On Wed, 21 Sep 2016, David North wrote:
Nick - please can you sort the Bugzilla versions?
Added 3.15-FINAL and 3.16-dev
3.14-dev and 3.11-FINAL disabled for new bugs
Nick
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.
Just waiting for it to roll out to the mirrors, then I'll send the
announce and sort the website.
Nick - please can you sort the Bugzilla versions?
Thanks,
David
On 21/09/16 07:21, David North wrote:
> +1 = 5
>
> No 0, no -1
>
> Accordingly, I will now release 3.15. Thanks everyone.
>
> On 20
+1 = 5
No 0, no -1
Accordingly, I will now release 3.15. Thanks everyone.
On 20/09/16 13:24, David North wrote:
> Thanks all. I'll do the tally and final actions tonight with a bit of luck.
>
> On 20/09/16 02:47, Javen O'Neal wrote:
>> +1 from me.
>>
>> Initiate countdown sequence. 10... 9... 8
Thanks all. I'll do the tally and final actions tonight with a bit of luck.
On 20/09/16 02:47, Javen O'Neal wrote:
> +1 from me.
>
> Initiate countdown sequence. 10... 9... 8...
>
> On Sep 19, 2016 07:50, "Allison, Timothy B." wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> Built on Windows and integrated successfully w
+1 from me.
Initiate countdown sequence. 10... 9... 8...
On Sep 19, 2016 07:50, "Allison, Timothy B." wrote:
> +1
>
> Built on Windows and integrated successfully with Tika and Tika's unit
> tests. I'm relying on my earlier run of RC2 on the full regression corpus
> as evidence that we're in g
+1
Built on Windows and integrated successfully with Tika and Tika's unit tests.
I'm relying on my earlier run of RC2 on the full regression corpus as evidence
that we're in good shape.
Thank you, David!
Cheers,
Tim
-Original Message-
From: David North [mailto:dno...@apa
When I got OOM's with POI because of insufficient heap size, I would
get them when I called wb.write(FileOutputStream).
IIRC I was using POI 3.8 and 3.9 when doing this memory testing.
On Sun, Sep 18, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Dominik Stadler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As far as I see it only reduces the amount of
+1
Sigs and docs look ok.
As this is a final release, please also add a note pointing to #59170 in the
release notes.
FYI, I've removed the obsolete nexus repos.
Andi
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@poi.apache.org
F
I did my usual tests of comparing release-content and running the newer
jars with my local projects, this time all worked fine for me, so I am
finally
+1
Thanks... Dominik.
On Sat, Sep 17, 2016 at 7:07 PM, David North wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/3.15-RC
Hi,
As far as I see it only reduces the amount of memory held while the file
was open, closing correctly already freed up the memory in previous
versions as well. It also only was visible with read-only access as then we
do not use memory-mapping. The user seems to have a very large file at some
p
Is this memory savings seen during regular use of POI, such as the
following example, or only when explicitly created with user code calling
lower level OPCPackage operations? If so, should release notes mention the
lower memory usage for OOXML documents due to File Backed Data Source?
Workbook wb
11 matches
Mail list logo