[RESULT] [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 1.4 (take four)
The vote has passed! Finally! :) +1 Nathan Bubna Antonio Petrelli (non-binding) Claude Brisson Will Glass-Husain No other votes (for take four) were received. On Nov 20, 2007 8:47 AM, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, the latest test build has been up since Sunday afternoon with no complaints. So, here's the fourth (and i really hope final) call for a vote to release it: Again, the test build for this release is available at: http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/tools/1.4/ Please vote regarding your support for releasing this test build as VelocityTools 1.4: [ ] +1 Let's do it [ ] +0 Have fun; i don't care. [ ] -0 Not sure about this, but i won't stop you. [ ] -1 No, because __ The voting period is typically 72 hours, putting its close time as roughly 9am PST on Friday, Nov 23rd. Of course, given the holiday weekend, the release may not be announced until as late as Monday. My vote is +1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[VOTE] Release VelocityTools 1.4 (take four)
Ok, the latest test build has been up since Sunday afternoon with no complaints. So, here's the fourth (and i really hope final) call for a vote to release it: Again, the test build for this release is available at: http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/tools/1.4/ Please vote regarding your support for releasing this test build as VelocityTools 1.4: [ ] +1 Let's do it [ ] +0 Have fun; i don't care. [ ] -0 Not sure about this, but i won't stop you. [ ] -1 No, because __ The voting period is typically 72 hours, putting its close time as roughly 9am PST on Friday, Nov 23rd. Of course, given the holiday weekend, the release may not be announced until as late as Monday. My vote is +1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 1.4 (take three)
+1 Le lundi 19 novembre 2007 à 21:52 +0100, Antonio Petrelli a écrit : 2007/11/19, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED]: all seems fairly quiet... wondering if it's safe to call for a vote (again)... anyone have a chance to review the latest test build, particularly the pom? Sorry for being late. +1 for the pom, +0 for the rest. Ciao Antonio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 1.4 (take four)
yes, that's the one i reviewed +1 Le mardi 20 novembre 2007 à 17:51 +0100, Antonio Petrelli a écrit : 2007/11/20, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Please vote regarding your support for releasing this test build as VelocityTools 1.4: [ ] +1 Let's do it [ ] +0 Have fun; i don't care. [ ] -0 Not sure about this, but i won't stop you. [ ] -1 No, because __ Again +1 for the pom, +0 for the rest. Ciao Antonio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 1.4 (take four)
+1 from me. On Nov 20, 2007 8:51 AM, Antonio Petrelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2007/11/20, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Please vote regarding your support for releasing this test build as VelocityTools 1.4: [ ] +1 Let's do it [ ] +0 Have fun; i don't care. [ ] -0 Not sure about this, but i won't stop you. [ ] -1 No, because __ Again +1 for the pom, +0 for the rest. Ciao Antonio -- Forio Business Simulations Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.forio.com
Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 1.4 (take three)
all seems fairly quiet... wondering if it's safe to call for a vote (again)... anyone have a chance to review the latest test build, particularly the pom? http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/tools/1.4/ On Nov 18, 2007 11:35 AM, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: a new test build is in the process of uploading. give it five minutes and try again... please try to find everything that matters to you... please. On Nov 18, 2007 9:44 AM, Antonio Petrelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nathan, sorry to disturb again :-) I notice that the servlet-api dependency scope has not been changed, at least in the src distribution. And another thing: there is a dependency to velocity, with groupId velocity. Shouldn't it be org.apache.velocity? Antonio 2007/11/17, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry about all the votes. I will in the future take Henning's advice and put the test builds up a couple days before calling for the vote. However, since we've already had a few days to go over this one, i'm guessing we don't need to wait. Third time's a charm, right? Again, the test build for this release is available at: http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/tools/1.4/ Please vote regarding your support for releasing this test build as VelocityTools 1.4: [ ] +1 Let's do it [ ] +0 Have fun; i don't care. [ ] -0 Not sure about this, but i won't stop you. [ ] -1 No, because __ The voting period is typically 72 hours, putting its close time as roughly 3pm PST on Monday, Nov 17th. My vote is +1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 1.4 (take three)
2007/11/19, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED]: all seems fairly quiet... wondering if it's safe to call for a vote (again)... anyone have a chance to review the latest test build, particularly the pom? Sorry for being late. +1 for the pom, +0 for the rest. Ciao Antonio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 1.4 (take two)
Remember http://velocity.markmail.org/message/uxk5qzd4nlhls7jt?q=groupid +from:%22Claude+Brisson%22 ? My fault, I should definitely have opened a JIRA entry. oops... http://tinyurl.com/3asmmg - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 1.4 (take three)
a new test build is in the process of uploading. give it five minutes and try again... please try to find everything that matters to you... please. On Nov 18, 2007 9:44 AM, Antonio Petrelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nathan, sorry to disturb again :-) I notice that the servlet-api dependency scope has not been changed, at least in the src distribution. And another thing: there is a dependency to velocity, with groupId velocity. Shouldn't it be org.apache.velocity? Antonio 2007/11/17, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Sorry about all the votes. I will in the future take Henning's advice and put the test builds up a couple days before calling for the vote. However, since we've already had a few days to go over this one, i'm guessing we don't need to wait. Third time's a charm, right? Again, the test build for this release is available at: http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/tools/1.4/ Please vote regarding your support for releasing this test build as VelocityTools 1.4: [ ] +1 Let's do it [ ] +0 Have fun; i don't care. [ ] -0 Not sure about this, but i won't stop you. [ ] -1 No, because __ The voting period is typically 72 hours, putting its close time as roughly 3pm PST on Monday, Nov 17th. My vote is +1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 1.4 (take two)
2007/11/16, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED]: hmm. do you think this is something worth re-rolling the release? It's really annoying for maven-based software (like Struts 2) that use Velocity Tools. In Struts 2 it was necessary to exclude the servlet-api 2.3 to make it work. And it is wrong: it has to be provided since it is usually provided by containers. I know that my vote is absolutely not-binding, but it is very annoying: a commit for you means less configuration for the rest. Antonio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 1.4 (take two)
2007/11/16, Henning P. Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Nothing should *ever* provide the servlet API or jar. Some releases of tomcat explicitly stopped deploying the jar in versions. It is a compile dependency. That is all. The runtime (servlet container) should provide the API. This is exactly what the scopeprovided/scope means: it is a compile dependency, but it is already provided by a container. See: http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-dependency-mechanism.html With this scope, the dependency is not transitive. In Struts 2 we use servlet-api 2.4, while in velocity-tools it is use 2.3. With the compile scope, the dependency is transitive, and to use the 2.4 we need to exclude explicitly the 2.3 version, inherited by velocity-tools. Antonio - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 1.4 (take two)
hmm. do you think this is something worth re-rolling the release? On Nov 16, 2007 12:03 AM, Antonio Petrelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I noticed that in the pom of velocity-tools, there is a compile dependency to the servlet-api 2.3. It should be a provided dependency. We had some problems at Struts 2 for this reason. Ciao Antonio 2007/11/16, Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED]: No problem revoting-- not a big deal. Tested again under jdk 1.5 and 1.6. +1 On Nov 15, 2007 5:49 PM, Marinó A. Jónsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nathan Bubna Sent: 16. nóvember 2007 00:44 To: Velocity Developers List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 1.4 (take two) Ok, i fixed the problems that Will found an uploaded a new test build. The test build for this release is available at: http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/tools/1.4/ http://people.apache.org/%7Enbubna/velocity/tools/1.4/ Please vote regarding your support for releasing this test build as VelocityTools 1.4: [ ] +1 Let's do it [ ] +0 Have fun; i don't care. [ ] -0 Not sure about this, but i won't stop you. [ ] -1 No, because __ The voting period is typically 72 hours, putting its close time as roughly 5pm PST on Sunday, Nov 17th. Since i don't feel like releasing it that day, i will do so first thing Monday morning (assuming the vote passes), with the hope that we can announce the release Tuesday morning. My vote is +1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Forio Business Simulations Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.forio.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 1.4 (take two)
Just give us a few hours/days to try it out before CfV. This avoids having to stop CfVs. :-) Best regards Henning Nathan Bubna schrieb: On Nov 16, 2007 1:00 PM, Henning P. Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Antonio Petrelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 2007/11/16, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED]: hmm. do you think this is something worth re-rolling the release? It's really annoying for maven-based software (like Struts 2) that use Velocity Tools. In Struts 2 it was necessary to exclude the servlet-api 2.3 to make it work. And it is wrong: it has to be provided since it is usually provided by containers. ^it has to be^it should be apart from that, I fully agree. The dependency should be 'provided'. Nathan: I am actually -1 to releasing with compile dependency for the servlet api. Antonio is right here. ok, here we go again... BTW: You can put out the RCs for consideration in your home directory without formal CfV. We only need a CfV if that stuff goes into an official repository or location. i know; that's been the hope with each CfV. Best regards Henning -- Henning P. Schmiedehausen -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | J2EE, Linux, 91054 Buckenhof, Germany -- +49 9131 506540 | Apache person Open Source Consulting, Development, Design| Velocity - Turbine guy INTERMETA - Gesellschaft fuer Mehrwertdienste mbH - RG Fuerth, HRB 7350 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Buckenhof. Geschaeftsfuehrer: Henning Schmiedehausen ...it's good to be a lunatic... -- 10th doctor - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Henning P. Schmiedehausen -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | J2EE, Linux 91054 Buckenhof, Germany -- +49 9131 506540 | Apache person Open Source Consulting, Development, Design| Velocity - Turbine Save the cheerleader. Save the world. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 1.4 (take two)
On Nov 16, 2007 1:00 PM, Henning P. Schmiedehausen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Antonio Petrelli [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: 2007/11/16, Nathan Bubna [EMAIL PROTECTED]: hmm. do you think this is something worth re-rolling the release? It's really annoying for maven-based software (like Struts 2) that use Velocity Tools. In Struts 2 it was necessary to exclude the servlet-api 2.3 to make it work. And it is wrong: it has to be provided since it is usually provided by containers. ^it has to be^it should be apart from that, I fully agree. The dependency should be 'provided'. Nathan: I am actually -1 to releasing with compile dependency for the servlet api. Antonio is right here. ok, here we go again... BTW: You can put out the RCs for consideration in your home directory without formal CfV. We only need a CfV if that stuff goes into an official repository or location. i know; that's been the hope with each CfV. Best regards Henning -- Henning P. Schmiedehausen -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] | J2EE, Linux, 91054 Buckenhof, Germany -- +49 9131 506540 | Apache person Open Source Consulting, Development, Design| Velocity - Turbine guy INTERMETA - Gesellschaft fuer Mehrwertdienste mbH - RG Fuerth, HRB 7350 Sitz der Gesellschaft: Buckenhof. Geschaeftsfuehrer: Henning Schmiedehausen ...it's good to be a lunatic... -- 10th doctor - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[VOTE] Release VelocityTools 1.4 (take three)
Sorry about all the votes. I will in the future take Henning's advice and put the test builds up a couple days before calling for the vote. However, since we've already had a few days to go over this one, i'm guessing we don't need to wait. Third time's a charm, right? Again, the test build for this release is available at: http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/tools/1.4/ Please vote regarding your support for releasing this test build as VelocityTools 1.4: [ ] +1 Let's do it [ ] +0 Have fun; i don't care. [ ] -0 Not sure about this, but i won't stop you. [ ] -1 No, because __ The voting period is typically 72 hours, putting its close time as roughly 3pm PST on Monday, Nov 17th. My vote is +1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 1.4
Le mercredi 14 novembre 2007 à 16:18 -0800, Nathan Bubna a écrit : Ok, folks. I believe it's time to wrap up VelocityTools 1.x and move on. This is the last planned release in the 1.x series. Since i really don't think anyone has other changes waiting in the wings for the release, i went ahead and rolled the test build. Please test thoroughly, so just maybe it can really be the last one without any point releases for typos or build problems. :) The test build for this release is available at: http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/tools/1.4/ Please vote regarding your support for releasing this test build as VelocityTools 1.4: [ ] +1 Let's do it [ ] +0 Have fun; i don't care. [ ] -0 Not sure about this, but i won't stop you. [ ] -1 No, because __ +1 let's head towards 2.0! The voting period is typically 72 hours, putting its close time as roughly 5pm PST on Saturday, Nov 17th. If i do not find time amidst chores that day to finish the release process, then i will do so first thing Monday morning (assuming the vote passes), with the hope that we can announce the release Tuesday morning. My vote is +1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 1.4
Good news. Let me download today and check it out. WILL On Nov 15, 2007 12:07 AM, Claude Brisson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Le mercredi 14 novembre 2007 à 16:18 -0800, Nathan Bubna a écrit : Ok, folks. I believe it's time to wrap up VelocityTools 1.x and move on. This is the last planned release in the 1.x series. Since i really don't think anyone has other changes waiting in the wings for the release, i went ahead and rolled the test build. Please test thoroughly, so just maybe it can really be the last one without any point releases for typos or build problems. :) The test build for this release is available at: http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/tools/1.4/http://people.apache.org/%7Enbubna/velocity/tools/1.4/ Please vote regarding your support for releasing this test build as VelocityTools 1.4: [ ] +1 Let's do it [ ] +0 Have fun; i don't care. [ ] -0 Not sure about this, but i won't stop you. [ ] -1 No, because __ +1 let's head towards 2.0! The voting period is typically 72 hours, putting its close time as roughly 5pm PST on Saturday, Nov 17th. If i do not find time amidst chores that day to finish the release process, then i will do so first thing Monday morning (assuming the vote passes), with the hope that we can announce the release Tuesday morning. My vote is +1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Forio Business Simulations Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.forio.com
Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 1.4
On Nov 15, 2007 4:01 PM, Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nice work! Some notes: The pom.xml file lists 1.4-dev as the version. Would it be worth it to re-roll the release and keep the maven mavens happy? sigh. i always forget the maven stuff. i write myself notes to remember these sort of things when rolling a release, but then i forget where i put the notes. :) thanks for catching this stuff. i don't really mind re-rolling the release, as i have that process fairly streamlined. i'm not all that thrilled about asking ya'll to have to re-vote and all that. but since you apparently check them more thoroughly than the rest of us, i suppose that's the biggest burden on you. :) No big deal, but if we did re-roll it, we should fix: * readme.txt file has the old URL for Velocity, not the new one. * readme has the old email list addresses. * the readme.txt has conflicting info on required JDK for building. On line 32 it claims a min of 1.3.1. Line 75 says 1.4. But actually it requires 1.5 (or so ant tells me). not worth it, but since i'm re-rolling, i suppose i might as well... I ran ant test under JDK 1.4 (failed with appropriate error message), JDK 1.5 (worked) and JDK 1.6 (worked). I'm -0 due to the pom issue but would flip to +1 if someone tells me this is ok or it's fixed. WILL On Nov 15, 2007 7:38 AM, Christopher Schultz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nathan, Nathan Bubna wrote: The test build for this release is available at: http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/tools/1.4/http://people.apache.org/%7Enbubna/velocity/tools/1.4/ Please vote regarding your support for releasing this test build as VelocityTools 1.4: [ ] +1 Let's do it [ ] +0 Have fun; i don't care. [ ] -0 Not sure about this, but i won't stop you. [ ] -1 No, because __ +1 - All the things I need are in there and work just fine ;) (Though I think I don't have any voting power...) Thanks for all the hard work, Nathan! -chris -- Forio Business Simulations Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.forio.com - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[VOTE] Release VelocityTools 1.4 (take two)
Ok, i fixed the problems that Will found an uploaded a new test build. The test build for this release is available at: http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/tools/1.4/ Please vote regarding your support for releasing this test build as VelocityTools 1.4: [ ] +1 Let's do it [ ] +0 Have fun; i don't care. [ ] -0 Not sure about this, but i won't stop you. [ ] -1 No, because __ The voting period is typically 72 hours, putting its close time as roughly 5pm PST on Sunday, Nov 17th. Since i don't feel like releasing it that day, i will do so first thing Monday morning (assuming the vote passes), with the hope that we can announce the release Tuesday morning. My vote is +1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Re: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 1.4 (take two)
No problem revoting-- not a big deal. Tested again under jdk 1.5 and 1.6. +1 On Nov 15, 2007 5:49 PM, Marinó A. Jónsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nathan Bubna Sent: 16. nóvember 2007 00:44 To: Velocity Developers List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 1.4 (take two) Ok, i fixed the problems that Will found an uploaded a new test build. The test build for this release is available at: http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/tools/1.4/http://people.apache.org/%7Enbubna/velocity/tools/1.4/ Please vote regarding your support for releasing this test build as VelocityTools 1.4: [ ] +1 Let's do it [ ] +0 Have fun; i don't care. [ ] -0 Not sure about this, but i won't stop you. [ ] -1 No, because __ The voting period is typically 72 hours, putting its close time as roughly 5pm PST on Sunday, Nov 17th. Since i don't feel like releasing it that day, i will do so first thing Monday morning (assuming the vote passes), with the hope that we can announce the release Tuesday morning. My vote is +1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Forio Business Simulations Will Glass-Husain [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.forio.com
RE: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 1.4 (take two)
+1 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nathan Bubna Sent: 16. nóvember 2007 00:44 To: Velocity Developers List; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [VOTE] Release VelocityTools 1.4 (take two) Ok, i fixed the problems that Will found an uploaded a new test build. The test build for this release is available at: http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/tools/1.4/ Please vote regarding your support for releasing this test build as VelocityTools 1.4: [ ] +1 Let's do it [ ] +0 Have fun; i don't care. [ ] -0 Not sure about this, but i won't stop you. [ ] -1 No, because __ The voting period is typically 72 hours, putting its close time as roughly 5pm PST on Sunday, Nov 17th. Since i don't feel like releasing it that day, i will do so first thing Monday morning (assuming the vote passes), with the hope that we can announce the release Tuesday morning. My vote is +1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[VOTE] Release VelocityTools 1.4
Ok, folks. I believe it's time to wrap up VelocityTools 1.x and move on. This is the last planned release in the 1.x series. Since i really don't think anyone has other changes waiting in the wings for the release, i went ahead and rolled the test build. Please test thoroughly, so just maybe it can really be the last one without any point releases for typos or build problems. :) The test build for this release is available at: http://people.apache.org/~nbubna/velocity/tools/1.4/ Please vote regarding your support for releasing this test build as VelocityTools 1.4: [ ] +1 Let's do it [ ] +0 Have fun; i don't care. [ ] -0 Not sure about this, but i won't stop you. [ ] -1 No, because __ The voting period is typically 72 hours, putting its close time as roughly 5pm PST on Saturday, Nov 17th. If i do not find time amidst chores that day to finish the release process, then i will do so first thing Monday morning (assuming the vote passes), with the hope that we can announce the release Tuesday morning. My vote is +1 - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
