Hi Jacopo, I already did!
See the 4th post
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Failed-comunication-between-Axis-server-and-JAX-WSclient-tp4658126p4658130.html
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Failed-comunication-between-Axis-server-and-JAX-WSclient-tp4658126p4658130.html
.
--
View this
This is what I ended up doing:
Not particurarly fond of it but works.
Now I am unsure if it breaks some webservices calls
--
View this message in context:
http://ofbiz.135035.n4.nabble.com/Failed-comunication-between-Axis-server-and-JAX-WSclient-tp4658126p4658145.html
Sent from the OFBiz
Launched test-result ant target, test results:
Tests 321
Failures 1
Errors 0
Skipped 0
Success rate 99.69%
Time 1326.873
The failed one:
basetests testBasicDisk Failure is-empty
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: is-empty
at
Le 13/11/2014 10:52, Gianluca84 a écrit :
Launched test-result ant target, test results:
Tests 321
Failures 1
Errors 0
Skipped 0
Success rate 99.69%
Time 1326.873
The failed one:
basetests testBasicDisk Failure is-empty
junit.framework.AssertionFailedError: is-empty
at
Le 12/11/2014 23:34, Gianluca84 a écrit :
Yes, I've seen it. (that's where I got the link for the RPC-Literal
specifications that I posted)
These are the solutions suggested: (quoting)
Daniel Kulp wrote
1) Download the wsdl and edit it to match what the service really
produces.
In this case,
Jacques Le Roux created OFBIZ-5874:
--
Summary: Fixes the stable demo
Key: OFBIZ-5874
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5874
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
Gianluca,
I had a cursory review at the OFBiz code you mentioned and there could be
issues; I see that Jacques modified the same code (e.g. in rev. 1243026)
and it may be that the solution he implemented is not generic enough but I
will let Jacques review it and comment before I spend more time
Hi,
In a recent user ML thread http://markmail.org/message/ivjocjr2ull7lwqe I suggested we could propose our users to use a release branch strategy rather
than downloaded packages.
And that we could expose this way of doing in our download page, or maybe
better with a link to an explaining
Jacques Le Roux wrote
Yes this happens randomly, though not recently. Do you use the trunk HEAD?
Jacques
Actually no, I use branch release13.07
--
View this message in context:
Ok. Thanks Jacopo!
Oh by the way.. to whom it may concern...it seems that branch release13.07
lacks this jar:
framework\base\lib\avalon-util-exception-1.0.0.jar
--
View this message in context:
In the past the ASF Board asked to the OFBiz PMC to fix the release
strategy of the project by providing officially voted release files thru
the ASF mirrors: at that time we were pushing the users to get the trunk.
Officially asking the user to use a release branch would be better than the
trunk
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5844?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Arun Patidar updated OFBIZ-5844:
Attachment: OFBIZ-5844-Product.patch
Replaced java files of 'product' component to Entity Query.
We are talking about components (applications) that are good and nobody
complains about. Code that is being used by our users. Code that is being
evaluated and contributors work on to improve it. And this is left out of
releases? Crazy
If that were to be the policy, we could also start to
Jacopo, Pierre,
I did not speak about forcing users, just suggesting and explaining why. Then
their choice, which is available anyway, but maybe hidden for some...
Jacques
Le 13/11/2014 13:44, Pierre Smits a écrit :
We are talking about components (applications) that are good and nobody
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nicolas Malin updated OFBIZ-5848:
-
Attachment: OFBIZ-5848-java17-12.04.patch
Ok, with the last patch run-tests is now successful
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14209725#comment-14209725
]
Nicolas Malin edited comment on OFBIZ-5848 at 11/13/14 1:14 PM:
That last sentence should have been: And not by forcing an implementation
methodology upon us that doesn't have the consensus of the community, that
leads to more misunderstanding (within the user part of the community) and
more work for the rest.
Pierre Smits
*ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14209831#comment-14209831
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-5848:
--
tests successful on a Mac with OSX
As an outsider, I can see what is bothering the ASF.
The voting out process is Apache's way of ensuring that the PMC and
contributors are putting their stamp of approval on the release.
It is the last chance to raise an objection about some bug/deficiency
before you put the warranty on the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14209855#comment-14209855
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-5848:
On Windows 7 running ant clean-all
I have added a new section (with title Release Management Guide) with my
notes about all the steps required to do a release:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBADMIN/Release+Plan
I didn't touch the other parts of the document but in my opinion most of
them could be removed now.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14209911#comment-14209911
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-5848:
--
Thanks for the report Jacques.
This
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14209918#comment-14209918
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-5848:
--
Jacques, could you please try again
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14209957#comment-14209957
]
Nicolas Malin commented on OFBIZ-5848:
--
Thanks Jacopo and Jacques for your return.
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14209962#comment-14209962
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-5848:
Despites what Einstein said about
Thanks Jacopo,
It was random finally :-O
Jacques
Le 13/11/2014 16:39, jaco...@apache.org a écrit :
Author: jacopoc
Date: Thu Nov 13 15:39:54 2014
New Revision: 1639373
URL: http://svn.apache.org/r1639373
Log:
Improved unit test that was failing when executed in certain platforms.
Modified:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14209967#comment-14209967
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-5848:
--
:-)
Well, my fix should have helped
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14209970#comment-14209970
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-5848:
Ha Jacopo, our comments crossed on wire,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14209981#comment-14209981
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-5848:
Ha no, it was already up to date when I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14209992#comment-14209992
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-5848:
--
Actually I have fixed the test after
Actually I have fixed the test after you reported the failure; after that
you reported a success... or am I missing something?
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 5:27 PM, Jacques Le Roux (JIRA) j...@apache.org
wrote:
[
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14210008#comment-14210008
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-5848:
No, sequence of operations:
# svn up
#
Jacques, all,
I don't like the big warning message that has been placed at the beginning
of all the pages in Confluence:
Due to spam, the infrastructure team has restricted the access to all ASF
Confluence open wikis (Confluence is shared by all ASF projects). If you
want to add or edit a page,
I suspect it may have failed the first time on a different test.
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 5:57 PM, Jacques Le Roux (JIRA) j...@apache.org
wrote:
[
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14210009#comment-14210009
]
Jacopo Cappellato commented on OFBIZ-5848:
--
I suspect it may have failed the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14210023#comment-14210023
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-5848:
The failure I C/Pasted was the only I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5835?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gary Shi reopened OFBIZ-5835:
-
After more testing, I found it works for Iava 7 under both windows7 and xp but
fails to build for Java 8
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5835?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Gary Shi updated OFBIZ-5835:
Environment:
windows 7 64-bit, oracle JDK 8 64-bit
and
windows xp 32bit, oracle JDK 8 32bit;
was:
Wai created OFBIZ-5875:
--
Summary: Example component causes null pointer exception message
on page
Key: OFBIZ-5875
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5875
Project: OFBiz
Issue Type: Bug
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5875?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Wai updated OFBIZ-5875:
---
Attachment: OFBIZ-5875.patch
Explanation: One of the things that example component does when building its
menu is to
Yes, I guess it's now time to move on. I mean people should not be surprised
anymore.
Jacques
Le 13/11/2014 17:57, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
Jacques, all,
I don't like the big warning message that has been placed at the beginning
of all the pages in Confluence:
Due to spam, the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5875?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14210133#comment-14210133
]
Jacques Le Roux commented on OFBIZ-5875:
Is it an issue OOTB or did you add code
For the licence free issues (an other related stuff) we could put a disclaimer
in the wiki page where all alternatives would be explained
Jacques
Le 13/11/2014 12:38, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
In the past the ASF Board asked to the OFBiz PMC to fix the release
strategy of the project by
Does this solve ASF's issue about having users access the main servers?
What do you put on the mirrors and how do you stop users from accessing
the development SVN which is ASF's concern?
Ron
On 13/11/2014 1:55 PM, Jacques Le Roux wrote:
For the licence free issues (an other related stuff)
Can you just get rid of the obsolete stuff.
If anything is lost, it can be retrieved from the old revision
If anyone wants to see an old version of the page it is easily found.
Let's be a bit ruthless in getting rid of old stuff that just confuses
the situation.
Ron
On 13/11/2014 10:14 AM,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5875?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14211217#comment-14211217
]
Wai commented on OFBIZ-5875:
This is from the latest sources from the trunk.
-check out the
+1
I agree with the approach
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Ron Wheeler rwhee...@artifact-software.com
wrote:
Can you just get rid of the obsolete stuff.
If anything is lost, it can be retrieved from the old revision
If anyone wants to see an old version of the page it is easily found.
Le 13/11/2014 20:03, Ron Wheeler a écrit :
Does this solve ASF's issue about having users access the main servers?
I don't try to solve an issue, just to propose an alternative. It's a free user
choice, but with more elements
What do you put on the mirrors and how do you stop users from
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5875?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14211281#comment-14211281
]
youssef khaye commented on OFBIZ-5875:
--
Hi jacques,
I confirm, It's an issue OOTB,
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5875?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14211309#comment-14211309
]
Jacques Le Roux edited comment on OFBIZ-5875 at 11/13/14 9:22 PM:
I agree too. About this page, I think we can remove all the old steps and maybe
move the rest above in another new page?
Jacques
Le 13/11/2014 21:06, Jacopo Cappellato a écrit :
+1
I agree with the approach
On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 8:08 PM, Ron Wheeler rwhee...@artifact-software.com
wrote:
Are we still discussing the r13.07.01 release? Changing the subject helps to
not confuse the readers.
Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad
Op 13 nov. 2014 om 22:38 heeft Jacques Le Roux jacques.le.r...@les7arts.com
het volgende geschreven:
I agree too. About this page, I think we can remove all the
That is not difficult to assess. Do a download from trunk, and see how many
Mb's are transferred. Do a ./ant clean-all. Subsequently remove all hidden
files in .svn folders. Finally do a zip of the cleaned download and compare the
original amount of Mb's with the size of the zip file. That
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5848?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Nicolas Malin updated OFBIZ-5848:
-
Attachment: OFBIZ-5848-java17-12.04.patch
I don't know exactly if Einstein said true, but I
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5875?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adrian Crum reassigned OFBIZ-5875:
--
Assignee: Adrian Crum
Example component causes null pointer exception message on page
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5875?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=14211481#comment-14211481
]
Adrian Crum commented on OFBIZ-5875:
Jacques - please do not add setters to model
Ok,
I have removed the old notes and updated the information in the old page:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBADMIN/Release+Plan
and I have moved my new section to a new page:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OFBADMIN/Release+Management+Guide+for+OFBiz
Jacopo
On Thu,
Jacopo,
Thank you! This will surely help others to be able to produce release
packages in a uniform and consistent way.
It seems that you forgot to mention that prior to step 4 some kind of
clean-up needs to be done, namely:
- perform a ./ant clean-all to remove built jar files in every
As I already have explained in
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OFBIZ-5464, in the first quarter of
this year, a release could even be more compact.
Regards,
Pierre Smits
*ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
Services Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail
Ahh. Ok. Wasn't aware of that.
Thanks.
Pierre Smits
*ORRTIZ.COM http://www.orrtiz.com*
Services Solutions for Cloud-
Based Manufacturing, Professional
Services and Retail Trade
http://www.orrtiz.com
On Fri, Nov 14, 2014 at 8:29 AM, Jacopo Cappellato
jacopo.cappell...@hotwaxmedia.com wrote:
60 matches
Mail list logo
