Re: [CWiki] Account Whitelisting

On 12/6/2016 1:01 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > Hi Keith, > > I would like to stick with petko. > > Thanks. > > > All the best > > Peter > > Peter; Account petco has been created on the MWiki. A temporary password has been sent to your e-mail address and you should change it at your first

Re: Facebook page

That Facebook group is linked on our homepage: http://www.openoffice.org/social/index.html BTW: Is someone in charge of the Twitter account? The Twitter widget on that page throws an error: "The Twitter API v1.0 is deprecated, and this widget has ceased functioning.","You can replace it with a

Re: Is there still someone who build for Solaris/Openindiana

On 12/6/2016 1:55 AM, Raphael Bircher wrote: Hi all I'm going to the configure script and I recognize that there are still parts for solaris. As far as I know, the last version who build with solaris was the AOO 3.4.x. My question is, if we should ride off the Solaris stuff or we should keep

Re: [CWiki] Account Whitelisting

On 12/6/2016 1:32 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: > great thanks a lot for your effort. :-) > > My pleasure Peter. > On 06.12.2016 17:02, Keith N. McKenna wrote: >> On 12/6/2016 1:01 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: >>> Hi Keith, >>> >>> I would like to stick with petko. >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> >>> All the

Re: [CWiki] Account Whitelisting

great thanks a lot for your effort. :-) On 06.12.2016 17:02, Keith N. McKenna wrote: On 12/6/2016 1:01 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: Hi Keith, I would like to stick with petko. Thanks. All the best Peter Peter; Account petco has been created on the MWiki. A temporary password has been sent

Re: Is there still someone who build for Solaris/Openindiana

+1 On 06.12.2016 18:31, Patricia Shanahan wrote: On 12/6/2016 1:55 AM, Raphael Bircher wrote: Hi all I'm going to the configure script and I recognize that there are still parts for solaris. As far as I know, the last version who build with solaris was the AOO 3.4.x. My question is, if we

Re: Is there still someone who build for Solaris/Openindiana

since build failed in AOO 4.0, i haven't try to build it anymore... 2016-12-06 17:55 GMT+08:00 Raphael Bircher : > Hi all > > I'm going to the configure script and I recognize that there are still > parts for solaris. As far as I know, the last version who build with >

Re: [CWiki] Account Whitelisting

On 12/6/2016 2:55 AM, Raphael Bircher wrote: > Hi Andrea > > > Am 12/6/2016 um 8:48 AM schrieb Andrea Pescetti: >> Raphael Bircher wrote: >>> For some reasons, I have also no edit rights. I don't know how they got >>> loost. I want them back! >>> My User is rbircher >> >> Where? CWiki or MWiki?

Re: Is there still someone who build for Solaris/Openindiana

FWIW; I think OpenIndiana still ships an older version of AOO: https://www.openindiana.org/ You may ask Alexander Pyhalov: I did merge a bunch of his patches (with changes) into AOO so it may be easier to build nowadays although it is surely a bumpy road. Pedro.

Re: [discussion] Roadmap for Open Office

Am 12/06/2016 07:39 AM, schrieb Peter Kovacs: I have created a page on the Confluence Wiki https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Roadmap I made a start, with Points that came into my mind without haveing to check on something. I thought we have in the upper Region our Release

Re: Facebook page

Matthias Seidel wrote: http://www.openoffice.org/social/index.html BTW: Is someone in charge of the Twitter account? The Twitter widget on that page throws an error: I don't think you need access to a Twitter account to create a widget for that account: you should be able to login at

Re: [discussion] Roadmap for Open Office

I have now Archieved the Roadmap on the Mediawiki. It is now in a subpage features/Archieve/OOo 3.3 And put a note out that the new Roadmap is to be found on the Confluence Wiki. But I have not delivered any link. Should I add it? Also there are lots of document that describe old processes in

Re: [discussion] Roadmap for Open Office

On 12/5/2016 12:35 PM, Peter Kovacs wrote: ... # Concerning 12h period. (did not find who brought this up :) ) What I mean is that it would be great if we could devide all activities in good estimate able chunks. Agile methology claims everything that an experienced developer estimates beyond

Is there still someone who build for Solaris/Openindiana

Hi all I'm going to the configure script and I recognize that there are still parts for solaris. As far as I know, the last version who build with solaris was the AOO 3.4.x. My question is, if we should ride off the Solaris stuff or we should keep it. Well it won't hurt to keep it, but it

Testlink Admin right back

Hello I just go the test link admin rights back. Thanks to Adfinis SyGroup. People who wants admin rights can ask me. Regards, Raphael - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org For additional commands,

Re: [discussion] Roadmap for Open Office

Peter Kovacs wrote: Also there are lots of document that describe old processes in Planing and so forth. We should Archive them too. However I can not move things to an appropriate Folder. So I left the Link to avoid unlinked pages. Can we maybe add a Open Office.org Archieve and move all the

Re: [discussion] Roadmap for Open Office

On 12/06/2016 01:39 AM, Peter Kovacs wrote: I have created a page on the Confluence Wiki https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Roadmap I made a start, with Points that came into my mind without haveing to check on something. I thought we have in the upper Region our Release