RE: [VOTE] Retire Apache Streams to the attic

2016-09-23 Thread Benjamin Young
I am currently sitting in the W3C’s Social Web Working Group’s face-to-face meeting and have just finished discussing features of ActivityStreams 2.0: https://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-core/ The Social Web WG is nearing the end of it’s charter, and preparing to ship the AS2.0 spec—which c

Envisioning

2016-10-18 Thread Benjamin Young
Hi all, Sorry I’ve not written here sooner. I’d reached out to the Incubator list while at the W3C’s TPAC even about keeping Apache Streams in the incubator in hopes of also seeing it support the nearly finalized ActivityStreams 2.0 specification: https://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-core/ Si

Granary & SocketHub

2016-10-18 Thread Benjamin Young
(resending from the correct account…likely the other got spammed…) Granary is a project with similar ideas and intents as Apache Streams (which also needs AS2 support ;) ): https://github.com/snarfed/granary In fact Apache Streams gets a mention in their “Related Work” section: https://github.co

Re: Granary & SocketHub

2016-10-20 Thread Benjamin Young
1:26:38 PM To: dev@streams.incubator.apache.org Cc: Matt Franklin; Benjamin Young Subject: Re: Granary & SocketHub On October 18, 2016 at 6:09:49 PM, Matt Franklin (m.ben.frank...@gmail.com<mailto:m.ben.frank...@gmail.com>) wrote: On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 10:39 AM Benjamin Young w

Re: Granary & SocketHub

2016-10-20 Thread Benjamin Young
6 3:06:21 PM To: dev@streams.incubator.apache.org; Benjamin Young Cc: Matt Franklin Subject: Re: Granary & SocketHub On October 20, 2016 at 1:33:33 PM, Benjamin Young (byo...@bigbluehat.com<mailto:byo...@bigbluehat.com>) wrote: Great points, Steven. What's always attracted me to Apa