Hello Michael,
Michael Brohl writes:
> a quick heads up for this topic.
>
> After following the release strategy and thinking more about it, I
> think that most users will go with a subscription model and subscribe
> for an LTS version. The costs are moderate [1] and I assume that few
> users
Because OpenJDK is the base for the Oracle JDK and Oracle is working on
Open JDK, I assume we will have the same problems. It can also be that
the two will be one product soon. Why should Oracle support Open JDK
with long term updates for free?
I did not find a clear roadmap for Open JDK so
I am beginning to wonder if we should consider moving to OpenJDK. I think I
really dislike this release model with all the extra costs and headache
involved.
Are we stuck with Oracle JDK? Does anyone know of limitations or problems
with OpenJDK? I vaguely remember font problems with the BIRT
Hi Mathieu,
my goal is to actively inform users about our roadmap and provide
information on how the project will deal with the new Java release
model. Users testing OFBiz for their needs in a professional environment
also check if a project has answers to these questions so I am wrapping
my
I see. well this means we have to do multiple things:
- First we need to upgrade gradle
- I have no preference with release 17 Java version support
Now the problem with upgrading gradle in a nutshell is that you can no
longer have spaces in server commands. So ./gradlew "ofbiz --start"
will not
Hi devs,
a quick heads up for this topic.
After following the release strategy and thinking more about it, I think
that most users will go with a subscription model and subscribe for an
LTS version. The costs are moderate [1] and I assume that few users will
go through a repeating 6 month
Hi Taher,
I would prefer if you start a new thread for this because it's a
complete new topic.
If it turns out that the community wants to work on a Java 11 update, I
would file an umbrella task for it and your issue OFBIZ-9972 would be a
sub-task (not the only one I think) of this.
Any problem here ?
Jacques
Le 28/07/2018 à 15:05, julian.leich...@ecomify.de a écrit :
Zitat von dev-h...@ofbiz.apache.org:
Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
dev@ofbiz.apache.org mailing list.
I'm working for my owner, who can be reached
at dev-ow...@ofbiz.apache.org.
To
Zitat von dev-h...@ofbiz.apache.org:
Hi! This is the ezmlm program. I'm managing the
dev@ofbiz.apache.org mailing list.
I'm working for my owner, who can be reached
at dev-ow...@ofbiz.apache.org.
To confirm that you would like
julian.leich...@ecomify.de
removed from the dev mailing
For what it's worth (nobody here knows me), +1 for OpenJDK.
- Original Message -From: Taher Alkhateeb
To: OFBIZ Development Mailing List
Sent: Sat, 28 Jul 2018 08:06:44 - (UTC)Subject: Re:
Oracle Java release model changes and consequences for the project
I am beginning to wonder
Hello All,
Currently, we don't have any user interface to do cycle count for the
warehouse, Where user can create or manage cycle count for different
locations within any facility. Authorized users to approve or reject the
count and record variance. Also, the recorded variance against
Hi Yashwant,
Besides the scenario you described, I'm working on a retail scenario, selling
goods in refrigerators/containers, when a door open/close, a count action is
triggered and fulfilled by RFID, the variance will be generated to an auto
payed order if the door is opened/closed by a
It seems false positive.
All test passed on the local machine.
Thanks & Regards
--
Deepak Dixit
On Sat, Jul 28, 2018 at 4:41 PM, wrote:
> The Buildbot has detected a build exception on builder
> ofbizTrunkFrameworkPlugins while building . Full details are available at:
>
13 matches
Mail list logo
