Hi Keith,
2017-10-14 5:52 GMT+02:00 Keith N. McKenna :
[...]
What is relevant is that having it
> functional would be a good enhancement to the product as well as
> provicing the potential of benefit to the project.
>
I entirely agree with your position an I have a
On Sun, 15 Oct 2017 17:45:20 -0600
Larry Gusaas wrote:
> On 2017-10-15, 3:38 PM Rory O'Farrell wrote
>
> > On Sun, 15 Oct 2017 15:27:15 -0600
> > Larry Gusaas wrote:
> >
> >> On 2017-10-15, 1:01 PM Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> >>
> >>> Larry
> >>>
>
While reading stuff at lunch I come across this article blogspot. Interesting
to read what he thinks our flaws are.
Maybe we should work on a solution.
I think worth reading:
https://www.google.com/amp/s/itsfoss.com/best-free-open-source-alternatives-microsoft-office/amp/
>>> Open it and type "openoffice4" (no quotes). OO should then open and run
>>> and give some possibly helpful diagnostics about what it is not finding, or
>>> what has happened. These will be helpful to developers debugging.
>>
>> Doesn't work. Needs more specific command. I will
On Mon, 16 Oct 2017 12:32:51 +0200
Peter kovacs wrote:
>
> While reading stuff at lunch I come across this article blogspot. Interesting
> to read what he thinks our flaws are.
> Maybe we should work on a solution.
>
> I think worth reading:
>
Assuming AOO is installed in /Applications:
/Applications/OpenOffice.app/Contents/MacOS/soffice
should do it.
> On Oct 16, 2017, at 6:59 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
>
> On Sun, 15 Oct 2017 17:45:20 -0600
> Larry Gusaas wrote:
>
>> On 2017-10-15,
Anyone onlist using High Sierra and able to test AOO
4.1.4-RC5?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
Guy Waterval wrote:
I do not know if such a collaboration is allowed
by Apache
No problem. Apache won't pay developers directly, but it doesn't forbid
that developers are paid of course! So whoever is the sponsor, there is
no problem as long as the code is under the Apache License version 2
Can you please link the bugs from LO?
I try to take care after I have some more time.
Please note that we might have different processes to LO. I am concerned that
users get different from our BZ processes out then they expect. That's all.
Thank you for your hint. I will have a look.
All the
> On Oct 16, 2017, at 11:09 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> I am on macOS Sierra and do not see the issues in RC4.
>
> With RC4 -
Sorry a typo - with RC5 I see:
>
> (1) I get the little general error dialog.
> (2) I don’t see any terminal output after starting
Hi Jim,
I am on macOS Sierra and do not see the issues in RC4.
With RC4 -
(1) I get the little general error dialog.
(2) I don’t see any terminal output after starting from Terminal.
(3) While the error is up the lock file .~lock.# has been created
with a length of 129
David
Did you open an existing file?
> On Oct 16, 2017, at 2:27 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> FWIW, I just installed 10.13 / High Sierra on a test machine. AOO 4.1.4-RC5
> opened up just fine. Because it was a virgin install, I had to go thru the
> "setup" phase. After that
FWIW, I just installed 10.13 / High Sierra on a test machine. AOO 4.1.4-RC5
opened up just fine. Because it was a virgin install, I had to go thru the
"setup" phase. After that closed-and-opened-and-closed multiple
times with no errors.
On 10/16/2017 03:45 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
-1, binding
The macOS problem seems to me to be sufficiently serious that we
cannot release RC5 with it. It has now been reported by two different
users. I may change my vote based on future information.
(If I were considering only my Windows
On 16/10/2017 Patricia Shanahan wrote:
I may change my vote based on future information.
Sure, we'll have to keep the vote open until at least we have determined
whether this is an issue with that particular set of binaries or not.
The full rebuild Jim is doing will give the answer. All
I'm also spinning up a 10.13/High Sierra VM for testing...
> On Oct 16, 2017, at 4:22 PM, Marcus wrote:
>
> Am 16.10.2017 um 22:12 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Just on the off-chance that it's an issue w/ the actual build and not
>> the source, I am rebuilding 4.1.4-RC5 on
OK... I found something weird.
If I open a .odp file, no issues.
If I open a .odt file, I get the General Error popup.
If I open a .ods file, I get "Not all attributes could be read" warning
This is on 10.13/High Sierra... I don't have RC4 to try.
I don't know how it is related, but we have exactly the same weird
behavior on Linux64 with the nightly buildbot builds from trunk (4.2.0):
https://bz.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=127315
Am 16.10.2017 um 23:37 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> OK... I found something weird.
>
> If I open a .odp file,
On 16/10/2017 Dave Fisher wrote:
with RC5 I see:
(1) I get the little general error dialog.
Can we get an issue in Bugzilla please, so that we can try and make it
reproducible?
What I understood so far is:
1. For some reason this (in RC5) only affects Mac OS X
2. It is NOT specific to
-1, binding
The macOS problem seems to me to be sufficiently serious that we cannot
release RC5 with it. It has now been reported by two different users. I
may change my vote based on future information.
(If I were considering only my Windows 8.1 and Windows 10 testing, my
vote would be +1)
Hi -
I’m not ready to build at the moment.
Some observations about macOS - The way our Mac versions work on the latest
macOS releases is problematic in several ways. This issue adds one more tricky
point.
(1) We do not sign with an Apple Developer account.
(2) Security Preferences need to be
Just on the off-chance that it's an issue w/ the actual build and not
the source, I am rebuilding 4.1.4-RC5 on macOS.
> On Oct 16, 2017, at 4:04 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> FWIW, the build machine did not change between RC4 and RC5.
>
> Would it make sense to do a rebuild
As a test, would it be possible for a Mac developer to rebuild with the
source code for RC5 but the process and libraries from RC4, and/or the
other way round? That will tell us whether the problem is a source code
change or a build process change.
On 10/16/2017 11:33 AM, Dave Fisher wrote:
FWIW, the build machine did not change between RC4 and RC5.
Would it make sense to do a rebuild and provide some rebuilt binaries
to test?
> On Oct 16, 2017, at 3:41 PM, Patricia Shanahan wrote:
>
> As a test, would it be possible for a Mac developer to rebuild with the
> source
Am 16.10.2017 um 22:12 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
Just on the off-chance that it's an issue w/ the actual build and not
the source, I am rebuilding 4.1.4-RC5 on macOS.
+1
For the moment the easiest and fastest way.
Marcus
On Oct 16, 2017, at 4:04 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> On Oct 16, 2017, at 1:16 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>
> The next bump for AOO to 4.2.0 also includes a number of
> other "gotchas" related to macOS. For example, QtKit in 10.12
> is deprecated and removed, meaning that we cannot build the
> avmedia component using any SDK
The next bump for AOO to 4.2.0 also includes a number of
other "gotchas" related to macOS. For example, QtKit in 10.12
is deprecated and removed, meaning that we cannot build the
avmedia component using any SDK older than 10.12. plus, we
cannot build with anything older than a 10.9 SDK due to
C++
On 2017-10-16, 3:37 PM Jim Jagielski wrote:
OK... I found something weird.
If I open a .odp file, no issues.
If I open a .odt file, I get the General Error popup.
That is the error I got. I seldom use other parts of AOO and hadn't tested them.
This is on 10.13/High Sierra... I don't have
Latest update: A from-scratch rebuild still results in the same macOS issue. I
am
now rebuilding w/ the expat change reverted, which is the only major change
between
RC4 and RC5, to see if that's the problem.
-
To unsubscribe,
I've been playing with LibreOffice on a dev version of High Sierra
(10.13.1) with no ill effects, but that was a short while ago. I can
try it with AOO, but is there anything in particular I should look
for? I use office suites sparingly and lightly but am game to try out
a suite of tests.
Note:
Just that AOO-4.1.4-RC5 actually opens and works :)
> On Oct 16, 2017, at 9:55 AM, Louis Suárez-Potts
> wrote:
>
> I've been playing with LibreOffice on a dev version of High Sierra
> (10.13.1) with no ill effects, but that was a short while ago. I can
> try it with
Jim, et al.,
So, where are the macOS builds of RC5? FWIW, finding these using the
website's obvious (to me) routes is … fruitless. Finding them using my
old bookmarks also bootless.
Louis
On 16 October 2017 at 08:18, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Anyone onlist using High Sierra and
Nevermind. I think I found them:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/openoffice/4.1.4-RC5/binaries/
Louis
On 16 October 2017 at 08:18, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Anyone onlist using High Sierra and able to test AOO
> 4.1.4-RC5?
>
>
33 matches
Mail list logo