Re: [VOTE] New site layout - Apache CMS

2016-05-17 Thread Jacob Champlin
+1 - Your great work is appreciated. On 05/16/2016 07:19 PM, Claude Brisson wrote: Hi Folks. The site hasn't moved for years, and nobody really knows how to build it (it used patched Maven plugins that were once installed somewhere on a machine that has since disappeared). Should we want to

Re: [VOTE] New site layout - Apache CMS

2016-05-17 Thread Claude Brisson
* Should we explain what Velocity is on the main page? Right now the main page is process oriented. Project of the foundation, open source, etc. It doesn't explain what we are about. Suggestion -- move the section "What is Velocity" from the Engine section to the top of the home page.

Re: [VOTE] New site layout - Apache CMS

2016-05-17 Thread Claude Brisson
+1 from myself. I discuss your remarks below, but it's orthogonal with the vote and the switch itselft, we can change anything later on. On 17/05/2016 03:38, Will Glass-Husain wrote: Wow. That's so nice. Much easier to find stuff. I offer a +1 no matter what. Two pieces of feedback. *

Re: [VOTE] New site layout - Apache CMS

2016-05-16 Thread Nathan Bubna
+1 You're my hero, Claude. On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 4:19 PM, Claude Brisson wrote: > Hi Folks. > > The site hasn't moved for years, and nobody really knows how to build it > (it used patched Maven plugins that were once installed somewhere on a > machine that has since

RE: [VOTE] New site layout - Apache CMS

2016-05-16 Thread Perry Tew
Your effort is greatly appreciated. I reviewed the site earlier today. It looks great. +1 to move. -Original Message- From: Claude Brisson [mailto:cla...@renegat.net] Sent: Monday, May 16, 2016 7:20 PM To: dev@velocity.apache.org Subject: [VOTE] New site layout - Apache CMS Hi Folks.

Re: [VOTE] New site layout - Apache CMS

2016-05-16 Thread Mike Kienenberger
On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 7:19 PM, Claude Brisson wrote: > Now to the vote: switch to this new site and to the Apache CMS? > > [ ] -1 > [ ] 0 > [ ]+1 +1 from me. I agree that the old site was no longer maintainable. I looked at it at one point but couldn't figure it out.