Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15 RC3

2016-09-21 Thread Nick Burch
On Wed, 21 Sep 2016, David North wrote: Nick - please can you sort the Bugzilla versions? Added 3.15-FINAL and 3.16-dev 3.14-dev and 3.11-FINAL disabled for new bugs Nick - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15 RC3

2016-09-20 Thread David North
Just waiting for it to roll out to the mirrors, then I'll send the announce and sort the website. Nick - please can you sort the Bugzilla versions? Thanks, David On 21/09/16 07:21, David North wrote: > +1 = 5 > > No 0, no -1 > > Accordingly, I will now release 3.15. Thanks everyone. > > On 20

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15 RC3

2016-09-20 Thread David North
+1 = 5 No 0, no -1 Accordingly, I will now release 3.15. Thanks everyone. On 20/09/16 13:24, David North wrote: > Thanks all. I'll do the tally and final actions tonight with a bit of luck. > > On 20/09/16 02:47, Javen O'Neal wrote: >> +1 from me. >> >> Initiate countdown sequence. 10... 9... 8

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15 RC3

2016-09-20 Thread David North
Thanks all. I'll do the tally and final actions tonight with a bit of luck. On 20/09/16 02:47, Javen O'Neal wrote: > +1 from me. > > Initiate countdown sequence. 10... 9... 8... > > On Sep 19, 2016 07:50, "Allison, Timothy B." wrote: > >> +1 >> >> Built on Windows and integrated successfully w

RE: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15 RC3

2016-09-19 Thread Javen O'Neal
+1 from me. Initiate countdown sequence. 10... 9... 8... On Sep 19, 2016 07:50, "Allison, Timothy B." wrote: > +1 > > Built on Windows and integrated successfully with Tika and Tika's unit > tests. I'm relying on my earlier run of RC2 on the full regression corpus > as evidence that we're in g

RE: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15 RC3

2016-09-19 Thread Allison, Timothy B.
+1 Built on Windows and integrated successfully with Tika and Tika's unit tests. I'm relying on my earlier run of RC2 on the full regression corpus as evidence that we're in good shape. Thank you, David! Cheers, Tim -Original Message- From: David North [mailto:dno...@apa

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15 RC3

2016-09-18 Thread Javen O'Neal
When I got OOM's with POI because of insufficient heap size, I would get them when I called wb.write(FileOutputStream). IIRC I was using POI 3.8 and 3.9 when doing this memory testing. On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Dominik Stadler wrote: > Hi, > > As far as I see it only reduces the amount of

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15 RC3

2016-09-18 Thread Andreas Beeker
+1 Sigs and docs look ok. As this is a final release, please also add a note pointing to #59170 in the release notes. FYI, I've removed the obsolete nexus repos. Andi - To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org F

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15 RC3

2016-09-18 Thread Dominik Stadler
I did my usual tests of comparing release-content and running the newer jars with my local projects, this time all worked fine for me, so I am finally +1 Thanks... Dominik. On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 7:07 PM, David North wrote: > Hi everyone, > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/3.15-RC

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15 RC3

2016-09-18 Thread Dominik Stadler
Hi, As far as I see it only reduces the amount of memory held while the file was open, closing correctly already freed up the memory in previous versions as well. It also only was visible with read-only access as then we do not use memory-mapping. The user seems to have a very large file at some p

Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 3.15 RC3

2016-09-17 Thread Javen O'Neal
Is this memory savings seen during regular use of POI, such as the following example, or only when explicitly created with user code calling lower level OPCPackage operations? If so, should release notes mention the lower memory usage for OOXML documents due to File Backed Data Source? Workbook wb