Re: Eclipse vs other IDEs (was: Re: Ide for Open Office (was Building OO))

>> > >> I agree. The wiki did say they managed to open all of AOO in one >Eclipse >> project, but it took a lot of memory. I must try it some time. >> > >​You can open AOO in ONE Eclipse project but it does take a lot of >physical >memory. And you need to up the memory for your Java

Re: Eclipse vs other IDEs (was: Re: Ide for Open Office (was Building OO))

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 1:04 AM, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Peter kovacs wrote: > > > Damian, > > > > I think you got me wrong. > > I am not saying Eclipse is bad. > > I say the wiki guide will configure eclipse to a basic

Re: Eclipse vs other IDEs (was: Re: Ide for Open Office (was Building OO))

Well, I like Google for its moon shot approach. So I tend to copy that methodology. I do have similar ambitious goals for Open Office. I am curious how far I get. Hope I get a lot of support for the ideas, including more ideas. :-D I am frightend at the same time. :P >the project is seen as

Re: Eclipse vs other IDEs (was: Re: Ide for Open Office (was Building OO))

Hi all Long time ago, most IDE faild with the size of the OO Code. I also know, that XCode failed. But I think, Time has changed. We have more RAM now. In NetBeans you have probably to extend the RAM in the JVM. I never tryed it. but I think I will. It will be interesting for testing. And

Re: Eclipse vs other IDEs (was: Re: Ide for Open Office (was Building OO))

About 5 years ago, when I tried to used Netbeans to open a large C project (the Wine project, about 2 million lines), it was unusably slow, and its C/C++ indexer crashed. I don't know if it has improved since then, but we have 6 times more code, and it's C++, not the much simpler C. Eclipse

Re: Ide for Open Office (was Building OO)

I use Visual Studio as a debug tool, and sometimes as an editor. I do my builds in a Cygwin shell, following https://wiki.openoffice.org/wiki/Documentation/Building_Guide_AOO/Step_by_step#Windows_7.2C_Windows_8.1.2C_Windows_10 instructions. I edit using either gvim or Visual Studio depending

Re: Eclipse vs other IDEs (was: Re: Ide for Open Office (was Building OO))

On Wed, Jul 19, 2017 at 9:13 AM, Peter kovacs wrote: > Damian, > > I think you got me wrong. > I am not saying Eclipse is bad. > I say the wiki guide will configure eclipse to a basic level. Basic means > you can navigate through code. Build elements. > > Complete integration

Re: Eclipse vs other IDEs (was: Re: Ide for Open Office (was Building OO))

On 7/19/17, Damjan Jovanovic wrote: > What is so "very basic" about Eclipse? It's an excellent IDE, among the > best C++ IDEs I ever used, and the only IDE I use to develop AOO. > > I only used Visual Studio a little, and it seemed very good at the .NET > languages, but poor at

Re: Eclipse vs other IDEs (was: Re: Ide for Open Office (was Building OO))

Damian, I think you got me wrong. I am not saying Eclipse is bad. I say the wiki guide will configure eclipse to a basic level. Basic means you can navigate through code. Build elements. Complete integration would include # have all in one project, instead of each module separated. # have all

Re: Eclipse vs other IDEs (was: Re: Ide for Open Office (was Building OO))

I have extensively used visual studio for 5+ years as a pure C++ developers. Even Eclipse is quite good and used it in my earlier android programming days although I find eclipse slower than visual studio. But I think both of them are excellent IDE and one can use any one of them. Thanks

Eclipse vs other IDEs (was: Re: Ide for Open Office (was Building OO))

What is so "very basic" about Eclipse? It's an excellent IDE, among the best C++ IDEs I ever used, and the only IDE I use to develop AOO. I only used Visual Studio a little, and it seemed very good at the .NET languages, but poor at C++. What does Visual Studio do, that Eclipse CDT doesn't?