Bruno David Rodrigues wrote:
> If we choose the modem, should kannel autodetect the speed or try to
> autodetect?
>
> Andrea wants to kannel always autodetect speed unless it's explicity set in
> smsc group
>
> I chosed to have a known working speed in modems.conf and use it, and only
> force
>
Dave White wrote:
>
> Stipe Tolj wrote:
>
> > Bruno David Rodrigues wrote:
> >
> >>Is it worth to code it now that new gprs phones don't have wap over sms
> >>option ?
> >>
> >
> > BTW, has anyone ever seems something working wi
Bruno David Rodrigues wrote:
>
> Is it worth to code it now that new gprs phones don't have wap over sms
> option ?
BTW, has anyone ever seems something working with a commercial WAP GW
and a real phone?!?!
I'd suggest in forgeting about this, just my 2ct.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bruno David Rodrigues wrote:
>
> Yep, it was I.
>
> I'll commit soon this patch:
thanks for fixing this.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel: +49-211-74845-0
Fax: +49-211-74845-299
E-Mail
if everything of the major improvements have been captured my me.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel: +49-211-74845-0
Fax: +49-211-74845-299
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http:
what about doing this in gw/smsc_emi2.c:664:
else {
unitime.year += 2000; /* Conversion function expects full year */
unitime.month -= 1;
msg->sms.time = date_convert_universal(&unitime);
}
this would pass the right month base to the date_conve
Angel Fradejas wrote:
>
> So IMHO the best solution is to maintain date.c v1.8, and fix the EMI2
> behaviour in smsc_emi2.c, to properly build timestamps for MO messages.
yep, can you resolve this in smsc_emi2.c? I'm going to put this to
STATUS.
> I think we should consider this EMI2 MO timesta
Hi Angel,
can you please see
http://www.kannel.3glab.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/gateway/gwlib/date.c.diff?r1=1.8&r2=1.9
and tell me exactly why this change was necessary?
I'm getting failure reports now from checks/check_date that does
reverse date conversion.
Until we have not cleanly resolved th
Jacob Vennervald Madsen wrote:
>
> > Instead we should tag the current cvs to 1.1.6 and warp it to 1.2.0 as
> > soon as we feal stable on that?!
> Good idea.
>
> Will the documentation be updated as well?
> There are a lot of new features that should be documented
> and some of the old features
Jacob Vennervald Madsen wrote:
>
> Will that be a new development version or stable?
AFAIK, we thought of taking down the two way approach of having one
development tree and one stable tree at the same time living parallel.
It very tricky to have those two coexist, especially when there is a
lo
I'm wondering if we should switch to 1.2.0 for the upcoming release?
This may indicate a rough cut to the divergence of the latest
development branch 1.1.5 and the current cvs tree.
Any suggestions or constraints?
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Jacob Vennervald Madsen wrote:
>
> It works.
good.
> Is the HTTP smsc configured differently in the CVS version than in the
> 1.1.5 version?
I don't think so.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldo
Jacob Vennervald Madsen wrote:
>
> Sorry.
> I send the wrong file ;o)
>
> This is the right one.
patch applied. Thanks.
Jacob, can you please test the current cvs tree on your PPC and S390
machine and confirm that this works out for you now?!
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Jacob Vennervald Madsen wrote:
>
> Around ½ a year ago I sent a bug in the octstr.c file that made kannel
> not work on PowerPC and S390 platforms. I just checked the latest
> snapshot and it's not fixed yet.
>
> I've attached a file containing the correction for development version
> 1.1.5, cou
Shridhar Raju wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've downloaded latest snapshot today. There is lot of changes in AT2
> driver. I'm having Nokia 7110, earlier in smsc_at2.c, I used to change speed
> of modem to 19200. But now the architecture has been change. So somebody
> advise me regarding the new configura
When trying to include several files, at least more then one, like
this in mykannc.conf:
...
include = "modems.conf"
include = "mysql.conf"
...
we get a damaged start marker for an area :(
I guess I'll add this as release show-stopper to STATUS.
Hmmm, I worked on this code and implemen
Hi there,
ok, as suggested, we are now in feature freeze until next week-end.
This week I would like to ask everyone to get there heads-up for any
bugs and errors that happen and report them to the list.
Everyone involved in development should concentrate on bug fixing
premierly, before we can
I have just commited a major restructuring the dlr module.
Basicly my intention was to abstract the dlr_foobar() calls to allow
multiple different external storage types, i.e. MySQL.
There is a new multi group introduced called 'mysql-connection', which
looks like this:
group = mysql-connecti
Stefan Cars wrote:
>
> What is the status of kannel's MMS ? WAP 1.2 , SAR, WSP multipart etc. ??
Aarno and I have been discussing about MMS proxy things for Kannel.
Basicly we have to change some slightly things in the PPG part to use
Kannel as PPG (SMS bearer) for the MMS notfication messages.
Oded Arbel wrote:
>
> Hi list.
>
> Since I didn't get any concrete responses about my queries about dlr.c
> mis-behavior about removing non-final DLRs when getting SMSC_* type DLR,
> here's my patch to dlr.c to add support for generating SMSC_* type DLRs.
> it changes the logic for removing old
Bruno David Rodrigues wrote:
>
> Now that you mention it, I think I've seen it too.
>
> You see the 200 OK in smsbox logs, but there's no message going out, right ?
>
> I'll check that.
Bruno, any news here?
This has been indicated by you as major release show-stopper, so I'd
like to resolve
I just finished (this was mostly astyle and hand-made!) the beautifing
of the smsc_at2.c code. It should now fit more to our CodingStyle
rules and hopefully you guys editing it will let it that way :)
Please check if nothing is screwed up. I was as carefull as possible.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
patch applied. Thanks for submission.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel: +49-211-74845-0
Fax: +49-211-74845-299
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de
-
Alex,
what is the change in this chunk for:
@@ -775,8 +800,8 @@
smpp = conn->data;
smpp->quitting = 1;
gwthread_wakeup(smpp->transmitter);
-gwthread_wakeup(smpp->receiver);
gwthread_join(smpp->transmitter);
+gwthread_wakeup(smpp->receiver);
gwthread_join(smpp->re
Alex Judd wrote:
>
> All
>
> I would welcome adding the ability to manually specify the source ton and
> npi that I've submitted before we freeze. Patch reattached for review.
Alex, I'm just revising the patch a bit, especialy taking the
underscores out of the configuration directives you use.
patch applied. Thanks.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel: +49-211-74845-0
Fax: +49-211-74845-299
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de
patch applied. Thanks for submission.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel: +49-211-74845-0
Fax: +49-211-74845-299
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de
-
I noticed that there seems to be no clean definition of which fields
for the config file and especially in the single groups should be
marked as mandatory and which ones as optional?!
I see (m) in case of group smsc and I see (o) in some other groups
indicating optional flags. Can we get to a col
I'm going to apply the patch, but I don't see the need to have the
'our-host' configuration directive marked 'mandatory' for smpp smsc,
because it works for single-homed boxes without the directive.
So I'll change the doc things a bit here.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Simon Beale wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> This is a patch so that you can specify which local address an SMPP
> connection goes out from, as currently, if you have multiple IP addresses on
> an interface, you can't specify which address you wish to make the
> connection from.
>
> It uses an optional parame
Bjoern Buettner wrote:
>
> In your production environment:
> How much SMS can be send with Kannel per second?
At least I can state some numbers Aarno passed us from load-testing:
max. SMS using test_cimd2 350 msg/sec. unsing HTTPS interface, 1300
msg/sec. *without* HTTPS interface.
> How much
Bjoern Buettner wrote:
>
> Hi Folks,
>
> I've send a XML OTA mesg. to an Erricson Mobile, this phone does not receive
> any SMS, too. I guess that's a problem with my SMSC Siemens Tc35 GSM Modem,
> perhaps!!??
> Can it be true??
maybe. AFAIK I have send OTA config messsages via Nokia 7110 and t
Andreas Fink wrote:
>
> >Hi there,
> >
> >when are we going to feature freeze the cvs tree?
> >
> >What patches are still open? I see a couple of submissions to the
> >devel@ list but yet to change in the STATUS file. Please heads up for
> >anyone of the developers who wants this to go in before
Anders Lindh wrote:
>
> I posted this probably a month ago. Should go in before freezing the
> tree. The patch contains some bug and stability fixes to the smsc_cgw
> code.
patch cleanly applied. Thanks!
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Andreas Fink wrote:
>
> >I think the DLR and time stamp patches I submitted should go in before
> >feature freeze and definetly before release (mainly as these are not new
> >features, but bug fixes).
>
> its bugs, not features. so they go in before the release.
>
> >I would also like to see th
Bjoern Buettner wrote:
> Is Nokia supported ?
> Which mobile are supported ?
yep, Nokia 7110, 6210, 7650, 9210 are definitly supported.
Ericsson R380m, 520m, T86m should also be supported.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems
Hi there,
when are we going to feature freeze the cvs tree?
What patches are still open? I see a couple of submissions to the
devel@ list but yet to change in the STATUS file. Please heads up for
anyone of the developers who wants this to go in before freezing.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bjoern Buettner wrote:
>
> Thanx,
>
> but I've some problems using XML4OTA
>
> This is my understanding of the Kannel Doc.
> http://mysmsgw:13013/cgi-bin/sendota?username=ota&password=ota1&phonenumber=
> 1234567&text=/usr/local/kannel-20020228/test.xml&type=settings
>
> Is this correct??
No,
lansea wrote:
>
> I have download the kannel cvs cygwin port from
> http://kannel.dev.wapme.net/dist/binaries/Kannel-1.1.x-cvs.exe ,and
> found the kannel binary file is very small, smsbox.exe 72k
> ,bearerbox.exe 137k, wapbox.exe 157k
> ,but when I build the source in my cygwin machine ( cygwin
Andreas Heckwolf wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> just noticed that accessing www.kannel.org takes one to
> http://www.kablum.com/. Any reason why it does not redirect to
> www.kannel.3glab.org ? I think to recall that www.kannel.org is owned by
> the Wapme Systems AG.
as I mentioned to the org@ list, it
Hi there,
as you all may imagine CeBIT expo time is a quite busy week. For those
that are anyway here or those who are especially interested in talking
to the other Kannel developers I suggest the following fixed
appointment for the meeting:
Kannel Developers Meeting at CeBIT 2002
15th March, 2
Avner Sternheim wrote:
>
> But y on the older versions when I used udh=
> It did worked what have changed since than
you should check out which file and code part is responsible for the
effect you see and see the ViewCVS interface at the web site to see
when and who changed the code.
Stipe
[EM
Aarno Syvänen wrote:
>
> I think that we should remember that XML *requires* UTF-8. Quite many
> apps
> are based on XML documents. If we use other Kannel internal encoding,
> either
> Kannel or app using XML must recode again.
which is definitly an argument from me, I'm +1 for Aarno's point of
Bruno David Rodrigues wrote:
>
> Attached to this message is a patch to at2 to have modem definitions
> outside the source
>
> I want you to test it and check if it's working and some
> comments/advise to some issues:
>
> 1. I'm opening a "kannel.conf" that is hard coded on the code. It's
> not
Bruno David Rodrigues wrote:
>
> ...
> checking for convert... (cached)
> /cygdrive/c/WINDOWS/system32/convert
> ...
>
> Ouch.
>
> There's a convert in windows ?
>
> Could any of you M4 Masters make some patch to check this ? :D
Cygwin has no "own" convert, so the win32 native version is foun
Oded Arbel wrote:
>
> Don't download the snapshot - get the CVS.
why is that? the snapshot packages are based on nightly cronjobs that
do checkout cvs. So you will not live on the edge, but will have
pretty up to date code.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Avner Sternheim wrote:
>
> Hi There,
>
> I didn't succeed to install the KANNEL CVS VERSION.
> I did the following steps:
>
BTW, I would prefer to direct these kind of questions that are not
development specific to the users@ list *only*.
We have to filter by means, otherwise there is no need
Oded Arbel wrote:
>
> Hi list.
>
> A question about SSL - I'm trying to establish a connection (using gwlib
> HTTPs support) to an HTTPS server, which unfortunatly is not responding
> well. whenever the server doesnot complete the SSL handshake, the HTTP
> connection gets stuck in SSL_connect. I
Hi list,
I have received at least a couple of suggestions for the Kannel
developer's meeting preferences for the CeBIT show and I'd like to
give any of the core developers the opportunity to mail me the details
I requested until today evening.
I will see which date seems to fit for most of us an
Hi Bruno
Bruno David Rodrigues wrote:
> Have you checked your patch ? like killing smsbox and checking the zillion
> warnings ?
in general yes, I do test things before commiting.
> Every line in kannel.conf would create a new octstr in that
> octstr_duplicate!
that's right, we hold the requir
For those who are interested in MMS proxy development using Kannel's
PPG, this may be for you.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel: +49-211-74845-0
Fax: +49-211-74845-299
E-Mail: [EMA
Paul Keogh wrote:
>
> I've a problem when I send a 160 character message (7BIT coding)
> to an M20 - the M20 fails with a CMS 304 because the charset_latin1_to_gsm()
> function *increases* the size of the message to 163 characters due to
> GSM code escaping.
>
> I think sms_split() should figure
Avner Sternheim wrote:
>
> can anyone help me and tell me what are the steps i have to do to install
> the KANNEL CVS on linux server:
>
> What I need to download, etc... etc..
> and whether there is a documentation of the instlallation parts
BTW, this kind of question should go to users@ inste
"P. A. Bagyenda" wrote:
>
> Definitely add fixing smsc_smpp.c so that concatenate = true and long
> text messages work.
has this been added to the STATUS file?!
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 D
Andreas Fink wrote:
>
> come on, this is not necessary. run_kannel_box does do that all for you.
yep, I forgot about that option :))
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel: +49-211-7484
Bewoopi Coriou wrote:
>
> starting the bearerbox i get these lines :
>
> 2002-03-04 17:42:32 [0] DEBUG: Started thread 2 (gwlib/fdset.c:poller)
> 2002-03-04 17:42:32 [0] DEBUG: Started thread 3 (gwlib/http.c:server_thread)
> 2002-03-04 17:42:32 [0] DEBUG: Started thread 4 (gw/bb_http.c:httpadmi
I would like to request all core developers, especially those that
have CVS write privilidges to subscribe to the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailinst list for further collaboration in establishing the KSF.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme
Ok guys,
I would like to discuss which issues are still open then should be
considered as major bugs or release showstoppers. (any open patches
yet?!)
These should be review, added ASAP, so that we can tag the tree and
keep it in feature freeze mode to extract all bugs that may be inside
before
William Wilson wrote:
>
> Currently I run cvs Kannel against redhat libxml2-2.4.2-1 (or 20402 as
> Kannel identifies it). I have noticed that Kannel is very picky over the
> wml you pass it - namely I get errors like:
>
> 2002-02-27 11:02:26 [8] ERROR: WML compiler: Compiling error: libxml
> ret
macky wrote:
>
> how do run bearerbox and smsbox in background without using "&"
since kannel's boxes do not detach from the initiating caller shell
(i.e. Apache's httpd does this) you will have to use the "&" to set
them in the background.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Jörg Pommnitz wrote:
>
> The content size gets negotiated between the phone
> and the gateway. The entity itself is the compiled
> WML code. Since you are using Kannel-1.0.3 it might
> well be that the D2 gateway generates compacter WMLC
> packets so that they fit into the 1800 bytes.
Jörg, I th
Bjoern Buettner wrote:
>
> It seems to be a bug? with libxml, perhaps.
>
> I've two scenarios, a production environment & a test environment.
>
> THE TEST SYSTEM:
> RedHat Linux 7.2
> Kannel CVS version 2002/02/28
> LibXML version libxml2-2.4.10-1 (devel & XML Packet)
>
> THE PRODUCTION SYSTEM
Bruno David Rodrigues wrote:
>
> I just love CVSWEB and checking-malloc;)
>
> smsbox panics on smsbox line 1180 because of a empty text field (NULL):
>
> http://www.kannel.3glab.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/gateway/gw/smsbox.c?
> annotate=1.174#1180
>
> In patch 1.164 at 2002/01/25:
> udh == NULL
Dedy Sutanto wrote:
>
> The strange thing is after that I cannot run kannel, because
> bearerbox always exit with same error.
it seems the message is going to the local store file and that's why
bearerbox tries to send it every time it gets up and crashes.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
Bjoern Buettner wrote:
>
> Oh guys, damn, I love Kannel, but I need a some working Siemens phones! :-))
stay cool, we'll get your loved Siemens phone to work! :))
> How can I help. I'm not a "C" programmer, yet, but I want help, :-)
>
> I can't sleep while the problem is not solved !!! :-)
I'l
Pekka Ahmavuo wrote:
>
> I have tried to use wapbox (latest cvs-kannel) with Nokia 6310. Fetching a WML-
> page generates generated error message into the log file.
>
> I looked for some other user agents from the log files and tried to figure out
> how they worked. The following user agents see
Stone Zhang wrote:
>
> I have a problem when I tried wap push with kannel cvs version. I am using a
> Nokia premicell as a SMSC
you're definitly conseptually wrong here, I'll try to explain:
> the I followed the User' Guide,
> 1. gw/bearerbox pushkannel.conf
>gw/wapbox pushkannel.conf
>
>
Bjoern Buettner wrote:
>
> I've tried to connect the URL http://d2wap.de Siemens S35 says "unsupported
> content type"
> Is there any DNS FQDN problem (Bug) with Kannel? FQDN are running fine!
> How can I solve the problem ?
>
> The D2 WAP GW has no problem. (Standard configuration with Siemens
Dedy Sutanto wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> I have problem with kannel CVS regarding SMPP.
> Thsi problem occured when I activate dlrmask in http request
>
>http://localhost:/cgi-bin/sendsms?username=xxxr&password=xxx&to=62818155112&mclass=1&text=hallo&dlrmask=1
>
> The message seem delivered. B
Alex,
Alex Judd wrote:
>
> My current (recent) cvs build appears to lose the responses from the SMS
> when using the url functions (get-url, post-url etc.) however works quite
> fine with a text dump etc.. Anyone else seen this or fixed it?
>
> Logs..
>
> 2002-02-27 15:25:26 Receive SMS [SMSC:
Oded Arbel wrote:
> attacehd it a patch that fixed the problem for me (I am going to attach
> it, this time :-)
I can see it. Can anybody else see it? I mean it's realy there. :
*just_kiding*
Stipe *spreading_humour_around* (or at least tries to)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> All the discussion about the kannel tree branching sounds great guys. When do
> you think we should expect to see a new branch/tree created?
I would like to ask everyone to wait until we have obtained access to
the kannel.org domain and can "re-launch" the project o
Bruno David Rodrigues wrote:
>
> I've done spam^H^H^H^Hmarketing with something like this:
>
> a text file with one msisdn per line
the main issue was how to create an input stream to Kannel's HTTP
sendsms interface with 300-400 concurrent messages.
When we consider concurrent = "within the sa
[EMAIL PROTECTED] write:
>
> >we should do two things - (a) teach kannel to
> > look for "+CMT:" and not any "+CMT" and (b) apply the
> > SIM buffering patch
> > Why does it do so with alphanumeric sender ? I guess it's > modem
> > dependant and nothing Kannel can do about.
> >
> Hi there,
> I to
macky wrote:
>
> is it possible to push flash messages using kannel? if yes how?
yes, simply add the "flash=1" GET parameter to the request line, i.e.
http://your.machine:13013/cgi-bin/sendsms?username=foo&password=bar&from=1234&to=1234&text=this+is+flash&flash=1
Please see the current cvs
> (I hate the information organization of 3gpp.org)
+1 from me :))
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel: +49-211-74845-0
Fax: +49-211-74845-299
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: htt
Bruno David Rodrigues wrote:
>
> Could you please tell me the state of Matt's patch (or the new one
> from Odded) so I could help them ?
there has not been any review from the other developers, AFAIK. So the
patches are in pending state, see STATUS file (and please keep it
updated if changes occ
Ok, once again:
I have asked in my previous mail with the subject "[REQ] Kannel
developer's meeting at CeBIT 2002" for Kannel developers that are
coming as company staff or antendees to CeBIT 2002 this year.
We are enforcing to organize a "Kannel Developer's Meeting" while this
event takes plac
Oded Arbel wrote:
>
> What's astyle ? I though the only thing to do is to define the right tab
> width (what is the tab width for the C sources anyway ?). some parts of
> the code look to me like the indenentation is random and optional..
see gateway/doc/CodingStyle.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Oded Arbel wrote:
>
>
> I'm not absolutly sure we don't need AT anymore, but I think it would
> probably be a good idea. if we need something that only AT does (nothing
> AFAIK) we can always grab it from the CVS.
> what about the SIM buffering patches - do you think these should be
> merged in
Alexei Pashkovsky wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> I think we should actually rename the AT2 to AT and forget the old
> AT before making the release.
> Anybody checking the last things and debugging before new stable
> version ?
BTW, I would like to see that smsc_at2.c is C source harmonized to our
coding s
Oded Arbel wrote:
>
> Hi list.
>
> I was wandering - after updating from CVS today, I saw that all of a
> sudden, in cfg.def, the smsc group has the option 'appname' written
> twice - is that on purpose ?
I see from
http://www.kannel.3glab.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/gateway/gwlib/cfg.def
that this
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> I would like to undesrtand signal handling
> in bearer and smsbox
> I found that the only difference is that smsbox doesn't
> handle SIGTERM, instead bearerbox does handle it.
> I would like to take it away from bearerbox.
> This because In WiNT I think that runnin
Alexei Pashkovsky wrote:
>
> Hi all,
> I think we should actually rename the AT2 to AT and forget the old
> AT before making the release.
> Anybody checking the last things and debugging before new stable
> version ?
any votes for this suggestion?
+1 from me.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
For those who are interested:
I uploaded a new pre-compiled full installation package of the current
CVS tree (2002-02-23) to http://kannel.dev.wapme.net/dist/binaries/.
The package is called "Kannel-1.1.x-cvs.exe" and is huge (11.2M)
containing:
* pre-compiled Cygwin 1.3.x binaries of gatewa
Hi everyone,
I have not received very much response to my first posting from Tue,
19 Feb.
Could you all that are coming to CeBIT and are willing to spend some
time for a Kannel developer's meeting please see my revious post and
come back to me with the requested data.
Thanks in advance!
Stipe
Alexei Pashkovsky wrote:
>
> I think idea of having the listening http interface inside bearerbox instead
> of running two executables could be usefull too.
> Obviously this should be configurable ..
that's not how Lars designed it.
SO I guess this leeds up here to a religious battle, I wouldn'
Bjoern Buettner wrote:
>
> I'm so sorry but I have no experience in programming in C, otherwise I would
> do it. Perhaps, I should learn it :-))
definitly :))
> How can we help Kannel to provide this ?
provide us with a good C coder?! :)) -- I think you guys from D2 have
a couple of those sitt
"P. A. Bagyenda" wrote:
>
> I'm still trying to figure out what's going wrong with the concatenation
> = true. It doesn't work for text or binary, for the current snapshot.
> I notice two interesting things: in access.log there is dump of each
> message sent out, plus udh header. However I note
Oded Arbel wrote:
>
> I think that would be very nice feature, and I see several things I can
> do with it.
> another revolutionary idea - wouldn't it be nice to load the smsc
> modules as dynamic libraries ? that way we don't need to build smsc
> modules that we're not going to use...
yep, that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> My question is: should I bother? Is there a need/want for this kind of
> thing?
I'm definitly interested in seen this.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf
Te
Bjoern Buettner wrote:
>
> Is is possible to use openssl for WTLS?
yes, currently it's the only "supported" configure option flag for
--with-wlts. But hey, it's currently ony in the state to compile
cleanly, I'm not aware how far Nick did get when implementing this,
Nick?!
> Are there any restr
patch applied, thanks!
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel: +49-211-74845-0
Fax: +49-211-74845-299
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de
patch applied, thanks!
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel: +49-211-74845-0
Fax: +49-211-74845-299
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de
Andreas Fink wrote:
> Depends on your CPU but unless you got a really slow machine with
> really low memory, yes it should. Can you feed it that fast?
that's the basic problem, the feeding of the beast. If you can
establish streams to the machine that do generate an average incoming
stream of 45
haikannel wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Please tell me can I send ringtone and logo to SMSC using SMPP v.3.3 ?
Please take a look in the mailing list archive before asking and
annoying pleople on the list!
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wa
Matthew Flax wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am wondering wether a patch will make it into kannel soon to add SIM
> routing to AT2 ?
Oded has submitted a patch, see STATUS file.
> I think it is necessary, and the sooner the better !
If you are interested in getting this in we need people reviewing
su
Oded Arbel wrote:
>
> Patch attached. pretty straight forward.
> hope I've seen the last of 'em :-)
any objections from your side Andreas?
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel: +49-21
"Nektarios K. Papadopoulos" wrote:
>
> the diff with todays cvs is attached, in case I am not wrong.
patch applied to cvs, thanks!
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel: +49-211-74845-
Oded Arbel wrote:
>
> Hi.
>
> If people agree, I'd like to at least note the SIM buffering patch I
> submitted to the list in STATUS (msgid :
> [EMAIL PROTECTED])
I'll add this.
> BTW - I was wondering - how many people (count, not interested in names
> :-) have CVS write access ?
something a
801 - 900 of 1248 matches
Mail list logo
