I have a student who hasn't succeeded in running compiled-from-source DrRacket
on 64-bit ubuntu. Specifically, he claims it dumps core with
SIGSEGV MAPERR si_code 1 fault on addr 0x4
Aborted
on startup. I have *not* tried to verify this myself, so he's almost certainly
made a minor mistake.
I build on 64bit ubuntu every day.
a gdb backtrace would be helpful.
gdb> handle SIGSEGV nostop noprint
gdb> run
Kevin
On 10/05/2010 11:26 AM, John Clements wrote:
I have a student who hasn't succeeded in running compiled-from-source DrRacket
on 64-bit ubuntu. Specifically, he claims it dump
DrDr is 64bit Ubuntu as well
Jay
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 11:37 AM, Kevin Tew wrote:
> I build on 64bit ubuntu every day.
> a gdb backtrace would be helpful.
>
> gdb> handle SIGSEGV nostop noprint
> gdb> run
>
> Kevin
>
> On 10/05/2010 11:26 AM, John Clements wrote:
>
> I have a student who hasn't
At Tue, 5 Oct 2010 10:26:04 -0700, John Clements wrote:
> I have a student who hasn't succeeded in running compiled-from-source
> DrRacket
> on 64-bit ubuntu. Specifically, he claims it dumps core with
>
>
> SIGSEGV MAPERR si_code 1 fault on addr 0x4
> Aborted
>
>
> on startup.
I think this
I just moved a collection out of my collects directory, and clicking the "check
syntax" button produces this internal error:
procedure application: expected procedure, given: #f; arguments were:
'scribblings
=== context ===
/Users/clements/plt/collects/setup/xref.rkt:14:2: for-loop
/Users/clem
A couple of weeks ago, you showed me the trick that rackunit uses to allow
single-instantiation of a modules. I'm now trying to do this
for a planet package, and it looks like I have to change the required module
from being a relative to being an absolute path. That is:
(require (prefix-in drl
John,
See "this-package-in", found both in the cce/scheme planet package and
in unstable/require. If you write (prefix-in drlink: (this-package-in
private/drracket-link)) you should get the behavior you want, and it
should be less fragile than the explicit "planet" path.
Carl Eastlund
On Tue, O
On 10/05/2010 03:59 PM, John Clements wrote:
A couple of weeks ago, you showed me the trick that rackunit uses to allow
single-instantiation of a modules. I'm now trying to do this
for a planet package, and it looks like I have to change the required module
from being a relative to being an ab
I seem to have mangled my response right before sending it. Here it is
again, hopefully straightened out.
On 10/05/2010 03:59 PM, John Clements wrote:
A couple of weeks ago, you showed me the trick that rackunit uses to allow
single-instantiation of a modules. I'm now trying to do this
for a
On Oct 5, 2010, at 3:25 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
> I seem to have mangled my response right before sending it. Here it is again,
> hopefully straightened out.
>
> On 10/05/2010 03:59 PM, John Clements wrote:
>> A couple of weeks ago, you showed me the trick that rackunit uses to allow
>> sing
John Clements wrote:
On Oct 5, 2010, at 3:25 PM, Ryan Culpepper wrote:
I seem to have mangled my response right before sending it. Here it is again,
hopefully straightened out.
On 10/05/2010 03:59 PM, John Clements wrote:
A couple of weeks ago, you showed me the trick that rackunit uses to a
11 matches
Mail list logo
