Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Superset 0.34.0 based on Superset 0.34.0rc1

2019-08-19 Thread Julian Feinauer
Hi Alan, two things I noticed. First, if the VOTE is already closed there should be a separate thread "[RESULT][VOTE] xxx" where you summarize the results. Second, if the vote is not yet closed I can offer to also check the release and cast a +1 binding IPMC Vote. It is best to have as much IPMC

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Superset 0.34.0 based on Superset 0.34.0rc1

2019-08-17 Thread Alan Gates
Yes, mentors are required to be part of the IPMC. When Max starts the thread on general I'll forward my +1. So we'll just need one more, since we also have Jakob's. Alan. On Sat, Aug 17, 2019 at 2:50 AM Bolke de Bruin wrote: > Alan > > Are you ipmc member as well? If so does your vote carry

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Superset 0.34.0 based on Superset 0.34.0rc1

2019-08-17 Thread Bolke de Bruin
Alan Are you ipmc member as well? If so does your vote carry forward to the ipmc together with Jakob’s? Maybe its good to include that? B. Verstuurd vanaf mijn iPad > Op 16 aug. 2019 om 22:10 heeft Alan Gates het volgende > geschreven: > > Yes. > > Alan. > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 12:45

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Superset 0.34.0 based on Superset 0.34.0rc1

2019-08-16 Thread Alan Gates
Yes. Alan. On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 12:45 PM Maxime Beauchemin < maximebeauche...@gmail.com> wrote: > @mentors, so should I kick off a vote with general@ now? > > Max > > On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 12:00 PM Jakob Homan wrote: > > > +1 (binding) > > * Some LICENSEs appear to be missing; can be fixed

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Superset 0.34.0 based on Superset 0.34.0rc1

2019-08-16 Thread Maxime Beauchemin
@mentors, so should I kick off a vote with general@ now? Max On Fri, Aug 16, 2019 at 12:00 PM Jakob Homan wrote: > +1 (binding) > * Some LICENSEs appear to be missing; can be fixed next release > * Artifact contains rc1 suffix; usually this isn't the case. Not sure > if the IPMC will be concer

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Superset 0.34.0 based on Superset 0.34.0rc1

2019-08-16 Thread Jakob Homan
+1 (binding) * Some LICENSEs appear to be missing; can be fixed next release * Artifact contains rc1 suffix; usually this isn't the case. Not sure if the IPMC will be concerned * Sig looks good * DISCLAIMER/LICENSE (other than above)/NOTICE look good * Spot check on headers look good -Jakob On T

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Superset 0.34.0 based on Superset 0.34.0rc1

2019-08-15 Thread Beto Dealmeida
I can take a look at the release today and vote. On 8/15/19 3:51 PM, Alan Gates wrote: We should have a 3rd PPMC vote. If we can get Thejas or Jakob to vote as mentors that will give us another PPMC vote and one more IPMC vote. Alan. On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 2:26 PM Maxime Beauchemin < maximeb

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Release Superset 0.34.0 based on Superset 0.34.0rc1

2019-08-15 Thread Alan Gates
We should have a 3rd PPMC vote. If we can get Thejas or Jakob to vote as mentors that will give us another PPMC vote and one more IPMC vote. Alan. On Thu, Aug 15, 2019 at 2:26 PM Maxime Beauchemin < maximebeauche...@gmail.com> wrote: > Vote passes! > > +2 binding votes (Alan & Max) > +3 non-bin

[RESULT][VOTE] Release Superset 0.34.0 based on Superset 0.34.0rc1

2019-08-15 Thread Maxime Beauchemin
Vote passes! +2 binding votes (Alan & Max) +3 non-binding vote (Ville, Charles, Bolke) No neutral or negative votes. Now (assuming 2 binding votes are enough) I have to figure out what my steps are. I think it consist of starting a vote thread similar to this one on gene...@incubator.apache.org