Re: Binding URL Options

2012-05-16 Thread Oleksandr Rudyy
Hi Rajith, I am sorry for a delayed reply. Option reject_behaviour is a client setting only and it is not passed into queue declare arguments. With reject_behaviour=server the 0-9-x client sends BasicReject commands for unacknowledged messages on recover to reject these messages either for the

[jira] [Created] (QPID-4003) qpid-cluster to allow --sasl-mechanism option

2012-05-16 Thread Pavel Moravec (JIRA)
Pavel Moravec created QPID-4003: --- Summary: qpid-cluster to allow --sasl-mechanism option Key: QPID-4003 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4003 Project: Qpid Issue Type:

[jira] [Updated] (QPID-4003) qpid-cluster to allow --sasl-mechanism option

2012-05-16 Thread Pavel Moravec (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4003?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Pavel Moravec updated QPID-4003: Attachment: qpid-cluster-mechList.patch patch implementing --sasl-mechanism option. Simple

Concerns about qpid::framing::Buffer::Iterator

2012-05-16 Thread Florian Weimer
Hi, the definition of qpid::framing::Buffer::Iterator seems buggy to me. This is not a bidirectional iterator. It's not even a forward iterator because the iterator state is kept in the referenced buffer object. It is not possible to use a pair of such iterators to form a range, so not

Re: Binding URL Options

2012-05-16 Thread Rajith Attapattu
Guys, thx for the explanation. I will have a look at the code to see how best to carry this option in the address structure. It appears that this can be put under x-subscriber map. When I post the code in this area, I will make sure to ping you both to ensure I got it right. Thanks again Rajith

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-3175) SSL support in Python client libraries

2012-05-16 Thread Michal Zerola (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3175?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13276773#comment-13276773 ] Michal Zerola commented on QPID-3175: - Hi, we are encountering problems when using the

Re: Concerns about qpid::framing::Buffer::Iterator

2012-05-16 Thread Andrew Stitcher
On Wed, 2012-05-16 at 15:09 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: Hi, the definition of qpid::framing::Buffer::Iterator seems buggy to me. This is not a bidirectional iterator. It's not even a forward iterator because the iterator state is kept in the referenced buffer object. It is not

[jira] [Created] (QPID-4004) qpid::framing::Buffer::Iterator not very useful

2012-05-16 Thread Florian Weimer (JIRA)
Florian Weimer created QPID-4004: Summary: qpid::framing::Buffer::Iterator not very useful Key: QPID-4004 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4004 Project: Qpid Issue Type:

[jira] [Assigned] (QPID-4004) qpid::framing::Buffer::Iterator not very useful

2012-05-16 Thread Andrew Stitcher (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Stitcher reassigned QPID-4004: - Assignee: Andrew Stitcher qpid::framing::Buffer::Iterator not very useful

Review Request: QPID-4001 Interfaces for QPID API

2012-05-16 Thread rajith attapattu
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/5151/ --- Review request for qpid, Robbie Gemmell, Weston Price, Rafael Schloming, and Rob

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-4001) Add a java version of the Qpid API

2012-05-16 Thread jirapos...@reviews.apache.org (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13276898#comment-13276898 ] jirapos...@reviews.apache.org commented on QPID-4001: -

Re: Review Request: Destination refactoring

2012-05-16 Thread rajith attapattu
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/4658/#review7940 --- Just an update on the status. I have already made the changes

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-3401) Refactor address resolution code

2012-05-16 Thread jirapos...@reviews.apache.org (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-3401?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13277049#comment-13277049 ] jirapos...@reviews.apache.org commented on QPID-3401: -

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-4004) qpid::framing::Buffer::Iterator not very useful

2012-05-16 Thread Andrew Stitcher (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13277073#comment-13277073 ] Andrew Stitcher commented on QPID-4004: --- There are a few bits of cruft in the Buffer

JBoss 5.1 to 6.1 Migration Problem...

2012-05-16 Thread Dan Carda
Hi there! I'm currently in the middle of a JBoss 5.1 to 6.1 migration and it's not going well. I know the problem was caused by ME, but I'm hopeful someone will go, oh yeah, you need to do this. Currently, I'm using the 0.10 version. This version worked fine under JBoss 5.1. So well in fact

[jira] [Updated] (QPID-4004) Cruft in qpid::framing::Buffer class should be removed

2012-05-16 Thread Andrew Stitcher (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Stitcher updated QPID-4004: -- Summary: Cruft in qpid::framing::Buffer class should be removed (was:

Re: JBoss 5.1 to 6.1 Migration Problem...

2012-05-16 Thread Weston M. Price
Hi Dan, It looks like your trying to mix JMS providers. The stacktrace is telling you that you are attempting to use the HornetQ activation spec for your MDB. HornetQ is the default JMS provider for EAP and as such, if you don't tell EAP you want to use another messaging provider then

[jira] [Resolved] (QPID-4004) Cruft in qpid::framing::Buffer class should be removed

2012-05-16 Thread Andrew Stitcher (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ] Andrew Stitcher resolved QPID-4004. --- Resolution: Fixed Fix Version/s: 0.17 Cruft in qpid::framing::Buffer class should

[jira] [Created] (QPID-4005) Eliminate using especially using namespace from header file

2012-05-16 Thread Andrew Stitcher (JIRA)
Andrew Stitcher created QPID-4005: - Summary: Eliminate using especially using namespace from header file Key: QPID-4005 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4005 Project: Qpid

Re: JBoss 5.1 to 6.1 Migration Problem...

2012-05-16 Thread Weston M. Price
For clarification, I should not have said EAP, that should simply read JBoss 5 and JBoss 6 where appropriate. Regards, Weston On May 16, 2012, at 4:47 PM, Weston M. Price wrote: Hi Dan, It looks like your trying to mix JMS providers. The stacktrace is telling you that you are

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-4005) Eliminate using especially using namespace from header file

2012-05-16 Thread Andrew Stitcher (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4005?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13277207#comment-13277207 ] Andrew Stitcher commented on QPID-4005: --- There is really a hierarchy of badness here:

Re: Review Request: QPID-4001 Interfaces for QPID API

2012-05-16 Thread rajith attapattu
--- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/5151/ --- (Updated 2012-05-17 04:34:35.003307) Review request for qpid, Robbie Gemmell,

[jira] [Commented] (QPID-4001) Add a java version of the Qpid API

2012-05-16 Thread jirapos...@reviews.apache.org (JIRA)
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-4001?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanelfocusedCommentId=13277561#comment-13277561 ] jirapos...@reviews.apache.org commented on QPID-4001: -