Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

[Jim Jagielski]

AND WE HAVE A WINNER!! With the below changes to the redland build setup, I get 
no errors when opening on Ubuntu 18.04.

> On Oct 29, 2020, at 7:28 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
> I'm trying with this:
> 
> diff --git a/main/redland/raptor/makefile.mk b/main/redland/raptor/makefile.mk
> index 51b78762c3..0c8b6a4d7b 100644
> --- a/main/redland/raptor/makefile.mk
> +++ b/main/redland/raptor/makefile.mk
> @@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ XSLTLIB!:=$(XSLTLIB) # expand dmake variables for 
> xslt-config
> CONFIGURE_DIR=
> CONFIGURE_ACTION=.$/configure
> # do not enable grddl parser (#i93768#)
> -CONFIGURE_FLAGS=--disable-static --disable-gtk-doc --enable-parsers="rdfxml 
> ntriples turtle trig guess rss-tag-soup" --with-www=xml 
> --prefix=$(PDW)/$(OUT) --includedir=$(PWD)/$(INCCOM) --libdir=$(PWD)/$(LB)
> +CONFIGURE_FLAGS=--with-threads --with-curl-config=no --with-icu-config=no 
> --disable-static --disable-gtk-doc --enable-parsers="rdfxml ntriples turtle 
> trig guess rss-tag-soup" --without-bdb --without-sqlite --without-mysql 
> --without-postgresql --without-threestore --with-regex-library=posix 
> --with-decimal=none --with-www=xml --prefix=$(PDW)/$(OUT) 
> --includedir=$(PWD)/$(INCCOM) --libdir=$(PWD)/$(LB)
> .IF "$(SYSTEM_LIBXML)" == "NO"
> CONFIGURE_FLAGS+=--with-xml2-config=${SOLARVERSION}/${INPATH}/bin/xml2-config 
> \
>   --with-xslt-config=${SOLARVERSION}/${INPATH}/bin/xslt-config
> diff --git a/main/redland/rasqal/makefile.mk b/main/redland/rasqal/makefile.mk
> index 72a4368635..b95d8ca28f 100644
> --- a/main/redland/rasqal/makefile.mk
> +++ b/main/redland/rasqal/makefile.mk
> @@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ XSLTLIB!:=$(XSLTLIB) # expand dmake variables for 
> xslt-config
> 
> CONFIGURE_DIR=
> CONFIGURE_ACTION=.$/configure PATH="..$/..$/..$/bin:$$PATH" 
> RASQAL_CFLAGS=-I${PWD}$/..$/${INPATH}/inc 
> RASQAL_LIBS="-L${PWD}/..$/${INPATH}/lib -lrasqual" 
> RAPTOR2_CFLAGS=-I${PWD}$/..$/${INPATH}/inc 
> RAPTOR2_LIBS="-L${PWD}/..$/${INPATH}/lib -lraptor2" 
> PKG_CONFIG_PATH="../raptor2-2.0.15:../rasqal-0.9.33"
> -CONFIGURE_FLAGS=--disable-static --disable-gtk-doc 
> --with-regex-library=posix --with-decimal=none
> +CONFIGURE_FLAGS=--disable-static --disable-gtk-doc 
> --with-regex-library=posix --with-decimal=none --with-libgcrypt-config=no
> .IF "$(SYSTEM_LIBXML)" == "NO"
> CONFIGURE_FLAGS+=--with-xml2-config=${SOLARVERSION}/${INPATH}/bin/xml2-config
> .ENDIF
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

[Jim Jagielski]

I'm trying with this:

diff --git a/main/redland/raptor/makefile.mk b/main/redland/raptor/makefile.mk
index 51b78762c3..0c8b6a4d7b 100644
--- a/main/redland/raptor/makefile.mk
+++ b/main/redland/raptor/makefile.mk
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@ XSLTLIB!:=$(XSLTLIB) # expand dmake variables for 
xslt-config
 CONFIGURE_DIR=
 CONFIGURE_ACTION=.$/configure
 # do not enable grddl parser (#i93768#)
-CONFIGURE_FLAGS=--disable-static --disable-gtk-doc --enable-parsers="rdfxml 
ntriples turtle trig guess rss-tag-soup" --with-www=xml --prefix=$(PDW)/$(OUT) 
--includedir=$(PWD)/$(INCCOM) --libdir=$(PWD)/$(LB)
+CONFIGURE_FLAGS=--with-threads --with-curl-config=no --with-icu-config=no 
--disable-static --disable-gtk-doc --enable-parsers="rdfxml ntriples turtle 
trig guess rss-tag-soup" --without-bdb --without-sqlite --without-mysql 
--without-postgresql --without-threestore --with-regex-library=posix 
--with-decimal=none --with-www=xml --prefix=$(PDW)/$(OUT) 
--includedir=$(PWD)/$(INCCOM) --libdir=$(PWD)/$(LB)
 .IF "$(SYSTEM_LIBXML)" == "NO"
 CONFIGURE_FLAGS+=--with-xml2-config=${SOLARVERSION}/${INPATH}/bin/xml2-config \
--with-xslt-config=${SOLARVERSION}/${INPATH}/bin/xslt-config
diff --git a/main/redland/rasqal/makefile.mk b/main/redland/rasqal/makefile.mk
index 72a4368635..b95d8ca28f 100644
--- a/main/redland/rasqal/makefile.mk
+++ b/main/redland/rasqal/makefile.mk
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@ XSLTLIB!:=$(XSLTLIB) # expand dmake variables for 
xslt-config
 
 CONFIGURE_DIR=
 CONFIGURE_ACTION=.$/configure PATH="..$/..$/..$/bin:$$PATH" 
RASQAL_CFLAGS=-I${PWD}$/..$/${INPATH}/inc 
RASQAL_LIBS="-L${PWD}/..$/${INPATH}/lib -lrasqual" 
RAPTOR2_CFLAGS=-I${PWD}$/..$/${INPATH}/inc 
RAPTOR2_LIBS="-L${PWD}/..$/${INPATH}/lib -lraptor2" 
PKG_CONFIG_PATH="../raptor2-2.0.15:../rasqal-0.9.33"
-CONFIGURE_FLAGS=--disable-static --disable-gtk-doc --with-regex-library=posix 
--with-decimal=none
+CONFIGURE_FLAGS=--disable-static --disable-gtk-doc --with-regex-library=posix 
--with-decimal=none --with-libgcrypt-config=no
 .IF "$(SYSTEM_LIBXML)" == "NO"
 CONFIGURE_FLAGS+=--with-xml2-config=${SOLARVERSION}/${INPATH}/bin/xml2-config
 .ENDIF


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

[Jim Jagielski]

I did try specifically forcing --with-curl-config=no, because I saw that too, 
but that wasn't it.I also add 'with-threads' which was in the old 
CONFIGURE_FLAGS but that this one and again no luck. But I think we're on the 
right track.

> On Oct 28, 2020, at 7:59 PM, Don Lewis  wrote:
> 
> On 27 Oct, Don Lewis wrote:
>> On 27 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> Maybe... but it DID WORK before. That is, before the mega patch,
>>> configure did the "right thing". So if something is causing configure
>>> to make a different decision, it is due to the interaction w/ the new
>>> stuff that the RDF stuff does. The problem is with the patch or how it
>>> is working...
>> 
>> I'm thinking of any configure scripts used by raptor / rasqal / redland,
>> which would have changed by the upgrade.
> 
> I took a look at the configure outputs for those three.  I did see some
> significant differences for redland.  In particular, on CentOS 5,
> redland was picking up a system version of curl.  I think I installed a
> newer version of curl, liked with a modern verson of openssl so a newer
> version of git would work with github.  Thinking that librdf might have
> been linked to the system libcurl, I uninstalled curl on the CentOS5 box
> and did a another rebuild.  I still saw breakage when I installed the
> packages on Ubuntu 16.
> 
> Digging in some more, I ran ldd on the librdf.so that we build and
> discovered that libgcrypt was not being found.  On CentOS 5, libgcrypt
> is version 11.5.2 and on Ubuntu 16 it is 20.0.5.  That's a problem.  I
> wonder if redland actually needs libgcrypt for our purposes.
> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

[Don Lewis]

On 28 Oct, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 28 Oct, Don Lewis wrote:
>> On 27 Oct, Don Lewis wrote:
>>> On 27 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
 Maybe... but it DID WORK before. That is, before the mega patch,
 configure did the "right thing". So if something is causing configure
 to make a different decision, it is due to the interaction w/ the new
 stuff that the RDF stuff does. The problem is with the patch or how it
 is working...
>>> 
>>> I'm thinking of any configure scripts used by raptor / rasqal / redland,
>>> which would have changed by the upgrade.
>> 
>> I took a look at the configure outputs for those three.  I did see some
>> significant differences for redland.  In particular, on CentOS 5,
>> redland was picking up a system version of curl.  I think I installed a
>> newer version of curl, liked with a modern verson of openssl so a newer
>> version of git would work with github.  Thinking that librdf might have
>> been linked to the system libcurl, I uninstalled curl on the CentOS5 box
>> and did a another rebuild.  I still saw breakage when I installed the
>> packages on Ubuntu 16.
>> 
>> Digging in some more, I ran ldd on the librdf.so that we build and
>> discovered that libgcrypt was not being found.  On CentOS 5, libgcrypt
>> is version 11.5.2 and on Ubuntu 16 it is 20.0.5.  That's a problem.  I
>> wonder if redland actually needs libgcrypt for our purposes.
> 
> libraptor2 wants to link to the system icu libraries.  I haven't quite
> figured out why raptor2 wants to use icu and the older raptor library
> does not seem to need it.

>From http://librdf.org/raptor/RELEASE.html, please read the last
paragraph:

Raptor2 2.0.7 changes

CVE-2012-0037 fixed

Issues Fixed:

448: Turtle parser does not return error status from 
turtle_parse_chunk()
469: Allow rapper to bypass server SSL certs checks in libcurl

Removed Expat support since expat has not had a release in years and
libxml2 works well. This allows some code simplification. Updated
configure so that if Raptor is configured with no parser that requires
an XML parser, libxml2 will not be required.

Removed internal Unicode NFC checking code used for checking RDF/XML
literals conformance which was expensive to check and a large of
compiled-in static dataset that was rather out of date. Replaced with
optional compiled use of ICU. If ICU is not explicitly configured, no
literal checking is done.


I think I've got a patch that eliminates the ICU dependency.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

[Don Lewis]

On 28 Oct, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 27 Oct, Don Lewis wrote:
>> On 27 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> Maybe... but it DID WORK before. That is, before the mega patch,
>>> configure did the "right thing". So if something is causing configure
>>> to make a different decision, it is due to the interaction w/ the new
>>> stuff that the RDF stuff does. The problem is with the patch or how it
>>> is working...
>> 
>> I'm thinking of any configure scripts used by raptor / rasqal / redland,
>> which would have changed by the upgrade.
> 
> I took a look at the configure outputs for those three.  I did see some
> significant differences for redland.  In particular, on CentOS 5,
> redland was picking up a system version of curl.  I think I installed a
> newer version of curl, liked with a modern verson of openssl so a newer
> version of git would work with github.  Thinking that librdf might have
> been linked to the system libcurl, I uninstalled curl on the CentOS5 box
> and did a another rebuild.  I still saw breakage when I installed the
> packages on Ubuntu 16.
> 
> Digging in some more, I ran ldd on the librdf.so that we build and
> discovered that libgcrypt was not being found.  On CentOS 5, libgcrypt
> is version 11.5.2 and on Ubuntu 16 it is 20.0.5.  That's a problem.  I
> wonder if redland actually needs libgcrypt for our purposes.

libraptor2 wants to link to the system icu libraries.  I haven't quite
figured out why raptor2 wants to use icu and the older raptor library
does not seem to need it.


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

[Carl Marcum]

Hi Jim,

On 10/28/20 2:08 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:

Thanks... in the meantime, please test the '-jj1' builds available.


General Errors on opening using Ubuntu 18.04 VM.

Best regards,
Carl




On Oct 28, 2020, at 1:28 PM, Pedro Lino  wrote:

Hi Jim

Find attached an odt and an ods that I just confirmed that cause the error 
messages with test12

Regards,
Pedro

(the attachments will not be available to the mailing list)




On 10/28/2020 3:02 PM Jim Jagielski  wrote:


Can someone send me a file or 2 that is known to cause the error? TIA


On Oct 28, 2020, at 9:34 AM, Pedro Lino  wrote:

Hi Jim

Top posting.
The most commonly used Ubuntu version should be 18.04 (but Canonical still 
supports as far back as 14.04) but many of us are already testing that version.
If this is just a test VM, I would say it could be useful if you installed 
20.04.1 LTS which none of us is using but early adopters have probably already 
switched to.

Regards,
Pedro


On 10/28/2020 11:26 AM Carl Marcum  wrote:


Hi Jim,

On 10/28/20 7:20 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:

I have some Ubuntu VMs that I can use to try to test... can someone share which 
one is the more-than-likely one to show the bug and is there any particular 
file(s) I should use to test?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org


I've been testing on an 18.04 VM.
It was throwing errors opening any previously saved ods or odt file for
me even one saved with the one I was testing.

Thanks,
Carl

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

[Don Lewis]

On 27 Oct, Don Lewis wrote:
> On 27 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Maybe... but it DID WORK before. That is, before the mega patch,
>> configure did the "right thing". So if something is causing configure
>> to make a different decision, it is due to the interaction w/ the new
>> stuff that the RDF stuff does. The problem is with the patch or how it
>> is working...
> 
> I'm thinking of any configure scripts used by raptor / rasqal / redland,
> which would have changed by the upgrade.

I took a look at the configure outputs for those three.  I did see some
significant differences for redland.  In particular, on CentOS 5,
redland was picking up a system version of curl.  I think I installed a
newer version of curl, liked with a modern verson of openssl so a newer
version of git would work with github.  Thinking that librdf might have
been linked to the system libcurl, I uninstalled curl on the CentOS5 box
and did a another rebuild.  I still saw breakage when I installed the
packages on Ubuntu 16.

Digging in some more, I ran ldd on the librdf.so that we build and
discovered that libgcrypt was not being found.  On CentOS 5, libgcrypt
is version 11.5.2 and on Ubuntu 16 it is 20.0.5.  That's a problem.  I
wonder if redland actually needs libgcrypt for our purposes.



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

[Pedro Lino]

Top posting:
Confirmed under Ubuntu 18.04.5 x64

> On 10/28/2020 8:10 PM Matthias Seidel  wrote:
> 
>  
> Hi Jim,
> 
> "General Error" when opening files on Ubuntu 16.04.
> 
> Am 28.10.20 um 19:08 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> > Thanks... in the meantime, please test the '-jj1' builds available.
> >
> >> On Oct 28, 2020, at 1:28 PM, Pedro Lino  wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Jim
> >>
> >> Find attached an odt and an ods that I just confirmed that cause the error 
> >> messages with test12
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Pedro
> >>
> >> (the attachments will not be available to the mailing list)
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>> On 10/28/2020 3:02 PM Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Can someone send me a file or 2 that is known to cause the error? TIA
> >>>
>  On Oct 28, 2020, at 9:34 AM, Pedro Lino  
>  wrote:
> 
>  Hi Jim
> 
>  Top posting.
>  The most commonly used Ubuntu version should be 18.04 (but Canonical 
>  still supports as far back as 14.04) but many of us are already testing 
>  that version.
>  If this is just a test VM, I would say it could be useful if you 
>  installed 20.04.1 LTS which none of us is using but early adopters have 
>  probably already switched to.
> 
>  Regards,
>  Pedro
> 
> > On 10/28/2020 11:26 AM Carl Marcum  wrote:
> >
> >
> > Hi Jim,
> >
> > On 10/28/20 7:20 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >> I have some Ubuntu VMs that I can use to try to test... can someone 
> >> share which one is the more-than-likely one to show the bug and is 
> >> there any particular file(s) I should use to test?
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>
> > I've been testing on an 18.04 VM.
> > It was throwing errors opening any previously saved ods or odt file for 
> > me even one saved with the one I was testing.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Carl
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>  -
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 
> >>>
> >>> -
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >> 
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Jim,

"General Error" when opening files on Ubuntu 16.04.

Am 28.10.20 um 19:08 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Thanks... in the meantime, please test the '-jj1' builds available.
>
>> On Oct 28, 2020, at 1:28 PM, Pedro Lino  wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jim
>>
>> Find attached an odt and an ods that I just confirmed that cause the error 
>> messages with test12
>>
>> Regards,
>> Pedro
>>
>> (the attachments will not be available to the mailing list)
>>
>>
>>
>>> On 10/28/2020 3:02 PM Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Can someone send me a file or 2 that is known to cause the error? TIA
>>>
 On Oct 28, 2020, at 9:34 AM, Pedro Lino  
 wrote:

 Hi Jim

 Top posting.
 The most commonly used Ubuntu version should be 18.04 (but Canonical still 
 supports as far back as 14.04) but many of us are already testing that 
 version.
 If this is just a test VM, I would say it could be useful if you installed 
 20.04.1 LTS which none of us is using but early adopters have probably 
 already switched to.

 Regards,
 Pedro

> On 10/28/2020 11:26 AM Carl Marcum  wrote:
>
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> On 10/28/20 7:20 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> I have some Ubuntu VMs that I can use to try to test... can someone 
>> share which one is the more-than-likely one to show the bug and is there 
>> any particular file(s) I should use to test?
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>
> I've been testing on an 18.04 VM.
> It was throwing errors opening any previously saved ods or odt file for 
> me even one saved with the one I was testing.
>
> Thanks,
> Carl
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

[Jim Jagielski]

Thanks... in the meantime, please test the '-jj1' builds available.

> On Oct 28, 2020, at 1:28 PM, Pedro Lino  wrote:
> 
> Hi Jim
> 
> Find attached an odt and an ods that I just confirmed that cause the error 
> messages with test12
> 
> Regards,
> Pedro
> 
> (the attachments will not be available to the mailing list)
> 
> 
> 
>> On 10/28/2020 3:02 PM Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Can someone send me a file or 2 that is known to cause the error? TIA
>> 
>>> On Oct 28, 2020, at 9:34 AM, Pedro Lino  
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Jim
>>> 
>>> Top posting.
>>> The most commonly used Ubuntu version should be 18.04 (but Canonical still 
>>> supports as far back as 14.04) but many of us are already testing that 
>>> version.
>>> If this is just a test VM, I would say it could be useful if you installed 
>>> 20.04.1 LTS which none of us is using but early adopters have probably 
>>> already switched to.
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Pedro
>>> 
 On 10/28/2020 11:26 AM Carl Marcum  wrote:
 
 
 Hi Jim,
 
 On 10/28/20 7:20 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> I have some Ubuntu VMs that I can use to try to test... can someone share 
> which one is the more-than-likely one to show the bug and is there any 
> particular file(s) I should use to test?
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 
 I've been testing on an 18.04 VM.
 It was throwing errors opening any previously saved ods or odt file for 
 me even one saved with the one I was testing.
 
 Thanks,
 Carl
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

[Pedro Lino]

Hi Jim

Find attached an odt and an ods that I just confirmed that cause the error 
messages with test12

Regards,
Pedro

(the attachments will not be available to the mailing list)



> On 10/28/2020 3:02 PM Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
>  
> Can someone send me a file or 2 that is known to cause the error? TIA
> 
> > On Oct 28, 2020, at 9:34 AM, Pedro Lino  
> > wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Jim
> > 
> > Top posting.
> > The most commonly used Ubuntu version should be 18.04 (but Canonical still 
> > supports as far back as 14.04) but many of us are already testing that 
> > version.
> > If this is just a test VM, I would say it could be useful if you installed 
> > 20.04.1 LTS which none of us is using but early adopters have probably 
> > already switched to.
> > 
> > Regards,
> > Pedro
> > 
> >> On 10/28/2020 11:26 AM Carl Marcum  wrote:
> >> 
> >> 
> >> Hi Jim,
> >> 
> >> On 10/28/20 7:20 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >>> I have some Ubuntu VMs that I can use to try to test... can someone share 
> >>> which one is the more-than-likely one to show the bug and is there any 
> >>> particular file(s) I should use to test?
> >>> -
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>> 
> >> I've been testing on an 18.04 VM.
> >> It was throwing errors opening any previously saved ods or odt file for 
> >> me even one saved with the one I was testing.
> >> 
> >> Thanks,
> >> Carl
> >> 
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> > 
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> > 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Two_words.odt
Description: application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.text


simple_sum.ods
Description: application/vnd.oasis.opendocument.spreadsheet

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

[Jim Jagielski]

Can someone send me a file or 2 that is known to cause the error? TIA

> On Oct 28, 2020, at 9:34 AM, Pedro Lino  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jim
> 
> Top posting.
> The most commonly used Ubuntu version should be 18.04 (but Canonical still 
> supports as far back as 14.04) but many of us are already testing that 
> version.
> If this is just a test VM, I would say it could be useful if you installed 
> 20.04.1 LTS which none of us is using but early adopters have probably 
> already switched to.
> 
> Regards,
> Pedro
> 
>> On 10/28/2020 11:26 AM Carl Marcum  wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> Hi Jim,
>> 
>> On 10/28/20 7:20 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> I have some Ubuntu VMs that I can use to try to test... can someone share 
>>> which one is the more-than-likely one to show the bug and is there any 
>>> particular file(s) I should use to test?
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> 
>> I've been testing on an 18.04 VM.
>> It was throwing errors opening any previously saved ods or odt file for 
>> me even one saved with the one I was testing.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Carl
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

[Pedro Lino]

Hi Jim

Top posting.
The most commonly used Ubuntu version should be 18.04 (but Canonical still 
supports as far back as 14.04) but many of us are already testing that version.
If this is just a test VM, I would say it could be useful if you installed 
20.04.1 LTS which none of us is using but early adopters have probably already 
switched to.

Regards,
Pedro

> On 10/28/2020 11:26 AM Carl Marcum  wrote:
> 
>  
> Hi Jim,
> 
> On 10/28/20 7:20 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > I have some Ubuntu VMs that I can use to try to test... can someone share 
> > which one is the more-than-likely one to show the bug and is there any 
> > particular file(s) I should use to test?
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >
> I've been testing on an 18.04 VM.
> It was throwing errors opening any previously saved ods or odt file for 
> me even one saved with the one I was testing.
> 
> Thanks,
> Carl
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

[Carl Marcum]

Hi Jim,

On 10/28/20 7:20 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:

I have some Ubuntu VMs that I can use to try to test... can someone share which 
one is the more-than-likely one to show the bug and is there any particular 
file(s) I should use to test?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org


I've been testing on an 18.04 VM.
It was throwing errors opening any previously saved ods or odt file for 
me even one saved with the one I was testing.


Thanks,
Carl

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

[Jim Jagielski]

I have some Ubuntu VMs that I can use to try to test... can someone share which 
one is the more-than-likely one to show the bug and is there any particular 
file(s) I should use to test?
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

[Jim Jagielski]

Possible... esp w/ raptor that saw a huge bump from 1.x to 2.x... 

> On Oct 27, 2020, at 6:47 PM, Don Lewis  wrote:
> 
> On 27 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Maybe... but it DID WORK before. That is, before the mega patch,
>> configure did the "right thing". So if something is causing configure
>> to make a different decision, it is due to the interaction w/ the new
>> stuff that the RDF stuff does. The problem is with the patch or how it
>> is working...
> 
> I'm thinking of any configure scripts used by raptor / rasqal / redland,
> which would have changed by the upgrade.
> 
>> In any case, iirc we did compare the config.log files between 4.1.7
>> and 4.1.8-RC2 and there was no pertinent difference between the 2...
>> 
>>> On Oct 27, 2020, at 5:24 PM, Don Lewis  wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 27 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
 For completeness, and especially for those not following the thread,
 what we have conclusively shown is that it is NOT an issue w/ the
 build server, which is the same we've been using for several 4.1.x
 releases, nor with the configure and build parameters (also
 unchanged from previous). It is this mega patch which combines
 several upgrades in one large patch.
 
 My thought is that w/ the change with the RDF libs, the patch either
 pulls in the wrong library (maybe the system library) for something,
 which causes issues w/ newer distros, or else it doesn't pull in a
 library and the one used by newer distros causes the problem.
>>> 
>>> Or maybe a configure script makes a different decision about the
>>> system libraries on CentOS 5 (vs when building on something newer)
>>> that causes the code not to work properly on newer distros.
>>> 
> On Oct 27, 2020, at 5:09 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On Oct 27, 2020, at 2:34 PM, Don Lewis  wrote:
>> 
>> On 27 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> Thanks all... I am now building the final 'git bisect' test,
>>> based on
>>> 
>>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/f7070ae3689d0d34bf9dab3d31f56744d0df4784
>>> 
>>> assuming that this is good, it seems like 99% likely that the
>>> problem arose with
>>> 
>>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/e9fab906a0063dca04a52bfc5270c9d70ccbbb27
>>> 
>>> the raptor / rasqal / redland mega patch. Which of those 3 is
>>> unknown, but a quick look over seems to indicate that the raptor
>>> upgrade was the most significant of the 3, but the redland patch
>>> also seems to have some weird things (like no longer linking
>>> openssl or libltdl) so who knows :/
>> 
>> Questions (which may be related):
>> 
>> Why does this only affect AOO418 and not AOO42X and trunk?
>> 
>> Why does this only seem to affect builds done on CentOS 5 and run
>> on a newer distro and not when run on CentOS 5 and not when
>> compiled on a newer distro?
> 
> If I knew those answers we wouldn't be wondering what is going on
> and I wouldn't have had to create >15 test builds :-)
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>  For additional
> commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> >> > For additional
>>> commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
>>> 
>>> >> >
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
> 

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

[Don Lewis]

On 27 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Maybe... but it DID WORK before. That is, before the mega patch,
> configure did the "right thing". So if something is causing configure
> to make a different decision, it is due to the interaction w/ the new
> stuff that the RDF stuff does. The problem is with the patch or how it
> is working...

I'm thinking of any configure scripts used by raptor / rasqal / redland,
which would have changed by the upgrade.

> In any case, iirc we did compare the config.log files between 4.1.7
> and 4.1.8-RC2 and there was no pertinent difference between the 2...
> 
>> On Oct 27, 2020, at 5:24 PM, Don Lewis  wrote:
>> 
>> On 27 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> For completeness, and especially for those not following the thread,
>>> what we have conclusively shown is that it is NOT an issue w/ the
>>> build server, which is the same we've been using for several 4.1.x
>>> releases, nor with the configure and build parameters (also
>>> unchanged from previous). It is this mega patch which combines
>>> several upgrades in one large patch.
>>> 
>>> My thought is that w/ the change with the RDF libs, the patch either
>>> pulls in the wrong library (maybe the system library) for something,
>>> which causes issues w/ newer distros, or else it doesn't pull in a
>>> library and the one used by newer distros causes the problem.
>> 
>> Or maybe a configure script makes a different decision about the
>> system libraries on CentOS 5 (vs when building on something newer)
>> that causes the code not to work properly on newer distros.
>> 
 On Oct 27, 2020, at 5:09 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
 
 
 
> On Oct 27, 2020, at 2:34 PM, Don Lewis  wrote:
> 
> On 27 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Thanks all... I am now building the final 'git bisect' test,
>> based on
>> 
>>  
>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/f7070ae3689d0d34bf9dab3d31f56744d0df4784
>> 
>> assuming that this is good, it seems like 99% likely that the
>> problem arose with
>> 
>>  
>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/e9fab906a0063dca04a52bfc5270c9d70ccbbb27
>> 
>> the raptor / rasqal / redland mega patch. Which of those 3 is
>> unknown, but a quick look over seems to indicate that the raptor
>> upgrade was the most significant of the 3, but the redland patch
>> also seems to have some weird things (like no longer linking
>> openssl or libltdl) so who knows :/
> 
> Questions (which may be related):
> 
> Why does this only affect AOO418 and not AOO42X and trunk?
> 
> Why does this only seem to affect builds done on CentOS 5 and run
> on a newer distro and not when run on CentOS 5 and not when
> compiled on a newer distro?
 
 If I knew those answers we wouldn't be wondering what is going on
 and I wouldn't have had to create >15 test builds :-)
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
  For additional
 commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
 
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>  For additional
>> commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

[Jim Jagielski]

Maybe... but it DID WORK before. That is, before the mega patch, configure did 
the "right thing". So if something is causing configure to make a different 
decision, it is due to the interaction w/ the new stuff that the RDF stuff 
does. The problem is with the patch or how it is working...

In any case, iirc we did compare the config.log files between 4.1.7 and 
4.1.8-RC2 and there was no pertinent difference between the 2...

> On Oct 27, 2020, at 5:24 PM, Don Lewis  wrote:
> 
> On 27 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> For completeness, and especially for those not following the thread,
>> what we have conclusively shown is that it is NOT an issue w/ the
>> build server, which is the same we've been using for several 4.1.x
>> releases, nor with the configure and build parameters (also unchanged
>> from previous). It is this mega patch which combines several upgrades
>> in one large patch.
>> 
>> My thought is that w/ the change with the RDF libs, the patch either
>> pulls in the wrong library (maybe the system library) for something,
>> which causes issues w/ newer distros, or else it doesn't pull in a
>> library and the one used by newer distros causes the problem.
> 
> Or maybe a configure script makes a different decision about the system
> libraries on CentOS 5 (vs when building on something newer) that causes
> the code not to work properly on newer distros.
> 
>>> On Oct 27, 2020, at 5:09 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
 On Oct 27, 2020, at 2:34 PM, Don Lewis  wrote:
 
 On 27 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Thanks all... I am now building the final 'git bisect' test, based
> on
> 
>  
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/f7070ae3689d0d34bf9dab3d31f56744d0df4784
> 
> assuming that this is good, it seems like 99% likely that the
> problem arose with
> 
>  
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/e9fab906a0063dca04a52bfc5270c9d70ccbbb27
> 
> the raptor / rasqal / redland mega patch. Which of those 3 is
> unknown, but a quick look over seems to indicate that the raptor
> upgrade was the most significant of the 3, but the redland patch
> also seems to have some weird things (like no longer linking
> openssl or libltdl) so who knows :/
 
 Questions (which may be related):
 
 Why does this only affect AOO418 and not AOO42X and trunk?
 
 Why does this only seem to affect builds done on CentOS 5 and run on
 a newer distro and not when run on CentOS 5 and not when compiled on
 a newer distro?
>>> 
>>> If I knew those answers we wouldn't be wondering what is going on and
>>> I wouldn't have had to create >15 test builds :-)
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>  For additional
>>> commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
> 

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

[Don Lewis]

On 27 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> For completeness, and especially for those not following the thread,
> what we have conclusively shown is that it is NOT an issue w/ the
> build server, which is the same we've been using for several 4.1.x
> releases, nor with the configure and build parameters (also unchanged
> from previous). It is this mega patch which combines several upgrades
> in one large patch.
> 
> My thought is that w/ the change with the RDF libs, the patch either
> pulls in the wrong library (maybe the system library) for something,
> which causes issues w/ newer distros, or else it doesn't pull in a
> library and the one used by newer distros causes the problem.

Or maybe a configure script makes a different decision about the system
libraries on CentOS 5 (vs when building on something newer) that causes
the code not to work properly on newer distros.

>> On Oct 27, 2020, at 5:09 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>>> On Oct 27, 2020, at 2:34 PM, Don Lewis  wrote:
>>> 
>>> On 27 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
 Thanks all... I am now building the final 'git bisect' test, based
 on
 
   
 https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/f7070ae3689d0d34bf9dab3d31f56744d0df4784
 
 assuming that this is good, it seems like 99% likely that the
 problem arose with
 
   
 https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/e9fab906a0063dca04a52bfc5270c9d70ccbbb27
 
 the raptor / rasqal / redland mega patch. Which of those 3 is
 unknown, but a quick look over seems to indicate that the raptor
 upgrade was the most significant of the 3, but the redland patch
 also seems to have some weird things (like no longer linking
 openssl or libltdl) so who knows :/
>>> 
>>> Questions (which may be related):
>>> 
>>> Why does this only affect AOO418 and not AOO42X and trunk?
>>> 
>>> Why does this only seem to affect builds done on CentOS 5 and run on
>>> a newer distro and not when run on CentOS 5 and not when compiled on
>>> a newer distro?
>> 
>> If I knew those answers we wouldn't be wondering what is going on and
>> I wouldn't have had to create >15 test builds :-)
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>  For additional
>> commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

[Jim Jagielski]

For completeness, and especially for those not following the thread, what we 
have conclusively shown is that it is NOT an issue w/ the build server, which 
is the same we've been using for several 4.1.x releases, nor with the configure 
and build parameters (also unchanged from previous). It is this mega patch 
which combines several upgrades in one large patch.

My thought is that w/ the change with the RDF libs, the patch either pulls in 
the wrong library (maybe the system library) for something, which causes issues 
w/ newer distros, or else it doesn't pull in a library and the one used by 
newer distros causes the problem.

> On Oct 27, 2020, at 5:09 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>> On Oct 27, 2020, at 2:34 PM, Don Lewis  wrote:
>> 
>> On 27 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> Thanks all... I am now building the final 'git bisect' test, based on
>>> 
>>>   
>>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/f7070ae3689d0d34bf9dab3d31f56744d0df4784
>>> 
>>> assuming that this is good, it seems like 99% likely that the problem arose 
>>> with
>>> 
>>>   
>>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/e9fab906a0063dca04a52bfc5270c9d70ccbbb27
>>> 
>>> the raptor / rasqal / redland mega patch. Which of those 3 is unknown, but 
>>> a quick look over seems to indicate that the raptor upgrade was the most 
>>> significant of the 3, but the redland patch also seems to have some weird 
>>> things (like no longer linking openssl or libltdl) so who knows :/
>> 
>> Questions (which may be related):
>> 
>> Why does this only affect AOO418 and not AOO42X and trunk?
>> 
>> Why does this only seem to affect builds done on CentOS 5 and run on a
>> newer distro and not when run on CentOS 5 and not when compiled on a
>> newer distro?
> 
> If I knew those answers we wouldn't be wondering what is going on and I 
> wouldn't have had to create >15 test builds :-)
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
> 

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

[Jim Jagielski]

> On Oct 27, 2020, at 2:34 PM, Don Lewis  wrote:
> 
> On 27 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> Thanks all... I am now building the final 'git bisect' test, based on
>> 
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/f7070ae3689d0d34bf9dab3d31f56744d0df4784
>> 
>> assuming that this is good, it seems like 99% likely that the problem arose 
>> with
>> 
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/e9fab906a0063dca04a52bfc5270c9d70ccbbb27
>> 
>> the raptor / rasqal / redland mega patch. Which of those 3 is unknown, but a 
>> quick look over seems to indicate that the raptor upgrade was the most 
>> significant of the 3, but the redland patch also seems to have some weird 
>> things (like no longer linking openssl or libltdl) so who knows :/
> 
> Questions (which may be related):
> 
> Why does this only affect AOO418 and not AOO42X and trunk?
> 
> Why does this only seem to affect builds done on CentOS 5 and run on a
> newer distro and not when run on CentOS 5 and not when compiled on a
> newer distro?

If I knew those answers we wouldn't be wondering what is going on and I 
wouldn't have had to create >15 test builds :-)
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

[Don Lewis]

On 27 Oct, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> Thanks all... I am now building the final 'git bisect' test, based on
> 
> 
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/f7070ae3689d0d34bf9dab3d31f56744d0df4784
> 
> assuming that this is good, it seems like 99% likely that the problem arose 
> with
> 
> 
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/e9fab906a0063dca04a52bfc5270c9d70ccbbb27
> 
> the raptor / rasqal / redland mega patch. Which of those 3 is unknown, but a 
> quick look over seems to indicate that the raptor upgrade was the most 
> significant of the 3, but the redland patch also seems to have some weird 
> things (like no longer linking openssl or libltdl) so who knows :/

Questions (which may be related):

Why does this only affect AOO418 and not AOO42X and trunk?

Why does this only seem to affect builds done on CentOS 5 and run on a
newer distro and not when run on CentOS 5 and not when compiled on a
newer distro?


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

[Jim Jagielski]

As expected:

e9fab906a0063dca04a52bfc5270c9d70ccbbb27 is the first bad commit
commit e9fab906a0063dca04a52bfc5270c9d70ccbbb27
Author: truckman 
Date:   Fri Aug 26 07:13:14 2016 +
Upgrade bundled raptor from raptor-1.4.18 to raptor2-2.0.15 to get the
fix for CVE-2012-0037.  It is not know whether this vulnerability
affects OpenOffice.

Also upgrade rasqal from version 0.9.16 to version 0.9.33 and redland
from version 1.0.8 to version 1.0.17 since all three packages are
closely related parts of the OpenOffice redland module for handling RDF.

OpenDocument version 1.2 documents contain an RDF metadata blob for
things like bookmarks and OLE objects.

git-svn-id: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/openoffice/trunk@1757789 
13f79535-47bb-0310-9956-ffa450edef68
:04 04 546891908fd61c817962a3c8ef40d1c6e021b426 
cfc579fc39380a77c054b7aef379c0013e14bde9 M  main


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

[Matthias Seidel]

No problems in test15 for me!

Matthias

Am 27.10.20 um 17:16 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> test15, likely the final test of the git bisect series, is now available.
>
>> On Oct 27, 2020, at 10:19 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>>
>> Thanks all... I am now building the final 'git bisect' test, based on
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/f7070ae3689d0d34bf9dab3d31f56744d0df4784
>>
>> assuming that this is good, it seems like 99% likely that the problem arose 
>> with
>>
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/e9fab906a0063dca04a52bfc5270c9d70ccbbb27
>>
>> the raptor / rasqal / redland mega patch. Which of those 3 is unknown, but a 
>> quick look over seems to indicate that the raptor upgrade was the most 
>> significant of the 3, but the redland patch also seems to have some weird 
>> things (like no longer linking openssl or libltdl) so who knows :/
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

[André Pereira]

test15
Debian 10 64bits
No error messages to open or save odt and ods files

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

[Jim Jagielski]

test15, likely the final test of the git bisect series, is now available.

> On Oct 27, 2020, at 10:19 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
> Thanks all... I am now building the final 'git bisect' test, based on
> 
>
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/f7070ae3689d0d34bf9dab3d31f56744d0df4784
> 
> assuming that this is good, it seems like 99% likely that the problem arose 
> with
> 
>
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/e9fab906a0063dca04a52bfc5270c9d70ccbbb27
> 
> the raptor / rasqal / redland mega patch. Which of those 3 is unknown, but a 
> quick look over seems to indicate that the raptor upgrade was the most 
> significant of the 3, but the redland patch also seems to have some weird 
> things (like no longer linking openssl or libltdl) so who knows :/
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

[Jim Jagielski]

Thanks all... I am now building the final 'git bisect' test, based on


https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/f7070ae3689d0d34bf9dab3d31f56744d0df4784

assuming that this is good, it seems like 99% likely that the problem arose with


https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/e9fab906a0063dca04a52bfc5270c9d70ccbbb27

the raptor / rasqal / redland mega patch. Which of those 3 is unknown, but a 
quick look over seems to indicate that the raptor upgrade was the most 
significant of the 3, but the redland patch also seems to have some weird 
things (like no longer linking openssl or libltdl) so who knows :/
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Jim,

No error messages on opening and saving on Ubuntu 16.04.

Am 27.10.20 um 14:01 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> test14 is ready for testing!
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

[André Pereira]

test14
Debian 10 64bits
No error messages to open or save odt and ods files


On Tue, Oct 27, 2020 at 10:02 AM Jim Jagielski  wrote:

> test14 is ready for testing!
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

[Jim Jagielski]

test14 is ready for testing!

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

[Carl Marcum]

Hi Jim,

On 10/26/20 4:32 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:

Thx... I'll wait for a few more tests before I mark test13 as bad

On Ubuntu 18.04 x86-64 VM
General error saving a new Writer doc.
Gereral Error opening an existing doc.
Saving existing document is okay.

Thanks,
Carl



On Oct 26, 2020, at 3:59 PM, André Pereira  wrote:

teste13
Here with Debian 10 64bits I have "General Error" message when opening odt
file and "Not all attributes could be read" when opening ods file. Saving
gives no error. The terminal gives "Failed to load module "atk-bridge"".


On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 4:34 PM Jim Jagielski  wrote:


test13 is now available for test and review. thx again!


On Oct 26, 2020, at 12:06 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:

Thanks... we *seem* to be narrowing down to raptor2 as the possible

cause.

On Oct 26, 2020, at 11:44 AM, Matthias Seidel <

matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote:

Hi Jim,

Confirming the error messages with test12.

Matthias

Am 26.10.20 um 16:18 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

Thanks... I'll wait for at least one additional confirmation that this

one is bad before I kick off #13

On Oct 26, 2020, at 11:11 AM, Pedro Lino 

wrote:

Hi Jim

Still the same errors on Ubuntu 18.04.5 x64

Pedro


On 10/26/2020 1:56 PM Jim Jagielski  wrote:


test12 is now available... you know where :)


On Oct 26, 2020, at 7:12 AM, André Pereira 

wrote:

teste11
Here with Debian 10 64bits I have "General Error" message when

opening odt

file and "Not all attributes could be read" when opening ods file.

Saving

gives no error. The terminal gives "Failed to load module

"atk-bridge"".




On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 10:40 PM Carl Marcum 

wrote:

Hi Jim,

On 10/25/20 8:16 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:

And test11 is now available for test

Getting the General Error opening Writer documents and when saving

a new

document.
I don't get the error again when saving after opening an existing
document and saving it.

I get the Not all attributes could be read error when opening an
existing Calc doc but it saves okay.
A new Calc document saves okay.

Best regards,
Carl


On Oct 25, 2020, at 2:11 PM, Carl Marcum 

wrote:



On 10/25/20 1:04 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:

Am 25.10.20 um 17:46 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

test10 builds are now available...

I still get "General Error"


I also get the Error on Ubuntu 18.04 x86-64 on test 10.

Thanks,
Carl




-

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org


-

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org




-

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

[Delio Orozco Gonzalez]

Hello to alll:

Test with AOO_4.1.8_test13

PC: Intel Core 2 Quad Q8400 (4) @ 2.669GHz 
OS: Debian GNU/Linux 10 (buster) x86_64
Kernel: 4.19.0-10-amd64
DE: IceWm and Budgie

1.-At saving a odt document first time, AOO_4.1.8_test13 show an error messages 
 
2.-When I open and odt document, even the same one that I just created, 
AOO_4.8.1 show an error messages. 

More later I will test with Debian 9.

Regards,

Delio.

- Mensaje original -
De: "André Pereira" 
Para: "dev" 
Enviados: Lunes, 26 de Octubre 2020 17:17:49
Asunto: Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

Does it help if I myself test it in another machine too? Is there anything
else I can do to help to spot this bug? (I don't know much  code though :-/

On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 5:33 PM Jim Jagielski  wrote:

> Thx... I'll wait for a few more tests before I mark test13 as bad
>
> > On Oct 26, 2020, at 3:59 PM, André Pereira  wrote:
> >
> > teste13
> > Here with Debian 10 64bits I have "General Error" message when opening
> odt
> > file and "Not all attributes could be read" when opening ods file. Saving
> > gives no error. The terminal gives "Failed to load module "atk-bridge"".
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 4:34 PM Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> >
> >> test13 is now available for test and review. thx again!
> >>
> >>> On Oct 26, 2020, at 12:06 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Thanks... we *seem* to be narrowing down to raptor2 as the possible
> >> cause.
> >>>
> >>>> On Oct 26, 2020, at 11:44 AM, Matthias Seidel <
> >> matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi Jim,
> >>>>
> >>>> Confirming the error messages with test12.
> >>>>
> >>>> Matthias
> >>>>
> >>>> Am 26.10.20 um 16:18 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> >>>>> Thanks... I'll wait for at least one additional confirmation that
> this
> >> one is bad before I kick off #13
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Oct 26, 2020, at 11:11 AM, Pedro Lino  .INVALID>
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi Jim
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Still the same errors on Ubuntu 18.04.5 x64
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Pedro
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On 10/26/2020 1:56 PM Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> test12 is now available... you know where :)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Oct 26, 2020, at 7:12 AM, André Pereira 
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> teste11
> >>>>>>>> Here with Debian 10 64bits I have "General Error" message when
> >> opening odt
> >>>>>>>> file and "Not all attributes could be read" when opening ods file.
> >> Saving
> >>>>>>>> gives no error. The terminal gives "Failed to load module
> >> "atk-bridge"".
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 10:40 PM Carl Marcum 
> >> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hi Jim,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On 10/25/20 8:16 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>> And test11 is now available for test
> >>>>>>>>> Getting the General Error opening Writer documents and when
> saving
> >> a new
> >>>>>>>>> document.
> >>>>>>>>> I don't get the error again when saving after opening an existing
> >>>>>>>>> document and saving it.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I get the Not all attributes could be read error when opening an
> >>>>>>>>> existing Calc doc but it saves okay.
> >>>>>>>>> A new Calc document saves okay.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>>>>>> Carl
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Oct 25, 2020, at 2:11 PM, Carl Marcum 
&

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

[André Pereira]

Does it help if I myself test it in another machine too? Is there anything
else I can do to help to spot this bug? (I don't know much  code though :-/

On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 5:33 PM Jim Jagielski  wrote:

> Thx... I'll wait for a few more tests before I mark test13 as bad
>
> > On Oct 26, 2020, at 3:59 PM, André Pereira  wrote:
> >
> > teste13
> > Here with Debian 10 64bits I have "General Error" message when opening
> odt
> > file and "Not all attributes could be read" when opening ods file. Saving
> > gives no error. The terminal gives "Failed to load module "atk-bridge"".
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 4:34 PM Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> >
> >> test13 is now available for test and review. thx again!
> >>
> >>> On Oct 26, 2020, at 12:06 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Thanks... we *seem* to be narrowing down to raptor2 as the possible
> >> cause.
> >>>
>  On Oct 26, 2020, at 11:44 AM, Matthias Seidel <
> >> matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote:
> 
>  Hi Jim,
> 
>  Confirming the error messages with test12.
> 
>  Matthias
> 
>  Am 26.10.20 um 16:18 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> > Thanks... I'll wait for at least one additional confirmation that
> this
> >> one is bad before I kick off #13
> >
> >> On Oct 26, 2020, at 11:11 AM, Pedro Lino  .INVALID>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Jim
> >>
> >> Still the same errors on Ubuntu 18.04.5 x64
> >>
> >> Pedro
> >>
> >>> On 10/26/2020 1:56 PM Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> test12 is now available... you know where :)
> >>>
>  On Oct 26, 2020, at 7:12 AM, André Pereira 
> >> wrote:
> 
>  teste11
>  Here with Debian 10 64bits I have "General Error" message when
> >> opening odt
>  file and "Not all attributes could be read" when opening ods file.
> >> Saving
>  gives no error. The terminal gives "Failed to load module
> >> "atk-bridge"".
> 
> 
> 
> 
>  On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 10:40 PM Carl Marcum 
> >> wrote:
> 
> > Hi Jim,
> >
> > On 10/25/20 8:16 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >> And test11 is now available for test
> > Getting the General Error opening Writer documents and when
> saving
> >> a new
> > document.
> > I don't get the error again when saving after opening an existing
> > document and saving it.
> >
> > I get the Not all attributes could be read error when opening an
> > existing Calc doc but it saves okay.
> > A new Calc document saves okay.
> >
> > Best regards,
> > Carl
> >
> >>> On Oct 25, 2020, at 2:11 PM, Carl Marcum 
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On 10/25/20 1:04 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>  Am 25.10.20 um 17:46 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> > test10 builds are now available...
>  I still get "General Error"
> 
> >>> I also get the Error on Ubuntu 18.04 x86-64 on test 10.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Carl
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >> -
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail:
> dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>>
> >>
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>
> >
> >
> >> -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >
> >
> >>>
> >>>
> -
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>
> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >
> 
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> 

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

[Jim Jagielski]

Thx... I'll wait for a few more tests before I mark test13 as bad

> On Oct 26, 2020, at 3:59 PM, André Pereira  wrote:
> 
> teste13
> Here with Debian 10 64bits I have "General Error" message when opening odt
> file and "Not all attributes could be read" when opening ods file. Saving
> gives no error. The terminal gives "Failed to load module "atk-bridge"".
> 
> 
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 4:34 PM Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
>> test13 is now available for test and review. thx again!
>> 
>>> On Oct 26, 2020, at 12:06 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Thanks... we *seem* to be narrowing down to raptor2 as the possible
>> cause.
>>> 
 On Oct 26, 2020, at 11:44 AM, Matthias Seidel <
>> matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote:
 
 Hi Jim,
 
 Confirming the error messages with test12.
 
 Matthias
 
 Am 26.10.20 um 16:18 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Thanks... I'll wait for at least one additional confirmation that this
>> one is bad before I kick off #13
> 
>> On Oct 26, 2020, at 11:11 AM, Pedro Lino 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Jim
>> 
>> Still the same errors on Ubuntu 18.04.5 x64
>> 
>> Pedro
>> 
>>> On 10/26/2020 1:56 PM Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> test12 is now available... you know where :)
>>> 
 On Oct 26, 2020, at 7:12 AM, André Pereira 
>> wrote:
 
 teste11
 Here with Debian 10 64bits I have "General Error" message when
>> opening odt
 file and "Not all attributes could be read" when opening ods file.
>> Saving
 gives no error. The terminal gives "Failed to load module
>> "atk-bridge"".
 
 
 
 
 On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 10:40 PM Carl Marcum 
>> wrote:
 
> Hi Jim,
> 
> On 10/25/20 8:16 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> And test11 is now available for test
> Getting the General Error opening Writer documents and when saving
>> a new
> document.
> I don't get the error again when saving after opening an existing
> document and saving it.
> 
> I get the Not all attributes could be read error when opening an
> existing Calc doc but it saves okay.
> A new Calc document saves okay.
> 
> Best regards,
> Carl
> 
>>> On Oct 25, 2020, at 2:11 PM, Carl Marcum 
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On 10/25/20 1:04 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
 Am 25.10.20 um 17:46 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> test10 builds are now available...
 I still get "General Error"
 
>>> I also get the Error on Ubuntu 18.04 x86-64 on test 10.
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> Carl
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 
> 
> 
>> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 
> 
>>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 
 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 
>> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

[André Pereira]

teste13
Here with Debian 10 64bits I have "General Error" message when opening odt
file and "Not all attributes could be read" when opening ods file. Saving
gives no error. The terminal gives "Failed to load module "atk-bridge"".


On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 4:34 PM Jim Jagielski  wrote:

> test13 is now available for test and review. thx again!
>
> > On Oct 26, 2020, at 12:06 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> >
> > Thanks... we *seem* to be narrowing down to raptor2 as the possible
> cause.
> >
> >> On Oct 26, 2020, at 11:44 AM, Matthias Seidel <
> matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Jim,
> >>
> >> Confirming the error messages with test12.
> >>
> >> Matthias
> >>
> >> Am 26.10.20 um 16:18 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> >>> Thanks... I'll wait for at least one additional confirmation that this
> one is bad before I kick off #13
> >>>
>  On Oct 26, 2020, at 11:11 AM, Pedro Lino 
> wrote:
> 
>  Hi Jim
> 
>  Still the same errors on Ubuntu 18.04.5 x64
> 
>  Pedro
> 
> > On 10/26/2020 1:56 PM Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> >
> >
> > test12 is now available... you know where :)
> >
> >> On Oct 26, 2020, at 7:12 AM, André Pereira 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> teste11
> >> Here with Debian 10 64bits I have "General Error" message when
> opening odt
> >> file and "Not all attributes could be read" when opening ods file.
> Saving
> >> gives no error. The terminal gives "Failed to load module
> "atk-bridge"".
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 10:40 PM Carl Marcum 
> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hi Jim,
> >>>
> >>> On 10/25/20 8:16 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>  And test11 is now available for test
> >>> Getting the General Error opening Writer documents and when saving
> a new
> >>> document.
> >>> I don't get the error again when saving after opening an existing
> >>> document and saving it.
> >>>
> >>> I get the Not all attributes could be read error when opening an
> >>> existing Calc doc but it saves okay.
> >>> A new Calc document saves okay.
> >>>
> >>> Best regards,
> >>> Carl
> >>>
> > On Oct 25, 2020, at 2:11 PM, Carl Marcum 
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 10/25/20 1:04 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> >> Am 25.10.20 um 17:46 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> >>> test10 builds are now available...
> >> I still get "General Error"
> >>
> > I also get the Error on Ubuntu 18.04 x86-64 on test 10.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Carl
> >
> >
> >
> -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >
> 
> -
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 
> >>>
> >>>
> -
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>>
> >>>
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>  -
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 
> >>>
> >>> -
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>>
> >>
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

[Jim Jagielski]

test13 is now available for test and review. thx again!

> On Oct 26, 2020, at 12:06 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
> Thanks... we *seem* to be narrowing down to raptor2 as the possible cause.
> 
>> On Oct 26, 2020, at 11:44 AM, Matthias Seidel  
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Jim,
>> 
>> Confirming the error messages with test12.
>> 
>> Matthias
>> 
>> Am 26.10.20 um 16:18 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> Thanks... I'll wait for at least one additional confirmation that this one 
>>> is bad before I kick off #13
>>> 
 On Oct 26, 2020, at 11:11 AM, Pedro Lino  
 wrote:
 
 Hi Jim
 
 Still the same errors on Ubuntu 18.04.5 x64
 
 Pedro
 
> On 10/26/2020 1:56 PM Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
> 
> test12 is now available... you know where :)
> 
>> On Oct 26, 2020, at 7:12 AM, André Pereira  wrote:
>> 
>> teste11
>> Here with Debian 10 64bits I have "General Error" message when opening 
>> odt
>> file and "Not all attributes could be read" when opening ods file. Saving
>> gives no error. The terminal gives "Failed to load module "atk-bridge"".
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 10:40 PM Carl Marcum  wrote:
>> 
>>> Hi Jim,
>>> 
>>> On 10/25/20 8:16 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
 And test11 is now available for test
>>> Getting the General Error opening Writer documents and when saving a new
>>> document.
>>> I don't get the error again when saving after opening an existing
>>> document and saving it.
>>> 
>>> I get the Not all attributes could be read error when opening an
>>> existing Calc doc but it saves okay.
>>> A new Calc document saves okay.
>>> 
>>> Best regards,
>>> Carl
>>> 
> On Oct 25, 2020, at 2:11 PM, Carl Marcum  wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 10/25/20 1:04 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Am 25.10.20 um 17:46 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> test10 builds are now available...
>> I still get "General Error"
>> 
> I also get the Error on Ubuntu 18.04 x86-64 on test 10.
> 
> Thanks,
> Carl
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
 
>>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> 
>>> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
 
>>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Jim,

Confirming the error messages with test12.

Matthias

Am 26.10.20 um 16:18 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Thanks... I'll wait for at least one additional confirmation that this one is 
> bad before I kick off #13
>
>> On Oct 26, 2020, at 11:11 AM, Pedro Lino  
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jim
>>
>> Still the same errors on Ubuntu 18.04.5 x64
>>
>> Pedro
>>
>>> On 10/26/2020 1:56 PM Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> test12 is now available... you know where :)
>>>
 On Oct 26, 2020, at 7:12 AM, André Pereira  wrote:

 teste11
 Here with Debian 10 64bits I have "General Error" message when opening odt
 file and "Not all attributes could be read" when opening ods file. Saving
 gives no error. The terminal gives "Failed to load module "atk-bridge"".




 On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 10:40 PM Carl Marcum  wrote:

> Hi Jim,
>
> On 10/25/20 8:16 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> And test11 is now available for test
> Getting the General Error opening Writer documents and when saving a new
> document.
> I don't get the error again when saving after opening an existing
> document and saving it.
>
> I get the Not all attributes could be read error when opening an
> existing Calc doc but it saves okay.
> A new Calc document saves okay.
>
> Best regards,
> Carl
>
>>> On Oct 25, 2020, at 2:11 PM, Carl Marcum  wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10/25/20 1:04 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
 Am 25.10.20 um 17:46 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> test10 builds are now available...
 I still get "General Error"

>>> I also get the Error on Ubuntu 18.04 x86-64 on test 10.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Carl
>>>
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

[Jim Jagielski]

Thanks... I'll wait for at least one additional confirmation that this one is 
bad before I kick off #13

> On Oct 26, 2020, at 11:11 AM, Pedro Lino  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jim
> 
> Still the same errors on Ubuntu 18.04.5 x64
> 
> Pedro
> 
>> On 10/26/2020 1:56 PM Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> test12 is now available... you know where :)
>> 
>>> On Oct 26, 2020, at 7:12 AM, André Pereira  wrote:
>>> 
>>> teste11
>>> Here with Debian 10 64bits I have "General Error" message when opening odt
>>> file and "Not all attributes could be read" when opening ods file. Saving
>>> gives no error. The terminal gives "Failed to load module "atk-bridge"".
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 10:40 PM Carl Marcum  wrote:
>>> 
 Hi Jim,
 
 On 10/25/20 8:16 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> And test11 is now available for test
 
 Getting the General Error opening Writer documents and when saving a new
 document.
 I don't get the error again when saving after opening an existing
 document and saving it.
 
 I get the Not all attributes could be read error when opening an
 existing Calc doc but it saves okay.
 A new Calc document saves okay.
 
 Best regards,
 Carl
 
> 
>> On Oct 25, 2020, at 2:11 PM, Carl Marcum  wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 10/25/20 1:04 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>>> Am 25.10.20 um 17:46 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
 test10 builds are now available...
>>> I still get "General Error"
>>> 
>> I also get the Error on Ubuntu 18.04 x86-64 on test 10.
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Carl
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
 
 
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

[Pedro Lino]

Hi Jim

Still the same errors on Ubuntu 18.04.5 x64

Pedro

> On 10/26/2020 1:56 PM Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
>  
> test12 is now available... you know where :)
> 
> > On Oct 26, 2020, at 7:12 AM, André Pereira  wrote:
> > 
> > teste11
> > Here with Debian 10 64bits I have "General Error" message when opening odt
> > file and "Not all attributes could be read" when opening ods file. Saving
> > gives no error. The terminal gives "Failed to load module "atk-bridge"".
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 10:40 PM Carl Marcum  wrote:
> > 
> >> Hi Jim,
> >> 
> >> On 10/25/20 8:16 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >>> And test11 is now available for test
> >> 
> >> Getting the General Error opening Writer documents and when saving a new
> >> document.
> >> I don't get the error again when saving after opening an existing
> >> document and saving it.
> >> 
> >> I get the Not all attributes could be read error when opening an
> >> existing Calc doc but it saves okay.
> >> A new Calc document saves okay.
> >> 
> >> Best regards,
> >> Carl
> >> 
> >>> 
>  On Oct 25, 2020, at 2:11 PM, Carl Marcum  wrote:
>  
>  
>  
>  On 10/25/20 1:04 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> > Am 25.10.20 um 17:46 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> >> test10 builds are now available...
> > I still get "General Error"
> > 
>  I also get the Error on Ubuntu 18.04 x86-64 on test 10.
>  
>  Thanks,
>  Carl
>  
>  
>  -
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>  
> >>> 
> >>> -
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>> 
> >> 
> >> 
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >> 
> >> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

[Carl Marcum]

Sorry I can't test until this evening.

On Mon, Oct 26, 2020 at 9:57 AM Jim Jagielski  wrote:

> test12 is now available... you know where :)
>
> > On Oct 26, 2020, at 7:12 AM, André Pereira  wrote:
> >
> > teste11
> > Here with Debian 10 64bits I have "General Error" message when opening
> odt
> > file and "Not all attributes could be read" when opening ods file. Saving
> > gives no error. The terminal gives "Failed to load module "atk-bridge"".
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 10:40 PM Carl Marcum  wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Jim,
> >>
> >> On 10/25/20 8:16 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> >>> And test11 is now available for test
> >>
> >> Getting the General Error opening Writer documents and when saving a new
> >> document.
> >> I don't get the error again when saving after opening an existing
> >> document and saving it.
> >>
> >> I get the Not all attributes could be read error when opening an
> >> existing Calc doc but it saves okay.
> >> A new Calc document saves okay.
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Carl
> >>
> >>>
>  On Oct 25, 2020, at 2:11 PM, Carl Marcum  wrote:
> 
> 
> 
>  On 10/25/20 1:04 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> > Am 25.10.20 um 17:46 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> >> test10 builds are now available...
> > I still get "General Error"
> >
>  I also get the Error on Ubuntu 18.04 x86-64 on test 10.
> 
>  Thanks,
>  Carl
> 
> 
>  -
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 
> >>>
> >>> -
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>
> >>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>

test12 (Was: Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run))

[Jim Jagielski]

test12 is now available... you know where :)

> On Oct 26, 2020, at 7:12 AM, André Pereira  wrote:
> 
> teste11
> Here with Debian 10 64bits I have "General Error" message when opening odt
> file and "Not all attributes could be read" when opening ods file. Saving
> gives no error. The terminal gives "Failed to load module "atk-bridge"".
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 10:40 PM Carl Marcum  wrote:
> 
>> Hi Jim,
>> 
>> On 10/25/20 8:16 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> And test11 is now available for test
>> 
>> Getting the General Error opening Writer documents and when saving a new
>> document.
>> I don't get the error again when saving after opening an existing
>> document and saving it.
>> 
>> I get the Not all attributes could be read error when opening an
>> existing Calc doc but it saves okay.
>> A new Calc document saves okay.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Carl
>> 
>>> 
 On Oct 25, 2020, at 2:11 PM, Carl Marcum  wrote:
 
 
 
 On 10/25/20 1:04 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> Am 25.10.20 um 17:46 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> test10 builds are now available...
> I still get "General Error"
> 
 I also get the Error on Ubuntu 18.04 x86-64 on test 10.
 
 Thanks,
 Carl
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
 
>>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 
>> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run)

[André Pereira]

teste11
Here with Debian 10 64bits I have "General Error" message when opening odt
file and "Not all attributes could be read" when opening ods file. Saving
gives no error. The terminal gives "Failed to load module "atk-bridge"".




On Sun, Oct 25, 2020 at 10:40 PM Carl Marcum  wrote:

> Hi Jim,
>
> On 10/25/20 8:16 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > And test11 is now available for test
>
> Getting the General Error opening Writer documents and when saving a new
> document.
> I don't get the error again when saving after opening an existing
> document and saving it.
>
> I get the Not all attributes could be read error when opening an
> existing Calc doc but it saves okay.
> A new Calc document saves okay.
>
> Best regards,
> Carl
>
> >
> >> On Oct 25, 2020, at 2:11 PM, Carl Marcum  wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> On 10/25/20 1:04 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
> >>> Am 25.10.20 um 17:46 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>  test10 builds are now available...
> >>> I still get "General Error"
> >>>
> >> I also get the Error on Ubuntu 18.04 x86-64 on test 10.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Carl
> >>
> >>
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>

Re: test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run)

[Carl Marcum]

Hi Jim,

On 10/25/20 8:16 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:

And test11 is now available for test


Getting the General Error opening Writer documents and when saving a new 
document.
I don't get the error again when saving after opening an existing 
document and saving it.


I get the Not all attributes could be read error when opening an 
existing Calc doc but it saves okay.

A new Calc document saves okay.

Best regards,
Carl




On Oct 25, 2020, at 2:11 PM, Carl Marcum  wrote:



On 10/25/20 1:04 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:

Am 25.10.20 um 17:46 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

test10 builds are now available...

I still get "General Error"


I also get the Error on Ubuntu 18.04 x86-64 on test 10.

Thanks,
Carl


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

test11 (Was: Re: test2 is ready to run)

[Jim Jagielski]

And test11 is now available for test

> On Oct 25, 2020, at 2:11 PM, Carl Marcum  wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On 10/25/20 1:04 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:
>> Am 25.10.20 um 17:46 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> test10 builds are now available...
>> I still get "General Error"
>> 
> 
> I also get the Error on Ubuntu 18.04 x86-64 on test 10.
> 
> Thanks,
> Carl
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test2 is ready to run

[Carl Marcum]

On 10/25/20 1:04 PM, Matthias Seidel wrote:

Am 25.10.20 um 17:46 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

test10 builds are now available...

I still get "General Error"



I also get the Error on Ubuntu 18.04 x86-64 on test 10.

Thanks,
Carl


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test2 is ready to run

[Matthias Seidel]

Am 25.10.20 um 17:46 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> test10 builds are now available...
I still get "General Error"
>
>> On Oct 25, 2020, at 5:28 AM, Matthias Seidel  
>> wrote:
>>
>> Confirmed, error message is back on Ubuntu 16.04 with test9.
>>
>> Matthias
>>
 http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ <
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: test2 is ready to run

[Jim Jagielski]

test10 builds are now available...

> On Oct 25, 2020, at 5:28 AM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
> 
> Confirmed, error message is back on Ubuntu 16.04 with test9.
> 
> Matthias
> 
>>> 
>>> http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ <


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test2 is ready to run

[Matthias Seidel]

Confirmed, error message is back on Ubuntu 16.04 with test9.

Matthias

Am 25.10.20 um 03:36 schrieb Carl Marcum:
> Hi Jim,
>
> On 10/24/20 8:22 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> And with that, test9 are now available...
>
> Test 9 gives me the General error on opening and saving on Ubuntu
> 18.04 x86-64.
>
> Best regards,
> Carl
>
>>
>>> On Oct 24, 2020, at 12:36 PM, Pedro Lino
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>> No problems on Ubuntu 18.04.5 x64
>>>
>>> Would it be useful to test on an older (or newer) distro like Ubuntu
>>> 14.04 or 20.10?
>>>
>>> I have an old laptop (Intel Classmate aka Magalhães) running Ubuntu
>>> 12.04 x86 which I can give a spin if/when a 32bit build is available.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Pedro
>>>
 On 10/24/2020 4:56 PM Matthias Seidel 
 wrote:


 No problems on Ubuntu 16.04 64-bit.

 Am 24.10.20 um 17:53 schrieb André Pereira:
> test8 opens and saves files with no error messages here.
> Debian 10
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 12:25 PM Jim Jagielski 
> wrote:
>
>> And test8 is now available...
>>
>>     http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ <
>> http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>>
>>
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: test2 is ready to run

[Carl Marcum]

Hi Jim,

On 10/24/20 8:22 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:

And with that, test9 are now available...


Test 9 gives me the General error on opening and saving on Ubuntu 18.04 
x86-64.


Best regards,
Carl




On Oct 24, 2020, at 12:36 PM, Pedro Lino  wrote:

No problems on Ubuntu 18.04.5 x64

Would it be useful to test on an older (or newer) distro like Ubuntu 14.04 or 
20.10?

I have an old laptop (Intel Classmate aka Magalhães) running Ubuntu 12.04 x86 
which I can give a spin if/when a 32bit build is available.

Regards,
Pedro


On 10/24/2020 4:56 PM Matthias Seidel  wrote:


No problems on Ubuntu 16.04 64-bit.

Am 24.10.20 um 17:53 schrieb André Pereira:

test8 opens and saves files with no error messages here.
Debian 10


On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 12:25 PM Jim Jagielski  wrote:


And test8 is now available...

http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ <
http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test2 is ready to run

[Jim Jagielski]

And with that, test9 are now available...

> On Oct 24, 2020, at 12:36 PM, Pedro Lino  
> wrote:
> 
> No problems on Ubuntu 18.04.5 x64
> 
> Would it be useful to test on an older (or newer) distro like Ubuntu 14.04 or 
> 20.10?
> 
> I have an old laptop (Intel Classmate aka Magalhães) running Ubuntu 12.04 x86 
> which I can give a spin if/when a 32bit build is available.
> 
> Regards,
> Pedro
> 
>> On 10/24/2020 4:56 PM Matthias Seidel  wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> No problems on Ubuntu 16.04 64-bit.
>> 
>> Am 24.10.20 um 17:53 schrieb André Pereira:
>>> test8 opens and saves files with no error messages here.
>>> Debian 10
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 12:25 PM Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>>> 
 And test8 is now available...
 
http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ <
 http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/>
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test2 is ready to run

[Pedro Lino]

Hi Matthias, all


> On 10/24/2020 5:39 PM Matthias Seidel  wrote:

> > I have an old laptop (Intel Classmate aka Magalhães) running Ubuntu 12.04 
> > x86 which I can give a spin if/when a 32bit build is available.
> 
> We would definitely need someone to test the RC on 32bit Linux.

Ok. I can do that when x86 builds are available. What about:

> > Would it be useful to test on an older (or newer) distro like Ubuntu 14.04 
> > or 20.10?

Or any other newer or older DEB based distro?

Is there any other combination that would help?

Regards,
Pedro

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test2 is ready to run

[Gavin McDonald]

Hi,

On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 6:50 PM Dave Fisher  wrote:

> Hi Gavin,
>
> These tests are not RCs. We had a bug in the RCs and now Jim is trying to
> find the commit that introduced it.
>

Ok yeah I've been following. So the only thing Jim is interested in during
these tests is open a file and save it?

Gav...


>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
> > On Oct 24, 2020, at 9:43 AM, Gavin McDonald 
> wrote:
> >
> > What is the full suite of tests that needs to be done for a release
> > candidate?
> >
> > Open, and Save a file seems a bit limited
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 6:39 PM Matthias Seidel <
> matthias.sei...@hamburg.de>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Pedro,
> >>
> >> Am 24.10.20 um 18:36 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> >>> No problems on Ubuntu 18.04.5 x64
> >>>
> >>> Would it be useful to test on an older (or newer) distro like Ubuntu
> >> 14.04 or 20.10?
> >>>
> >>> I have an old laptop (Intel Classmate aka Magalhães) running Ubuntu
> >> 12.04 x86 which I can give a spin if/when a 32bit build is available.
> >>
> >> We would definitely need someone to test the RC on 32bit Linux.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >>
> >>   Matthias
> >>
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Pedro
> >>>
>  On 10/24/2020 4:56 PM Matthias Seidel 
> >> wrote:
> 
> 
>  No problems on Ubuntu 16.04 64-bit.
> 
>  Am 24.10.20 um 17:53 schrieb André Pereira:
> > test8 opens and saves files with no error messages here.
> > Debian 10
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 12:25 PM Jim Jagielski 
> >> wrote:
> >
> >> And test8 is now available...
> >>
> >>http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ <
> >> http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/>
> >>> -
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
> > --
> >
> > *Gavin McDonald*
> > Systems Administrator
> > ASF Infrastructure Team
>
>

-- 

*Gavin McDonald*
Systems Administrator
ASF Infrastructure Team

Re: test2 is ready to run

[Dave Fisher]

Hi Gavin,

These tests are not RCs. We had a bug in the RCs and now Jim is trying to find 
the commit that introduced it.

Regards,
Dave

> On Oct 24, 2020, at 9:43 AM, Gavin McDonald  wrote:
> 
> What is the full suite of tests that needs to be done for a release
> candidate?
> 
> Open, and Save a file seems a bit limited
> 
> 
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 6:39 PM Matthias Seidel 
> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Pedro,
>> 
>> Am 24.10.20 um 18:36 schrieb Pedro Lino:
>>> No problems on Ubuntu 18.04.5 x64
>>> 
>>> Would it be useful to test on an older (or newer) distro like Ubuntu
>> 14.04 or 20.10?
>>> 
>>> I have an old laptop (Intel Classmate aka Magalhães) running Ubuntu
>> 12.04 x86 which I can give a spin if/when a 32bit build is available.
>> 
>> We would definitely need someone to test the RC on 32bit Linux.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> 
>>   Matthias
>> 
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Pedro
>>> 
 On 10/24/2020 4:56 PM Matthias Seidel 
>> wrote:
 
 
 No problems on Ubuntu 16.04 64-bit.
 
 Am 24.10.20 um 17:53 schrieb André Pereira:
> test8 opens and saves files with no error messages here.
> Debian 10
> 
> 
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 12:25 PM Jim Jagielski 
>> wrote:
> 
>> And test8 is now available...
>> 
>>http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ <
>> http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> *Gavin McDonald*
> Systems Administrator
> ASF Infrastructure Team


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test2 is ready to run

[Gavin McDonald]

What is the full suite of tests that needs to be done for a release
candidate?

Open, and Save a file seems a bit limited


On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 6:39 PM Matthias Seidel 
wrote:

> Hi Pedro,
>
> Am 24.10.20 um 18:36 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> > No problems on Ubuntu 18.04.5 x64
> >
> > Would it be useful to test on an older (or newer) distro like Ubuntu
> 14.04 or 20.10?
> >
> > I have an old laptop (Intel Classmate aka Magalhães) running Ubuntu
> 12.04 x86 which I can give a spin if/when a 32bit build is available.
>
> We would definitely need someone to test the RC on 32bit Linux.
>
> Regards,
>
>Matthias
>
> >
> > Regards,
> > Pedro
> >
> >> On 10/24/2020 4:56 PM Matthias Seidel 
> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> No problems on Ubuntu 16.04 64-bit.
> >>
> >> Am 24.10.20 um 17:53 schrieb André Pereira:
> >>> test8 opens and saves files with no error messages here.
> >>> Debian 10
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 12:25 PM Jim Jagielski 
> wrote:
> >>>
>  And test8 is now available...
> 
>  http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ <
>  http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/>
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >
>
>

-- 

*Gavin McDonald*
Systems Administrator
ASF Infrastructure Team

Re: test2 is ready to run

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Pedro,

Am 24.10.20 um 18:36 schrieb Pedro Lino:
> No problems on Ubuntu 18.04.5 x64
>
> Would it be useful to test on an older (or newer) distro like Ubuntu 14.04 or 
> 20.10?
>
> I have an old laptop (Intel Classmate aka Magalhães) running Ubuntu 12.04 x86 
> which I can give a spin if/when a 32bit build is available.

We would definitely need someone to test the RC on 32bit Linux.

Regards,

   Matthias

>
> Regards,
> Pedro
>
>> On 10/24/2020 4:56 PM Matthias Seidel  wrote:
>>
>>  
>> No problems on Ubuntu 16.04 64-bit.
>>
>> Am 24.10.20 um 17:53 schrieb André Pereira:
>>> test8 opens and saves files with no error messages here.
>>> Debian 10
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 12:25 PM Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>>>
 And test8 is now available...

 http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ <
 http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: test2 is ready to run

[Pedro Lino]

No problems on Ubuntu 18.04.5 x64

Would it be useful to test on an older (or newer) distro like Ubuntu 14.04 or 
20.10?

I have an old laptop (Intel Classmate aka Magalhães) running Ubuntu 12.04 x86 
which I can give a spin if/when a 32bit build is available.

Regards,
Pedro

> On 10/24/2020 4:56 PM Matthias Seidel  wrote:
> 
>  
> No problems on Ubuntu 16.04 64-bit.
> 
> Am 24.10.20 um 17:53 schrieb André Pereira:
> > test8 opens and saves files with no error messages here.
> > Debian 10
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 12:25 PM Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> >
> >> And test8 is now available...
> >>
> >> http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ <
> >> http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/>

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test2 is ready to run

[Carl Marcum]

Hi Jim,
Test 8 works without errors on Ubuntu 18.04

Thanks
Carl

On 10/24/20 11:24 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:

And test8 is now available...

 http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ 




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test2 is ready to run

[Matthias Seidel]

No problems on Ubuntu 16.04 64-bit.

Am 24.10.20 um 17:53 schrieb André Pereira:
> test8 opens and saves files with no error messages here.
> Debian 10
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 12:25 PM Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>
>> And test8 is now available...
>>
>> http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ <
>> http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: test2 is ready to run

[André Pereira]

test8 opens and saves files with no error messages here.
Debian 10


On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 12:25 PM Jim Jagielski  wrote:

> And test8 is now available...
>
> http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ <
> http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/>

Re: test2 is ready to run

[Jim Jagielski]

And test8 is now available...

http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/ 

Re: test2 is ready to run

[Jim Jagielski]

Getting closer! Yeah. Starting build for test8. Thx

> On Oct 24, 2020, at 8:29 AM, André Pereira  wrote:
> 
> test7 opens and saves files with no error messages for me too.
> Debian 10
> 
> On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 9:09 AM Matthias Seidel 
> wrote:
> 
>> Hi Jim,
>> 
>> Opens documents without error message on Ubuntu 16.04 for me.
>> 
>> Am 24.10.20 um 13:32 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> And test7 is uploaded and ready to be tested. Thx!
>>> 
 On Oct 23, 2020, at 6:51 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
 
 Thanks you all... test7 is getting kicked off
 
> On Oct 23, 2020, at 5:51 PM, Carl Marcum > cmar...@apache.org>> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jim,
> 
> On 10/23/20 5:09 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> test6 is ready!! Thx everyone for their patience and for their
>> testing.
> Test 6 is also good for me as well on Ubuntu 18.04 !!
> 
> Best regards,
> Carl
> 
>>> On Oct 23, 2020, at 2:21 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Status update
>>> ... still working on this... the issue is that the random selected
>> picks end up with snapshots that can't be built as-is, so I need to
>> cherry-pick stuff (like the nss and HW acceleration stuff) and so it's
>> taking a lot longer than a regular build would.
>>> 
 On Oct 23, 2020, at 10:57 AM, Jim Jagielski 
>> wrote:
 
 w00t! Kicking off test6
 
> On Oct 23, 2020, at 10:55 AM, Carl Marcum > > wrote:
> 
> Hi Jim,
> 
> On 10/23/20 10:28 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> test5 is now available...
> Getting closer.
> No errors on Ubuntu 18.04 opening or saving .odt and .ods with
>> test5.
> 
> Best regards,
> Carl
>>> On Oct 23, 2020, at 10:16 AM, Matthias Seidel <
>> matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Jim,
>>> 
>>> Am 23.10.20 um 13:54 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
 OK, so we have narrowed things down... somewhere between
 
 
>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/21aebe28dbe5d985add2fadc46e6217b148303bb
 
 and
 
 
>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/27aafff9ac690db20ff7d9edf69a595216b2386e
 
 things broke for CentOS5.
 
 Starting git bisect with those bounds. Stay tuned.
>>> Great!
>>> 
>>> Meanwhile, can we revert
>>> 
>>> 
>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/37eaa1bfc66860d3eb86d451678c521ed3dbf36d
>>> 
>>> on trunk and
>>> 
>>> 
>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/babbd85bf6ae11bd8b1571318e861462a3033be8
>>> 
>>> on AOO42X?
>>> 
>>> It breaks the build for two days now...
>>> 
>> sure... go ahead. thx
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 
> 
>> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>  > dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org>>
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>  > dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>  > dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org>>
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>  > dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >
>> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org> > dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org > dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org>>
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>  > dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >
>>> 
>> 
>> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test2 is ready to run

[André Pereira]

test7 opens and saves files with no error messages for me too.
Debian 10

On Sat, Oct 24, 2020 at 9:09 AM Matthias Seidel 
wrote:

> Hi Jim,
>
> Opens documents without error message on Ubuntu 16.04 for me.
>
> Am 24.10.20 um 13:32 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> > And test7 is uploaded and ready to be tested. Thx!
> >
> >> On Oct 23, 2020, at 6:51 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks you all... test7 is getting kicked off
> >>
> >>> On Oct 23, 2020, at 5:51 PM, Carl Marcum  cmar...@apache.org>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Jim,
> >>>
> >>> On 10/23/20 5:09 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>  test6 is ready!! Thx everyone for their patience and for their
> testing.
> >>> Test 6 is also good for me as well on Ubuntu 18.04 !!
> >>>
> >>> Best regards,
> >>> Carl
> >>>
> > On Oct 23, 2020, at 2:21 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> >
> > Status update
> > ... still working on this... the issue is that the random selected
> picks end up with snapshots that can't be built as-is, so I need to
> cherry-pick stuff (like the nss and HW acceleration stuff) and so it's
> taking a lot longer than a regular build would.
> >
> >> On Oct 23, 2020, at 10:57 AM, Jim Jagielski 
> wrote:
> >>
> >> w00t! Kicking off test6
> >>
> >>> On Oct 23, 2020, at 10:55 AM, Carl Marcum  > wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Jim,
> >>>
> >>> On 10/23/20 10:28 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>  test5 is now available...
> >>> Getting closer.
> >>> No errors on Ubuntu 18.04 opening or saving .odt and .ods with
> test5.
> >>>
> >>> Best regards,
> >>> Carl
> > On Oct 23, 2020, at 10:16 AM, Matthias Seidel <
> matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jim,
> >
> > Am 23.10.20 um 13:54 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> >> OK, so we have narrowed things down... somewhere between
> >>
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/21aebe28dbe5d985add2fadc46e6217b148303bb
> >>
> >> and
> >>
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/27aafff9ac690db20ff7d9edf69a595216b2386e
> >>
> >> things broke for CentOS5.
> >>
> >> Starting git bisect with those bounds. Stay tuned.
> > Great!
> >
> > Meanwhile, can we revert
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/37eaa1bfc66860d3eb86d451678c521ed3dbf36d
> >
> > on trunk and
> >
> >
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/babbd85bf6ae11bd8b1571318e861462a3033be8
> >
> > on AOO42X?
> >
> > It breaks the build for two days now...
> >
>  sure... go ahead. thx
> 
> 
> 
> -
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 
> >>>
> -
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>   dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org  dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org>>
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>   dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >
>  -
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>   dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org  dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org>>
>  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>   dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >
> 
> >>>
> >>> -
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org  dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org>  dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org  dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org>>
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>   dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >
> >
>
>

Re: test2 is ready to run

[Carl Marcum]

Test 7 works for me on Ubuntu 18.04!

Thanks,
Carl

On 10/24/20 7:32 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:

And test7 is uploaded and ready to be tested. Thx!


On Oct 23, 2020, at 6:51 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:

Thanks you all... test7 is getting kicked off


On Oct 23, 2020, at 5:51 PM, Carl Marcum mailto:cmar...@apache.org>> wrote:

Hi Jim,

On 10/23/20 5:09 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:

test6 is ready!! Thx everyone for their patience and for their testing.

Test 6 is also good for me as well on Ubuntu 18.04 !!

Best regards,
Carl


On Oct 23, 2020, at 2:21 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:

Status update
... still working on this... the issue is that the random selected picks end up 
with snapshots that can't be built as-is, so I need to cherry-pick stuff (like 
the nss and HW acceleration stuff) and so it's taking a lot longer than a 
regular build would.


On Oct 23, 2020, at 10:57 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:

w00t! Kicking off test6


On Oct 23, 2020, at 10:55 AM, Carl Marcum mailto:cmar...@apache.org>> wrote:

Hi Jim,

On 10/23/20 10:28 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:

test5 is now available...

Getting closer.
No errors on Ubuntu 18.04 opening or saving .odt and .ods with test5.

Best regards,
Carl

On Oct 23, 2020, at 10:16 AM, Matthias Seidel  
wrote:

Hi Jim,

Am 23.10.20 um 13:54 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

OK, so we have narrowed things down... somewhere between

https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/21aebe28dbe5d985add2fadc46e6217b148303bb

and

https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/27aafff9ac690db20ff7d9edf69a595216b2386e

things broke for CentOS5.

Starting git bisect with those bounds. Stay tuned.

Great!

Meanwhile, can we revert

https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/37eaa1bfc66860d3eb86d451678c521ed3dbf36d

on trunk and

https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/babbd85bf6ae11bd8b1571318e861462a3033be8

on AOO42X?

It breaks the build for two days now...


sure... go ahead. thx


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
 
>
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
 >

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
 
>
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
 >



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
 
>
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
 >





-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test2 is ready to run

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Jim,

Opens documents without error message on Ubuntu 16.04 for me.

Am 24.10.20 um 13:32 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> And test7 is uploaded and ready to be tested. Thx!
>
>> On Oct 23, 2020, at 6:51 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>>
>> Thanks you all... test7 is getting kicked off
>>
>>> On Oct 23, 2020, at 5:51 PM, Carl Marcum >> > wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Jim,
>>>
>>> On 10/23/20 5:09 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
 test6 is ready!! Thx everyone for their patience and for their testing.
>>> Test 6 is also good for me as well on Ubuntu 18.04 !!
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Carl
>>>
> On Oct 23, 2020, at 2:21 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>
> Status update
> ... still working on this... the issue is that the random selected picks 
> end up with snapshots that can't be built as-is, so I need to cherry-pick 
> stuff (like the nss and HW acceleration stuff) and so it's taking a lot 
> longer than a regular build would.
>
>> On Oct 23, 2020, at 10:57 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>>
>> w00t! Kicking off test6
>>
>>> On Oct 23, 2020, at 10:55 AM, Carl Marcum >> > wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Jim,
>>>
>>> On 10/23/20 10:28 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
 test5 is now available...
>>> Getting closer.
>>> No errors on Ubuntu 18.04 opening or saving .odt and .ods with test5.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Carl
> On Oct 23, 2020, at 10:16 AM, Matthias Seidel 
>  wrote:
>
> Hi Jim,
>
> Am 23.10.20 um 13:54 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> OK, so we have narrowed things down... somewhere between
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/21aebe28dbe5d985add2fadc46e6217b148303bb
>>
>> and
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/27aafff9ac690db20ff7d9edf69a595216b2386e
>>
>> things broke for CentOS5.
>>
>> Starting git bisect with those bounds. Stay tuned.
> Great!
>
> Meanwhile, can we revert
>
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/37eaa1bfc66860d3eb86d451678c521ed3dbf36d
>
> on trunk and
>
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/babbd85bf6ae11bd8b1571318e861462a3033be8
>
> on AOO42X?
>
> It breaks the build for two days now...
>
 sure... go ahead. thx


 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
>>>  
>>> >> >
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
>>>  
>>> >> >
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
  
 >
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
  
 >

>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
>>>  
>>> >> >
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
>>>  
>>> >> >
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: test2 is ready to run

[Jim Jagielski]

And test7 is uploaded and ready to be tested. Thx!

> On Oct 23, 2020, at 6:51 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
> Thanks you all... test7 is getting kicked off
> 
>> On Oct 23, 2020, at 5:51 PM, Carl Marcum > > wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Jim,
>> 
>> On 10/23/20 5:09 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> test6 is ready!! Thx everyone for their patience and for their testing.
>> 
>> Test 6 is also good for me as well on Ubuntu 18.04 !!
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Carl
>> 
 On Oct 23, 2020, at 2:21 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
 
 Status update
 ... still working on this... the issue is that the random selected picks 
 end up with snapshots that can't be built as-is, so I need to cherry-pick 
 stuff (like the nss and HW acceleration stuff) and so it's taking a lot 
 longer than a regular build would.
 
> On Oct 23, 2020, at 10:57 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
> w00t! Kicking off test6
> 
>> On Oct 23, 2020, at 10:55 AM, Carl Marcum > > wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Jim,
>> 
>> On 10/23/20 10:28 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> test5 is now available...
>> Getting closer.
>> No errors on Ubuntu 18.04 opening or saving .odt and .ods with test5.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Carl
 On Oct 23, 2020, at 10:16 AM, Matthias Seidel 
  wrote:
 
 Hi Jim,
 
 Am 23.10.20 um 13:54 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> OK, so we have narrowed things down... somewhere between
> 
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/21aebe28dbe5d985add2fadc46e6217b148303bb
> 
> and
> 
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/27aafff9ac690db20ff7d9edf69a595216b2386e
> 
> things broke for CentOS5.
> 
> Starting git bisect with those bounds. Stay tuned.
 Great!
 
 Meanwhile, can we revert
 
 https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/37eaa1bfc66860d3eb86d451678c521ed3dbf36d
 
 on trunk and
 
 https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/babbd85bf6ae11bd8b1571318e861462a3033be8
 
 on AOO42X?
 
 It breaks the build for two days now...
 
>>> sure... go ahead. thx
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
>>  
>> > >
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
>>  
>> > >
>>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
>>>  
>>> >> >
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
>>>  
>>> >> >
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
>>  
>> > >
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
>>  
>> > >

Re: test2 is ready to run

[Jim Jagielski]

Thanks you all... test7 is getting kicked off

> On Oct 23, 2020, at 5:51 PM, Carl Marcum  wrote:
> 
> Hi Jim,
> 
> On 10/23/20 5:09 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> test6 is ready!! Thx everyone for their patience and for their testing.
> 
> Test 6 is also good for me as well on Ubuntu 18.04 !!
> 
> Best regards,
> Carl
> 
>>> On Oct 23, 2020, at 2:21 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Status update
>>> ... still working on this... the issue is that the random selected picks 
>>> end up with snapshots that can't be built as-is, so I need to cherry-pick 
>>> stuff (like the nss and HW acceleration stuff) and so it's taking a lot 
>>> longer than a regular build would.
>>> 
 On Oct 23, 2020, at 10:57 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
 
 w00t! Kicking off test6
 
> On Oct 23, 2020, at 10:55 AM, Carl Marcum  > wrote:
> 
> Hi Jim,
> 
> On 10/23/20 10:28 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> test5 is now available...
> Getting closer.
> No errors on Ubuntu 18.04 opening or saving .odt and .ods with test5.
> 
> Best regards,
> Carl
>>> On Oct 23, 2020, at 10:16 AM, Matthias Seidel 
>>>  wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Jim,
>>> 
>>> Am 23.10.20 um 13:54 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
 OK, so we have narrowed things down... somewhere between
 
  
 https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/21aebe28dbe5d985add2fadc46e6217b148303bb
 
 and
 
  
 https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/27aafff9ac690db20ff7d9edf69a595216b2386e
 
 things broke for CentOS5.
 
 Starting git bisect with those bounds. Stay tuned.
>>> Great!
>>> 
>>> Meanwhile, can we revert
>>> 
>>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/37eaa1bfc66860d3eb86d451678c521ed3dbf36d
>>> 
>>> on trunk and
>>> 
>>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/babbd85bf6ae11bd8b1571318e861462a3033be8
>>> 
>>> on AOO42X?
>>> 
>>> It breaks the build for two days now...
>>> 
>> sure... go ahead. thx
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
>  
>  >
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
>  
>  >
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
>> 
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
>> 
>> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
> 

Re: test2 is ready to run

[Carl Marcum]

Hi Jim,

On 10/23/20 5:09 PM, Jim Jagielski wrote:

test6 is ready!! Thx everyone for their patience and for their testing.


Test 6 is also good for me as well on Ubuntu 18.04 !!

Best regards,
Carl


On Oct 23, 2020, at 2:21 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:

Status update
... still working on this... the issue is that the random selected picks end up 
with snapshots that can't be built as-is, so I need to cherry-pick stuff (like 
the nss and HW acceleration stuff) and so it's taking a lot longer than a 
regular build would.


On Oct 23, 2020, at 10:57 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:

w00t! Kicking off test6


On Oct 23, 2020, at 10:55 AM, Carl Marcum mailto:cmar...@apache.org>> wrote:

Hi Jim,

On 10/23/20 10:28 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:

test5 is now available...

Getting closer.
No errors on Ubuntu 18.04 opening or saving .odt and .ods with test5.

Best regards,
Carl

On Oct 23, 2020, at 10:16 AM, Matthias Seidel  
wrote:

Hi Jim,

Am 23.10.20 um 13:54 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

OK, so we have narrowed things down... somewhere between

  
https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/21aebe28dbe5d985add2fadc46e6217b148303bb

and

  
https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/27aafff9ac690db20ff7d9edf69a595216b2386e

things broke for CentOS5.

Starting git bisect with those bounds. Stay tuned.

Great!

Meanwhile, can we revert

https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/37eaa1bfc66860d3eb86d451678c521ed3dbf36d

on trunk and

https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/babbd85bf6ae11bd8b1571318e861462a3033be8

on AOO42X?

It breaks the build for two days now...


sure... go ahead. thx


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
 
>
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
 >


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test2 is ready to run

[André Pereira]

test6 opens and saves odt file without any error message on Debian 10

On Fri, Oct 23, 2020 at 6:29 PM Matthias Seidel 
wrote:

> Hi Jim,
>
> Am 23.10.20 um 23:09 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> > test6 is ready!! Thx everyone for their patience and for their testing.
>
> Works for me! ;-)
>
> Matthias
>
> >
> >> On Oct 23, 2020, at 2:21 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> >>
> >> Status update
> >> ... still working on this... the issue is that the random selected
> picks end up with snapshots that can't be built as-is, so I need to
> cherry-pick stuff (like the nss and HW acceleration stuff) and so it's
> taking a lot longer than a regular build would.
> >>
> >>> On Oct 23, 2020, at 10:57 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> >>>
> >>> w00t! Kicking off test6
> >>>
>  On Oct 23, 2020, at 10:55 AM, Carl Marcum  > wrote:
> 
>  Hi Jim,
> 
>  On 10/23/20 10:28 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> > test5 is now available...
>  Getting closer.
>  No errors on Ubuntu 18.04 opening or saving .odt and .ods with test5.
> 
>  Best regards,
>  Carl
> >> On Oct 23, 2020, at 10:16 AM, Matthias Seidel <
> matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Jim,
> >>
> >> Am 23.10.20 um 13:54 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> >>> OK, so we have narrowed things down... somewhere between
> >>>
> >>>
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/21aebe28dbe5d985add2fadc46e6217b148303bb
> >>>
> >>> and
> >>>
> >>>
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/27aafff9ac690db20ff7d9edf69a595216b2386e
> >>>
> >>> things broke for CentOS5.
> >>>
> >>> Starting git bisect with those bounds. Stay tuned.
> >> Great!
> >>
> >> Meanwhile, can we revert
> >>
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/37eaa1bfc66860d3eb86d451678c521ed3dbf36d
> >>
> >> on trunk and
> >>
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/babbd85bf6ae11bd8b1571318e861462a3033be8
> >>
> >> on AOO42X?
> >>
> >> It breaks the build for two days now...
> >>
> > sure... go ahead. thx
> >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >
> 
>  -
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>   dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org  dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org>>
>  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>   dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org >
> >
> > -
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >
>
>

Re: test2 is ready to run

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Jim,

Am 23.10.20 um 23:09 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> test6 is ready!! Thx everyone for their patience and for their testing.

Works for me! ;-)

Matthias

>
>> On Oct 23, 2020, at 2:21 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>>
>> Status update
>> ... still working on this... the issue is that the random selected picks end 
>> up with snapshots that can't be built as-is, so I need to cherry-pick stuff 
>> (like the nss and HW acceleration stuff) and so it's taking a lot longer 
>> than a regular build would.
>>
>>> On Oct 23, 2020, at 10:57 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>>>
>>> w00t! Kicking off test6
>>>
 On Oct 23, 2020, at 10:55 AM, Carl Marcum >>> > wrote:

 Hi Jim,

 On 10/23/20 10:28 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
> test5 is now available...
 Getting closer.
 No errors on Ubuntu 18.04 opening or saving .odt and .ods with test5.

 Best regards,
 Carl
>> On Oct 23, 2020, at 10:16 AM, Matthias Seidel 
>>  wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jim,
>>
>> Am 23.10.20 um 13:54 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>>> OK, so we have narrowed things down... somewhere between
>>>
>>>  
>>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/21aebe28dbe5d985add2fadc46e6217b148303bb
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>>  
>>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/27aafff9ac690db20ff7d9edf69a595216b2386e
>>>
>>> things broke for CentOS5.
>>>
>>> Starting git bisect with those bounds. Stay tuned.
>> Great!
>>
>> Meanwhile, can we revert
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/37eaa1bfc66860d3eb86d451678c521ed3dbf36d
>>
>> on trunk and
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/babbd85bf6ae11bd8b1571318e861462a3033be8
>>
>> on AOO42X?
>>
>> It breaks the build for two days now...
>>
> sure... go ahead. thx
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>

 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
  
 >
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
  
 >
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: test2 is ready to run

[Pedro Lino]

Test6 works perfectly under Ubuntu 18.04 x64!


> On 10/23/2020 10:09 PM Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
>  
> test6 is ready!! Thx everyone for their patience and for their testing.
> 
> > On Oct 23, 2020, at 2:21 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> > 
> > Status update
> > ... still working on this... the issue is that the random selected picks 
> > end up with snapshots that can't be built as-is, so I need to cherry-pick 
> > stuff (like the nss and HW acceleration stuff) and so it's taking a lot 
> > longer than a regular build would.
> > 
> >> On Oct 23, 2020, at 10:57 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> >> 
> >> w00t! Kicking off test6
> >> 
> >>> On Oct 23, 2020, at 10:55 AM, Carl Marcum  >>> > wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> Hi Jim,
> >>> 
> >>> On 10/23/20 10:28 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>  test5 is now available...
> >>> 
> >>> Getting closer.
> >>> No errors on Ubuntu 18.04 opening or saving .odt and .ods with test5.
> >>> 
> >>> Best regards,
> >>> Carl
>  
> > On Oct 23, 2020, at 10:16 AM, Matthias Seidel 
> >  wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Jim,
> > 
> > Am 23.10.20 um 13:54 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> >> OK, so we have narrowed things down... somewhere between
> >> 
> >>  
> >> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/21aebe28dbe5d985add2fadc46e6217b148303bb
> >> 
> >> and
> >> 
> >>  
> >> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/27aafff9ac690db20ff7d9edf69a595216b2386e
> >> 
> >> things broke for CentOS5.
> >> 
> >> Starting git bisect with those bounds. Stay tuned.
> > Great!
> > 
> > Meanwhile, can we revert
> > 
> > https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/37eaa1bfc66860d3eb86d451678c521ed3dbf36d
> > 
> > on trunk and
> > 
> > https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/babbd85bf6ae11bd8b1571318e861462a3033be8
> > 
> > on AOO42X?
> > 
> > It breaks the build for two days now...
> > 
>  sure... go ahead. thx
>  
>  
>  -
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>  
> >>> 
> >>> 
> >>> -
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
> >>>  
> >>>  >>> >
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
> >>>  
> >>>  >>> >
> > 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test2 is ready to run

[Jim Jagielski]

test6 is ready!! Thx everyone for their patience and for their testing.

> On Oct 23, 2020, at 2:21 PM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
> Status update
> ... still working on this... the issue is that the random selected picks end 
> up with snapshots that can't be built as-is, so I need to cherry-pick stuff 
> (like the nss and HW acceleration stuff) and so it's taking a lot longer than 
> a regular build would.
> 
>> On Oct 23, 2020, at 10:57 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>> 
>> w00t! Kicking off test6
>> 
>>> On Oct 23, 2020, at 10:55 AM, Carl Marcum >> > wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Jim,
>>> 
>>> On 10/23/20 10:28 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
 test5 is now available...
>>> 
>>> Getting closer.
>>> No errors on Ubuntu 18.04 opening or saving .odt and .ods with test5.
>>> 
>>> Best regards,
>>> Carl
 
> On Oct 23, 2020, at 10:16 AM, Matthias Seidel 
>  wrote:
> 
> Hi Jim,
> 
> Am 23.10.20 um 13:54 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> OK, so we have narrowed things down... somewhere between
>> 
>>  
>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/21aebe28dbe5d985add2fadc46e6217b148303bb
>> 
>> and
>> 
>>  
>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/27aafff9ac690db20ff7d9edf69a595216b2386e
>> 
>> things broke for CentOS5.
>> 
>> Starting git bisect with those bounds. Stay tuned.
> Great!
> 
> Meanwhile, can we revert
> 
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/37eaa1bfc66860d3eb86d451678c521ed3dbf36d
> 
> on trunk and
> 
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/babbd85bf6ae11bd8b1571318e861462a3033be8
> 
> on AOO42X?
> 
> It breaks the build for two days now...
> 
 sure... go ahead. thx
 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
>>>  
>>> >> >
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
>>>  
>>> >> >
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test2 is ready to run

[Jim Jagielski]

Status update
... still working on this... the issue is that the random selected picks end up 
with snapshots that can't be built as-is, so I need to cherry-pick stuff (like 
the nss and HW acceleration stuff) and so it's taking a lot longer than a 
regular build would.

> On Oct 23, 2020, at 10:57 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
> w00t! Kicking off test6
> 
>> On Oct 23, 2020, at 10:55 AM, Carl Marcum > > wrote:
>> 
>> Hi Jim,
>> 
>> On 10/23/20 10:28 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>>> test5 is now available...
>> 
>> Getting closer.
>> No errors on Ubuntu 18.04 opening or saving .odt and .ods with test5.
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Carl
>>> 
 On Oct 23, 2020, at 10:16 AM, Matthias Seidel  
 wrote:
 
 Hi Jim,
 
 Am 23.10.20 um 13:54 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> OK, so we have narrowed things down... somewhere between
> 
>   
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/21aebe28dbe5d985add2fadc46e6217b148303bb
> 
> and
> 
>   
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/27aafff9ac690db20ff7d9edf69a595216b2386e
> 
> things broke for CentOS5.
> 
> Starting git bisect with those bounds. Stay tuned.
 Great!
 
 Meanwhile, can we revert
 
 https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/37eaa1bfc66860d3eb86d451678c521ed3dbf36d
 
 on trunk and
 
 https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/babbd85bf6ae11bd8b1571318e861462a3033be8
 
 on AOO42X?
 
 It breaks the build for two days now...
 
>>> sure... go ahead. thx
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
>>  
>> > >
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
>>  
>> > >

Re: test2 is ready to run

[Jim Jagielski]

w00t! Kicking off test6

> On Oct 23, 2020, at 10:55 AM, Carl Marcum  wrote:
> 
> Hi Jim,
> 
> On 10/23/20 10:28 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:
>> test5 is now available...
> 
> Getting closer.
> No errors on Ubuntu 18.04 opening or saving .odt and .ods with test5.
> 
> Best regards,
> Carl
>> 
>>> On Oct 23, 2020, at 10:16 AM, Matthias Seidel  
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Jim,
>>> 
>>> Am 23.10.20 um 13:54 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
 OK, so we have narrowed things down... somewhere between
 

 https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/21aebe28dbe5d985add2fadc46e6217b148303bb
 
 and
 

 https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/27aafff9ac690db20ff7d9edf69a595216b2386e
 
 things broke for CentOS5.
 
 Starting git bisect with those bounds. Stay tuned.
>>> Great!
>>> 
>>> Meanwhile, can we revert
>>> 
>>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/37eaa1bfc66860d3eb86d451678c521ed3dbf36d
>>> 
>>> on trunk and
>>> 
>>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/babbd85bf6ae11bd8b1571318e861462a3033be8
>>> 
>>> on AOO42X?
>>> 
>>> It breaks the build for two days now...
>>> 
>> sure... go ahead. thx
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org 
> 
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org 
> 

Re: test2 is ready to run

[Carl Marcum]

Hi Jim,

On 10/23/20 10:28 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:

test5 is now available...


Getting closer.
No errors on Ubuntu 18.04 opening or saving .odt and .ods with test5.

Best regards,
Carl



On Oct 23, 2020, at 10:16 AM, Matthias Seidel  
wrote:

Hi Jim,

Am 23.10.20 um 13:54 schrieb Jim Jagielski:

OK, so we have narrowed things down... somewhere between


https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/21aebe28dbe5d985add2fadc46e6217b148303bb

and


https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/27aafff9ac690db20ff7d9edf69a595216b2386e

things broke for CentOS5.

Starting git bisect with those bounds. Stay tuned.

Great!

Meanwhile, can we revert

https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/37eaa1bfc66860d3eb86d451678c521ed3dbf36d

on trunk and

https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/babbd85bf6ae11bd8b1571318e861462a3033be8

on AOO42X?

It breaks the build for two days now...


sure... go ahead. thx


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org




-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test2 is ready to run

[André Pereira]

Debian 10
No error messages on test5

Re: test2 is ready to run

[Jim Jagielski]

test5 is now available...

> On Oct 23, 2020, at 10:16 AM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jim,
> 
> Am 23.10.20 um 13:54 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> OK, so we have narrowed things down... somewhere between
>> 
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/21aebe28dbe5d985add2fadc46e6217b148303bb
>> 
>> and
>> 
>>
>> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/27aafff9ac690db20ff7d9edf69a595216b2386e
>> 
>> things broke for CentOS5.
>> 
>> Starting git bisect with those bounds. Stay tuned.
> 
> Great!
> 
> Meanwhile, can we revert
> 
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/37eaa1bfc66860d3eb86d451678c521ed3dbf36d
> 
> on trunk and
> 
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/babbd85bf6ae11bd8b1571318e861462a3033be8
> 
> on AOO42X?
> 
> It breaks the build for two days now...
> 

sure... go ahead. thx


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test2 is ready to run

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Jim,

Am 23.10.20 um 13:54 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> OK, so we have narrowed things down... somewhere between
>
> 
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/21aebe28dbe5d985add2fadc46e6217b148303bb
>
> and
>
> 
> https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/27aafff9ac690db20ff7d9edf69a595216b2386e
>
> things broke for CentOS5.
>
> Starting git bisect with those bounds. Stay tuned.

Great!

Meanwhile, can we revert

https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/37eaa1bfc66860d3eb86d451678c521ed3dbf36d

on trunk and

https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/babbd85bf6ae11bd8b1571318e861462a3033be8

on AOO42X?

It breaks the build for two days now...

Regards,

   Matthias

> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: test2 is ready to run

[Jim Jagielski]

OK, so we have narrowed things down... somewhere between


https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/21aebe28dbe5d985add2fadc46e6217b148303bb

and


https://github.com/apache/openoffice/commit/27aafff9ac690db20ff7d9edf69a595216b2386e

things broke for CentOS5.

Starting git bisect with those bounds. Stay tuned.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test2 is ready to run

[André Pereira]

>
> Opening a document with test4 On Debian 10 I get the "General Error"
> message and the terminal displays "tk-Message: 08:47:39.634: Failed to load
> module "atk-bridge""

Re: test2 is ready to run

[Carl Marcum]

Hi Jim,

On 10/23/20 6:53 AM, Jim Jagielski wrote:

test4 is uploaded and ready to be tested. Thx again!

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org



Installed test4 on Ubuntu 18.04 VM
New writer document created okay.
Problem saving.
Error saving the document test2: General Error

General Error on opening a document also.
But document opened after the error.

Best regards,
Carl

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test2 is ready to run

[Pedro Lino]

This build has the same errors when opening ods and odt

> On 10/23/2020 11:53 AM Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
>  
> test4 is uploaded and ready to be tested. Thx again!
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test2 is ready to run

[Jim Jagielski]

test4 is uploaded and ready to be tested. Thx again!

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test2 is ready to run

[Jim Jagielski]

I've had some things pop up so I'm just starting the test4 build now... this 
will be on 27aafff9ac690db20ff7d9edf69a595216b2386e (right before the libxml 
updates)

> On Oct 22, 2020, at 5:51 PM, André Pereira  wrote:
> 
> I can confirm test3 open documents without any error messages on Debian 10.
> 
> 
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 4:22 PM Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
>> Yep!
>> 
>>> On Oct 22, 2020, at 3:11 PM, Matthias Seidel 
>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Confirmed!
>>> 
>>> So we are now at August 22nd?
>>> 
>>> Am 22.10.20 um 21:04 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
 Wow. I had just uploaded test3 ! :)
 
 
> On Oct 22, 2020, at 2:53 PM, Pedro Lino 
>> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jim
> 
> Good news!
> Test 3 has no problems and check for Update also works (it didn't in
>> test2)
> 
> Apparentely we have a good one! :)
> 
> (Downloading at 500Mbit means 3 seconds to download 150MB :) )
> 
> Regards,
> Pedro
> 
>> On 10/22/2020 5:58 PM Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> YEAH! I am now building from 21aebe28dbe5d985add2fadc46e6217b148303bb
>> which is right after the OpenSLL upgrade(s). If test3, to be provided ASAP,
>> fails, then we know the problem. If not, I'll start a full git bisect with
>> 21aebe28dbe5d985add2fadc46e6217b148303bb as 'git bisect good'
>> 
>>> On Oct 22, 2020, at 12:52 PM, Matthias Seidel <
>> matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Jim,
>>> 
>>> test2 is OK for me.
>>> 
>>> Am 22.10.20 um 18:33 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
 Via
 
 http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/
 
> On Oct 22, 2020, at 10:38 AM, Jim Jagielski 
>> wrote:
> 
> OK... just did a co of 787546a0bd53c78489200311961fb621d00e1e69.
>> This is before the openssl upgrade and is dated Aug 12, 2020. Give me a few
>> hours and we'll see if this one works.
> 
>> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 
 
>> -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 
>> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test2 is ready to run

[André Pereira]

I can confirm test3 open documents without any error messages on Debian 10.


On Thu, Oct 22, 2020 at 4:22 PM Jim Jagielski  wrote:

> Yep!
>
> > On Oct 22, 2020, at 3:11 PM, Matthias Seidel 
> wrote:
> >
> > Confirmed!
> >
> > So we are now at August 22nd?
> >
> > Am 22.10.20 um 21:04 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> >> Wow. I had just uploaded test3 ! :)
> >>
> >>
> >>> On Oct 22, 2020, at 2:53 PM, Pedro Lino 
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Jim
> >>>
> >>> Good news!
> >>> Test 3 has no problems and check for Update also works (it didn't in
> test2)
> >>>
> >>> Apparentely we have a good one! :)
> >>>
> >>> (Downloading at 500Mbit means 3 seconds to download 150MB :) )
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Pedro
> >>>
>  On 10/22/2020 5:58 PM Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
> 
>  YEAH! I am now building from 21aebe28dbe5d985add2fadc46e6217b148303bb
> which is right after the OpenSLL upgrade(s). If test3, to be provided ASAP,
> fails, then we know the problem. If not, I'll start a full git bisect with
> 21aebe28dbe5d985add2fadc46e6217b148303bb as 'git bisect good'
> 
> > On Oct 22, 2020, at 12:52 PM, Matthias Seidel <
> matthias.sei...@hamburg.de> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Jim,
> >
> > test2 is OK for me.
> >
> > Am 22.10.20 um 18:33 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> >> Via
> >>
> >>  http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/
> >>
> >>> On Oct 22, 2020, at 10:38 AM, Jim Jagielski 
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> OK... just did a co of 787546a0bd53c78489200311961fb621d00e1e69.
> This is before the openssl upgrade and is dated Aug 12, 2020. Give me a few
> hours and we'll see if this one works.
> >>>
> -
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>>
> >>
> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>
> 
>  -
>  To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>  For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>> -
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>>
> >>
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>
> >
>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>

Re: test2 is ready to run

[Jim Jagielski]

Yep!

> On Oct 22, 2020, at 3:11 PM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
> 
> Confirmed!
> 
> So we are now at August 22nd?
> 
> Am 22.10.20 um 21:04 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Wow. I had just uploaded test3 ! :)
>> 
>> 
>>> On Oct 22, 2020, at 2:53 PM, Pedro Lino  
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Jim
>>> 
>>> Good news!
>>> Test 3 has no problems and check for Update also works (it didn't in test2)
>>> 
>>> Apparentely we have a good one! :)
>>> 
>>> (Downloading at 500Mbit means 3 seconds to download 150MB :) )
>>> 
>>> Regards,
>>> Pedro
>>> 
 On 10/22/2020 5:58 PM Jim Jagielski  wrote:
 
 
 YEAH! I am now building from 21aebe28dbe5d985add2fadc46e6217b148303bb 
 which is right after the OpenSLL upgrade(s). If test3, to be provided 
 ASAP, fails, then we know the problem. If not, I'll start a full git 
 bisect with 21aebe28dbe5d985add2fadc46e6217b148303bb as 'git bisect good'
 
> On Oct 22, 2020, at 12:52 PM, Matthias Seidel 
>  wrote:
> 
> Hi Jim,
> 
> test2 is OK for me.
> 
> Am 22.10.20 um 18:33 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Via
>> 
>>  http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/
>> 
>>> On Oct 22, 2020, at 10:38 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>>> 
>>> OK... just did a co of 787546a0bd53c78489200311961fb621d00e1e69. This 
>>> is before the openssl upgrade and is dated Aug 12, 2020. Give me a few 
>>> hours and we'll see if this one works.
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test2 is ready to run

[Matthias Seidel]

Confirmed!

So we are now at August 22nd?

Am 22.10.20 um 21:04 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Wow. I had just uploaded test3 ! :)
>
>
>> On Oct 22, 2020, at 2:53 PM, Pedro Lino  
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hi Jim
>>
>> Good news!
>> Test 3 has no problems and check for Update also works (it didn't in test2)
>>
>> Apparentely we have a good one! :)
>>
>> (Downloading at 500Mbit means 3 seconds to download 150MB :) )
>>
>> Regards,
>> Pedro
>>
>>> On 10/22/2020 5:58 PM Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> YEAH! I am now building from 21aebe28dbe5d985add2fadc46e6217b148303bb which 
>>> is right after the OpenSLL upgrade(s). If test3, to be provided ASAP, 
>>> fails, then we know the problem. If not, I'll start a full git bisect with 
>>> 21aebe28dbe5d985add2fadc46e6217b148303bb as 'git bisect good'
>>>
 On Oct 22, 2020, at 12:52 PM, Matthias Seidel  
 wrote:

 Hi Jim,

 test2 is OK for me.

 Am 22.10.20 um 18:33 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Via
>
>   http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/
>
>> On Oct 22, 2020, at 10:38 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>>
>> OK... just did a co of 787546a0bd53c78489200311961fb621d00e1e69. This is 
>> before the openssl upgrade and is dated Aug 12, 2020. Give me a few 
>> hours and we'll see if this one works.
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>
>>>
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

Re: test2 is ready to run

[Jim Jagielski]

Wow. I had just uploaded test3 ! :)


> On Oct 22, 2020, at 2:53 PM, Pedro Lino  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jim
> 
> Good news!
> Test 3 has no problems and check for Update also works (it didn't in test2)
> 
> Apparentely we have a good one! :)
> 
> (Downloading at 500Mbit means 3 seconds to download 150MB :) )
> 
> Regards,
> Pedro
> 
>> On 10/22/2020 5:58 PM Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>> 
>> 
>> YEAH! I am now building from 21aebe28dbe5d985add2fadc46e6217b148303bb which 
>> is right after the OpenSLL upgrade(s). If test3, to be provided ASAP, fails, 
>> then we know the problem. If not, I'll start a full git bisect with 
>> 21aebe28dbe5d985add2fadc46e6217b148303bb as 'git bisect good'
>> 
>>> On Oct 22, 2020, at 12:52 PM, Matthias Seidel  
>>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Hi Jim,
>>> 
>>> test2 is OK for me.
>>> 
>>> Am 22.10.20 um 18:33 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
 Via
 
   http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/
 
> On Oct 22, 2020, at 10:38 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
> OK... just did a co of 787546a0bd53c78489200311961fb621d00e1e69. This is 
> before the openssl upgrade and is dated Aug 12, 2020. Give me a few hours 
> and we'll see if this one works.
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 
 
 -
 To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
 For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
 
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test2 is ready to run

[Pedro Lino]

Hi Jim

Good news!
Test 3 has no problems and check for Update also works (it didn't in test2)

Apparentely we have a good one! :)

(Downloading at 500Mbit means 3 seconds to download 150MB :) )

Regards,
Pedro

> On 10/22/2020 5:58 PM Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> 
>  
> YEAH! I am now building from 21aebe28dbe5d985add2fadc46e6217b148303bb which 
> is right after the OpenSLL upgrade(s). If test3, to be provided ASAP, fails, 
> then we know the problem. If not, I'll start a full git bisect with 
> 21aebe28dbe5d985add2fadc46e6217b148303bb as 'git bisect good'
> 
> > On Oct 22, 2020, at 12:52 PM, Matthias Seidel  
> > wrote:
> > 
> > Hi Jim,
> > 
> > test2 is OK for me.
> > 
> > Am 22.10.20 um 18:33 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> >> Via
> >> 
> >>http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/
> >> 
> >>> On Oct 22, 2020, at 10:38 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
> >>> 
> >>> OK... just did a co of 787546a0bd53c78489200311961fb621d00e1e69. This is 
> >>> before the openssl upgrade and is dated Aug 12, 2020. Give me a few hours 
> >>> and we'll see if this one works.
> >>> -
> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >>> 
> >> 
> >> -
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
> >> 
> > 
> 
> 
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test2 is ready to run

[Jim Jagielski]

YEAH! I am now building from 21aebe28dbe5d985add2fadc46e6217b148303bb which is 
right after the OpenSLL upgrade(s). If test3, to be provided ASAP, fails, then 
we know the problem. If not, I'll start a full git bisect with 
21aebe28dbe5d985add2fadc46e6217b148303bb as 'git bisect good'

> On Oct 22, 2020, at 12:52 PM, Matthias Seidel  
> wrote:
> 
> Hi Jim,
> 
> test2 is OK for me.
> 
> Am 22.10.20 um 18:33 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
>> Via
>> 
>>http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/
>> 
>>> On Oct 22, 2020, at 10:38 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>>> 
>>> OK... just did a co of 787546a0bd53c78489200311961fb621d00e1e69. This is 
>>> before the openssl upgrade and is dated Aug 12, 2020. Give me a few hours 
>>> and we'll see if this one works.
>>> -
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>> 
>> 
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>> 
> 


-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org

Re: test2 is ready to run

[Matthias Seidel]

Hi Jim,

test2 is OK for me.

Am 22.10.20 um 18:33 schrieb Jim Jagielski:
> Via
>
> http://home.apache.org/~jim/AOO-builds/
>
>> On Oct 22, 2020, at 10:38 AM, Jim Jagielski  wrote:
>>
>> OK... just did a co of 787546a0bd53c78489200311961fb621d00e1e69. This is 
>> before the openssl upgrade and is dated Aug 12, 2020. Give me a few hours 
>> and we'll see if this one works.
>> -
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>>
>
> -
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@openoffice.apache.org
>



smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature