So i have determined the locations of most of sbase and ubase using
the linux FHS [0]. I have a few that needs categories for the legacy
style linux and was hoping someone would have a few pointers. I
offered my thoughts based on the FHS description of the directories,
correct me if I'm wrong. Than
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 10:01:12AM -0400, stephen Turner wrote:
> So i have determined the locations of most of sbase and ubase using
> the linux FHS [0]. I have a few that needs categories for the legacy
> style linux and was hoping someone would have a few pointers. I
> offered my thoughts based
On Mon, 17 Oct 2016 16:07:24 +0100
Dimitris Papastamos wrote:
Hey,
> everything in /bin
I agree Dimitris. Some people really do love about the benefits of
separating into /bin, /usr/bin, /usr/local/bin, /opt/bin and so on.
Let's stop this madness! There is no reason to support this ancient
conc
In my opinion:
/bin - for binaries that come with the system
/usr/bin - binaries installed the default package manager, which is at
/bin
/usr/local/bin - is for binaries installed by the user without using the
package manager
*/sbin - is nonsense
However, I still support adding everything to /
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 07:03:59PM +0300, Ali H. Fardan wrote:
> /bin - for binaries that come with the system
So they never get maintained with a package manager? Sounds like a
really weird way of doing things. If you bootstrap with a tarball, the
distinction becomes meaningless once you've updat
On 2016-10-17 19:19, a...@alexpilon.ca wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 07:03:59PM +0300, Ali H. Fardan wrote:
/bin - for binaries that come with the system
So they never get maintained with a package manager? Sounds like a
really weird way of doing things. If you bootstrap with a tarball, the
d
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 05:56:56PM +0200, Laslo Hunhold wrote:
> There is no reason to support this ancient concept of a separate
> /usr-partition. The age of tape-drives is over, there is no need for
> it. And I must admit, it really makes things complicated in a lot of
> respects.
NFS mounts may
> Throw away your Linux-ish idea of "everything is a package",
What the heck is wrong with that?
And why argue against, if you mentioned it in the first place? I was
just pointing out an inconsistency in how it was presented, as if /bin
wasn't managed by the package manager. Geez.
> and take a l
I had no intention of starting a debate, just wanted a little
direction on where to place these few applications appropriate to
legacy linux/bsd. I understand its not the common view of the members
here, and I'm definitely not trying to say one way is more correct
than the other. Sta.Li has its pla
On 2016-10-17 19:44, a...@alexpilon.ca wrote:
Throw away your Linux-ish idea of "everything is a package",
What the heck is wrong with that?
Relax, okay, just relax.
And why argue against, if you mentioned it in the first place? I was
just pointing out an inconsistency in how it was presen
On 2016-10-17 19:44, a...@alexpilon.ca wrote:
Throw away your Linux-ish idea of "everything is a package",
What the heck is wrong with that?
Relax, okay, just relax.
And why argue against, if you mentioned it in the first place? I was
just pointing out an inconsistency in how it was presen
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016, at 08:40, Bruno Vetter wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I just checked out dvtm on a stali installation with default config.h. As
> a default, mod+page up is configured for scrollback along with shift-page
> up, which seems more convenient for me.
>
> From my understanding, shift-page
On Sat, Oct 15, 2016 at 5:57 AM, Bruno Vetter
wrote:
> Guten Tag,
>
> trying out stali I see that manpages are included, but how can I actually
> view them? Before I install anything I want to ensure to do it in the most
> suckless way.
>
> Thank you
> Bruno
The plan for now is to use 9 base tr
On Mon, Oct 17, 2016 at 6:53 PM, Evan Gates wrote:
> The plan for now is to use 9 base troff and a pager which has not yet
> been picked. Currently 9 base troff has been added to the src repo,
> but the mdoc macros still need to be included (the ones from heirloom
> troff worked). As such you shou
14 matches
Mail list logo