On Wed, 2016-09-28 at 22:37 +, Stefan Seifert wrote:
> discussed at the Sling Committer Round Table @ adaptTo() 2016
>
> before taking steps like migration sling svn to git we should check
> if we have modules that are no longer relevant and maintained, and
> moving them to the "attic" (perhap
Hey Bertrand,
Am 20.10.16 um 09:12 schrieb Bertrand Delacretaz:
Hi Sandro,
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 11:15 PM, Sandro Boehme wrote:
...I'm still working on the Sitebuilder [1] and the resource editor and need
the js module for that...
ok, good to hear from you! No problem keeping those module
Hi Sandro,
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 11:15 PM, Sandro Boehme wrote:
> ...I'm still working on the Sitebuilder [1] and the resource editor and need
> the js module for that...
ok, good to hear from you! No problem keeping those modules out of the attic.
-Bertrand
Hello,
I'm still working on the Sitebuilder [1] and the resource editor and
need the js module for that.
Please keep it.
Thanks!
Sandro
2) We scheduled contrib/jcr/js for removal, but it's indirectly
referenced from contrib/explorers/resourceeditor.
So we either keep both or move both to t
Is there a list or something of modules that the sling developers would like to
have someone work on?
-Original Message-
From: Bertrand Delacretaz [mailto:bdelacre...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 18, 2016 10:04 AM
To: dev
Subject: Re: sling attic / cleanup
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 18
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 3:53 PM, Robert Munteanu wrote:
> ...1) There are modules where we have people who think should move to the
> attic, but also others think the modules should be kept.
>
> - contrib/auth/xing
> - contrib/commons/html
> - contrib/scripting/freemarker ..
I don't have str
On Fri, 2016-10-14 at 10:53 +0300, Robert Munteanu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Sun, 2016-10-02 at 11:01 +0200, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> > Oliver Lietz wrote
> >
> > > >
> > > > I personally think we should be radical here in order for clean
> > > > up. If
> > > > someone speaks up and wants to work on
Hi,
On Sun, 2016-10-02 at 11:01 +0200, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Oliver Lietz wrote
>
> > >
> > > I personally think we should be radical here in order for clean
> > > up. If
> > > someone speaks up and wants to work on something we can easily
> > > move it back.
> > > I see the point of forking
On Sat, 2016-10-01 at 09:25 +0200, Oliver Lietz wrote:
> On Saturday 01 October 2016 01:54:17 Robert Munteanu wrote:
> > On Fri, 2016-09-30 at 12:55 +, Stefan Seifert wrote:
> > > i assume in samples/ there are also some candidates.
>
>
> Hi Robert,
>
> > I think it would be a good time to m
Oliver Lietz wrote
>>
>> I personally think we should be radical here in order for clean up. If
>> someone speaks up and wants to work on something we can easily move it back.
>> I see the point of forking though. Not sure :)
>
> And not moving anything to (SVN) attic would help us to be consiste
On Saturday 01 October 2016 10:37:47 Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Oliver Lietz wrote
>
> > + freemarker
> > FreeMarker is a very well known templating language and was donated to the
> > ASF last year (still in incubator). I did made some updates and added
> > some ITs recently and hope to get Sling
Oliver Lietz wrote
>
> + freemarker
> FreeMarker is a very well known templating language and was donated to the
> ASF
> last year (still in incubator). I did made some updates and added some ITs
> recently and hope to get Sling Models useable soon. Doing a first release
> afterwards.
Ok, let
On Saturday 01 October 2016 01:54:17 Robert Munteanu wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-09-30 at 12:55 +, Stefan Seifert wrote:
> > i assume in samples/ there are also some candidates.
Hi Robert,
> I think it would be a good time to make a distinction between 'real'
> samples, i.e. here's how you do X wit
On Fri, 2016-09-30 at 12:55 +, Stefan Seifert wrote:
> i assume in samples/ there are also some candidates.
I think it would be a good time to make a distinction between 'real'
samples, i.e. here's how you do X with Sling and demos, which are
complete applications.
For samples I see for insta
On Friday 30 September 2016 10:11:28 Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Stefan Seifert wrote
>
> > discussed at the Sling Committer Round Table @ adaptTo() 2016
> >
> > before taking steps like migration sling svn to git we should check if we
> > have modules that are no longer relevant and maintained, an
Daniel Klco wrote
> I think we should make this a table instead of a list. This lets us keep
> track for each dependency we're proposing to put into the attic:
>
>- Last update (excluding pom.xml or license changes)
>- Where the code is referenced (if anywhere)
>
> Otherwise, it's going t
inal Message-
> >From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
> >Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 1:55 PM
> >To: dev@sling.apache.org
> >Subject: Re: sling attic / cleanup
> >
> >Started a wiki page to collect the modules:
> >
> > https://cwiki.apac
there are also some candidates.
stefan
>-Original Message-
>From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:cziege...@apache.org]
>Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 1:55 PM
>To: dev@sling.apache.org
>Subject: Re: sling attic / cleanup
>
>Started a wiki page to collect the modules
Started a wiki page to collect the modules:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/SLING/Module+Cleanup
--
Carsten Ziegeler
Adobe Research Switzerland
cziege...@apache.org
Stefan Seifert wrote
> discussed at the Sling Committer Round Table @ adaptTo() 2016
>
> before taking steps like migration sling svn to git we should check if we
> have modules that are no longer relevant and maintained, and moving them to
> the "attic" (perhaps creating a new one for this).
>
20 matches
Mail list logo
