Re: BUG in emi2 (was Re: anyone using EMI2 with DLR?)

2001-10-08 Thread Stipe Tolj
forgot to say: this effect is noticed on _both_ OS, Linux and Win200 (Cygwin) Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Münsterstr. 248 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-74845-0 Fax: +49-211-74845-299 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In

BUG in emi2 (was Re: anyone using EMI2 with DLR?)

2001-10-08 Thread Stipe Tolj
Hi all, > Did you check if the problem still occurs when you comment fakesmsc group > entries ? I noticed that bearerbox crashes with cgi-bin/status on Redhat 6.2 > with the last CVS version abd only when you add fakesmsc group. There is no fakesmsc group in the config file. There is definitly n

RE: anyone using EMI2 with DLR?

2001-10-08 Thread Gildas PERROT
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]De la part de Stipe Tolj > Envoyé : lundi 8 octobre 2001 11:43 > À : Bruno David Rodrigues > Cc : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Objet : Re: anyone using EMI2 with DLR? > > > Bi Bruno, > > > do you get the panic even if you don'

Re: anyone using EMI2 with DLR?

2001-10-08 Thread Stipe Tolj
Bi Bruno, > do you get the panic even if you don't specify the dlr_* in http push ? yes, even for "normal" cgi-bin/sendsms this happens. Stipe [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Wapme Systems AG Münsterstr. 248 40470 Düsseldorf Tel: +49-211-

Re: anyone using EMI2 with DLR?

2001-10-06 Thread Bruno David Rodrigues
AIL PROTECTED]> To: "Andreas Fink" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, October 04, 2001 9:03 AM Subject: Re: anyone using EMI2 with DLR? > > I've never seen a crash in smsbox because of this. SMSbox is > > unchanged as far as DLR

Re: anyone using EMI2 with DLR?

2001-10-04 Thread Stipe Tolj
> I've never seen a crash in smsbox because of this. SMSbox is > unchanged as far as DLR's are concerned. If you got an assert, in > your case, thats normal because your EMI reply is not what bearerbox > would expect. Of course this should be fixed and is relatively easy > to fix. But it also mean

Re: anyone using EMI2 with DLR?

2001-10-03 Thread Andreas Fink
> > Ok, if you got this problem then you most probably dont connect to a >> CMG SMSC but something emulating it or a CMG with an old release. >> >> The thing it does in this line is reading the timestamp information >> out which the SMSC gives back on a request. Apparently yours is empty >> o

Re: anyone using EMI2 with DLR?

2001-10-03 Thread Stipe Tolj
> Ok, if you got this problem then you most probably dont connect to a > CMG SMSC but something emulating it or a CMG with an old release. > > The thing it does in this line is reading the timestamp information > out which the SMSC gives back on a request. Apparently yours is empty > or such. In m

Re: anyone using EMI2 with DLR?

2001-10-02 Thread Andreas Fink
>Hi, > >as I reported previously we had huge problems with latest CVS snapshot >for emi2. > >There were assertion errors after using /cgi-bin/sendsms and both >smsbox and bearerbox died. I located the problem to be in: > >gw/smsc_emi2.c:696:i = octstr_search_char(ts,':',0);

anyone using EMI2 with DLR?

2001-10-02 Thread Stipe Tolj
Hi, as I reported previously we had huge problems with latest CVS snapshot for emi2. There were assertion errors after using /cgi-bin/sendsms and both smsbox and bearerbox died. I located the problem to be in: gw/smsc_emi2.c:696: i = octstr_search_char(ts,':',0); so it