Re: [OSM-dev] Multipolygon relation way member without role

2016-09-19 Thread Pierre Béland
the Manoa Innovation Center.    Pierre De : patrick keshishian <pkesh...@gmail.com> À : Pierre Béland <pierz...@yahoo.fr> Cc : osm dev <dev@openstreetmap.org> Envoyé le : lundi 19 Septembre 2016 14h49 Objet : Re: [OSM-dev] Multipolygon relation way member without role

Re: [OSM-dev] Multipolygon relation way member without role

2016-09-19 Thread patrick keshishian
Hi Pierre, On 9/19/16, Pierre Béland wrote: > Hi Patrick, > Note that these general subjects are discussed on talk while dev discussion > group is more for subjects related to software development, servers > technical aspects, etc My apologies for the noise. I was viewing my

Re: [OSM-dev] Multipolygon relation way member without role

2016-09-19 Thread Pierre Béland
Hi Patrick, Note that these general subjects are discussed on talk while dev discussion group is more for subjects related to software development, servers technical aspects, etc.This wiki page describes Multipolygon relations used to describe complex

Re: [OSM-dev] Multipolygon relation way member without role

2016-09-19 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2016-09-19 5:50 GMT+02:00 patrick keshishian : > Question: Is there a general rule used when processing role=""? > it depends on the type of relation > OSM wiki for Relation [3] indicates that roles are optional. > yes, they are generally optional, save for certain

Re: [OSM-dev] Multipolygon relation way member without role

2016-09-19 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, On 09/19/2016 05:50 AM, patrick keshishian wrote: > It seems that this association is a mistake. If so, is there a > better place to report these sort of things as I come across them? As pointed out by Michael, using "notes" is an option. > As I am still learning my way through the data, I

Re: [OSM-dev] Multipolygon relation way member without role

2016-09-18 Thread Michael Zangl
Am 19.09.2016 um 05:50 schrieb patrick keshishian: > It seems that this association is a mistake. If so, is there a > better place to report these sort of things as I come across them? > As I am still learning my way through the data, I don't wish to > do wholesale edits. You can add a note about