Re: [context-aware config] first release this week?

2016-10-14 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
Oliver Lietz wrote > On Thursday 13 October 2016 20:36:10 Stefan Seifert wrote: >>> Do we really want org.apache.sling.contextaware.config as package name? >>> Sling Content Distribution uses org.apache.sling.distribution, so >>> org.apache.sling.configuration for Sling's context-ware

RE: [context-aware config] first release this week?

2016-10-14 Thread Oliver Lietz
On Thursday 13 October 2016 20:36:10 Stefan Seifert wrote: > >Do we really want org.apache.sling.contextaware.config as package name? > >Sling Content Distribution uses org.apache.sling.distribution, so > >org.apache.sling.configuration for Sling's context-ware configuration > >should be fine, no?

Re: [context-aware config] first release this week?

2016-10-14 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
On Thu, Oct 13, 2016 at 10:36 PM, Stefan Seifert wrote: > ...only "configuration" is misleading, because it's not about osgi > configuration, but only > about context-aware configuration. thus "contextaware" has to be part of the > package name... I agree that just

RE: [context-aware config] first release this week?

2016-10-13 Thread Stefan Seifert
>Do we really want org.apache.sling.contextaware.config as package name? >Sling Content Distribution uses org.apache.sling.distribution, so >org.apache.sling.configuration for Sling's context-ware configuration >should be fine, no? only "configuration" is misleading, because it's not about osgi

Re: [context-aware config] first release this week?

2016-10-13 Thread Oliver Lietz
On Tuesday 11 October 2016 21:51:19 Stefan Seifert wrote: > we've reached a quite good featureset in the current implementation of the > context-ware configuration [1]. > > to make it usable by projects it would be useful to make a release soon. > > there are some planned extensions missing, but

Re: [context-aware config] first release this week?

2016-10-12 Thread Carsten Ziegeler
+1 for a release Stefan Seifert wrote > we've reached a quite good featureset in the current implementation of the > context-ware configuration [1]. > > to make it usable by projects it would be useful to make a release soon. > > there are some planned extensions missing, but i've moved them