On 05/28/2016 03:48 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/ponymail.html
>
> I'm going to send separate emails to Ulises and David to get them to submit
> ICLAs.
>
> John
>
I have pinged them on IRC, should hopefully get some ICLAs in the coming
days :)
With regards,
D
On 05/28/2016 04:11 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 9:50 PM Daniel Gruno wrote:
>
>> On 05/28/2016 03:48 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
>>> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/ponymail.html
>>>
>>> I'm going to send separate emails
On 05/28/2016 04:07 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:16 PM Daniel Gruno wrote:
>
>> On 05/28/2016 04:11 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
>>> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 9:50 PM Daniel Gruno
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 05/2
On 05/28/2016 04:11 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 9:50 PM Daniel Gruno wrote:
>
>> On 05/28/2016 03:48 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
>>> http://incubator.apache.org/projects/ponymail.html
>>>
>>> I'm going to send separate emails
I've been pondering this since I was forcibly introduced (by Ulises!) to
CoffeeScript and found it to my likingwould it be sensible to start
porting the JS we have to CoffeeScript and possibly make it just a tad
more understandable to people not intricately knowledgeable about how
Pony Mail wor
;
> Best regards,
>
> Pierre Smits
>
> ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>
> OFBiz based solutions & services
>
> OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
> http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
>
> On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 9:19 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò > wrote:
>
On 05/30/2016 03:06 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> I was wondering, is there an easy way to get sample data together? Should
> I steal archives off of minotaur?
>
> John
>
Either do that (or download some mbox archives from lists.apache.org) or
you can use Sam's PR on GitHub to import from Maildir f
Hi folks,
I've added a menu bar to the web site as well as tweaked/added a few
sections, including a mailing list section and a little bit about who we
are, as well as splitting source and download into two sections.
Comments are most welcome!
At some point, we should grow the web site and start
I got to thinking about how we should work, and more specifically, how
we should accept PRs and such. jClouds has an excellent guide on this,
at https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/JCLOUDS/Git+workflow and
I think we should try to follow their guidelines for Pony Mail.
Having a guide on th
On 05/31/2016 09:01 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
> On 31/05/2016 07:20, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>> I got to thinking about how we should work, and more specifically, how
>> we should accept PRs and such. jClouds has an excellent guide on this,
>> at https://cwiki.apache.o
On 05/31/2016 09:12 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
>
> Anyway: are we going to put in place any tool to generate our website? I
> would think we'll eventually have the need to add more pages besides
> index.html.
>
> Regards.
>
I have split the web site into several markdown files now and ad
On 05/31/2016 10:54 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
> Is there something wrong with our GitHub integration?
>
It's not tuned for GitHub issues, that seems to be why it's breaking. It
works with pull requests though.
> On 31/05/2016 10:53, asfgit wrote:
>> Github user asfgit closed the pull req
pos/asf/incubator-ponymail-site.git
(there's a readme in the source dir)
With regards,
Daniel.
>
> On Tue, 31 May 2016 at 08:13 Francesco Chicchiriccò
> wrote:
>
>> On 31/05/2016 09:07, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
>>> On 31/05/2016 09:02, Daniel Gruno wrote:
&
Hi folks,
Sam and I have tweaked the Message-ID generators a bit to avoid some
issues with duplicate emails having the same short-link. This does not
affect older installations, only new ones with the generator directive
set in ponymail.cfg will use these new generators.
Enjoy them :)
With regard
On 06/01/2016 04:27 PM, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
> Hi all,
> I see from [1] that we are supposed to use JIRA to track issues, but it
> seems instead that we are working with GitHub issue tracker [2] - the
> only problem being that notification e-mails seem not to distinguish
> well enough betw
On 06/01/2016 07:57 PM, Chris Mattmann wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I noticed something the other day and wasn’t sure if I was correct
> so I’ll just ask - is ponymail using git-dual for repo or git-wp?
It's using git-wip, GitHub is read-only (for now).
With regards,
Daniel.
>
> Thanks,
> Chris
>
>
Hi folks,
As an FYI, I've kicked off a Podling Name Search to assess whether
'Apache Pony Mail' is something we can use for our project.
The ticket is at
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/PODLINGNAMESEARCH-104
If anyone has any input to this, do speak up :)
Better sooner than later.
With reg
Hi folks,
As we are sooort of approaching the point where we should probably kick
a release out the door (the changelog is growing!), I got to think about
versioning.
Should we stick with the current scheme, and call the next version 0.9
(and then master would move to 0.10b), or should we ado
Hi folks,
I've added a KEYS file to our dev area (where we push release
candidates). If you intend to be Release Manager at any point in time,
do add your own key(s) to the file.
Our RC/dev area is at:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/ponymail/
Our final release area is:
https
On 06/04/2016 10:58 AM, Gav wrote:
Hi Guys,
Infra has a thing where one can automatically build and publish the website
from a
commit and subsequent successful build.
Interested ?
If so I'll get it set up.
Gav...
I'd be interested in this - it would mean we'd just have to modify the
MD fi
hit 1.0. I just don't know how to do that with semantic
versioning if that's the path we pick.
With regards,
Daniel.
Gav...
On Sat, Jun 4, 2016 at 7:32 PM, Francesco Chicchiriccò
wrote:
Il 2016-06-04 09:53 Daniel Gruno ha scritto:
Hi folks,
As we are sooort of approaching the p
gards,
Daniel.
Best regards,
Pierre Smits
ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>
OFBiz based solutions & services
OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 4:46 PM, Ulises wrote:
I'm fine with either as well.
On Wed, 1 Jun 2016 at 15:45
Looks like we have a bug in the system, I'm working on it :)
that comment was mine, btw.
On 06/05/2016 11:43 AM, PierreSmits wrote:
Github user PierreSmits commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-ponymail/pull/56
see httpd for instance - we have never put licenses
ing.
With regards,
Daniel.
Pierre Smits
ORRTIZ.COM <http://www.orrtiz.com>
OFBiz based solutions & services
OFBiz Extensions Marketplace
http://oem.ofbizci.net/oci-2/
On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 11:39 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
On 06/05/2016 11:35 AM, Pierre Smits wrote:
+1 for having issue
/servicedesk/customer/portal/1/INFRA-11998>
Waiting
for Infra
Daniel Gruno Today 01:28
ping? :)
You can view the full request
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/servicedesk/customer/portal/1/INFRA-11998>
Previous activity
Daniel Gruno 01/Jun/16 01:09
Everything but Confluence/JIRA is already s
Assuming no one else volunteers (or objects), I'll get started on this
month's report :)
With regards,
Daniel.
On 07/03/2016 03:11 PM, johndam...@apache.org wrote:
Dear podling,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give
ator of the lists now.
Apart from the various archives (4 of them, I believe), we have 13
people on the dev@ list and 7 on the users@ list. I'll ping Andrew and
ask about his whereabouts.
With regards,
Daniel.
On Sun, Jul 3, 2016 at 10:31 AM Daniel Gruno wrote:
Assuming no one else
I'm unsure about this, so asking here.
There are a few notices in the NOTICE file for some AL/2 and MIT
licensed pieces of code. Should those simply be removed from the NOTICE
file, or is it fine if we keep them?
Personally, I'm fine with keeping them there as a sort of thank you to
the projects/
As is a pony's prerogative, I am getting started on a 0.9 branch slated
for a release vote later next week (or this week if you're an ISO
freak). We have a lot of changes to get out to to people and ponies.
I intend to start a vote in the coming days and - assuming it passes -
bring it to the Incu
On 07/10/2016 04:31 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> Maybe I'm missing something, but is there some kind of release process for
> pony mail? Or even a build process? Might be good to test that out.
>
> John
>
The software does not require anything to be built (other than some
JavaScript files to be c
On 07/10/2016 07:36 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2016 at 1:18 PM Daniel Gruno wrote:
>
>> On 07/10/2016 04:31 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
>>> Maybe I'm missing something, but is there some kind of release process
>> for
>>> pony mail? Or eve
On 07/05/2016 03:43 PM, Sharan Foga wrote:
> Hi
>
> Any plans to have some sort of preview before posting functionality? (or is
> that on the wishlist somewhere?).
>
> I just posted a message which I thought had hyperlinks in it (but didn't when
> it posted).
>
> Thanks
> Sharan
>
It could
Hello folks,
As mentioned earlier, I have now started the release process for the 0.9
branch, and am now calling a vote on release candidate 1.
This is a vote on the artefacts collected from the tree in the 0.9
branch with commit hash 9881edb4ff13b88d231b5a069399a74d9550c2fe.
The tree can be insp
02 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> Hello folks,
> As mentioned earlier, I have now started the release process for the 0.9
> branch, and am now calling a vote on release candidate 1.
>
> This is a vote on the artefacts collected from the tree in the 0.9
>
On 2016-07-13 04:53 (+0200), Gav wrote:
> Hi,
>
> When running :-
>
> python3 import-mbox.py --source https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/
> --mod-mbox --project httpd
>
> I get what seems to be all lists being slurped k, the output ends with:-
>
> ...
> Parsed httpd-announce/201511.mb
+1
>
> Thanks
> Sharan
>
> On 12/07/16 11:02, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>> Hello folks,
>> As mentioned earlier, I have now started the release process for the 0.9
>> branch, and am now calling a vote on release candidate 1.
>>
>> This is a vote on
This is a vote to release Apache Pony Mail (Incubating) 0.9.RC2 as 0.9.
Some regressions were found by Gavin McDonald in RC1 which rendered the
importer useless. RC2 contains fixes to this issue.
The git hash for the current 0.9.RC2 head is:
116797982cec1e483349ed48a397e0b0cdad5b1d
As before, the
And here's my +1.
Bug fixes aside, this passes the same checks I ran earlier.
With regards,
Daniel.
On 07/13/2016 01:46 PM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> This is a vote to release Apache Pony Mail (Incubating) 0.9.RC2 as 0.9.
> Some regressions were found by Gavin McDonald in RC1 which r
Binding votes:
Daniel Gruno: +1
Ulises Beresi: +1
Francesco Chicchiriccò: +1
Non-binding votes:
Gavin McDonald: +1
Sharan Foga: +1
With 3 binding +1s and 2 non-binding, the vote passes.
I'll send this to the incubator for the official incubator vote soon.
With regards,
Daniel.
On
On 07/23/2016 02:16 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Jul 22, 2016 19:40, "Gav" wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Jul 17, 2016 at 6:58 PM, Daniel Gruno
> wrote:
>>
>>> Binding votes:
>>> Daniel Gruno: +1
>>> Ulises Beresi: +1
>>> Frances
FWIW, the release is slightly delayed while I work through the backlog
from my holidays. I expect to announce and publish it in a day or two.
With regards,
Daniel.
On 07/23/2016 04:58 AM, Daniel Gruno wrote:
> On 07/23/2016 02:16 AM, John D. Ament wrote:
>> On Jul 22, 2016 19:40, &qu
Anyone wanna try taking a stab at this? :)
With regards,
Daniel.
On 07/31/2016 03:15 PM, johndam...@apache.org wrote:
> Dear podling,
>
> This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
> Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to
> prepare your qua
Hi folks and ponies,
I am pleased to announce that Apache Pony Mail (Incubating) 0.9 has been
released and is available on the apache mirrors now.
You may download 0.9 at:
https://ponymail.incubator.apache.org/downloads.html
Noteworthy changes in 0.9:
- Private lists can be hidden in the index f
##
CVE-2016-4460: Apache Pony Mail (Incubating) disclosure vulnerability
Severity: Moderate
Vendor: The Apache Software Foundation
Versions affected: 0.6c through 0.8b
Description:
A flaw was discovered in the access, authentic
I have submitted a short report to the IPMC now.
In essence, we need to start being better at spreading the word about
Pony Mail, now that we have a release, and hpefully get some more
developers on board.
If anyone has any suggestions, I am more than willing to hear them out :)
With regards,
Hi folks,
As is evident, we haven't been getting a lot of traction on the JS dev
front from new people, and as such, I am going to bring up an old
subject, rehashed a bit.
Specifically, I would like to propose that we make a coffee branch of
PonyMail with a ReactDOM-like approach to handling DOM,
Hi folks,
As you can see from the flurry of commits, I've begun working my way
through rebuilding Pony mail from scratch with coffee and a new DOM
model. For now, the basic list view (compact mode) works, and the
results so far show a 70% decrease in processing time required to render
the list view
On 09/05/2016 09:32 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
> On 04/09/2016 18:38, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>> Hi folks,
>> As you can see from the flurry of commits, I've begun working my way
>> through rebuilding Pony mail from scratch with coffee and a new DOM
>> mod
Hi folks,
I've started on our report for September, which should(?) be the last
monthly report - after that, it will be quarterly. Report is paste at
the bottom of this email.
As noted, our primary goal right now is to attract more contributors.
I sincerely hope that the coffee-and-cake branch wil
/ae791c1a
>> Tree: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-ponymail/tree/ae791c1a
>> Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-ponymail/diff/ae791c1a
>>
>> Branch: refs/heads/coffee-and-cake
>> Commit: ae791c1a619fc965cca72f1f62edb87b07a088b9
>>
On 09/13/2016 10:50 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 13 September 2016 at 09:01, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>> On 09/12/2016 12:48 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 8 September 2016 at 07:03, wrote:
>>>> Repository: incubator-ponymail
>>>> Updated Branches:
>>>&g
On 09/13/2016 11:07 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 13 September 2016 at 09:53, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>> On 09/13/2016 10:50 AM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 13 September 2016 at 09:01, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>>>> On 09/12/2016 12:48 PM, sebb wrote:
>>>>> On 8 Septem
/incubator-ponymail/diff/5baa9534
>>
>> Branch: refs/heads/coffee-and-cake
>> Commit: 5baa9534da5a055adb7d311bd4a29205eb7f00de
>> Parents: ae791c1
>> Author: Daniel Gruno
>> Authored: Thu Sep 8 08:07:35 2016 +0200
>> Committer: Daniel Gruno
>> Committed: Thu S
On 09/26/2016 11:36 AM, sebb wrote:
> I could not find a tag for the 0.9 release in the Git repo.
>
> Surely there should be one?
>
While it's not strictly required, I agree we should have a 0.9 tag.
Can someone sort this out? :) see the [VOTE] thread for the exact tree
this should point to.
On 09/30/2016 03:27 PM, sebb wrote:
> The Lua files contain lots of the following code in various versions:
>
> canUse = false
> if account then
> local lid = doc.list_raw:match("<[^.]+%.(.-)>")
> local flid = doc.list_raw:match("<([^.]+%..-)>")
> for k, v in pairs(rights or {}) do
>
On 10/14/2016 12:12 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 13 October 2016 at 21:28, sebb wrote:
>> On 7 October 2016 at 00:44, sebb wrote:
>>> The id generator is used to create a key for the message database, and
>>> also to create a Permalink.
>>>
>>> Therefore, an id generator needs to fulfil the following des
A workaround would be to force the ID generator to
always use the original list ID in the source for generating the ID, and
only use the forced list ID if no list was found.
Thoughts?
>
> How can list renaming be managed in Pony Mail?
> Or is it not allowed?
>
>
> On 14 Octobe
On 10/21/2016 09:22 PM, sebb wrote:
> The issues@p.a.o is currently unused.
>
> Seems to me it ought to be getting the Github issue mails.
>
> OK if I ask Infra for this to be done?
> Or maybe someone one the PPMC can do it already?
>
sgtm, probably best to make a ticket so the request is record
On 10/28/2016 07:09 PM, sebb wrote:
> I have been having a look at the coffee files.
> They now build OK on my system and generate the same output as before.
>
> However I cannot work out how the generated Javascript is supposed to be used.
> The HTML files still invoke ponymail.js
>
> I tried re
On 10/28/2016 07:45 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 28 October 2016 at 18:17, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>> On 10/28/2016 07:09 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> I have been having a look at the coffee files.
>>> They now build OK on my system and generate the same output as before.
>>>
&
On 11/06/2016 03:18 PM, sebb wrote:
> Fields such as message-id are stored as text strings, but they are
> only really intended to be used as ids. They don't contain independent
> text parts.
>
> From what I have understood so far from reading the ES docs, such
> fields should be tagged as
>
> "i
On 11/07/2016 01:02 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
> sebb wrote on 11/6/16 10:10 PM:
>> On 7 November 2016 at 02:21, John D. Ament wrote:
> ...snip...
>>> Although the interesting thing, I just tried searching by message ID, and
>>> that doesn't seem to work on the ASF version out there -
>>> https://li
On 11/07/2016 06:00 PM, sebb wrote:
> The epoch field is defined as 'double' in setup.py.
>
> However AFAICT it contains seconds since the epoch (it defaults to
> os.time() in lua)
>
> I'm not sure we are interested in fractions of seconds in the case of
> mail docs so why not store the value as
On 11/08/2016 01:00 AM, sebb wrote:
> import-mbox sets the @version field to 1 in all uploads.
> However the archiver does not set the field.
>
> What is the purpose of the field?
>
I honestly can't remember. I think we can just remove that, it doesn't
currently serve any purpose.
With regards,
Just as a FWIW, I'm at ApacheCon at the moment, so my time for PM is
limited. I'll reply in length next week when I get back. On the whole, I
agree with your thoughts.
With regards,
Daniel.
On 11/18/2016 12:28 PM, sebb wrote:
> At present if the archiver cannot extract what it considers
> display
On 11/21/2016 12:50 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 21 November 2016 at 11:40, Francesco Chicchiriccò
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> not sure but it seems that the commit below broke my scheduled import from
>> mbox:
>
> It won't be that commit, most likely the fix for #251
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator
Hi folks,
I did a quick'n'dirty report this time around, as I have way too many
projects coming out my ears these days (don't we all?!).
With regards,
Daniel
Report below, changes/suggestions are welcome:
###
Pony Mail
Pony Mail is a mail-archivin
ready to be pushed out.
Which reminds me: Folks, when you fix a bug, please put it in the
changelog, so users can tell the difference :)
>
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 1:04 PM Daniel Gruno wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>> I did a quick'n'dirty report this time around, as I have
Hi folks,
just a reminder; If/when you change functionality in the system, please
log it in the CHANGELOG.md file under the appropriate upcoming version
name (currently 0.10).
With regards,
Daniel.
gt;>>
>>>> The original message fields (including full body) are not enough to
>>>> uniquely id a message in the mailing list stream.
>>>> For that one needs something like a sequence number.
>>>> However some early mailboxes don't include
On 12/22/2016 12:36 PM, sebb wrote:
> Does anyone know the exact version of Python used by lists.a.o?
> And the version of the mail package?
>
> I'm seeing some different behaviour for mail parsing that I don't
> understand, and I would like to eliminate the version of Python/mail
> as a cause.
>
I wanted to wait itl I had the coffee and cake branch all snazzy and
ready, but seeing as we have 96 changes in the log for 0.10 already, I
think it's time to push a new release very soon.
Thoughts? I'll gladly RM it.
With regards,
Daniel.
On 12/25/2016 02:45 AM, Gavin McDonald wrote:
>
>> On 24 Dec. 2016, at 11:47 pm, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>>
>> I wanted to wait itl I had the coffee and cake branch all snazzy and
>> ready, but seeing as we have 96 changes in the log for 0.10 already, I
>> think it&
On 01/03/2017 02:12 AM, sebb wrote:
> The test VM is now running ES 5.x with a basic database.
> The Apache config appears OK, Javascript is able to invoke lua scripts OK.
>
> However a couple of the queries fail:
>
> api/pminfo.lua:169: Backend Database returned code 400!
>
> {"error":{"root_ca
On 01/03/2017 03:44 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 3 January 2017 at 12:33, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>> On 01/03/2017 02:12 AM, sebb wrote:
>>> The test VM is now running ES 5.x with a basic database.
>>> The Apache config appears OK, Javascript is able to invoke lua scripts OK.
>
On 01/03/2017 05:23 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 3 January 2017 at 14:47, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>> On 01/03/2017 03:44 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> On 3 January 2017 at 12:33, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>>>> On 01/03/2017 02:12 AM, sebb wrote:
>>>>> The test VM is now ru
Forwarding to dev list, which is where it belongs :)
Forwarded Message
Subject: Re: incubator-ponymail git commit: 'hot topics' feature should
use terms, not significant_terms
Date: Sun, 8 Jan 2017 01:01:07 +0100
From: Daniel Gruno
Reply-To: dev@ponymail.incubator.
Top posting because lot of text :p
Yeah, it's a specific issue with ezmlm doing what it's not supposed to
do, which is edit an email to add that field (there are lots of other
issues with that!). We can possibly work around it if need be?
This is a specific thing that ezmlm (and some other mailing
On 01/15/2017 01:35 PM, sebb wrote:
> There seems to be a problem with the site repo:
>
> $ git clone
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-ponymail-site.git
> Cloning into 'incubator-ponymail-site'...
> remote: Counting objects: 1230, done.
> remote: Compressing objects: 100% (1195
On 01/15/2017 01:46 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 15 January 2017 at 12:40, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>> On 01/15/2017 01:35 PM, sebb wrote:
>>> There seems to be a problem with the site repo:
>>>
>>> $ git clone
>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf
On 02/24/2017 07:29 PM, sebb wrote:
> On 24 February 2017 at 11:29, Jacques Le Roux
> wrote:
>> Hi Pony mail users and devs :)
>>
>> Permalinks in Pony Mail are great. But, for committers, could we not have a
>> special button to chain the "URL shortening service". Most of the time I
>> prefer to
Hi folks,
looking at the huge changeset we have in the master branch, I think it's
about time we cut a release very soon. Unless I head objections, I'll
aim for a T&R in early May, which should mean we'll have a new release
(0.11) right before ApacheCon.
This will not include the coffee-and-cake
While having a cup of coffee on the balcony, I got to thinking - would
it make sense for us to convert the PM UI configuration to yaml instead
of a .lua file? It should make it less arcane to edit for non-techies.
The config could be something like this:
# ElasticSearch settings
database:
hos
e reasoning is that most config
management today is centered around yaml - so going from yaml (in cfg
mgmt) to yaml (in PM) would be easier than trying to convert to a custom
lua script.
>
>> You got my +1 here.
>>
>> U
>>
>> On Mon, May 1, 2017, 12:35 Daniel Gruno
On 05/02/2017 02:10 PM, Shane Curcuru wrote:
> Daniel Gruno wrote on 5/1/17 1:35 PM:
>> While having a cup of coffee on the balcony, I got to thinking - would
>> it make sense for us to convert the PM UI configuration to yaml instead
>> of a .lua file? It should make it less a
: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-ponymail/diff/c4e38edb
>>
>> Branch: refs/heads/master
>> Commit: c4e38edb4032d1613fcff161be0a3bd201986a4a
>> Parents: 2b8b5b0
>> Author: Daniel Gruno
>> Authored: Fri May 5 20:01:28 2017 +0200
>> Committer: Dani
I've added some bits to the IPMC report about us.
I think our main focus, 0.10 aside, is still finding and recognizing new
contributors. We have seen a few new contributions over the past month,
would be interesting to see if those people stick with the project :)
With regards,
Daniel.
On 06/03/
Hi folks,
I've been pondering about the difficulties PM faces in terms of getting
new contributors, and one of the core issues, as I see it, is our choice
of using Lua for the web application. Apart from locking people to
apache/nginx, it seems that people are - for lack of another word -
scared to
nt to imply that django could handle sessions
and such).
It is entirely possible that I'm ignorant about what Django would have
to offer here.
With regards,
Daniel.
>
> On Sun, Jun 4, 2017 at 3:26 PM Daniel Gruno wrote:
>
>> Hi folks,
>> I've been pondering a
ttp://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-ponymail/tree/e2d81036
>> Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-ponymail/diff/e2d81036
>>
>> Branch: refs/heads/master
>> Commit: e2d8103635db012d13fc6af46d336c96be31d4c1
>> Parents: 8b7ede8
&
wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-ponymail/diff/e2d81036
>>
>> Branch: refs/heads/master
>> Commit: e2d8103635db012d13fc6af46d336c96be31d4c1
>> Parents: 8b7ede8
>> Author: Daniel Gruno
s.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-ponymail/tree/e2d81036
>> Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-ponymail/diff/e2d81036
>>
>> Branch: refs/heads/master
>> Commit: e2d8103635db012d13fc6af46d336c96be31d4c1
>> Parents: 8b7ede8
>> Author: Daniel Gruno
On 06/05/2017 11:01 AM, sebb wrote:
> On 5 June 2017 at 09:17, Daniel Gruno wrote:
>> I missed a git add in the last commit, sorry. Will add and recommit now.
>
> Have you tested that the change is complete?
>
> I'm still getting an error.
Tested it with a bunch of m
ail/tree/fda07b8d
>> Diff: http://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator-ponymail/diff/fda07b8d
>>
>> Branch: refs/heads/master
>> Commit: fda07b8d73decb0943c817d6fee69416c2016714
>> Parents: 2802e29
>> Author: Daniel Gruno
>> Authored: Mon Jun 5 10:32:36 2017 +
repos/asf/incubator-ponymail/diff/15c35544
>>
>> Branch: refs/heads/master
>> Commit: 15c355442ea146f1ee28315e0e7ac4b203a5b851
>> Parents: fda07b8
>> Author: Daniel Gruno
>> Authored: Mon Jun 5 11:14:17 2017 +0200
>> Committer: Daniel Gruno
>> Committed: Mon Jun 5 11:14:17
On 06/06/2017 08:15 AM, Francesco Chicchiriccò wrote:
> Hi all,
> until recently (at least one week ago, but possibly later), I had my
> corporate Ponymail deployment successfully hide private lists from
> unauthenticated view.
>
> After recent upgrades (not sure exactly which one, as said) instea
Here are my thoughts (and progress) so far on the subject:
I have ported about half of the API at home, and am testing it while
also building some simple unit tests.
Once I am satisfied that the port covers the complete current API, I
will donate this to Apache for review and whatever we then cho
On 06/19/2017 08:32 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> I was searching around for information and wanted to get some simple
> examples together. How are the releases for Pony Mail created (tar +
> signatures)?
>
> John
>
Spotty Internet today, but here goes.
Pony Mail is designed to just run out of th
On 06/20/2017 12:11 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 5:19 PM Daniel Gruno wrote:
>
>> On 06/19/2017 08:32 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
>>> I was searching around for information and wanted to get some simple
>>> examples together. How are the relea
On 06/20/2017 12:35 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 6:16 AM Daniel Gruno wrote:
>
>> On 06/20/2017 12:11 PM, John D. Ament wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jun 19, 2017 at 5:19 PM Daniel Gruno
>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 06/19/2017 08:32 PM, John
1 - 100 of 175 matches
Mail list logo
