Hi,
Broken - do not release.
It seems WebSocket support is broken for Google Chrome 32+.
I tested Apache Wicket integration and it failed with:
WebSocket connection to
'ws://localhost:8080/ws/wicket/websocket?pageId=0wicket-ajax-baseurl=behavior?0'
failed: Invalid UTF-8 sequence in header value
2014-01-28 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release is now available for voting.
This is the first non-RC release so I am leaving all the stability
options open to get an idea of where folks think we currently stand.
The main changes since RC10 are:
- Fix
On 29/01/2014 10:11, Martin Grigorov wrote:
Hi,
Broken - do not release.
It seems WebSocket support is broken for Google Chrome 32+.
I tested Apache Wicket integration and it failed with:
WebSocket connection to
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 12:37 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 29/01/2014 10:11, Martin Grigorov wrote:
Hi,
Broken - do not release.
It seems WebSocket support is broken for Google Chrome 32+.
I tested Apache Wicket integration and it failed with:
WebSocket connection
I'm seeing consistent unit test failures in TestAsyncContextImpl when
using APR:
Testcase: testDispatchErrorWithThreadSingleThenComplete took 5.171 sec
Testcase: testDispatchErrorSingleThenComplete took 2.226 sec
Testcase: testTimeoutListenerCompleteNonAsyncDispatch took 2.257 sec
FAILED
I can confirm that the issue with the empty Sec-WebSocket-Protocol header
also affects Chrome 31.0.1650.63.
The actual issue appears as an Invalid UTF-8 sequence in header value
message in the Chrome dev tool. Although I had read what Martin reported
for Chrome 32, I couldn't confirm it's the
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 9:55 AM, Rossen Stoyanchev
rstoyanc...@gopivotal.com wrote:
I can confirm that the issue with the empty Sec-WebSocket-Protocol header
also affects Chrome 31.0.1650.63.
I haven't tested 8.0.0 myself yet, but if it's broken on Chrome 31,
that's a far bigger problem than
I've reproduced this issue with Chrome 32.0.1700.102 and Chrome canary
34.0.1811.0.
Chrome 32 is already mainstream anyway (thanks evergreen browsers):
http://clicky.com/marketshare/global/web-browsers/google-chrome/
--
Brian Clozel
On Wed, Jan 29, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Yoav Shapira
On 29/01/2014 14:32, Rainer Jung wrote:
I'm seeing consistent unit test failures in TestAsyncContextImpl when
using APR:
I can reproduce these and have hopefully found a fix. This is a serious
enough regression (async timeouts are broken in some cases) to justify
dropping 8.0.0 and tagging
2014-01-29 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release is now available for voting.
(...)
It can be obtained from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.0.0/
The Maven staging repo is:
On 29/01/2014 21:03, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2014-01-29 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release is now available for voting.
(...)
It can be obtained from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/tomcat/tomcat-8/v8.0.0/
The Maven staging repo is:
On 28/01/2014 20:28, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release is now available for voting.
FYI, the production ASF Jira instance is now running on Tomcat 8.0.0. It
is early days (more like minutes than days) and I have already had to
work around one Jira bug [1]. Apart from
Good to know.
We're still using Tomcat 6 to host Jira and Confluence and I wasn't
aware Tomcat 7 and soon Tomcat 8 could be used.
Thanks for the clue.
I'll test Tomcat 8 on a bunch of common CI apps and will told you.
Cheers
2014-01-29 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org:
On 28/01/2014 20:28, Mark
On 24/12/2013 23:42, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 19.12.2013 19:38, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 10 is now available
for voting.
As always, many thanks for the detailed review.
- One special observation in unit tests: Test
On 19.12.2013 19:38, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 10 is now available
for voting.
Given this is a release candidate I am working on the basis that it is
equivalent to an alpha. The main changes since RC5 are:
- Better handling of generic types in the
2013/12/23 Andrew Carr andrewlanec...@gmail.com:
Wine not found?? im on a headless server, what did i do wrong? See
error below...
Clean setup to test:
Fresh VM with Ubuntu 13.10 64 bit server
Apache Ant(TM) version 1.9.2 compiled on July 14 2013
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea
Hello Konstantin,
Thank you very much for the reply. I understand what Wine is and why
you can't build the installer without it. What I don't understand is
why the configuration tries to build it by default. Wine is not a
prerequesite in the documentation. Maybe the default build.properties
On 23/12/2013 14:54, Andrew Carr wrote:
Hello Konstantin,
Thank you very much for the reply. I understand what Wine is and why
you can't build the installer without it. What I don't understand is
why the configuration tries to build it by default.
A release build needs to build the
Thank you for the clarification Mark. That all makes sense.
On Mon, Dec 23, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
On 23/12/2013 14:54, Andrew Carr wrote:
Hello Konstantin,
Thank you very much for the reply. I understand what Wine is and why
you can't build the installer
Wine not found?? im on a headless server, what did i do wrong? See
error below...
Clean setup to test:
Fresh VM with Ubuntu 13.10 64 bit server
Apache Ant(TM) version 1.9.2 compiled on July 14 2013
OpenJDK Runtime Environment (IcedTea 2.3.12) (7u25-2.3.12-4ubuntu3)
fresh checkout of 8_0_0RC10
My aPologIzes, While ThE build floundered with a fail message, the
output folder dist was intact. Ran some tests and all appears good.
Still the build failure thingy threw me off.
Flip flopping on my vote =)
[] Broken - do not release
[X] Alpha - go ahead and release as 8.0.0-RC10 alpha
On
2013/12/19 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 10 is now available
for voting.
Given this is a release candidate I am working on the basis that it is
equivalent to an alpha. The main changes since RC5 are:
- Better handling of generic types in the
On 20/12/2013 01:40, Andrew Carr wrote:
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 3:04 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 December 2013 18:38, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 10 is now available
for voting.
Given this is a release candidate I am
On 2013-12-19 1:38 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed 8.0.0-RC10 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[X] Alpha - go ahead and release as 8.0.0-RC10 alpha
Tested jsr356 AsyncContext with Atmosphere, no issue.
-- Jeanfrancois
Mark
Can you please add the signature files for
apache-tomcat-8.0.0-RC10.tar.gz and apache-tomcat-8.0.0-RC10.zip. The
other signature files are present, but not for those two files.
Thanks!
Rainer
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 20/12/2013 12:36, Rainer Jung wrote:
Can you please add the signature files for
apache-tomcat-8.0.0-RC10.tar.gz and apache-tomcat-8.0.0-RC10.zip. The
other signature files are present, but not for those two files.
Done. No idea how they got missed. I'll keep an eye on the next release.
2013/12/19 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org
The proposed 8.0.0-RC10 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[X] Alpha - go ahead and release as 8.0.0-RC10 alpha
Rémy
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 1:38 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 10 is now available
for voting.
Given this is a release candidate I am working on the basis that it is
equivalent to an alpha. The main changes since RC5 are:
- Better
On 19/12/2013 18:38, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 10 is now available
for voting.
Given this is a release candidate I am working on the basis that it is
equivalent to an alpha. The main changes since RC5 are:
- Better handling of generic types in the
Mark,
2013/12/19 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 10 is now available
for voting.
Given this is a release candidate I am working on the basis that it is
equivalent to an alpha. The main changes since RC5 are:
- Better handling of generic
On 19 December 2013 18:38, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 10 is now available
for voting.
Given this is a release candidate I am working on the basis that it is
equivalent to an alpha. The main changes since RC5 are:
- Better handling
On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 3:04 PM, sebb seb...@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 December 2013 18:38, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 10 is now available
for voting.
Given this is a release candidate I am working on the basis that it is
equivalent to
2013/12/18 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 9 is now available
for voting.
Given this is a release candidate I am working on the basis that it is
equivalent to an alpha. The main changes since RC5 are:
- Better handling of generic types in the
On 18/12/2013 00:59, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 9 is now available
for voting.
Given this is a release candidate I am working on the basis that it is
equivalent to an alpha. The main changes since RC5 are:
- Better handling of generic types in the
On Dec 17, 2013, at 7:59 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 9 is now available
for voting.
Given this is a release candidate I am working on the basis that it is
equivalent to an alpha. The main changes since RC5 are:
- Better
On 2013-12-17 7:59 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed 8.0.0-RC9 release is:
[X] Broken - do not release
[ ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 8.0.0-RC9 alpha
Atmosphere stopped working with 8.0.0-RC9. With all previous RC from 1
to 7 it worked (didn't test 8) and websockets properly handled
On 18/12/2013 14:51, Jeanfrancois Arcand wrote:
On 2013-12-17 7:59 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed 8.0.0-RC9 release is:
[X] Broken - do not release
[ ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 8.0.0-RC9 alpha
Atmosphere stopped working with 8.0.0-RC9. With all previous RC from 1
to 7 it
On Dec 17, 2013, at 6:32 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 8 is now available
for voting.
Given this is a release candidate I am working on the basis that it is
equivalent to an alpha. The main changes since RC5 are:
- Better
On 17/12/2013 14:27, Daniel Mikusa wrote:
On Dec 17, 2013, at 6:32 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 8 is now available
for voting.
Given this is a release candidate I am working on the basis that it is
equivalent to an alpha. The
On 14/12/2013 15:37, Konstantin Preißer wrote:
If more info is needed to debug the problem, please let me know.
No more info needed at the moment.
I can re-create the problem.
The issues appear to be related to the changes I made to support
non-blocking IO with AJP so they should be limited
On 16/12/2013 14:07, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 14/12/2013 15:37, Konstantin Preißer wrote:
If more info is needed to debug the problem, please let me know.
No more info needed at the moment.
I can re-create the problem.
The additional issues I thought I was seeing were user error rather
Hi Mark,
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, December 16, 2013 3:44 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 8.0.0-RC7
On 16/12/2013 14:07, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 14/12/2013 15:37, Konstantin Preißer wrote
Hi Mark,
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2013 12:28 AM
The proposed 8.0.0-RC7 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 8.0.0-RC7 alpha
While the issue with large static files that I
-Original Message-
From: Konstantin Preißer [mailto:kpreis...@apache.org]
Sent: Saturday, December 14, 2013 1:53 PM
To: 'Tomcat Developers List'
Subject: RE: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 8.0.0-RC7
Hi Mark,
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org
2013/12/12 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 7 is now available
for voting.
Given this is a release candidate I am working on the basis that it is
equivalent to an alpha. The main changes since RC5 are:
- Better handling of generic types in the
2013/12/13 Violeta Georgieva miles...@gmail.com
I'm receiving NPE when testing an application with jsp that specifies tld
location with relative path:
java.lang.NullPointerException
org.apache.jasper.compiler.TldCache.getTaglibXml(TldCache.java:97)
2013/12/12 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 7 is now available
for voting.
Given this is a release candidate I am working on the basis that it is
equivalent to an alpha. The main changes since RC5 are:
- Better handling of generic types in the
2013/12/13 Violeta Georgieva miles...@gmail.com
I found another issue:
If a tag file is placed in a jar file in WEB-INF/lib and then is used, the
The change in the code is introduced with r1541960
Besides that the message is wrong because we check only for WEB-INF/tags
[1], what should be
On 13/12/2013 14:35, Rémy Maucherat wrote:
2013/12/13 Violeta Georgieva miles...@gmail.com
I found another issue:
If a tag file is placed in a jar file in WEB-INF/lib and then is used, the
The change in the code is introduced with r1541960
Besides that the message is wrong because we check
2013/12/13 Rémy Maucherat r...@apache.org
2013/12/13 Violeta Georgieva miles...@gmail.com
I found another issue:
If a tag file is placed in a jar file in WEB-INF/lib and then is used,
the
The change in the code is introduced with r1541960
Besides that the message is wrong because we
2013/12/13 Violeta Georgieva miles...@gmail.com
Unfortunately with that fix I'm receiving FNF:
java.io.FileNotFoundException: /META-INF/tags/my.tag
org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.loadTagFile(JspServletWrapper.java:235)
2013/12/13 Rémy Maucherat r...@apache.org
2013/12/13 Violeta Georgieva miles...@gmail.com
Unfortunately with that fix I'm receiving FNF:
java.io.FileNotFoundException: /META-INF/tags/my.tag
org.apache.jasper.servlet.JspServletWrapper.loadTagFile(JspServletWrapper.java:235)
2013/12/13 Violeta Georgieva miles...@gmail.com
Here [1] is the test
[1] https://www.dropbox.com/s/3zd106lpqfb3ytv/test.zip
Fixed. I didn't add the test yet since I suppose adding a binary should be
avoided.
Rémy
2013/12/13 Rémy Maucherat r...@apache.org
2013/12/13 Violeta Georgieva miles...@gmail.com
Here [1] is the test
[1] https://www.dropbox.com/s/3zd106lpqfb3ytv/test.zip
Fixed. I didn't add the test yet since I suppose adding a binary should be
avoided.
Thanks it is working now.
On Dec 11, 2013, at 6:24 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 7 is now available
for voting.
Given this is a release candidate I am working on the basis that it is
equivalent to an alpha. The main changes since RC5 are:
- Better
On 2013-12-11 6:24 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed 8.0.0-RC7 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[X] Alpha - go ahead and release as 8.0.0-RC7 alpha
-- Jeanfrancois
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
On 11/12/2013 23:24, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 7 is now available
for voting.
Given this is a release candidate I am working on the basis that it is
equivalent to an alpha. The main changes since RC5 are:
- Better handling of generic types in the
2013/12/12 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 7 is now available
for voting.
Given this is a release candidate I am working on the basis that it is
equivalent to an alpha. The main changes since RC5 are:
- Better handling of generic types in the
On 11/12/2013 23:24, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 7 is now available
for voting.
Given this is a release candidate I am working on the basis that it is
equivalent to an alpha. The main changes since RC5 are:
- Better handling of generic types in the
Hi,
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, December 10, 2013 1:22 AM
snip/
Any idea what is going on there? Why would Tomcat create such a big
byte array for a static file?
Lots of things going on here.
1. The content of resources was
On 09/12/2013 20:18, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 6 is now available
for voting.
Given this is a release candidate I am working on the basis that it is
equivalent to an alpha. The main changes since RC5 are:
- Better handling of generic types in the
Hi Mark,
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Monday, December 9, 2013 9:19 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 8.0.0-RC6
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 6 is now available
for voting.
Given
Konstantin,
On 12/9/13, 4:40 PM, Konstantin Preißer wrote:
The webapp contains a large static file with a size of 4,582,875,812 bytes.
I believe that static file is better-described as huge, enormous,
[bleeping] gigantic. Anything bigger than 2^32 bytes deserves a proper
adjective. :)
-chris
On 09/12/2013 21:40, Konstantin Preißer wrote:
With Tomcat 8.0.0-RC6, I seem to have problems serving large static
files in one of my webapps.
I've run it on a Windows Server 2012 R2 system with Java 1.7.0_45
(64-Bit) and the NIO HTTP connector. The webapp contains a large
static file with
On 16/10/2013 19:21, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 5 is now available
for voting.
Given this is a release candidate I am working on the basis that it is
equivalent to an alpha. The main changes since RC4 are:
- Stability fixes in the APR/native
Mark,
On 16.10.2013 20:21, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 5 is now available
for voting.
...
The proposed 8.0.0-RC5 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[X] Alpha - go ahead and release as 8.0.0-RC5 alpha
Tested .zip distribution on Windows 7
On Wed, Oct 16, 2013 at 2:21 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
The proposed 8.0.0-RC5 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[ X ] Alpha - go ahead and release as 8.0.0-RC5 alpha
Yoav
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
2013/10/16 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 5 is now available
for voting.
Given this is a release candidate I am working on the basis that it is
equivalent to an alpha. The main changes since RC4 are:
- Stability fixes in the APR/native
On 16.10.2013 20:21, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 5 is now available
for voting.
Given this is a release candidate I am working on the basis that it is
equivalent to an alpha. The main changes since RC4 are:
- Stability fixes in the APR/native
Hi Mark,
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, October 16, 2013 8:21 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 8.0.0-RC5
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 5 is now available
for voting.
Given
On Oct 15, 2013, at 8:48 AM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 4 is now available
for voting.
Given this is a release candidate I am working on the basis that it is
equivalent to an alpha. The main changes since RC3 are:
- Stability
-Original Message-
From: Mark Thomas [mailto:ma...@apache.org]
Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 2:49 PM
To: Tomcat Developers List
Subject: [VOTE] Release Apache Tomcat 8.0.0-RC4
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 4 is now available
for voting.
Given this is a
[X] Alpha - go ahead and release as 8.0.0-RC4 alpha
Focused on websocket testing, default configuration.
-- Jeanfrancois
On 2013-10-15 8:48 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 4 is now available
for voting.
Given this is a release candidate I am working
On 15/10/2013 17:31, Konstantin Preißer wrote:
Note, that the documentation index.html included in the binaries
says:
Apache Tomcat version @VERSION_MAJOR_MINOR@ implements the Servlet
3.1 and JavaServer Pages 2.3 specifications from the Java Community
Process [...]
I guess this is
On 15/10/2013 15:23, Daniel Mikusa wrote:
Tested a couple apps that I have and everything worked OK for me.
One note though, there are some errors with the examples when I run
with the security manager enabled.
Here are the steps to replicate the issues:
1.) Downloaded Tomcat 8.0.0-RC4
On 20/09/2013 12:35, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 20/09/2013 11:36, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 3 is now available
for voting.
Given this is a release candidate I am working on the basis that it is
equivalent to an alpha. The main changes since RC1 are:
-
Hi Mark
What kind of tests, specific to TC 8.0 are awaited to 'qualify' ?
2013/9/23 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org
On 20/09/2013 12:35, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 20/09/2013 11:36, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 3 is now available
for voting.
Given
On 23/09/2013 06:20, Henri Gomez wrote:
Hi Mark
What kind of tests, specific to TC 8.0 are awaited to 'qualify' ?
Not sure what you mean.
The only tests we have are the unit tests. We do not have access to the
Java EE 7 TCKs.
In terms of this release, I am personally happy if the unit tests
2013/9/20 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 3 is now available
for voting.
Given this is a release candidate I am working on the basis that it is
equivalent to an alpha. The main changes since RC1 are:
- Updated spec implementations with results
On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 12:36 PM, Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 3 is now available
for voting.
Given this is a release candidate I am working on the basis that it is
equivalent to an alpha. The main changes since RC1 are:
- Updated
Mark,
On 9/20/13 6:36 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 3 is now available
for voting.
Given this is a release candidate I am working on the basis that it is
equivalent to an alpha. The main changes since RC1 are:
- Updated spec implementations with
On 20.09.2013 12:36, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed 8.0.0-RC3 release is:
[ ] Broken - do not release
[X] Alpha - go ahead and release as 8.0.0-RC3 alpha
+1 as alpha.
Overview:
- MD5 OK
- signatures OK
- key in KEYS file
- gz and zip for src and bin consistent
- src consistent with svn tag
[X] Alpha - go ahead and release as 8.0.0-RC3 alpha
Tested with Atmosphere jsr356 and Servlet 3 Async API.
-- Jeanfrancois
On 2013-09-20 6:36 AM, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 3 is now available
for voting.
Given this is a release candidate I am
On 20/09/2013 11:36, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 3 is now available
for voting.
Given this is a release candidate I am working on the basis that it is
equivalent to an alpha. The main changes since RC1 are:
- Updated spec implementations with
I get a crash when using tcnative 1.1.28 and JDK 1.7.0_40 on Solaris 10:
WARN: Test failure in
'output/build/logs/TEST-org.apache.tomcat.websocket.TestWsWebSocketContainer.APR.txt':
Testsuite: org.apache.tomcat.websocket.TestWsWebSocketContainer
Tests run: 1, Failures: 0, Errors: 1, Skipped: 0,
On 19/09/2013 07:18, Rainer Jung wrote:
I get a crash when using tcnative 1.1.28 and JDK 1.7.0_40 on Solaris 10:
WARN: Test failure in
'output/build/logs/TEST-org.apache.tomcat.websocket.TestWsWebSocketContainer.APR.txt':
Testsuite: org.apache.tomcat.websocket.TestWsWebSocketContainer
Tests
On 19/09/2013 09:12, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 19/09/2013 07:18, Rainer Jung wrote:
I get a crash when using tcnative 1.1.28 and JDK 1.7.0_40 on Solaris 10:
WARN: Test failure in
'output/build/logs/TEST-org.apache.tomcat.websocket.TestWsWebSocketContainer.APR.txt':
Testsuite:
On 19.09.2013 13:01, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 19/09/2013 09:12, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 19/09/2013 07:18, Rainer Jung wrote:
I get a crash when using tcnative 1.1.28 and JDK 1.7.0_40 on Solaris 10:
WARN: Test failure in
On 19.09.2013 18:32, Rainer Jung wrote:
On 19.09.2013 13:01, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 19/09/2013 09:12, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 19/09/2013 07:18, Rainer Jung wrote:
I get a crash when using tcnative 1.1.28 and JDK 1.7.0_40 on Solaris 10:
WARN: Test failure in
2013/9/17 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 2 is now available
for voting.
Given this is a release candidate I am working on the basis that it is
equivalent to an alpha. The main changes since RC1 are:
- Updated spec implementations with results
Mark,
On 9/17/13 1:53 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 2 is now available
for voting.
Given this is a release candidate I am working on the basis that it is
equivalent to an alpha. The main changes since RC1 are:
- Updated spec implementations with
On 18/09/2013 21:18, Christopher Schultz wrote:
Mark,
On 9/17/13 1:53 PM, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 2 is now
available for voting.
Given this is a release candidate I am working on the basis that
it is equivalent to an alpha. The main changes
On 18/09/2013 20:49, Konstantin Kolinko wrote:
2013/9/17 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 2 is now available
for voting.
Given this is a release candidate I am working on the basis that it is
equivalent to an alpha. The main changes since RC1
Hi Mark,
thanks for the thorough inspection of my results. I'll try to make sure
that I won't include now known false positives in future reports.
Some few remarks inline.
On 04.08.2013 18:14, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 03/08/2013 12:06, Rainer Jung wrote:
Overview:
- one crash in tcnative
On 05/08/2013 11:49, Rainer Jung wrote:
Hi Mark,
thanks for the thorough inspection of my results. I'll try to make sure
that I won't include now known false positives in future reports.
No problem. I'd rather a few false positives than a few false negatives.
On 04.08.2013 18:14, Mark
On 05.08.2013 18:22, Mark Thomas wrote:
On 05/08/2013 11:49, Rainer Jung wrote:
The Thread-4 has stack
java.lang.Thread.State: RUNNABLE
at sun.nio.ch.SolarisEventPort.portGet(Native Method)
at sun.nio.ch.SolarisEventPort.access$400(SolarisEventPort.java:38)
at
2013/8/2 Mark Thomas ma...@apache.org:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 1 is now available
for voting.
Given this is a release candidate I am working on the basis that it is
equivalent to an alpha. That said:
- Servlet 3.1 is complete
- JSP 2.3 is complete
- EL 3.0 is
On 03/08/2013 12:06, Rainer Jung wrote:
Overview:
- one crash in tcnative during unit tests
- MBeans indicate common loader is gone (is that expected?
At least the common.loader entry still exists in catalina.properties)
Expected as StandardClassLoader has been removed. That decision is
Rainer,
On 8/3/13 6:06 AM, Rainer Jung wrote:
- On APR in addition a crash (core) in:
b76dfe74 Java_org_apache_tomcat_jni_Socket_recv (30b528, b30ff188,
b30fd09c, b29500, b30ff214, 0) + 34
fbc0f780 * org/apache/tomcat/jni/Socket.recv(J[BII)I+32362
fbc0f72c *
On 01.08.2013 22:53, Mark Thomas wrote:
The proposed Apache Tomcat 8.0.0 release candidate 1 is now available
for voting.
Given this is a release candidate I am working on the basis that it is
equivalent to an alpha. That said:
- Servlet 3.1 is complete
- JSP 2.3 is complete
- EL 3.0 is
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
