt/docs/2.0.1/ src/site/apt/docs/2.0.10/ src/site/apt/docs/2.0.

2009-11-23 Thread Dennis Lundberg
See below... br...@apache.org wrote: Author: brett Date: Tue Nov 17 04:46:15 2009 New Revision: 881151 URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=881151view=rev Log: merge changes from branch and make minor improvements - now have aggregated 3.x-dev notes and aggregated 2.x notes Added:

Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Maven 3.0-alpha-5

2009-11-23 Thread Igor Fedorenko
+1 -- Regards, Igor Benjamin Bentmann wrote: Hi, We solved some more issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=10500version=14952 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=10500status=1

Re: svn commit: r881151 - in /maven/site/trunk: ./ src/site/ src/site/apt/ src/site/apt/developers/release/ src/site/apt/docs/ src/site/apt/docs/2.0.1/ src/site/apt/docs/2.0.10/ src/site/apt/docs/2.0.

2009-11-23 Thread Brett Porter
On 24/11/2009, at 8:53 AM, Dennis Lundberg wrote: See below... @@ -281,6 +287,14 @@ artifactIdmaven-site-plugin/artifactId version2.0.1/version !-- version2.1-SNAPSHOT/version -- + dependencies +!-- remove once we use a site-plugin

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Changes Plugin version 2.2

2009-11-23 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Dennis Lundberg wrote: Hi, We solved 18 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11212version=14696 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=truepid=11212status=1 Staging repo:

[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Maven Changes Plugin version 2.2

2009-11-23 Thread Dennis Lundberg
Hi, The vote has passed with the following result : +1 (binding): Arnaud Héritier, Benjamin Bentmann, Olivier Lamy, Hervé Boutemy, Vincent Siveton, Dennis Lundberg +1 (non binding): Michael I will promote the artifacts to the central repo. Dennis Lundberg wrote: Hi, We solved 18 issues:

Re: [VOTE] Release Maven Changes Plugin version 2.2

2009-11-23 Thread Tony Chemit
Le Fri, 20 Nov 2009 23:15:41 +0100, Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org a écrit : Hi, We solved 18 issues: http://jira.codehaus.org/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=11212version=14696 There are still a couple of issues left in JIRA:

Re: The Maven web site has the wrong skin

2009-11-23 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
On Mon, Nov 23, 2009 at 10:39 PM, Brett Porter br...@apache.org wrote: What version of Maven are you building it with? I suppose/hope I did it with 2.2.1 before the trying 3.0 I suggest always doing a sanity check with mvn site before deploying something. I did it, but I focused only on

Re: The Maven web site has the wrong skin

2009-11-23 Thread Brett Porter
On 24/11/2009, at 10:12 AM, Arnaud HERITIER wrote: I updated my /pom dir in our svn (I don't know why it wasn't up to date) and ... it works I don't know what I had in my maven/asf pom to have this behavior. Sorry for the annoyance. I'll be more conscientious the next time (I'm too used

Re: The Maven web site has the wrong skin

2009-11-23 Thread Arnaud HERITIER
Hmm, I updated the site not to add the skin since it is inherited from the parent. Maybe it's not actually being read from the repository? It's sure because I just updated parent poms. I didn't install them. Arnaud

git was: MNG-3004/MNG-2802

2009-11-23 Thread Dan Fabulich
Kristian Rosenvold wrote: Ever since my git-fu got sufficiently strong I get this allergic rash every time someone says subversion. Anyone wishing to join can just fork and we'll have some git-fun ;) I'm on Windows; the best Windows git client (msysgit) is covered in poison oak. ;-) -Dan

Re: git was: MNG-3004/MNG-2802

2009-11-23 Thread Kristian Rosenvold
Someone'll probably have to get some antihistamines ;) Seriously though, we're 20 people using git in my daily job, and we're stuck on windows. Most of us are using cygwin (and that git is just like a slower version of linux git). Eclipse has it's own java-based git implementation (which lacks