deas?
> >
> >
> >
> > [1]
> >
> https://na01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fgithub.com%2Fapache%2Froyale-asjs%2Fwiki%2FRelease-Manager-Notesdata=02%7C01%7Caharui%40adobe.com%7C77d7607ce3594d6f38bd08d645bbda29%7Cfa7
t;
>
>
>
>
> ________
> From: Yishay Weiss
> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 1:21:33 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> Subject: RE
Yishay Weiss"
> wrote:
>
> The error message is in the console, I guess the redirect was
> of STDOUT only.
>
>
>
> Git push doesn’t require credentials in my console.
>
>
>
> Just to be clear, should I make failonerror false for push
> targets and do them ma
178decee1%7C0%7C0%7C636761902900462348sdata=Xusmt0Fvp3Q6BJmz%2BuX35NGWnB0AYOuYDErFEDrbCUc%3Dreserved=0
From: Alex Harui
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2018 2:07:38 AM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject
ez262eaWf9qBfUQ0QRtY%3Dreserved=0
From: Alex Harui
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2018 2:07:38 AM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3
Well, you can't really do the push manually because the script is expecting
files that need to be pushed are
ect: Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3
Well, you can't really do the push manually because the script is expecting
files that need to be pushed are pushed before calling Maven to do its thing.
You would have to break apart the Ant targets to allow you to push manually.
But the push of ut
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3
Hi Yishay,
I didn't see an error at the end of the output.
Piotr, did you make the suggested changes to releasecandidate.xml when you
got stuck at a similar point? Yishaw, see a p
: Thursday, October 25, 2018 8:20:27 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3
Hi Yishay,
I didn't see an error at the end of the output.
Piotr, did you make the suggested changes to releasecandidate.xml when you got
stuck at a similar point? Yishaw, see a past
6, 2018 1:21:33 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3
Ok, thanks.
From: Piotr Zarzycki
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 1:07:08 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Discus
_
> From: Yishay Weiss
> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 1:21:33 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3
>
> Ok, thanks.
>
>
>
> ________
> From: Piotr Zarzycki
> Sent: Tuesday, Octo
PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: RE: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3
Ok, thanks.
From: Piotr Zarzycki
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 1:07:08 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3
Yishay,
You need to follow th
Ok, thanks.
From: Piotr Zarzycki
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 1:07:08 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3
Yishay,
You need to follow the tutorial on the Wiki, so setup everything what is
saying there. However
e/royale-asjs/wiki/Release-Manager-Notes
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Piotr Zarzycki
> Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 12:30:54 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3
>
> Hi Yishay,
>
> What do you mean by more s
: Piotr Zarzycki
Sent: Tuesday, October 16, 2018 12:30:54 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3
Hi Yishay,
What do you mean by more such tasks ?
Thanks,
Piotr
wt., 16 paź 2018 o 07:10 Yishay Weiss napisał(a):
> Just deleted them.
>
>
>
___
> From: Piotr Zarzycki
> Sent: Monday, October 15, 2018 6:29:30 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3
>
> Hi Yishay,
>
> This [1][2]
>
> [1]
>
> https://github.com/apache/royale-compiler/tree/org.apache.royale.comp
Just deleted them.
I haven’t followed this thread closely enough. Can you think of more such tasks?
From: Piotr Zarzycki
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2018 6:29:30 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3
Hi Yishay
mes of the tags that need to be deleted?
>
>
>
>
> From: Piotr Zarzycki
> Sent: Monday, October 15, 2018 4:08:34 PM
> To: dev@royale.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3
>
> Hi Alex,
>
> I have all enviro
What’s the full names of the tags that need to be deleted?
From: Piotr Zarzycki
Sent: Monday, October 15, 2018 4:08:34 PM
To: dev@royale.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Discuss] Start release process 0.9.3
Hi Alex,
I have all environment property which you
Hi Alex,
I have all environment property which you are mentioning in place.
AIR_HOME = d:\Work\flex-sdk-4.16.1_adobe_air_30
FLASHPLAYER_DEBUGGER = D:\Work\player\flashplayer.exe
PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME = D:\Work\player
In my folder with player I have following folders with playerglobal.swc
11.1,
Looks like your environment variables aren't set? Having js.swc on the
external-library-path to run a SWF doesn't seem right. Check AIR_HOME,
PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME, FLASHPLAYER_DEBUGGER.
-Alex
On 10/15/18, 12:37 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote:
Now tests are failing :) [1]
[1]
Now tests are failing :) [1]
[1] https://paste.apache.org/FY4O
niedz., 14 paź 2018 o 22:34 Piotr Zarzycki
napisał(a):
> Before I contact Maven mailing list I would like to try again release to
> see what I got.
>
>
> On Sat, Oct 13, 2018, 11:28 AM Carlos Rovira
> wrote:
>
>> Hi, commit done
Before I contact Maven mailing list I would like to try again release to
see what I got.
On Sat, Oct 13, 2018, 11:28 AM Carlos Rovira
wrote:
> Hi, commit done and seems no other side effect was done. So I think the
> tweaks worked.
>
> El sáb., 13 oct. 2018 a las 11:18, Carlos Rovira ( >)
>
Hi, commit done and seems no other side effect was done. So I think the
tweaks worked.
El sáb., 13 oct. 2018 a las 11:18, Carlos Rovira ()
escribió:
> Hi,
>
> about delete tag, I was investigating and did some tweaks to my system. So
> we'll see in the next commit if it works.
>
> El sáb., 13
Hi,
about delete tag, I was investigating and did some tweaks to my system. So
we'll see in the next commit if it works.
El sáb., 13 oct. 2018 a las 8:59, Carlos Rovira ()
escribió:
> Hi,
>
> I think asking ni maven list is our best bet since as we do here, surely
> they can help and give some
Hi,
I think asking ni maven list is our best bet since as we do here, surely
they can help and give some light on what's happening, so
+1 to ask in maven list
El sáb., 13 oct. 2018 a las 7:56, Alex Harui ()
escribió:
> No, some people think the script was trying to upload the RC to Maven
>
No, some people think the script was trying to upload the RC to Maven Central
instead of repository.apache.org. From my reading of the logs, you had a
problem downloading a Maven plugin from Maven Central which is allowed, while
Om was having trouble uploading to repository.apache.org.
I
I my problems were with downloading plugin maybe it was temporary. I could
try again.
On Sat, Oct 13, 2018, 7:47 AM Piotr Zarzycki
wrote:
> So the difference is that when we vote successful y for release we are
> uploading manually those artifacts?
>
> Automatic is not allowed? This is how I
So the difference is that when we vote successful y for release we are
uploading manually those artifacts?
Automatic is not allowed? This is how I understand.
Piotr
On Sat, Oct 13, 2018, 7:40 AM Piotr Zarzycki
wrote:
> Alex,
>
> I'm not running behind the proxy.
>
> Hi Dave,
>
> We are
Alex,
I'm not running behind the proxy.
Hi Dave,
We are publishing only RC. Why it is against?
Piotr
On Sat, Oct 13, 2018, 1:05 AM Dave Fisher wrote:
>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Oct 12, 2018, at 2:33 PM, Guild, Jason A (DOT) <
> jason.gu...@alaska.gov> wrote:
> >
> > Forgive my
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 12, 2018, at 2:33 PM, Guild, Jason A (DOT)
> wrote:
>
> Forgive my asking perhaps silly questions.
+1
>
> Why in the world does the Royale release script have a dependency on
> publishing directly to Maven Central?
That is likely against Apache Release
Hi Jason,
I think Piotr's failure was an attempt to download a dependency of a Maven
plugin which should come from Maven Central. Om's errors were from uploading
to repository.a.o and not Maven Central.
I found this article about proxies and Maven:
Forgive my asking perhaps silly questions.
Why in the world does the Royale release script have a dependency on
publishing directly to Maven Central?
Doesn't Apache maintain its own Maven repository of apache-produced
artifacts?
Isn't that what repo.maven.apache.org is? Why can't Royale
You could ask on the Maven mailing lists.
HTH,
-Alex
On 10/12/18, 2:05 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote:
Yes! A lot was successful. It looks like it is total random. Probably some
kind of problem with connection, but I doubt that is on my sight. I notice
one thing when I click for the
Yes! A lot was successful. It looks like it is total random. Probably some
kind of problem with connection, but I doubt that is on my sight. I notice
one thing when I click for the first time on the link to the central
repository - I was in a connecting state forever. I had to refresh website,
Piotr,
Did any transfers succeed?
-Alex
On 10/12/18, 1:02 PM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote:
Unfortunately I got the same result as OM :( Something is really wrong with
Maven central, cause I can't believe that we all have bad internet
connection. :)
Unfortunately I got the same result as OM :( Something is really wrong with
Maven central, cause I can't believe that we all have bad internet
connection. :)
https://paste.apache.org/eqN9
Piotr
pt., 12 paź 2018 o 19:14 Piotr Zarzycki
napisał(a):
> The weirdest thing is that I cannot use
The weirdest thing is that I cannot use anymore sourcetree after that
update. I'm getting wrong password and user name on other repositories
which are private.
git version 2.19.1.windows.1
However after update I was able to continue process of release. Update
fixes for me some problems with gpg.
I was able to delete the tag. What version of Git are you using? I'm
concerned other problems may arise.
If you run into a problem like this again, you might want to try just giving up
on rc1 and calling it rc2 so the tag names don't conflict.
HTH,
-Alex
On 10/12/18, 9:42 AM, "Piotr
I would like to ask also someone for delete
tag org.apache.royale.compiler-0.9.4-rc1 - I'm not sure what has happened
but after updating git I cannot do that. I can commit stuff, but doing
delete tag I'm getting
remote: Permission to apache/royale-compiler.git denied to piotrzarzycki21.
fatal:
I was too focused on the credentials and didn't notice that your settings
didn't have HTTPS.
apache.releases.https
aharui
...
apache.snapshots.https
aharui
...
HTH,
-Alex
On 10/12/18,
I logged in without the problem. Om was on the stage where he was able to
upload something. I hope he will respond. Maybe he had some special
settings in file.
Piotr
pt., 12 paź 2018 o 17:55 Alex Harui napisał(a):
> Hi Piotr,
>
> Yes, I have the same settings (username aharui, password is my
Hi Piotr,
Yes, I have the same settings (username aharui, password is my apache
password). Try logging into repository.apache.org from your browser. I don't
know for sure that repository.a.o uses LDAP, it might be I just used the same
username and password to be lazy).
I will also say that
Hi,
@Piotr, I know all you're talking about, and that's ok, not saying at all
that you must make release in a day.
The fact is we have a problem in various points, and is not anyone guilty,
just the technologies we are using and that we want to make many things
happen:
1.- The release process,
Alex, Om,
I'm a bit farther. I had a lot of problems on my sight with gpg, but I was
able to configure it properly in GitBash. I reached point with artifacts
upload. It's failed cause it looks like my password was incorrect. I would
like to make sure that I'm having similar configuration as you.
Hi Piotr,
Well, it depends. In looking at the repos, I do not see the 0.9.4 tag, which
is strange since Carlos's Git GUI client is updating it.
IMO, for sure, you should update releasecandidate.xml per my earlier email,
delete the repos out of the folder you are using and see how far you get.
Alex,
In the other words If I have time today I can continue with the process? We
end up with situation where I need to remove tag and try again as I
remember?
Thanks,
Piotr
On Fri, Oct 12, 2018, 7:12 AM Alex Harui wrote:
> Hi Piotr,
>
> I agree with your sentiments. However, I think one
Hi Piotr,
I agree with your sentiments. However, I think one problem is that the revert
emails are misleading. Unlike other commits, the subject of a revert does not
show what branch was changed, so I think Carlos was reverting things in a
branch.
That said, it is still very troublesome
Carlos,
You are expecting from people who are volunteers to do some things in one
day? It's impossible to do that. I'm not working on that full time. I did
first finally successful step for the release. Everything was reported on
this list. I had problems and didn't have time to resolve it. Alex
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 11, 2018, at 5:09 PM, Carlos Rovira wrote:
>
> Hi Alex,
> if you check in actual develop for "0.9.5-SNAPSHOT" and "0.9.4-SNAPSHOT"
> you'll see maven build compiler and typedefs 0.9.5-SNAPSHOT, but when build
> framework, it downloads compiler and typedefs
Well, I'm not sure how the framework and typedefs versions got out of sync, but
generally, reverting stuff now puts in a state that the next RM will have to
spend more time trying to figure out where we are with the branches and
especially the tags because your Git GUI keeps overwriting the
Hi Alex,
if you check in actual develop for "0.9.5-SNAPSHOT" and "0.9.4-SNAPSHOT"
you'll see maven build compiler and typedefs 0.9.5-SNAPSHOT, but when build
framework, it downloads compiler and typedefs 0.9.4-SNAPSHOT since the
versions in framework are not updated. This is the reason you don't
The 0.9.4 release branch has been cut. I have not seen any problems reported
against it, so I don't know of any reason to delete it. Thus, the develop
branch should be at 0.9.5-SNAPSHOT.
I noticed you messed around with the versions so I have no idea what state we
are in, plus I continue to
Hi,
I'm a bit confused with the actual state of the repo. We should stay in
0.9.4-SNAPSHOT? or 0.9.5-SNAPSHOT?
I'm building with the latest since 1-2 days but removed all royale folder
with all maven artifacts and rebuild from scratch, makes me have mixed
versions, since some artifacts are
Hi Alex,
Unfortunately in the next couple of days I won't have time for that. If
someone can do that feel free jump into it.
Piotr
On Thu, Oct 11, 2018, 6:43 PM Alex Harui wrote:
> After digging through the output you pasted, it appears that the
> "check-empty-folder" target isn't quite right
After digging through the output you pasted, it appears that the
"check-empty-folder" target isn't quite right and didn't catch that you didn't
run "maven" against an empty folder. Although I am a bit puzzled why there
were modified files in the working copy.
Maven and the scripts have some
I gave up again :) It costs me to much time. I thought since Om did so much
progress I will launch the script and will work. It's still failing.
https://paste.apache.org/WJ44
I run first time and had problem with gpg password - just forgot it, but
run it again and type correct password. Probably
Hi Alex,
This is what I'm getting for git status for royale-compiler [1]
[1] https://paste.apache.org/YuiH
Thanks,
Piotr
śr., 10 paź 2018 o 17:50 Alex Harui napisał(a):
> What does 'git status' return for that local copy of the royale-compiler
> repo?
>
> That part of the script is trying to
What does 'git status' return for that local copy of the royale-compiler repo?
That part of the script is trying to see if compiler-jburg-types and
compiler-build-tools needed a version update that needs to be pushed. Those
two projects should be at 1.0.0 since we rarely, if ever, will need to
Ok It's failed :) However I passed step 3 in instruction. Step 4 is failing
[1] - if someone know what could it be - I will wait with reverting changes.
Lines in stacktrace are pointing in ant script to following targets:
Line 556: git-commit-and-push-utils
Line 487:
Ok Piotr, good luck! :)
El mié., 10 oct. 2018 a las 10:34, Piotr Zarzycki (<
piotrzarzyck...@gmail.com>) escribió:
> Hi Guys,
>
> I will try right now process from my PC. We will see how far I will go with
> that.
>
> Piotr
>
> czw., 4 paź 2018 o 22:01 Alex Harui napisał(a):
>
> > Hi Om,
> >
>
Hi,
It turns out that the checkintest do not actually run on master. They must run
on the agent. We've not been actually testing our code. The player does not
launch and then the flashlog from the last test to run on the agent is reported
on.
I am in the process of moving the builds that
Hi Om,
If make_branches succeeds, then you shouldn't need to go back and delete
branches and tags and run make_branches again if the "maven" step fails.
You might need to revert any changes to the release branch that the "maven"
step did, but then you should be able to delete the local copy of
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 1:48 AM Alex Harui wrote:
> Om, it looks like you are still deleting and recreating the branches.
> Does this mean you have never completed the make_branches step?
Yes, I delete the tags, branches (remote) each time something fails. Then
I do a global search for 0.9.5
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 9:33 AM Alex Harui wrote:
> Om,
>
> What version of Java are you using? Maven uses Java and maybe there is an
> incompatibility in the server communication layer of Java.
>
OmPrakashs-MacBook-Pro:release om$ java -version
java version "1.8.0_181"
Java(TM) SE Runtime
It seems that releases are overly automated.
Seems like once everything is built and tests are passed a set of scripts in a
runbook can be manually run by the RM.
Regards,
Dave
Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 4, 2018, at 9:23 AM, Alex Harui wrote:
>
> I don't know for sure, but I believe much
Om,
What version of Java are you using? Maven uses Java and maybe there is an
incompatibility in the server communication layer of Java.
-Alex
On 10/4/18, 1:14 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
DSL via AT :-)
Although this morning was a different connection (at work)
I don't know for sure, but I believe much of it is part of Maven's default
release process. We "must" prove that the example sources pass all standard
release requirements (pass the RAT check and compiles without error). I think
by default after those tests, Maven packages up the sources for
I am curious about why we are uploading example swcs to maven central.
What is the usecase?
Thanks,
Om
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018, 2:26 AM Alex Harui wrote:
> We are using both Maven and Ant to create releases. Some of our users
> prefer Maven others prefer Ant. Best way to make sure both work is
We are using both Maven and Ant to create releases. Some of our users prefer
Maven others prefer Ant. Best way to make sure both work is to use Maven for
Maven and Ant for Ant.
I don't know if is really Maven that is failing or just something wrong with
Om's internet connection.
-Alex
On
Hi Harbs,
for me Maven is not easier, seems as difficult as ANT. For me the points
for maven is the reliability and robustness of the build process and the
management of dependencies. ANT was the first step for me, and I always
liked, but the problems was that it was more a way to script than
Om, it looks like you are still deleting and recreating the branches. Does
this mean you have never completed the make_branches step? Is make_branches
failing trying to run a build in the develop branch and uploading
0.9.5-SNAPSHOT artifacts? I supposed we could try to find a way to skip
DSL via AT :-)
Although this morning was a different connection (at work)
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018 at 1:09 AM Piotr Zarzycki
wrote:
> Neverending story ;) What's your internet connection actually?
>
> On Thu, Oct 4, 2018, 10:04 AM OmPrakash Muppirala
> wrote:
>
> > Hmm, failed again at a different
Neverending story ;) What's your internet connection actually?
On Thu, Oct 4, 2018, 10:04 AM OmPrakash Muppirala
wrote:
> Hmm, failed again at a different spot:
>
> [exec] [INFO] [INFO] Apache Royale: Framework: Themes:
> Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Sunflower-Theme SUCCESS [ 22.251 s]
>
>
Hmm, failed again at a different spot:
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] Apache Royale: Framework: Themes:
Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Sunflower-Theme SUCCESS [ 22.251 s]
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] Apache Royale: Framework: Themes:
Jewel-Dark-NoFlat-Emphasized-Topaz-Theme SUCCESS [ 18.741 s]
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 2:02 PM Alex Harui wrote:
> Hi Om,
>
> Does anything deploy, or is that the first thing that is attempted to
> deploy? I found this article that might help:
>
> https://community.apigee.com/questions/50756/unable-to-deploy-using-maven-script-due-to-error-r.html
It
Hi Om,
Does anything deploy, or is that the first thing that is attempted to deploy?
I found this article that might help:
https://community.apigee.com/questions/50756/unable-to-deploy-using-maven-script-due-to-error-r.html
I would be concerned about restarting from the middle of a Maven call.
It would be hard to make this happen. I think all artefacts are spread
across target folders and local caches. When artefacts is build I'm not
sure from where Maven is taking it - Cache or Targets folder.
You are almost done with that. If you won't succeed till Monday maybe I
will try to find
Another suggestion I have is - can we do all the pushes to remote after
everything is done locally? That way, if something goes wrong halfway, we
can just delete the royale-* dirs locally and rerun the releasecandiate ant
script?
Not sure if this is an easy change?
Thanks,
Om
On Wed, Oct 3,
Okay, I tried a couple of times and I have started getting `SSL peer shut
down incorrectly errors`
[exec] [INFO] [INFO]
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[exec] [INFO] [INFO]
Looks like it was a missing [
MXRoyale and SparkRoyale built for me.
HTH,
-Alex
On 10/3/18, 12:43 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
Thanks!
I reverted everything back to previous state. I can give it a shot
tomorrow evening.
Regards,
Om
On Wed, Oct 3,
Thanks!
I reverted everything back to previous state. I can give it a shot
tomorrow evening.
Regards,
Om
On Wed, Oct 3, 2018 at 12:41 AM Alex Harui wrote:
> It was in a releasable state. TourDeFlex was running on it.
>
> I'm trying to track down the change that broke it.
>
> -Alex
>
> On
It was in a releasable state. TourDeFlex was running on it.
I'm trying to track down the change that broke it.
-Alex
On 10/3/18, 12:32 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
A bit more progress. Now we are failing on the MXRoyale project:
[exec] [INFO] [INFO]
A bit more progress. Now we are failing on the MXRoyale project:
[exec] [INFO] [INFO]
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] BUILD FAILURE
[exec] [INFO] [INFO]
I'm going to give this another shot in a couple of hours, unless there are
any objections.
Thanks,
Om
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018, 2:04 PM Alex Harui wrote:
> Jewel is mentioned in there. I added mention of the migration components
> and tour de flex. Not sure if I got the formatting right. I think
Jewel is mentioned in there. I added mention of the migration components and
tour de flex. Not sure if I got the formatting right. I think it is good
enough.
-Alex
On 10/1/18, 12:13 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
I updated it, although it looks a bit sparse now. Can we list a few
I updated it, although it looks a bit sparse now. Can we list a few major
highlights here, that I can go add to the release notes?
Jewel should at least have several updates.
Thanks,
Om
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 12:09 PM Alex Harui wrote:
> Hey, I just noticed that nobody put a 0.9.4 section in
Hey, I just noticed that nobody put a 0.9.4 section in the RELEASE_NOTES.
Maybe just rename the 0.9.3 section?
-Alex
On 10/1/18, 12:07 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" wrote:
Good catch! I just pushed a fix for that.
Thanks,
Om
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 11:04 AM Alex Harui
Good catch! I just pushed a fix for that.
Thanks,
Om
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 11:04 AM Alex Harui wrote:
> Om,
>
> I think the release/0.9.4 in royale-asjs/pom.xml needs to be
> reverted back to 0.9.3.
>
> Everything else looks ok from my quick examination.
>
> Thanks and good luck,
> -Alex
>
>
Om,
I think the release/0.9.4 in royale-asjs/pom.xml needs to be
reverted back to 0.9.3.
Everything else looks ok from my quick examination.
Thanks and good luck,
-Alex
On 10/1/18, 10:29 AM, "Piotr Zarzycki" wrote:
I saw your commit and I think you should be ok.
pon., 1 paź
I saw your commit and I think you should be ok.
pon., 1 paź 2018 o 19:21 OmPrakash Muppirala
napisał(a):
> Okay, I did the following to reset:
>
> For all three repos:
> * Reverted all references of 0.9.5 to 0.9.4
> * Deleted 0.9.4-rc1 tag
> * Deleted branch: release/0.9.4
>
> Can someone
Okay, I did the following to reset:
For all three repos:
* Reverted all references of 0.9.5 to 0.9.4
* Deleted 0.9.4-rc1 tag
* Deleted branch: release/0.9.4
Can someone please make sure that we are good before starting work?
Thanks,
Om
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 1:51 AM Carlos Rovira
wrote:
> Hi
Hi Om,
is related to flash player debugger not launched? are you on Mac?
I think on Mac I have to make *.swf files be always opened by Flash Player
debugger.
In the other hand, I need to commit during the day some fixes, one on
typedefs and expect more on compiler. So if you plan to try again
I provided path to Chrome via -Dbrowser, but I got an error that ant was
not able to access the application.
So, I tried installing firefox and that seemed to work.
On Mon, Oct 1, 2018 at 1:26 AM Piotr Zarzycki
wrote:
> Hi Om,
>
> You did use Firefox for that purpose ? I had to specify
Hi Om,
You did use Firefox for that purpose ? I had to specify -Dbrowser=path to
firefox.exe
Thanks,
Piotr
pon., 1 paź 2018 o 10:22 OmPrakash Muppirala
napisał(a):
> Okay, I made several attempts through the day, making progress each time.
> The last run failed because the browser could not
Okay, I made several attempts through the day, making progress each time.
The last run failed because the browser could not be launched.
I am going to pause on this and try again tomorrow (or later) . If someone
else wants to give this a go in the meantimne, they are welcome :-)
Thanks,
Om
On
Hi Om,
no, I Thought this was due to different tries of the release process but
most of the poms are in 0.9.6-SNAPSHOT.
You can search the entire repo for "0.9.X-SNAPSHOT" string to see that now
X is 6.
thanks
El lun., 1 oct. 2018 a las 2:07, OmPrakash Muppirala ()
escribió:
> On Sun, Sep 30,
On Sun, Sep 30, 2018, 2:13 PM Carlos Rovira wrote:
> Hi Om,
> just saw that some poms was not changed to 0.9.6-SNAPSHOT.
>
Do you mean 0.9.4-SNAPSHOT?
Thanks,
Om
I think that should be fixed and get a prepare maven release process that
> could finaly gets all poms updated to new version.
>
Hi Om,
just saw that some poms was not changed to 0.9.6-SNAPSHOT.
I think that should be fixed and get a prepare maven release process that
could finaly gets all poms updated to new version.
Don't know if that could be the problem. Can you try again?
thanks
El dom., 30 sept. 2018 a las 21:32,
Made a bit more progress, but the build is failing here now:
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] Apache Royale: Examples: Royale:
DataBindingExample_as SUCCESS [ 2.469 s]
[exec] [INFO] [INFO] Apache Royale: Examples: Royale:
DataBindingExample_Flat FAILURE [ 1.756 s]
[exec] [INFO] [INFO]
Thanks for the quick fix! Will pull develop and try again. Will report in
a while.
Regards,
Om
On Sun, Sep 30, 2018, 8:47 AM Carlos Rovira wrote:
> Hi Om,
>
> error is now fixed. Can you try to release again?
> thanks
>
> Carlos
>
>
>
>
>
> El dom., 30 sept. 2018 a las 17:27, Carlos Rovira
1 - 100 of 355 matches
Mail list logo
