On Sun, 21 Jul 2013 10:32:10 -0600, Matthew Flatt
mflatt-sDh8Nw2yj/+vc3sceru...@public.gmane.org said:
Matthew When the gui (or gui-lib) package is installed, then a
Matthew gracket executable is added to bin. The starter executable
Matthew is used by `raco exe' to generate
On Sat, 20 Jul 2013 10:36:09 -0600, Matthew Flatt
mflatt-sDh8Nw2yj/+vc3sceru...@public.gmane.org said:
Matthew At Sat, 20 Jul 2013 17:12:26 +0200, Togan Muftuoglu wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 17:43:42 -0600, Matthew Flatt
On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 17:43:42 -0600, Matthew Flatt
mflatt-sDh8Nw2yj/+vc3sceru...@public.gmane.org said:
Matthew The documentation directory and collection directory should be
Matthew configurable, now.
Looks like but I still have problems with the build process as directory
At Sat, 20 Jul 2013 17:12:26 +0200, Togan Muftuoglu wrote:
On Fri, 19 Jul 2013 17:43:42 -0600, Matthew Flatt
mflatt-sDh8Nw2yj/+vc3sceru...@public.gmane.org said:
Matthew The documentation directory and collection directory should be
Matthew configurable, now.
Looks like but
The latest snapshot page includes plain-source options:
http://www.cs.utah.edu/plt/snapshots/
The reason for having both Minimal Racket | Source and Minimal
Racket | Source + built packages isn't obvious, given that Minimal
Racket doesn't include any packages --- but there is a difference
At Fri, 19 Jul 2013 07:37:13 +0200, Togan Muftuoglu wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 17:07:38 -0600, Matthew Flatt
mflatt-sDh8Nw2yj/+vc3sceru...@public.gmane.org said:
Matthew At Fri, 19 Jul 2013 00:48:10 +0200, Togan Muftuoglu wrote:
1. configure and Makefile should allow docdir
The documentation directory and collection directory should be
configurable, now.
Besides starting from the git repository, you could also try out the
new source snapshot:
http://www.cs.utah.edu/plt/snapshots/
The label on the Source snapshots really should say something like
kernel in source
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 19:52:21 -0600, Matthew Flatt
mflatt-sDh8Nw2yj/+vc3sceru...@public.gmane.org said:
Matthew I think the new system is as ready as it's going to get without
Matthew further feedback, and my guess is that the problem hasn't been
Matthew fixed. Can you check with
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 04:17:10PM +0200, Togan Muftuoglu wrote:
I guess it depends on how one works. When there is no release or I want to
package a git version of the project. I need to put a version number in
the package spec file, that would make it possible to upgrade or
On 07/13/2013 12:56 PM, Matthew Flatt wrote:
Here's a big-picture update of where we are in the new package system
and the conversion of the Racket distribution to use packages.
This message covers [lots of awesome stuff]...
Thanks a ton for the update and clarifications, Matthew.
I have one
At Thu, 18 Jul 2013 11:44:41 -0600, Neil Toronto wrote:
I maintain 3 collections that will become ring-0
packages. What should I (and others like me) be doing right now in
response to the Big Package Shift?
For packages that are currently in the main Racket repo, then there's
nothing in
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 19:52:21 -0600, Matthew Flatt
mflatt-sDh8Nw2yj/+vc3sceru...@public.gmane.org said:
Matthew At Mon, 15 Jul 2013 23:17:08 +0200, Togan Muftuoglu wrote:
Maybe I have missed it but is there, or will there be a documentation
showing the dependency of packages. Like
At Fri, 19 Jul 2013 00:48:10 +0200, Togan Muftuoglu wrote:
1. configure and Makefile should allow docdir parameter given at as an arg
[...]
2. collects path should be allowed for another location ie.
[...]
I'll work on those.
Finally currently build system can't complete the install
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 05:07:38PM -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote:
At Fri, 19 Jul 2013 00:48:10 +0200, Togan Muftuoglu wrote:
1. configure and Makefile should allow docdir parameter given at as an arg
[...]
2. collects path should be allowed for another location ie.
[...]
I'll work on
On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 19:51:08 -0400, James McCoy
jamessan-8fiuurrzop0dnm+yrof...@public.gmane.org said:
James On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 05:07:38PM -0600, Matthew Flatt wrote:
At Fri, 19 Jul 2013 00:48:10 +0200, Togan Muftuoglu wrote:
1. configure and Makefile should allow docdir
On Thu, 18 Jul 2013 17:07:38 -0600, Matthew Flatt
mflatt-sDh8Nw2yj/+vc3sceru...@public.gmane.org said:
Matthew At Fri, 19 Jul 2013 00:48:10 +0200, Togan Muftuoglu wrote:
1. configure and Makefile should allow docdir parameter given at as an
arg [...]
2. collects path
At Mon, 15 Jul 2013 23:17:08 +0200, Togan Muftuoglu wrote:
Maybe I have missed it but is there, or will there be a documentation showing
the dependency of packages. Like package B requires A C and recommends F.
We'll need documentation to say which package provides a given library.
I don't
On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
3(a) Speaking of which, I think there is some backlog of pull requests
on GitHub. Would it be simpler to to accept any more of these before
the source layout universe changes, or too much to deal with so punt
until
At Sun, 14 Jul 2013 09:43:13 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
At Sun, 14 Jul 2013 09:02:28 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
But when you run `raco pkg install' or `raco pkg update', then the
package details are not
At Sun, 14 Jul 2013 18:02:11 -0400, Greg Hendershott wrote:
1. Racket has a wonderful story about simple installation.
[..]
For many users, a monolithic(ish) simple install will remain a wonderful
thing.
As best I understand, the proposal isn't to get rid of that, instead
it's to
On Mon, 15 Jul 2013 09:34:00 -0600, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu
said:
Matthew At Sun, 14 Jul 2013 15:59:28 +0200, tog...@opensuse.org wrote:
On Sun, 14 Jul 2013 07:00:14 -0600, Matthew Flatt
mfl...@cs.utah.edu said:
Matthew Longer term, I think that OS-level
Matthew Flatt wrote at 07/13/2013 02:56 PM:
Others seem
overwhelmed by the details, unsure of how it will all work out, and
disconcerted by conflicting messages from others who seem to
understand the issues.
BTW, I don't know whether I'm involved in anyone being disconcerted. If
I am, please
At Sun, 14 Jul 2013 02:54:06 +0200, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
On 07/13/13 20:56, Matthew Flatt wrote:
[...]
** Downloading release installers from PLT
The www.racket-lang.org site's big blue button will provide the same
installers that it does now, at least by default. That
Thanks! (For one, I found the From Back There to Here section
particularly helpful.)
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 1:56 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
Here's a big-picture update of where we are in the new package system
and the conversion of the Racket distribution to use packages.
At Sun, 14 Jul 2013 02:54:06 +0200, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
On 07/13/13 20:56, Matthew Flatt wrote:
[...]
** Downloading release installers from PLT
The www.racket-lang.org site's big blue button will provide the same
installers that it does now, at least by default.
First, thanks for the very informative update.
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
[Guess:] The Racket and Minimal Racket distributions might point
to different pre-built package catalogs. Possibly, the Racket
catalog never updates packages that were
At Sun, 14 Jul 2013 09:02:28 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
First, thanks for the very informative update.
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
[Guess:] The Racket and Minimal Racket distributions might point
to different pre-built package catalogs.
On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 9:29 AM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
At Sun, 14 Jul 2013 09:02:28 -0400, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt wrote:
But when you run `raco pkg install' or `raco pkg update', then the
package details are not necessarily determined by
pkg.racket-lang.org. The package might
See below
Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 14, 2013, at 8:03 AM, Sam Tobin-Hochstadt sa...@ccs.neu.edu wrote:
First, thanks for the very informative update.
On Sat, Jul 13, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu wrote:
[Guess:] The Racket and Minimal Racket distributions might point
On Sun, 14 Jul 2013 07:00:14 -0600, Matthew Flatt mfl...@cs.utah.edu
said:
At Sun, 14 Jul 2013 02:54:06 +0200, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
On 07/13/13 20:56, Matthew Flatt wrote:
[...] ** Downloading release installers from PLT
The www.racket-lang.org
On 07/14/13 15:00, Matthew Flatt wrote:
At Sun, 14 Jul 2013 02:54:06 +0200, Juan Francisco Cantero Hurtado wrote:
On 07/13/13 20:56, Matthew Flatt wrote:
[...]
** Downloading release installers from PLT
The www.racket-lang.org site's big blue button will provide the same
installers that it
On 07/13/13 20:56, Matthew Flatt wrote:
[...]
** Downloading release installers from PLT
The www.racket-lang.org site's big blue button will provide the same
installers that it does now, at least by default. That is, the content
provided by the installer --- DrRacket, teaching languages, etc.
32 matches
Mail list logo
