resent because SeaMonkey chose didn't find out the reason by now) the
(unsubscribed) OOo mail address as sender (please don't moderate my
other mail to the list):
Hi Louis, all
sorry if I misunderstand your action here, but (if timestamps are true)
you posted this message exactly at the time
Hi Martin, all,
your comments are worth reading and thinking about, but as I want to
reply to one single point, I skip the major part of it (for people not
reading the releases list, i strongly recommend to read the full mail [0])
Martin Hollmichel schrieb:
On 10/17/2010 05:44 AM, Caio Tia
Hi André,
Op 15-10-2010 19:01, André Schnabel schreef:
Hi Louis,
Am 15.10.2010 18:05, schrieb Louis Suárez-Potts:
I guess then we disagree. For I see OpenOffice.org as quite distinct
and different from Oracle, just as it was different from Sun, and
just as it differs from any one company. O
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 4:42 AM, Martin Hollmichel wrote:
> On 10/17/2010 05:44 AM, Caio Tiago Oliveira wrote:
>> What's the difference? Why is there conflict of interest with TDF and
>> there is not COI with Oracle?
> OpenOffice.org was so far the smallest common ground of all the
> OpenOffice.o
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Caio Tiago Oliveira wrote:
> It would be better if OpenOffice.org as a product could benefit from
> every changes made into LibreOffice. But due to SCA this is not
> possible, since LibreOffice won't require any kind of shared copyright
> assignment which would ma
On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 7:11 PM, Lior Kaplan wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 17, 2010 at 10:15 PM, Caio Tiago Oliveira wrote:
>
>> It would be better if OpenOffice.org as a product could benefit from
>> every changes made into LibreOffice. But due to SCA this is not
>> possible, since LibreOffice won't requi