Hi Ivone,
Firstly, I would try :
You could also try going back to the openssl source directory and type :
"make test"
This will perform a series of tests on the compiled openssl and return any
problems. If the rc5 test passes, it would appear that your kannel
compilation is picking up openssl fr
There's a bug in EMI which shows up under the following conditions:
a) Kannel is under heavy load.
b) the throughput of the EMI/UCP smsc is limited to a low value
The effect occurs like this:
The EMI/UCP SMSC does throttle to enforce the speed limitations. So the ACK's/NACK's will not come in i
hi
sounds good.. Under what conditions do you retry?
Nisan
At 04:13 PM 10/22/02 +0200, Oded Arbel wrote:
Hi
list.
we added a patch to Kannel to enable message
retry and backoff. it was quite simple really, but I'm pretty sure it can
mess things up, so I would like to get suggestions as to how to
Rodrigo Sousa Coutinho wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> This is a bug in the 7 bit encoding, and is not directly related with
> the size of the message:
> -> "123456789012345678901234567890z" works (31 chars)
> -> "..." does not work (7 chars)
>
> In attachment goes the patch that solve
Thanks Oded,
I'll put something together for this.
On Mon, 2002-10-21 at 01:45, Oded Arbel wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Alan McNatty [mailto:alan@;catalyst.net.nz]
>
> > If I receive a message from a smsc in say ucs2, from what I can see in
> > smsc_smpp.c pdu_to_msg the ms
Hi Mark!
Thanks for your advice...
I removed the openssl0.9.6rpm and I just download openssl source code 0.9.6g
and compile this to usr/local/ssl I did the config, the make and the
make install and I think it is ok.
But when I configure the gateway with
./configure
--prefix=/usr/local/kan
-Original Message-From: Rene
Kluwen / Chimit Software Solutions
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I'm all for it!
Will sms.retry and sms.delay be
configurable? (rethorical question).
ahmm.. currently they are compile time configurabe. I don't see a
problem putting th
I'm all for it!
Will sms.retry and sms.delay be
configurable? (rethorical question).
-- Rene...
This email message has been automatically scanned for viri
using Sophos antivirus.
- Original Message -
From:
Oded Arbel
To: Kannel-devel (E-mail)
Sent:
Does anyone work out the format of OTA message for GD87?
rgs
Stone Zhang
NOTICE AND DISCLAIMER:
This email (including attachments) is confidential. If you have received
this email in error please notify the sender immediately and delete this
email from your system without copying or dissemin
Hello,
This is a bug in the 7 bit encoding, and is not directly related with
the size of the message:
-> "123456789012345678901234567890z" works (31 chars)
-> "..." does not work (7 chars)
In attachment goes the patch that solves this bug.
Regards,
Rodrigo
-Original Me
Hi
list.
we added a patch to
Kannel to enable message retry and backoff. it was quite simple really, but I'm
pretty sure it can mess things up, so I would like to get suggestions as to how
to properly handle this . it goes something like this :
- we add to the
message structure
I tracked it down to:
All messages of 31 characters
won't send (in my case).
I tested using both a Siemens SL45
and a Siemens M35.
Is this a Siemens thingy? Or is
something wrong packing the PDU?
Could anybody confirm or deny this
using a non-Siemens phone?
I will see if I can find so
What where your input (pap control and content files )? It would be
nice, too, to see
your wapbox logs in full.
Aarno
On Friday, October 18, 2002, at 11:20 AM, Stipe Tolj wrote:
Guido Meyer schrieb:
Hi to all!
I have a problem compiling the kannel 1.2 gateway.
I want to compile it on window
Hi all,
I am trying to use Kannel as WAP&SMS Gateway. Initially i started with SMS
Gateway, using a GSM phone as modem and (after some trials) everything was
ok. Now i am testing kannel as WAP gateway. The idea is to establish a PPP
connection (dial-in) between a WAP phone and the GSM phone (connec
Hi,
I was in the process of compiling kannel( gw 1.2.0 ) on Redhat Linux 7.2
I have got the error while compiling the kannel ie xmllib version should
be 2.2.5 or above
fine i have collected Xmllib and compiled with newer version of xml
Now it is reporting the no member children in structure
> -Original Message-
> From: Harrie Hazewinkel [mailto:harrie@;mod-snmp.com]
> Just from an architectural point of view would it indeed not be
> better to have no character encoding in the SMPP portion except
> for configure/compile time/configuration options to select the
> character enc
--On Tuesday, October 22, 2002 11:11 AM +0200 Oded Arbel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Andreas Fink [mailto:andreas@;fink.org]
While we are at SMPP, in the SMPP code it does a gsm_to_latin1
conversion.
This breaks Unicode SMS coming in and a unicode test messa
> -Original Message-
> From: Andreas Fink [mailto:andreas@;fink.org]
> While we are at SMPP, in the SMPP code it does a gsm_to_latin1
> conversion.
> This breaks Unicode SMS coming in and a unicode test message shows up
> as @T@E@S@T instead as of TEST.
>
> Now whats the correct fix fo
On Dienstag, Oktober 22, 2002, at 09:53 Uhr, Stipe Tolj wrote:
Then in smpp_pdu_unpack we check for these. It wont allways work, it
will depend on which other optional params are used by the SMSC. We
almost need an array type in the def file to handle this properly.
we have an SMPP v3.4 optio
> Then in smpp_pdu_unpack we check for these. It wont allways work, it
> will depend on which other optional params are used by the SMSC. We
> almost need an array type in the def file to handle this properly.
we have an SMPP v3.4 optional parameter patch running on our side
here.
As soon as I ro
20 matches
Mail list logo
