[racket-dev] EOPL tests

2012-02-21 Thread David Van Horn
Is there a test suite for EOPL? I didn't find anything in collects/eopl or collects/tests, but eopl.rkt mentions the "test harness". David _ Racket Developers list: http://lists.racket-lang.org/dev

[racket-dev] Interactive Stepping

2012-02-21 Thread Stephen Bloch
The latest student query on "users@racket-lang" comes from a student who typed an expression at the prompt and hit "Step" to single-step its evaluation. Which is a reasonable thing to do, and one I've wished for years were possible. How difficult would it be? A related wish-list item: I'd lik

[racket-dev] OS X 10.8 includes new restrictions on running apps

2012-02-21 Thread John Clements
In a move that I find not even slightly surprising, the new Apple operating system (10.8, out soon?) includes new features that make it harder for developers to deploy their code on user machines. http://tidbits.com/article/12795 Specifically, the technology is called "Gatekeeper", and it allo

Re: [racket-dev] Interactive Stepping

2012-02-21 Thread John Clements
On Feb 21, 2012, at 1:44 PM, Stephen Bloch wrote: > The latest student query on "users@racket-lang" comes from a student who > typed an expression at the prompt and hit "Step" to single-step its > evaluation. Which is a reasonable thing to do, and one I've wished for years > were possible. H

Re: [racket-dev] Is anybody else getting this error?

2012-02-21 Thread Gustavo Massaccesi
I saw an error like this a few days ago, but it was in a large project. This is the minimal example to reproduce the error. I guest that the problem is that a .zo exist for an older version of a file that now doesn't compile. The error disappears if I delete all the .zo files. I am using the DrRa

Re: [racket-dev] OS X 10.8 includes new restrictions on running apps

2012-02-21 Thread Robby Findler
I'm hoping that there will be some backlash from this and we'll not actually see a high setting being the default in 10.8 Robby On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 3:56 PM, John Clements wrote: > In a move that I find not even slightly surprising, the new Apple operating > system (10.8, out soon?) inc

Re: [racket-dev] Interactive Stepping

2012-02-21 Thread Stephen Bloch
On Feb 21, 2012, at 5:00 PM, John Clements wrote: > Perhaps the simplest would be to read in the student program, stick the > current expression on the end of it, and run the stepper. Perhaps it's just > because I'm the implementer, but this seems error-prone. Perhaps the right > thing wou

Re: [racket-dev] Is anybody else getting this error?

2012-02-21 Thread SF
On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Sean Reque wrote: > I'm getting this error on the latest release of Racket (5.2) on Windows just > using vanilla Racket and running my program. The exact message is: > > exception raised by error display handler: normalize-path: # > (within the input path) is not a

Re: [racket-dev] Is anybody else getting this error?

2012-02-21 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 5:51 PM, SF wrote: > On Sat, Feb 18, 2012 at 7:31 PM, Sean Reque wrote: >> I'm getting this error on the latest release of Racket (5.2) on Windows just >> using vanilla Racket and running my program. The exact message is: >> >> exception raised by error display handler: nor

Re: [racket-dev] OS X 10.8 includes new restrictions on running apps

2012-02-21 Thread Eli Barzilay
5 hours ago, John Clements wrote: > In a move that I find not even slightly surprising, the new Apple > operating system (10.8, out soon?) includes new features that make > it harder for developers to deploy their code on user machines. > > http://tidbits.com/article/12795 The thing that I didn't

Re: [racket-dev] OS X 10.8 includes new restrictions on running apps

2012-02-21 Thread Sam Tobin-Hochstadt
On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote: > > Also, it's likely that I don't understand, but it sounds to me like > it's better to stay out of this thing since otherwise you need to > commit to be sandboxed -- and if it's the same as on the ios, then a > sandboxed racket is not very us

Re: [racket-dev] OS X 10.8 includes new restrictions on running apps

2012-02-21 Thread Eli Barzilay
A few minutes ago, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: > On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote: > > > > Also, it's likely that I don't understand, but it sounds to me > > like it's better to stay out of this thing since otherwise you > > need to commit to be sandboxed -- and if it's the same

Re: [racket-dev] OS X 10.8 includes new restrictions on running apps

2012-02-21 Thread John Clements
On Feb 21, 2012, at 7:54 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote: > A few minutes ago, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 21, 2012 at 10:22 PM, Eli Barzilay wrote: >>> >>> Also, it's likely that I don't understand, but it sounds to me >>> like it's better to stay out of this thing since otherwise you >>>