US/Canada Central
Subject: Re: gump failure
I'm not really an ant expert, but since I was looking at build.xml
anyway
On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 12:03 -0700, Cezar Andrei wrote:
About this email, this is not actually a failure. In order to
consider
- Original Message -
From: pkel...@globalphasing.com
To: dev@xmlbeans.apache.org
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 5:51:41 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: Re: gump failure
I'm not really an ant expert, but since I was looking at build.xml
anyway
On Thu
1363870) since it's your contribution.
Cezar
- Original Message -
From: pkel...@globalphasing.com
To: dev@xmlbeans.apache.org
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 5:51:41 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: Re: gump failure
I'm not really an ant expert, but since
to mention your name on the checkin description (rev
1363870) since it's your contribution.
Cezar
- Original Message -
From: pkel...@globalphasing.com
To: dev@xmlbeans.apache.org
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 5:51:41 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: Re: gump failure
I'm
-
From: pkel...@globalphasing.com
To: dev@xmlbeans.apache.org
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 5:51:41 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: Re: gump failure
I'm not really an ant expert, but since I was looking at build.xml
anyway
On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 12:03 -0700, Cezar Andrei
I'm not really an ant expert, but since I was looking at build.xml
anyway
On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 12:03 -0700, Cezar Andrei wrote:
About this email, this is not actually a failure. In order to consider
it a failure, the bootstrap needs to run twice and only if it errors
second time is it
...@globalphasing.com
To: dev@xmlbeans.apache.org
Sent: Friday, July 20, 2012 5:51:41 AM GMT -06:00 US/Canada Central
Subject: Re: gump failure
I'm not really an ant expert, but since I was looking at build.xml
anyway
On Thu, 2012-07-19 at 12:03 -0700, Cezar Andrei wrote:
About this email, this is not actually
