On 06/11/2012 Rob Weir wrote:
https://blogs.apache.org/preview/OOo/?previewEntry=you_can_help_us_improve
Thanks, the final version at
https://blogs.apache.org/OOo/entry/you_can_help_us_improve
is very good and useful to the project, like everything else you've
published on the OpenOffice blog
We used Google Moderator before and it is really nice thing to use. I like
the base of the idea, but I have one question what about the questions
coming from users through the user(s)@ mailing list ? Would that make them
feel isolated in case some of them would not like to use Google Moderator
for
Joining a mailing list means signing up and wading through lots of emails
one is not interested in. This proposal is a way to reach out to people who
have a question but not the desire to engage with the community. There is
no risk of isolation since these people wont come to those chanels. Note
Hi Robert,
On 14.11.2012 09:55, Robert Barbey wrote:
Hi everyone,
since my colleagues and I started writing a plug-in for OpenOffice Writer I
wanted to let you guys know what we're trying to achieve with it.
My company's main product is a client-server-based tool that assists authors
in
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 9:09 AM, Ross Gardler rgard...@opendirective.comwrote:
Joining a mailing list means signing up and wading through lots of emails
one is not interested in. This proposal is a way to reach out to people who
have a question but not the desire to engage with the community.
Alexandro ,
On Tue, Nov 13, 2012 at 11:24 PM, Phillip Zadro
ricaza1...@hotmail.com.auwrote:
hi Is there any likelihood that OpenOffice will one day include a desktop
publisher? There is only one thing that is stopping me from migrating
completely from Microsoft Office to either OpenOffice
Hello All,
I've been exploring the information design (content) for the dockable task
pane. I've analyzed the current content in both LS and AOO, and captured
some thoughts on future design direction.
See:
Hello,
I've heard some discussion and interest in this topic off-list. There
has been some practical experience, but nothing that we've written
down or promoted. I'd be interested in seeing if we can come up with
some solid best practices.
The problem: Many (most?) open source
Hi,
On 15.11.2012 00:10, Rob Weir wrote:
I see that our project is growing new branches. Would it make sense
to start documenting these on a wiki page, so it is clear what each
one is, and who is maintaining it?
Current branches are:
AOO34/ --- Our 3.4.x branch, would be used if we ever
Simon,
Indeed, I think we should keep it simple for the initial implementation.
Contextual properties is a must have. I'll prep some interaction design
mockups.
Regards,
Kevin
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 5:32 PM, Shenfeng Liu liush...@gmail.com wrote:
Kevin,
The proposal is very good!
I
Kori,
We'd love your feedback on the templates. Does it meet your needs, anything
missing?
Regards,
Kevin
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 6:25 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
Hi Kori,
Our templates website is here: http://templates.openoffice.org/
If you type recipe in the search box
KG01 - See comments inline.
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Ian C i...@amham.net wrote:
Hi David,
welcome aboard. Getting involved kind of depends on you and what you
want to do. Development, testing, documentation, internationalisation,
web site?
KG01 - plus user interface design,
On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 13:33:52 -0500
Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 6:23 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 3:08 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org
wrote:
Thanks, Kevin!
And I added your Content Design page to the sidebar planning wiki:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/AOO+4.0+sidebar
- Shenfeng (Simon)
2012/11/15 Kevin Grignon kevingrignon...@gmail.com
Simon,
Indeed, I think we should keep it simple for the initial
On 15.11.2012 00:10, Rob Weir wrote:
I see that our project is growing new branches. Would it make sense
to start documenting these on a wiki page, so it is clear what each
one is, and who is maintaining it?
Current branches are:
AOO34/ --- Our 3.4.x branch, would be used if we ever need a
Taking a little break from my vacations ...
- Is there anything in particular that you want to see cleaned up?
Extracting code without the history is not exactly easy so we basically have to
check wth the IBM guys anyways.
There is also the issue that we only release code through the project
On 15.11.2012 10:33, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
On 15.11.2012 00:10, Rob Weir wrote:
I see that our project is growing new branches. Would it make sense
to start documenting these on a wiki page, so it is clear what each
one is, and who is maintaining it?
Current branches are:
[...]
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 7:02 AM, Herbert Duerr h...@apache.org wrote:
On 15.11.2012 10:33, Oliver-Rainer Wittmann wrote:
On 15.11.2012 00:10, Rob Weir wrote:
I see that our project is growing new branches. Would it make sense
to start documenting these on a wiki page, so it is clear what
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Mohammad Nour El-Din
nour.moham...@gmail.com wrote:
We used Google Moderator before and it is really nice thing to use. I like
the base of the idea, but I have one question what about the questions
coming from users through the user(s)@ mailing list ? Would that
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote:
actually we do had faqs, many of them actually, the main issue is
mantaining such FAQs.
this remind me of a xkcd
http://xkcd.com/927/
On
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 2:44 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
On 11/11/2012 Kay Schenk wrote:
On 11/11/2012 04:22 AM, Andrea Pescetti wrote:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Development+Snapshot+Builds
(they are also called with/without system integration
On 14/11/2012 Andrea Pescetti wrote:
copied and pasted into an e-mail, see other announcements ...
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/FOSDEM+2013+CFP
is just for writing/reviewing this text. Link won't be published.
Reminder: in slightly more than 24 hours, that page will be
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 8:07 AM, jan iversen jancasacon...@gmail.com wrote:
Is this a place we want to show up ?
http://www.opensourcedays.org/2012/
It is pretty big in scandinavia.
Maybe add it here:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Events+Calendar
Certainly would be a
Hi,
On 12-11-15, at 08:07 , jan iversen jancasacon...@gmail.com wrote:
Is this a place we want to show up ?
http://www.opensourcedays.org/2012/
It is pretty big in scandinavia.
Jan.
I have attended prior versions of this event, run by Peter Toft; the last time
I went was, I think, in
On 11/15/2012 04:47 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 13:33:52 -0500
Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Kay Schenk kay.sch...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 6:23 AM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 3:08 AM,
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 11:07 AM, Herbert Duerr h...@apache.org wrote:
On 15.11.2012 15:35, Rob Weir wrote:
I just checked in a new script (platform.py) that queries the
SourceForge REST API to get a platform breakdown for downloads.
For example, looking at 3.4.1 downloads from November 1st
It has nothing to do with whether anything from the Symphony donation is ever
released in AOO. The code has been donated and it should have its IP cleaned
up. Also, the history is not needed. It is simply the headers and notices on
the code as donated that is a problem. There are simple
Interesting result.
I know what you guys saying, that it only means people downloading AOO from
android devices, but not using AOO from android devices.
In my opinion, such number would at least means that, there do exist
thousands of AOO customers, who prefer using mobile devices on their cyber
Hi Dennis;
I am afraid that what we are doing is exactly cherry picking code and creating
patches. AFAICT there is no one actively working on the symphony code. If I
notice something I like, I open a bugzilla issue and try to get someone from
IBM to look at it.
The code still has unacceptable
On 11/15/12, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 1:13 AM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Alexandro Colorado j...@oooes.org
wrote:
actually we do had faqs, many of them actually, the main issue is
mantaining such FAQs.
this
Apart from the branches it seems we have a directory called trunk-orig,
that only seems to contain 3 files, are they important ??
+1 to remove branches when they are integrated, it gives a lot better
overview.
Jan.
On 15 November 2012 13:19, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Wed, Nov 14,
All that is required to clean up the headers is to have some sort of official
permission from IBM to ASF that allows it to be done. That or an IBM-employed
committer needs to be identified as authorized to do it. The basic requirement
is under Source File Headers for Code Developed at the ASF
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 4:00 PM, jan iversen jancasacon...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 to move.
But please help me out with a simple question, if I delete a file/directory
in SVN, I assume it is only deleted from that version, so if I do a
checkout of an old version it is included ??
If you check
Rob Weir wrote:
The problem: Many (most?) open source contributors are not opposed to
AOO or LO. They are just interested in helping out. If they produce
a patch, or documentation, fix a bug or add a translation, they want
to maximize the public good that comes from that work.
You are
On 15 November 2012 22:16, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 4:00 PM, jan iversen jancasacon...@gmail.com
wrote:
+1 to move.
But please help me out with a simple question, if I delete a
file/directory
in SVN, I assume it is only deleted from that version, so if
On 15/11/2012 jan iversen wrote:
I have a new mail account, which I have created in bugzilla.
Is there a way to move the bugs I have reported with my old e-mail to the
new e-mail (in bugzilla) ?
Regina is right, the right way is: update your e-mail address in the old
account. Creating a new
On 11/15/2012 17:28, Jan iversen wrote:
Hi.
I have a new mail account, which I have created in bugzilla.
Is there a way to move the bugs I have reported with my old e-mail to the
new e-mail (in bugzilla) ?
Jan.
Hi, Jan,
If you changed your email address in an existing BZ account
On 11/14/2012 05:06 PM, TJ Frazier wrote:
On 11/14/2012 18:47, Kay Schenk wrote:
HI --
Could one of our BZ admins please remove the podling reference in the
footer area for Apache OOo Bugzilla? Thanks.
Hi, Kay,
A little research in the BZ Help [1] reveals in Section 6.3.5 that the
global
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 3:00 PM, F C. Costero fjcc.apa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 12:06 PM, Rob Weir robw...@apache.org wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 7:44 AM, Andrea Pescetti pesce...@apache.org wrote:
Rob Weir wrote:
This is mainly a community-relations / public outreach
Andre,
I have updated the gmake branch (branches/gbuild) and changed all the
headers. A couple of quick fixes are added.
At this point the branch is trunk + CWS patches. make -di takes me
pretty far in, but I get:
GNUmakefile:35: *** Corrupted module targetstack! . Stop
also, there is a
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 9:28 PM, RGB ES rgb.m...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/11/15 Kevin Grignon kevingrignon...@gmail.com
Hello All,
I've been exploring the information design (content) for the dockable
task
pane. I've analyzed the current content in both LS and AOO, and captured
some
Hi All,
This is Manju from INDIA.
Interested in QA, Automated Testing,
Looking forward to join Apache team :-)
Regards,
Manju
- Forwarded by Manju2 M/TVM/TCS on 11/16/2012 11:43 AM -
From:
Manju2 M/TVM/TCS
To:
q...@openoffice.apache.org.
Date:
11/16/2012 11:35 AM
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 2:19 PM, Kevin Grignon kevingrignon...@gmail.comwrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2012 at 9:28 PM, RGB ES rgb.m...@gmail.com wrote:
2012/11/15 Kevin Grignon kevingrignon...@gmail.com
Hello All,
I've been exploring the information design (content) for the dockable
task
On 13/11/2012 Andrew Rist wrote:
That makes all flows 'green'.
Including this new build that builds from the SNAPSHOT tag.
Great news! Working buildbots are a prerequisite to proper QA.
What changes need to be made to these install bits usable as our dev
snapshot?
Localization on
44 matches
Mail list logo
