+1
As I believe it may improve collaboration and PR workflows.
On May 19, 2017 2:58 AM, "Jeremy Mitchell" wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 3:35 PM, Dave Neuman wrote:
>
> > +1, thanks for putting the vote up Jan
> >
> > On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 4:57 PM, Steve Malenfant
> > wrote:
> >
> >
+1
On 5/18/17, 2:32 PM, "Jan van Doorn" wrote:
In
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5bdb9b073343f49c1d5b85147eb9d260bf7ad15d61384929993c7e1d@%3Cdev.trafficcontrol.apache.org%3E
Dave
mentioned that we can now move to "full" GitHub. Some more information in
that thread if y
+1
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 1:41 PM, Dremin, Sergey
wrote:
> +1
>
> On 5/18/17, 2:32 PM, "Jan van Doorn" wrote:
>
> In
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5bdb9b073343f49c1d5b85147eb9d2
> 60bf7ad15d61384929993c7e1d@%3Cdev.trafficcontrol.apache.org%3E
> Dave
> mentioned that we
Unless there are any objections:
* Ashish and I will begin migrating the conf wiki pages to github on Monday.
* We also need to add a release notation to the page titles so we know
to which release the discussions apply.
* As we copy things over, we will move the existing conf w
I don’t think we can begin moving stuff over until we have write access to the
Github repo. It looks like the Issues and Wiki tabs are disabled currently
—Eric
On May 19, 2017, at 11:34 AM, Durfey, Ryan
mailto:ryan_dur...@comcast.com>> wrote:
Unless there are any objections:
* Ashish and
I’m going to be putting together a small TOI of information from the meetings
last week with some of my coworkers inside of Cisco. It would be really helpful
for me to reuse some of the presenters slides, instead of working entirely from
notes.
If people are interested in their sharing slides,
+1
On 05/18/2017 04:32 PM, Jan van Doorn wrote:
In
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/5bdb9b073343f49c1d5b85147eb9d260bf7ad15d61384929993c7e1d@%3Cdev.trafficcontrol.apache.org%3E
Dave
mentioned that we can now move to "full" GitHub. Some more information in
that thread if you are not familiar.
(hope I'm replying to Ryan re wiki move, Google mail is confusing)
I think we want to hold off on the Wiki. Full Github means just issues and
git work flow in this case.
On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 10:45 AM Hank Beatty wrote:
> +1
>
> On 05/18/2017 04:32 PM, Jan van Doorn wrote:
> > In
> >
> https:
Aye, and we can't call the vote until Sunday at the earliest, to give
everyone time to contribute. We seem to be pretty +1 on the change, but
it's important to give everyone a chance.
Also, I think the +1s here are for Issues, PRs, and Tags in GitHub. I do
believe we'll get access to the Wiki, too
@Eric_Friedrich - any concerns from you regarding removal of these
duplicate routes? Here they are to summarize:
remove GET /api/$version/deliveryservices/list in favor of GET
/api/$version/deliveryservices
remove GET /api/$version/deliveryservices/:id/get in favor of GET
/api/$version/deliveryser
Thumbs up on removal
> On May 19, 2017, at 1:58 PM, Jeremy Mitchell wrote:
>
> @Eric_Friedrich - any concerns from you regarding removal of these
> duplicate routes? Here they are to summarize:
>
> remove GET /api/$version/deliveryservices/list in favor of GET
> /api/$version/deliveryservices
>
11 matches
Mail list logo
