https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63041
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yift...@moogsoft.com
--- Comment #33 fro
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63041
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||harvinder_ru...@hotmail.com
--- Comment
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63041
--- Comment #31 from Christopher Schultz ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #26)
(for the record)
> Assuming the above is correct I think we have two options:
>
> 1. Revert the "&" -> "&&" change. systemd users (and possibly others) w
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Mark,
On 2/13/19 06:46, bugzi...@apache.org wrote:
> https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63041
>
> --- Comment #26 from Mark Thomas --- Got it.
>
> With the single & the pid of the process that is put in the
> background is not the pid
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63041
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63041
--- Comment #29 from Mark Thomas ---
(In reply to Konstantin Kolinko from comment #28)
> My preference is to revert and to start planning a new patch from there.
+1
We can re-open bug 53930 and discuss options there.
Calling touch on a named
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63041
--- Comment #28 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
(In reply to Rainer Jung from comment #27)
> Excellent analysis!
>
> I *think* the "&" at the end of the line is only useful, if a pipe command
> is actually being used. So one could put it into the
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63041
--- Comment #27 from Rainer Jung ---
Excellent analysis!
I *think* the "&" at the end of the line is only useful, if a pipe command is
actually being used. So one could put it into the construction of the string
variable to which we pipe, just
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63041
--- Comment #26 from Mark Thomas ---
Got it.
With the single & the pid of the process that is put in the background is not
the pid of the Tomcat process. If I specify $CATALINA_PID and then configure
systemd to use the same file with PIDFILE e
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63041
--- Comment #24 from Mark Thomas ---
(In reply to Rainer Jung from comment #22)
> Do we actually understand, what would be wrong with the line
>
> 2\>\&1 \& echo \$! \>\"$catalina_pid_file\" \; \} $catalina_out_command "&"
>
> (single escaped
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63041
--- Comment #25 from Mark Thomas ---
(In reply to Mark Thomas from comment #24)
> bash: syntax error near unexpected token `}'
I think this is just incorrect escaping of the command and could be a red
herring.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63041
--- Comment #23 from Thomas Opfer ---
(In reply to Rainer Jung from comment #22)
> Do we actually understand, what would be wrong with the line
>
> 2\>\&1 \& echo \$! \>\"$catalina_pid_file\" \; \} $catalina_out_command "&"
>
> (single escape
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63041
--- Comment #22 from Rainer Jung ---
Do we actually understand, what would be wrong with the line
2\>\&1 \& echo \$! \>\"$catalina_pid_file\" \; \} $catalina_out_command "&"
(single escaped ampersand)?
As far as I understand from this ticket
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63041
--- Comment #21 from Thomas Opfer ---
> If I am understanding this correctly that would mean:
>
> - reverting r1848046 and r1850829 for 9.0.x
> - reverting r1848048 and r1850830 for 8.5.x
> - reverting r1848049 and r1850831 for 7.0.x
That sho
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63041
--- Comment #20 from Mark Thomas ---
(In reply to Konstantin Kolinko from comment #19)
> An idea: use a named pipe (a FIFO special file) to solve the original bug
> 53930.
If I am understanding this correctly that would mean:
- reverting r184
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63041
--- Comment #19 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
An idea: use a named pipe (a FIFO special file) to solve the original bug
53930.
1. mkfifo command is documented in POSIX. It is a standard feature.
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/u
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63041
--- Comment #18 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
For a reference: POSIX-2018 documentation on Shell Command Language:
http://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/utilities/V3_chap02.html
The $! parameter is defined in section "2.5.2 Special Pa
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63041
--- Comment #17 from Konstantin Kolinko ---
Another report of this issue on the users@ list.
https://markmail.org/message/x4rzdpsjzoi2pbdd
Quoting:
---
I'm observing this on RHEL 6 and 7.
RHEL6$ /bin/sh --version
GNU bash, version 4.1.2(1)-r
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63041
--- Comment #16 from Mark Thomas ---
Sigh. Sorry for the hassle. Sticking with catalina.sh from 9.0.14 is the way to
go if you are seeing issues.
We should be able to get this fixed for the next release. I don't know yet what
that fix will loo
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63041
--- Comment #15 from Thomas Opfer ---
(In reply to norad from comment #14)
This is the same problem I observed.
> Now I'm using the old catalina.sh from v9.0.14 that works fine, but I'm
> considering whether it is better to modify my script i
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63041
Thomas Opfer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ubuntu...@thomasopfer.de
--
You are re
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63041
--- Comment #14 from no...@email.it ---
This fix seems to break the shell script /etc/init.d/tomcat I use to manage
Tomcat as a service with systemd (generated from init.d): https://git.io/fhQv4
Output follows:
$ sudo service tomcat start
Job
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63041
no...@email.it changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||no...@email.it
--
You are receiving t
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63041
ubuntu...@thomasopfer.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOL
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63041
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||patrik@gmx.net
--- Comment #11 from
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63041
Mark Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63041
--- Comment #10 from Mark Thomas ---
The issue isn't obvious but is observable on Ubuntu.
I agree that "\&" -> to "\&\&" is the correct fix. I'll get that implemented
and back-ported.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assig
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63041
--- Comment #9 from Igal Sapir ---
I can not reproduce the issue on Ubuntu 18.04 with Java 1.8.0_192
Tomcat shuts down immediately when calling shutdown.sh
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
---
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63041
--- Comment #8 from Patrik S. ---
Yes, BZ-63063 is exactly the same issue opened for tomcat 8.5 branch.
In tomcat 9.0 the catalina.sh contains at the same line 479 and 489 that faulty
code:
2\>\&1 \& echo \$! \>\"$catalina_pid_file\" \; \} $c
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63041
--- Comment #7 from Igal Sapir ---
Possibly related to BZ-63063
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubs
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63041
--- Comment #6 from Igal Sapir ---
(In reply to Christopher Schultz from comment #5)
> On the users' mailing list, I asked Steve to try the catalina.sh from 9.0.13
> on his 9.0.14 install, but there has been no reply for a few days.
He wrote t
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63041
--- Comment #5 from Christopher Schultz ---
On the users' mailing list, I asked Steve to try the catalina.sh from 9.0.13 on
his 9.0.14 install, but there has been no reply for a few days.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the as
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63041
--- Comment #4 from Igal Sapir ---
I will look into this issue if no one else has already started
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
-
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63041
--- Comment #3 from Igal Sapir ---
(In reply to Steve Demy from comment #2)
> Tomcat 9.0.14 runs as expected using a transplanted 9.0.13 catalina.sh. It
> starts, stops and restarts using systemd (systemctl start|stop|restart
> tomcat).
So
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63041
jpho...@korem.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jpho...@korem.com
--
You are recei
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63041
Steve Demy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63041
Christopher Schultz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|NEW
37 matches
Mail list logo
