DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40782.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
ballot
[X] +1
[ ] +0
[ ] -1
/ballot
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
fredk2 wrote:
The question is - how can you set secret in mod_proxy_ajp ?
Not at the moment.
If this feature is not (yet) implemented, can this be easily added - aka can
we expect this in a later version :) ?
Please let me know if this post should be made on apache-httpd dev forum.
Good work...
Am 18.10.2006 um 02:01 schrieb Remy Maucherat:
ballot
[ X] +1
[ ] +0
[ ] -1
/ballot
Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi,
fredk2 wrote:
The question is - how can you set secret in mod_proxy_ajp ?
Not at the moment.
If this feature is not (yet) implemented, can this be easily added -
aka can
we expect this in a later version :) ?
Please let me know if this post should be made on
Author: remm
Date: Wed Oct 18 03:13:28 2006
New Revision: 465195
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=465195
Log:
- Fix NPE on isValid for an expired session when activity check is enabled.
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/java/org/apache/catalina/session/StandardSession.java
Author: mturk
Date: Wed Oct 18 04:09:50 2006
New Revision: 465208
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=465208
Log:
Copy the tomcat-connector/jni/native to the native/connector.
Added:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/native/connector/
- copied from r465207,
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
The release plan is located here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/RELEASE-PLAN-6.0.txt
ballot
[X] +1
[ ] +0
[ ] -1
/ballot
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
Author: mturk
Date: Wed Oct 18 04:30:36 2006
New Revision: 465217
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=465217
Log:
Add srclib build repository.
Added:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/native/connector/srclib/
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/native/connector/srclib/VERSIONS
Added:
Hi Mladen,
my apologies for the reply format
I am curious about your last statement.
I understant that an ip filter is more secure. However, if I am not
mistaken, to setup IPFilter you need to be a sysadmin (aka Root) and you can
lock yourself out if you do not have physical access to the
Hi,
On 10/17/06, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The release plan is located here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/RELEASE-PLAN-6.0.txt
ballot
[ X ] +1
[ ] +0
[ ] -1
/ballot
Yoav
-
To
Hi,
Fred, I think you may be confusing IPFilter (the Solaris-specific
package) with a generic IP filter. I might be misunderstanding Mladen
myself, but I think he meant a simple configuration of Tomcat's Remote
Address Valve (http://tomcat.apache.org/tomcat-5.5-doc/config/valve.html)
or a
ballot
[X] +1
[ ] +0
[ ] -1
/ballot
-- Jeanfrancois
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am connecting to LDAP using Tomcat 5.5.12 and everything is fine. However,
when I change over to Tomcat 5.5.16, I can no longer connect to LDAP because
of a binding error.
The error I see is -
javax.naming.NamingException: [LDAP: error code 1 - : LdapErr:
DSID-0C0905FF, comment: In
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40751.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: pero
Date: Wed Oct 18 09:37:42 2006
New Revision: 465293
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=465293
Log:
Made recovery more robust.
Modified:
tomcat/container/tc5.5.x/modules/cluster/src/share/org/apache/catalina/cluster/tcp/FastAsyncSocketSender.java
Author: fhanik
Date: Wed Oct 18 10:10:44 2006
New Revision: 465303
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=465303
Log:
Implemented SSLEngine attribute on the Java HTTP connectors.
This allows one to specify secure=true and scheme=https to prevent tomcat from
redirecting
when using a SSL
Author: rjung
Date: Wed Oct 18 10:12:35 2006
New Revision: 465304
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=465304
Log:
Ups: Forgot to delete two memo lines.
Modified:
tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/xdocs/index.xml
Modified: tomcat/connectors/trunk/jk/xdocs/index.xml
URL:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40789.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: fhanik
Date: Wed Oct 18 10:30:57 2006
New Revision: 465308
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=465308
Log:
added new changes
Modified:
tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
Modified: tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/webapps/docs/changelog.xml
URL:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-ssl = endpoint.getSecure();
+ssl = on.equalsIgnoreCase(endpoint.getSSLEngine());
Like Remy said, anything except Off is acceptable.
It can be either On or EngineName (eg, SSLEngine=nuron)
Regards,
Mladen.
Mladen Turk wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-ssl = endpoint.getSecure();
+ssl = on.equalsIgnoreCase(endpoint.getSSLEngine());
Like Remy said, anything except Off is acceptable.
It can be either On or EngineName (eg, SSLEngine=nuron)
that's for APR, because of
if
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-ssl = endpoint.getSecure();
+ssl = on.equalsIgnoreCase(endpoint.getSSLEngine());
Like Remy said, anything except Off is acceptable.
It can be either On or EngineName (eg, SSLEngine=nuron)
that's
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-ssl = endpoint.getSecure();
+ssl = on.equalsIgnoreCase(endpoint.getSSLEngine());
Like Remy said, anything except Off is acceptable.
It can be either On or
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
The release plan is located here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/RELEASE-PLAN-6.0.txt
ballot
[X] +1
[ ] +0
[ ] -1
/ballot
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For
does anyone have these, I assume I wouldn't have to sign another
agreement to upgrade TCK, as I already signed the agreement to use TCK
with tomcat 5.5
Filip
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional
I don't have them. You don't need to sign antoher agreement I think.
You do simply need to ask Geir ([EMAIL PROTECTED], our JCP liaison) for a
copy, assuming these TCKs already exist, and he will get it for you.
Yoav
On 10/18/06, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
does anyone
Hi folks,
There was talk earlier in the year about having a
'6.5' release after 6.0 with 'major functionality',
just as was done for Tomcat 5.0/5.5. Is that still the
plan?
Thanks,
/s
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-devm=114684703111576w=2
Remy Maucherat wrote:
Hi,
The release plan
Hi,
Assuming you mean the small thread that started with
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=tomcat-devm=114684618907238w=2, I
would say no. That whole thread was conjecture and was never
discussed seriously. Of course we may do such things (major features
= a .5 release increment rather than a .1)
Mladen Turk wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
to eager to press send, that way the connector would have only on/off
values, while the actual SSLEngine value neuron would be in the
APRLifeCycleListener,
much cleaner, and all our connectors become consistent on that value
Look,
no
+1
Costin
On 10/17/06, Remy Maucherat [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The release plan is located here:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tomcat/tc6.0.x/trunk/RELEASE-PLAN-6.0.txt
ballot
[ ] +1
[ ] +0
[ ] -1
/ballot
This calls for a first build to be released by friday, and it will use
the same
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
no need to get edgy :), your point is well taken.
I was edgy? Wasn't my intention.
I have two suggestions
1. The SSLEngine attribute should be in the APR lifecycle listener, and
not in the connector, since its static, I can't have more than one, so
why do I
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40677.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
Mladen Turk wrote:
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
to eager to press send, that way the connector would have only on/off
values, while the actual SSLEngine value neuron would be in the
APRLifeCycleListener,
much cleaner, and all our connectors become
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
not really, this wouldn't work
Connector port=8444 scheme=https secure=true
protocol=org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11AprProtocol
SSLEngine=oneengine/
Connector port=8555 scheme=https secure=true
protocol=org.apache.coyote.http11.Http11AprProtocol
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40782.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: fhanik
Date: Wed Oct 18 16:24:52 2006
New Revision: 465417
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=465417
Log:
Implement non blocking read on HTTP requests.
A common scalability problem when it comes to HTTP is the fact that there are
slow clients, that will block a server
Author: markt
Date: Wed Oct 18 16:32:37 2006
New Revision: 465418
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revrev=465418
Log:
Fix bug 38048. memory leak with EL in JSPs. Patch provided by Taras Tielkes.
Modified:
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38048.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Filip Hanik - Dev Lists wrote:
is this existent in 6.0 as well?
It's possible there are leaks, but we'll have to find them, as the
implementation is completely different.
Rémy
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40792.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40793.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40793.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
much thanks!
Yoav Shapira wrote:
I don't have them. You don't need to sign antoher agreement I think.
You do simply need to ask Geir ([EMAIL PROTECTED], our JCP liaison) for a
copy, assuming these TCKs already exist, and he will get it for you.
Yoav
On 10/18/06, Filip Hanik - Dev Lists
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG·
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40792.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND·
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
45 matches
Mail list logo
