Am 10/27/2016 07:17 PM, schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Great work!
The numbers show the ongoing worldwide interest in Apache OpenOffice
over all these years.
But Pedro has a point here: Either the year should be left of the
separator or better be increased by 1.
One small note:
I think there should
Am 10/27/2016 12:22 AM, schrieb Pedro:
Hi Marcus, all
Note:
Until now it's not published. I want to give you the chance of a first
look.
[1] http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/stats/downloads.html
This is a public list so...
sure, but not as public as if everybody could see it on the webp
Hi Marcus,
Great work!
The numbers show the ongoing worldwide interest in Apache OpenOffice
over all these years.
But Pedro has a point here: Either the year should be left of the
separator or better be increased by 1.
One small note:
I think there should be a space after the bracket in "SourceF
Hi Marcus, all
Note:
Until now it's not published. I want to give you the chance of a first
look.
[1] http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/stats/downloads.html
This is a public list so...
There is a small problem in the chart: the year separators have the
wrong value, the first one should
Am 10/23/2016 05:07 PM, schrieb Marcus:
Am 10/23/2016 04:52 PM, schrieb Matthias Seidel:
(How) could I help?
BTW, the script has to be updated for 4.1.3 before it reaches 12.10.2016.
But that might take some time...
right, the data for this is in
"/share/daten/svn/asf-aoo/devtools/aoo-stats/4
Am 10/23/2016 04:52 PM, schrieb Matthias Seidel:
(How) could I help?
BTW, the script has to be updated for 4.1.3 before it reaches 12.10.2016.
But that might take some time...
right, the data for this is in
"/share/daten/svn/asf-aoo/devtools/aoo-stats/413.lst". It needs to be
added to "all.l
(How) could I help?
BTW, the script has to be updated for 4.1.3 before it reaches 12.10.2016.
But that might take some time...
regards, Matthias
Am 23.10.2016 um 16:34 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 10/21/2016 03:42 PM, schrieb Marcus:
>> Am 10/21/2016 03:22 PM, schrieb Matthias Seidel:
>>> That sounds g
Am 10/21/2016 03:42 PM, schrieb Marcus:
Am 10/21/2016 03:22 PM, schrieb Matthias Seidel:
That sounds good!
Do you have access to the website, so that we can adjust the height of
the graph?
yes, but I don't know yet how to fix as the graph is created with help
from an external widget. I would l
I think it is just one line, set the total height to e.g. 180px and see
if the curve goes up: Daily Downloads Total
(Cumulative)Downloads But maybe the height has to be set accordingly in the
script? regards, Matthias
Am 21.10.2016 um 15:42 schrieb Marcus:
> Am 10/21/2016 03:22 PM, schrieb Matth
Am 10/21/2016 03:22 PM, schrieb Matthias Seidel:
That sounds good!
Do you have access to the website, so that we can adjust the height of
the graph?
yes, but I don't know yet how to fix as the graph is created with help
from an external widget. I would like to first get the numbers online
and
That sounds good!
Do you have access to the website, so that we can adjust the height of
the graph?
BTW: Over 1 Million downloads since 4.1.3 release-date:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/4.1.3/stats/timeline?dates=2016-10-12+to+2016-10-21
regards, Matthias
P.S.: Cur
Am 10/17/2016 07:41 PM, schrieb Marcus:
Am 10/17/2016 05:30 PM, schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Answering myself... ;-)
The python-script on that page should be updated to include version
4.1.3. And I think it must be run manually for updated data.
I've tried this before the release and was surprise
No, I meant the Google+ Forum, as linked on the official site at "I want
to stay in touch with OpenOffice":
https://plus.google.com/+openoffice/posts
Until last year it was managed by Rob Weir (?). 4.1.2 was announced on
29.10.2015, since then there was no other post.
Associated is a community,
Matthias Seidel wrote:
I'll post such blogs on the Google+ Community until we have access to
the official forum...
What do you mean by "official forum" here? The official site
http://www.openoffice.org/ or something else?
Regards,
Andrea.
--
Am 17.10.2016 um 19:41 schrieb Marcus:
>
> Sourgeforce told me now close to 700,000. :-)
>
> Marcus
>
That is downloads per week, including older versions?
Anyway, the download rates are constant and that even without
notification from the program...
(I have one PC left with 4.1.2 to test the up
Am 10/17/2016 05:30 PM, schrieb Matthias Seidel:
Answering myself... ;-)
The python-script on that page should be updated to include version
4.1.3. And I think it must be run manually for updated data.
I've tried this before the release and was surprised that it took hours
for just a single w
; particular, we
>>> don't
>>>> know what downloads are for new users and what downloads are for
>>>> updates
>>>> (including re-downloading) by existing users.
>>>>
>>>> Here's a recent summary:<https://s.apache.org/dxaX>
>>>>
>&
nday, October 17, 2016 08:30
To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
Subject: Re: Download Stats
Answering myself... ;-)
The python-script on that page should be updated to include version
4.1.3. And I think it must be run manually for updated data.
The problem with the graphs is that both are defined with a height of
150p
ads, about 40% of all
>>> downloads are of an English localization.
>>>
>>> - Dennis
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de]
>>>>
rg/dxaX>
> >
> > Although US destinations account for 16% of downloads, about 40% of all
> > downloads are of an English localization.
> >
> > - Dennis
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >> -Original Message-
> >> From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei..
gt;
> - Dennis
>
>
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Matthias Seidel [mailto:matthias.sei...@hamburg.de]
>> Sent: Monday, October 17, 2016 08:30
>> To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Download Stats
>>
>> Answering myself...
gt; To: dev@openoffice.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Download Stats
>
> Answering myself... ;-)
>
> The python-script on that page should be updated to include version
> 4.1.3. And I think it must be run manually for updated data.
>
> The problem with the graphs is that both are de
Answering myself... ;-)
The python-script on that page should be updated to include version
4.1.3. And I think it must be run manually for updated data.
The problem with the graphs is that both are defined with a height of 150px.
That's OK for the daily downloads, but at 160.000.000 total downloa
On Sat, Jun 27, 2015 at 10:42 AM, jan i wrote:
> On Saturday, June 27, 2015, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
> >
> > On 06/26/2015 11:27 AM, Marcus wrote:
> > > Am 06/26/2015 12:40 PM, schrieb Rory O'Farrell:
> > >> Just to note that the OO download statistics haven't been updated in a
> > >> long time.
> >
On Sun, Jun 28, 2015 at 9:33 AM, Andrea Pescetti
wrote:
>
> Note: as discussed several times on this list, replacing this with a link
> to the SourceForge statistics is wrong, since the scripts do the right
> thing in terms of accounting for all downloads and reducing duplicates
> (SourceForge st
On 27/06/2015 Kay Schenk wrote:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/openoffice/devtools/aoo-stats/
using the csv file you see there ...
This was a nice feature but we need instructions.
They were sent by Rob to this list a few months ago, see
https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@openoffice.apache.org/msg
On Saturday, June 27, 2015, Kay Schenk wrote:
>
> On 06/26/2015 11:27 AM, Marcus wrote:
> > Am 06/26/2015 12:40 PM, schrieb Rory O'Farrell:
> >> Just to note that the OO download statistics haven't been updated in a
> >> long time.
> >
> > I remember that Rob has taken care about updating these n
On 06/26/2015 11:27 AM, Marcus wrote:
> Am 06/26/2015 12:40 PM, schrieb Rory O'Farrell:
>> Just to note that the OO download statistics haven't been updated in a
>> long time.
>
> I remember that Rob has taken care about updating these numbers.
> Unfortunately, I don't know where it is decribed h
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 7:52 PM, Marcus wrote:
> Am 06/26/2015 08:33 PM, schrieb Simon Phipps:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 7:28 PM, Marcus wrote:
>>
>> Am 06/26/2015 06:27 PM, schrieb Simon Phipps:
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Rory O'Farrell
wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jun
Am 06/26/2015 08:33 PM, schrieb Simon Phipps:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 7:28 PM, Marcus wrote:
Am 06/26/2015 06:27 PM, schrieb Simon Phipps:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 15:25:01 +0100
Simon Phipps wrote:
Hi Rory,
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 7:28 PM, Marcus wrote:
> Am 06/26/2015 06:27 PM, schrieb Simon Phipps:
>
>> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 15:25:01 +0100
>>> Simon Phipps wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Rory,
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Rory O'Farre
Am 06/26/2015 06:27 PM, schrieb Simon Phipps:
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 15:25:01 +0100
Simon Phipps wrote:
Hi Rory,
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Rory O'Farrell
wrote:
Just to note that the OO download statistics haven't been updated
Am 06/26/2015 12:40 PM, schrieb Rory O'Farrell:
Just to note that the OO download statistics haven't been updated in a long
time.
I remember that Rob has taken care about updating these numbers.
Unfortunately, I don't know where it is decribed how it is done.
Marcus
---
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 15:25:01 +0100
> Simon Phipps wrote:
>
> > Hi Rory,
> >
> > On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Rory O'Farrell
> wrote:
> >
> > > Just to note that the OO download statistics haven't been updated in a
> > > long time.
>
On Fri, 26 Jun 2015 15:25:01 +0100
Simon Phipps wrote:
> Hi Rory,
>
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
>
> > Just to note that the OO download statistics haven't been updated in a
> > long time.
> >
>
> Which ones are you referring to? The ones at
> http://sourceforge.n
Hi Rory,
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 11:40 AM, Rory O'Farrell wrote:
> Just to note that the OO download statistics haven't been updated in a
> long time.
>
Which ones are you referring to? The ones at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stats/timeline
or something else?
Tha
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 10:50 AM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 5:40 AM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
>> > I notice that the stats havent been update to 2015. We are already on
>> > February and 2015 don't show up in the scal
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 5:40 AM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> > I notice that the stats havent been update to 2015. We are already on
> > February and 2015 don't show up in the scale.I would expect at least a 5%
> > of the graph to belong to 2015.
On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 5:40 AM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
> I notice that the stats havent been update to 2015. We are already on
> February and 2015 don't show up in the scale.I would expect at least a 5%
> of the graph to belong to 2015.
>
I've been updating the stats occasionally, using the sc
On 18/giu/2013, at 13:14, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Shenfeng Liu wrote:
>> We can get the data from SourceForge by define the date range by ourselves:
>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stats/map
>> :)
>
> That page measures something subtl
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:26 PM, Shenfeng Liu wrote:
> We can get the data from SourceForge by define the date range by ourselves:
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stats/map
> :)
>
That page measures something subtly different. It shows what platform
the user was run
We can get the data from SourceForge by define the date range by ourselves:
http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stats/map
:)
- Shenfeng (Simon)
2013/6/18 Rob Weir
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 5:00 PM, David Gerard wrote:
> > On 17 June 2013 21:45, Rob Weir wrote:
> >> On
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 5:00 PM, David Gerard wrote:
> On 17 June 2013 21:45, Rob Weir wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 2:32 PM, David Gerard wrote:
>
>>> In the first 1 million or so AOO downloads, the breakdown was 87%
>>> Windows, 11% Macintosh and 2% Linux.
>>> But, of course, there's been
On 17 June 2013 21:45, Rob Weir wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 2:32 PM, David Gerard wrote:
>> In the first 1 million or so AOO downloads, the breakdown was 87%
>> Windows, 11% Macintosh and 2% Linux.
>> But, of course, there's been over 50 million. Do we have a
>> per-platform breakdown of th
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 2:32 PM, David Gerard wrote:
> In the first 1 million or so AOO downloads, the breakdown was 87%
> Windows, 11% Macintosh and 2% Linux.
>
> But, of course, there's been over 50 million. Do we have a
> per-platform breakdown of the numbers since then for AOO?
>
>
It sounds
Thanks for quick update...well, it hasn't been there. I can understand if
it's because of the time to syn such a huge download number :-) Just a
reminder.
Helen
2013/4/2 Rob Weir
> On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 11:10 PM, Yue Helen
>
> De: Rob Weir ; Enviadas: Segunda-feira, 1 de Abril de
> 2013 17:59
> OK. It is updated now. We're over 44 million now. I think we could hit
> 50 million close to the start of May, when we have our 1-year anniversary
> for the release of AOO 3.4.
Good. :-)
Call for designers [1] in pt-br.
On Mon, Apr 1, 2013 at 8:37 AM, Rob Weir wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 11:10 PM, Yue Helen wrote:
>
>> I'm looking at the download stats here,
>> http://www.openoffice.org/stats/downloads.html. It's still the number of
>> 40M on Mar.3. Who can help to update it? Thanks.
>>
>>
> I usuall
On Sun, Mar 31, 2013 at 11:10 PM, Yue Helen wrote:
> I'm looking at the download stats here,
> http://www.openoffice.org/stats/downloads.html. It's still the number of
> 40M on Mar.3. Who can help to update it? Thanks.
>
>
I usually update the stats every 5 million downloads or so. It is manual
49 matches
Mail list logo
