Re: Support of Java 10

[Kai Uwe Pel]

AWESOME !

Cheers,
Kai


On 3/14/2018 1:00 AM, Geertjan Wielenga wrote:

Excellent!

JDK 10, welcome to NetBeans IDE. :-)

Gj

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 8:31 PM, Jan Lahoda  wrote:


FYI, the JDK 10 support (branch jdk18_3) has been merged to master.

Many thanks to all that contributed to the effort in some form: Dusan
Balek, Reema Taneja, Vikas Prabhakar, Geertjan, etc.

Jan


On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:48 AM, Neil C Smith 
wrote:


On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 at 02:09 Wade Chandler 
wrote:


-1 as well. The LTS versions live longer, and the processes between the
orgs will be different. They are also just different orgs. I don't

think

it

makes sense to try to align versioning. It was essentially marketing
between Oracle's Java and it's IDE, which made sense considering that,

but

isn't the case any longer. It also means we will jump major versions

just

for the Java support when NB is so much more than that.


Good points!  Yes, agree it was mainly marketing, although also about

what

level of Java was officially supported?

My original question elsewhere was whether we were consciously deciding

to

decouple versions or just letting it happen.  Quite happy with either,
actually, and I'd probably prefer a better semantic versioning strategy
anyway.

Of course, we need to be sure we don't disregard all marketing now in
Apache.  Something for discussion elsewhere might be how / whether this

is

communicated - you know someone will ask why we're releasing NetBeans 9
just as Java 10 is out?! ;-)

Best wishes,

Neil
--
Neil C Smith
Artist & Technologist
www.neilcsmith.net

Praxis LIVE - hybrid visual IDE for creative coding - www.praxislive.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@netbeans.incubator.apache.org

For further information about the NetBeans mailing lists, visit:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/NETBEANS/Mailing+lists

Re: Support of Java 10

[Geertjan Wielenga]

Excellent!

JDK 10, welcome to NetBeans IDE. :-)

Gj

On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 8:31 PM, Jan Lahoda  wrote:

> FYI, the JDK 10 support (branch jdk18_3) has been merged to master.
>
> Many thanks to all that contributed to the effort in some form: Dusan
> Balek, Reema Taneja, Vikas Prabhakar, Geertjan, etc.
>
> Jan
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:48 AM, Neil C Smith 
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 at 02:09 Wade Chandler 
> > wrote:
> >
> > > -1 as well. The LTS versions live longer, and the processes between the
> > > orgs will be different. They are also just different orgs. I don't
> think
> > it
> > > makes sense to try to align versioning. It was essentially marketing
> > > between Oracle's Java and it's IDE, which made sense considering that,
> > but
> > > isn't the case any longer. It also means we will jump major versions
> just
> > > for the Java support when NB is so much more than that.
> > >
> >
> > Good points!  Yes, agree it was mainly marketing, although also about
> what
> > level of Java was officially supported?
> >
> > My original question elsewhere was whether we were consciously deciding
> to
> > decouple versions or just letting it happen.  Quite happy with either,
> > actually, and I'd probably prefer a better semantic versioning strategy
> > anyway.
> >
> > Of course, we need to be sure we don't disregard all marketing now in
> > Apache.  Something for discussion elsewhere might be how / whether this
> is
> > communicated - you know someone will ask why we're releasing NetBeans 9
> > just as Java 10 is out?! ;-)
> >
> > Best wishes,
> >
> > Neil
> > --
> > Neil C Smith
> > Artist & Technologist
> > www.neilcsmith.net
> >
> > Praxis LIVE - hybrid visual IDE for creative coding - www.praxislive.org
> >
>

Re: Support of Java 10

[Jan Lahoda]

FYI, the JDK 10 support (branch jdk18_3) has been merged to master.

Many thanks to all that contributed to the effort in some form: Dusan
Balek, Reema Taneja, Vikas Prabhakar, Geertjan, etc.

Jan


On Tue, Mar 13, 2018 at 10:48 AM, Neil C Smith 
wrote:

> On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 at 02:09 Wade Chandler 
> wrote:
>
> > -1 as well. The LTS versions live longer, and the processes between the
> > orgs will be different. They are also just different orgs. I don't think
> it
> > makes sense to try to align versioning. It was essentially marketing
> > between Oracle's Java and it's IDE, which made sense considering that,
> but
> > isn't the case any longer. It also means we will jump major versions just
> > for the Java support when NB is so much more than that.
> >
>
> Good points!  Yes, agree it was mainly marketing, although also about what
> level of Java was officially supported?
>
> My original question elsewhere was whether we were consciously deciding to
> decouple versions or just letting it happen.  Quite happy with either,
> actually, and I'd probably prefer a better semantic versioning strategy
> anyway.
>
> Of course, we need to be sure we don't disregard all marketing now in
> Apache.  Something for discussion elsewhere might be how / whether this is
> communicated - you know someone will ask why we're releasing NetBeans 9
> just as Java 10 is out?! ;-)
>
> Best wishes,
>
> Neil
> --
> Neil C Smith
> Artist & Technologist
> www.neilcsmith.net
>
> Praxis LIVE - hybrid visual IDE for creative coding - www.praxislive.org
>

Re: Support of Java 10

[Neil C Smith]

On Tue, 13 Mar 2018 at 02:09 Wade Chandler  wrote:

> -1 as well. The LTS versions live longer, and the processes between the
> orgs will be different. They are also just different orgs. I don't think it
> makes sense to try to align versioning. It was essentially marketing
> between Oracle's Java and it's IDE, which made sense considering that, but
> isn't the case any longer. It also means we will jump major versions just
> for the Java support when NB is so much more than that.
>

Good points!  Yes, agree it was mainly marketing, although also about what
level of Java was officially supported?

My original question elsewhere was whether we were consciously deciding to
decouple versions or just letting it happen.  Quite happy with either,
actually, and I'd probably prefer a better semantic versioning strategy
anyway.

Of course, we need to be sure we don't disregard all marketing now in
Apache.  Something for discussion elsewhere might be how / whether this is
communicated - you know someone will ask why we're releasing NetBeans 9
just as Java 10 is out?! ;-)

Best wishes,

Neil
-- 
Neil C Smith
Artist & Technologist
www.neilcsmith.net

Praxis LIVE - hybrid visual IDE for creative coding - www.praxislive.org

Re: Support of Java 10

[Wade Chandler]

On Mar 12, 2018 12:05 PM, "Jaroslav Tulach" 
wrote:

> > do we have an agreement to merge the branch from Jan to have at least

> > basic
> > > support for Java 10?
> > >
> >
> > I hope so, my plan is to send a pull request "sometime soon".
> >
>
> +1
>

+1


+1



> And still +1 for keeping version sync and calling this NB 10! ;-)
>

-1


-1 as well. The LTS versions live longer, and the processes between the
orgs will be different. They are also just different orgs. I don't think it
makes sense to try to align versioning. It was essentially marketing
between Oracle's Java and it's IDE, which made sense considering that, but
isn't the case any longer. It also means we will jump major versions just
for the Java support when NB is so much more than that.

Wade

Re: Support of Java 10

[Jaroslav Tulach]

> > do we have an agreement to merge the branch from Jan to have at least

> > basic
> > > support for Java 10?
> > >
> >
> > I hope so, my plan is to send a pull request "sometime soon".
> >
>
> +1
>

+1


> And still +1 for keeping version sync and calling this NB 10! ;-)
>

-1

-jt

Re: Support of Java 10

[Neil C Smith]

On Thu, 8 Mar 2018, 08:12 Jan Lahoda,  wrote:

> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 8:57 AM, Sven Reimers 
> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > do we have an agreement to merge the branch from Jan to have at least
> basic
> > support for Java 10?
> >
>
> I hope so, my plan is to send a pull request "sometime soon".
>

+1

The last time this came up wasn't there a rough consensus on merging this
prior to NetCAT?

And still +1 for keeping version sync and calling this NB 10! ;-)

Best wishes,

Neil

> --
Neil C Smith
Artist & Technologist
www.neilcsmith.net

Praxis LIVE - hybrid visual IDE for creative coding - www.praxislive.org

Re: Support of Java 10

[Jan Lahoda]

On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 8:57 AM, Sven Reimers  wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> do we have an agreement to merge the branch from Jan to have at least basic
> support for Java 10?
>

I hope so, my plan is to send a pull request "sometime soon".

Jan


> Thanks
>
> -Sven
>