Oded Arbel wrote:
Speaking of sendsms' HTTP interface - I've noticed that sendsms doesn't
honor the 'Connection: close' header and always use keep-alive. can that be
fixed, please ?
I had a look in gwlib/http.c:899 where the following is inside
handle_transaction():
[...]
h =
Off-topic:
First of all I would like to suggest to use a more related subject
line for mails. (no subject) is often mis-noticed by developers. So
if you want some fast help, make sure your subject line keeps the
folks in charge interested :)
Ok, not for the core:
I installed Kannel 1.1.4
Jörg Pommnitz wrote:
I think the right patch is:
if ((server == NULL) || (emi2_handle_smscreq (conn, *server) 0)) {
return; /* reopen the connection */
}
instead of your commit:
if ((*server !=NULL) (emi2_handle_smscreq (conn, *server) 0)) {
return; /* reopen the
Jörg Pommnitz wrote:
The most important question: what platform do you use when
you see this problems?
I'm a little bit hesitant to completely trust the glibc pthread
implementation (especially under high load). In a previous project
I could reliably cause misbehaviour in the pthread
for '127.0.0.1'.
I do not really know what that means, I hope some one can explain.
That's only the HTTP client connection of the previous
/cgi-bin/sendsms call you made. It's nothing to do with receiving an
SMS on the device.
Regards,
Stipe Tolj
Department Management
Technology Center Research
I'm generating the Kannel (latest snapshot) with cygwin 1.3.6 on a Win2000
platform. It compiles OK but generates some errors related to pthread/poll in
the self tests.
I'm expiencing the same on Cygwin -- unfortunatly I had not yet the
time to figure out why.
Nevertheless both sms and wap
group = sms-service
keyword = pay
file =
C:/phpdev/www/mobile/samp1.php?sec_para=%sthr_para=%sphone=%p
am I missing something!
yes you are missing that the file directive is used to output the
content of a static file.
I guess you want to do some PHP magic and get that output to the
Hi Olivier,
Does anybody knows if Kannel works with a Nokia 7160 (TDMA) linked by serial
cable for sending SMS ?
at least for the european Nokia 7110 and 6120 I can confirm that it
works using the DLR-3 data cable on both Linux and Cygwin systems.
As long as the data cable supports the
Hi Bernino,
I'm throwing my 2ct (now to be noted europien Euro Cents :)) on this:
Bernino Lind wrote:
First of all:
The web site: deep links to the various standards, such as the ETSI
standard, with a brief note: You need this standard in order to do a
ringtone and other binary SMS.
The
Andrea Viscovich wrote:
Uhm, yes, I had to strip some rows (wap related) as I only use smsbox.
There were no parameter in config.h (Kannel_no_wap) at that time.
Since september with at2 I had no more poll error messages.
Can you send me a diff which lines you have striped out to have a look
Kalle Marjola wrote:
On Fri, 11 Jan 2002, Stipe Tolj wrote:
Nevertheless both sms and wap functionality seems very stable on
Cygwin. Andrea, can you expience the poll error messages on your
productive environment?
Speaking about Cygwin, how fast it is? I mean, is there any big
Bruno Rodrigues wrote:
On Qui, 2002-01-10 at 09:57, Bernino Lind wrote:
Dear users of Kannel,
I have some questions about the mclass and mwi parameters of Kannel sendsms
method.
Problems/Questions:
MWI:
If I want to set mwi=1 for example, I can only do
Ok guys, I'm the one to blame.
The commit that caused the code break is:
http://www.kannel.3glab.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/gateway/gw/smsbox.c.diff?r1=1.161r2=1.162
I'm just gonna fix this to exlude the text == NULL checking.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Angel Fradejas wrote:
Hi,
I found a bug in smsbox, related to empty text SMS handling (or a sms
contaning only spaces). The problem arises when you send a space only text
for example, and in the default sms-service get-url you use the %k token,
for example
group = sms-service
Pedro Duque wrote:
I found no way to do it besides editing the code.
If you remove (or comment) and add the following lines in smsc_smpp.c,
it should work:
conn-status = SMSCCONN_CONNECTING;
smpp-transmitter = gwthread_create(io_thread, io_arg_create(smpp,
1));
(-)
please send fixes in diff -u format attached as plain/text to the
devel@ list.
There are a couple of guys working (more or less) as active CVS
commiters, see ChangeLog. If your patch doesn't get applied for some
days ask someone personaly to commit it.
When you have contributed some patches we
Jacob Vennervald Madsen wrote:
You should not put either + or 00 in front of the sender number.
Kannel is supposed to figure that out for you.
But unfortunately there is a bug in the Kannel code so when you
overwrite the sender address with a phonenumber it's not set correctly
through the
Forwarded to devel@
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel: +49-211-74845-0
Fax: +49-211-74845-299
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Internet: http://www.wapme-systems.de
Andreas Fink wrote:
Anyone have seen this one before?
2002-01-16 13:55:45 [16] PANIC: gw/smpp_pdu.def:126: smpp_pdu_unpack:
Assertion `p-sm_length == (unsigned long)
octstr_len(p-short_message)' failed.
I guess nop would satisfy you?! :[
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Valter,
I have done something in smsbox.c to support mutiple-receiver when using
http post method that seems to work with EMI2 and SMPP... (diff attached)
For instance, X-Kannel-To header could be used with multiple receivers
separated
by a blank char; i add a iteraction in
Got a new problem under high load.
Does this happen *only* under high load, or can it be reproduced (with
the same situation) under a very minor load?
bearerbox is running and has delivery reports to deliver to smsbox.
smsbox is down.
an application is ready to fire lots of data to smsbox.
Nick Clarey wrote:
The problem is that I haven't had a lot of time to follow development (or
even run Kannel!) for some months now. I think that Stipe might be better to
handle the job, because he keeps his finger on the pulse of what's going
on. He's also got the necessary access rights to
Alex Judd wrote:
If there is a need for a lighter weight binary with reduced driver support
shouldn't this be something put into the build process so that on
compilation people can define the support and drivers they want to build
in their binaries.
Yes, definitly. This would add a pro to
Jörg Pommnitz wrote:
Could this be relevant?
http://sources.redhat.com/ml/libc-hacker/2001-11/msg00028.html
yeah, maybe we got some sort of race condition here.
I guess, it this is the fact I may try to reprocuce the error on one
of our Sun boxes to see if Solaris' pthreads suffert the
Hi all,
today I have implemented the multi-cast support within
gw/smsbox.c:smsbox_req_handle().
This allows to pass a 'to' element containing a list of receiver
numbers seperated by a blank. The octstr gets split into a list and
further processing is done.
Main problem is how to deal with a
BTW, I took care that the additional things don't break the current
messages and handling of single message receivers in 'to'.
So I guess this should be not breaking any current running setups?!
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme
especialy for sendsms-user and sms-service groups.
I would suggest a mysql interface to allow Kannel to be configured to
use the above multi-groups from the kannel config file *and* querying
a mysql database. This way we may include and delete (i.e.
sms-service) entries 'on-the-fly', which means
As some of you know, we add Wapme have a properietary solution for
so-called MSISDN Provisioning, which means wapbox queries for any
imcoming request the MSISDN number from a NAS (network access service,
i.e. Ascend MAX) based on the dynamical client ip.
We use MySQL as storage for the client
Paul Keogh wrote:
* You could of course choose to implement the UDP proxy as a thread within
the WAP box...
yep, that was my intension.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel:
Andreas Fink wrote:
Hi folks,
I'm trying to compile kannel on a solaris 8 machine (SunOS 5.8) to
see if I can reproduce the mutex problem I often run into. So I did:
1. checkout the software with cvs.
2. ./configure --with-malloc=native --disable-doc --with-mysql --with-mysql-dlr
3.
Jörg Pommnitz wrote:
I cannot comment on this exact problem, but it does not
seem to warrant a panic.
IMHO a defect PDU should be dropped without taking down
all of Kannel.
I agree. Defect send-in messages should not break further operations
of Kannel.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Aarno Syvänen wrote:
has anyone succeeded sending a OTA bookmark to T39m. If so, can I have
hexdump of the message. I begin to suspect that either the model or my
phone is buggy.
I have done this to a Nokia 7110 and Ericsson T520m with slight
modification to the sendota function. Both
Peter Lewandowski wrote:
I was wondering if any one has any information about how to get kannel to
work witrh WTLS. I've downloaded the two updated versions of 3ui.com's WTLS
patch, but I can't find any information or documentation about how to get it
all to work together.
WTLS support has
Jörg Pommnitz wrote:
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Bernino Lind [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Gesendet am: Donnerstag, 17. Januar 2002 16:14
The Gnu make tool distributed with Linux has some
differences from the BSD
derived Make tool which is shipped with Solaris and
Aarno Syvänen wrote:
Hi Stipe,
I would commit soonish (tomorrow ?) a patch accepting configuration and
bookmark XML documents. Perhaps you will test it with your T520m ;)
yup, I will.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme
freundlichen Grüßen
Stipe Tolj
Department Management
Technology Center Research Lab
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel: +49-211-74845-0
Fax: +49-211-74845-299
E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Valter Santos wrote:
I have tested the patch!... it works fine to me (for now!!!)
have you tried white/black-lists too?
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel: +49-211-74845-0
Fax:
Karl Friedrich wrote:
im using Kannel 1.1.5 over CIMD2...
when FROM is not set or FROM has no value, the message is not being
sent, but when i add value to FROM, the message is being sent...
yep, that's how it is intended. See the user's guide for more.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charles wrote:
Hi guys,
I would like to ask wherther there is any development on SSL encypyted
information transfer via HTTP from Kannel to other server. Normally, send
SMS and SMSservice can interprete HTTP actions where HTTP request can be
transfer over to another server, however, is
Jörg Pommnitz wrote:
What's missing in
http://www.kannel.3glab.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs.cgi/gateway/gwlib/conn.c.diff?r1
=1.39r2=1.40 ?
Sorry Jörg, I did not want to make your contribution not worth noted.
Of course it's implemented for the HTTP client side, but we have yet
no configuration
Bernino Lind wrote:
Dear developers,
Hope you enjoy your day.
It now seems that the problem I have at hand, is very much related to
configure and FreeBSD.
Namely that configure does a search in a for loop only in a small set of
possible places where docbook could be. I have changed
Ronan Derby wrote:
Folks,
I'm looking at the kannel code and trying to figure
out what constitutes a queued message.
When/how does a message become queued?
I'll try to answer this on a low-level, I'm not EMI or SMPP expert.
In case of EMI the messages get queued when your SMSC is
Andrea Viscovich [EMAIL PROTECTED] provided me a patch for
implementing a ring service for the at2 devices. Basical idea is to
use the GSM AT commands to get notice of incoming calls to the GSM
modem device -- yes! you can call them, but don't wonder if they don't
reply :)) -- and activate some
WERKSTUDENT1 wrote:
Sure!
Sorry, but I'm getting a little bit into panic as my thesis has to be
finished in a few weeks and I have to solve this problem :-)
OK: I've got a client simulator using the kannel-wap-gw. It requests for
some content from a web server. The web server starts my
WERKSTUDENT1 wrote:
What simulator do you use ?
Siemens S45
isn't this a real phone?!
How old is your Kannel version ?
System CYGWIN_NT-4.0, release 1.1.8(0.34/3/2), version 2001-01-31 10:08,
machine i686.
this is your OS, not Kannel's version or cvs checkout date. -- BTW, I
would
Jörg Pommnitz wrote:
This ring-service could be used in conjunction with other devices
than GSM modems.
You could attach an ISDN card with multiple channels listening on the
same MSN and ease the problem of the busy phone. The answer would
still have to be sent by SMS, of course.
ok, I
Angel Fradejas wrote:
Why not use the accept-x-kannel-headers in the sms-service declaration, and
output a X-Kannel-MClass header in the http response?
IMHO, no need for flash=yes
ok, that was my obvious question.
So we *have* already that support using the accept-x-kannel-headers
Marc schrieb:
Yes, I can, but please remember that it even does not work when I replace
the function call of 'doConversions()' with a simple while-do-nothing-loop!
So the servlet just does nothing, it waits, then it returns the requested
wml-content without any conversions.
ok.
But fyi:
Are there going to be any of us at 3GSM World Congress, 19-22.
February, Cannes, France?
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel: +49-211-74845-0
Fax: +49-211-74845-299
E-Mail: [EMAIL
Jörg Pommnitz wrote:
This looks very much like the smsbox eats all CPU cycles that
has been discussed here on the list. One workaround was to disable
HTTP-1.1 support and to use HTTP-1.0 instead.
can you point that workaround more out, please? I have not found
anything on the list itself.
Aarno Syvänen wrote:
Using wapbox only for pushing (fetching is done by operator's gateway)
seems to
cause an idle loop, one thread (poll thread) taking up to 40 % of CPU
time.
I hope that this does not happen when wapbox is used for fetching (I
cannot test
this myself).
The
Oded Arbel wrote:
Hi list.
Since we're already discussing the at2 gsm7bit escaping issue, I would
like to resubmit my suggested fix for the problem (as apparently it did
not arrive to the proper authorities the first time). my apologies if
you are reading it for the second time.
I would
Stipe Tolj wrote:
Just applied the patch to a test environment and giving it a try for
various smsc types.
tested messages via EMI2, SMPP and AT2, all ok. +1 for commitment from
my side.
Can someone test against the issues the patch is fixing, I guess I
only tried to send normal messages
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi. Some of our kannel-servers access both SMSCs and gsm modems. For each
of these, a bit of unified-prefix trickery is needed. However, they don't
need the same rules ! But there is only one unified-prefix setting in the
core group?
(thus, they conflict).
1)
Jörg Pommnitz wrote:
What's the
easiest way to compile the on my Win NT4-machine with VS6.0?
I don't think there is an easy way for VS6.0. You will want to try
cygwin (see http://sources.redhat.com/cygwin/).
I agree and even strength this up to you HAVE TO use Cygwin 1.3.6-6 or
later
Aarno Syvänen wrote:
I just added OTA compiler (for compiling XML settings and bookmarks
documents)
to CVS. Settings part is tested with T39m and 6210, bookmarks with 6210.
Well
bookmarks are tested with T39m, they just do not work ;)
thanks. Have you considered to add the SyncML
Andreas Fink wrote:
Hello everybody,
yesterday i've configured SSL for the SMS Box. It's running very
fine with a Self-Signed Certificate, but we don't have only HTTPS
Webserver:-)
Because, now it isn't possible to receive a normal HTTP request, it
is only possible to receive a
David Holland wrote:
On Thu, Jan 24, 2002 at 05:43:34PM -, Paul Keogh wrote:
Are there going to be any of us at 3GSM World Congress, 19-22.
We (ANAM) will be there on the Enterprise Ireland stand. Drop
by and say hello !
3G Lab will have a stand... and a yacht.
great, don't
Stipe Tolj wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi. Some of our kannel-servers access both SMSCs and gsm modems. For each
of these, a bit of unified-prefix trickery is needed. However, they don't
need the same rules ! But there is only one unified-prefix setting in the
core group
Bjoern,
while re-reading this thread I think Andreas and I missed what you
meant in your question.
Which one is it:
a) You want to be able to use HTTP *and* HTTPS to *one* port (i.e.
443) for the sendsms HTTP interface.
b) You want to have *only* HTTPS for the sendsms HTTP interface, but
HTTP
Inspired by Jörgs repost of the orginal problem reported by:
Frederik Ammitzbøll [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tue, 17 Jul 2001 12:07:02 +0200
Msg-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I did some in-deep investigations on this and here is a draft of the
current summary:
As Frederik pointed out there is a *huge*
Bernino Lind wrote:
Kannel supports DeLivery Reports via MySQL.
correcting this a bit if you don't mind Bernino.
DLR support can utilize mysql dbs for storage, they don't have to.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Lucio Ferrao wrote:
When smsc_at2 sent a message in 7bit the length written in the PDU did not
include
the escape chars. I solved the problem calling the charset_latin1_to_gsm a
little earlier.
This lead to missing end chars when using escaped chars []...
Lucio Ferrao
Bjoern Buettner wrote:
We have one HTTPS webserver and we have one HTTP webserver.
Both servers hold a site with a send SMS formular.
If SSL is enabled, only the HTTPS webserver will send the SMS correctly
via SSL tunnel, and the smsbox receives it and sends the message to the
recipient
Alex Judd wrote:
Just my luck that I upgrade to a SMPP connection and have lots of fun
trying to get Kannel to run with it :) From my (brief) investigations it
looks like the way that gwthread_create is implemented has changed - so
that the old format of the function passes the wrong
Peter Löfman wrote:
has there been any change in the CVS smsc_smpp lately?
I have a some weeks old version which is working very fine with my SMS-C and it
sends message with TON=0.
But now when I tested the latest cvs, the message was sent with TON=2, which is not
good because the sms-c
Just to let you all know that I commited the patch I proposed for the
multi-cast support in gw/smsbox.c:smsbox_req_handle().
At least some of us have tested this and yet no objections have been
posted, so here it goes. If it breaks something for you, please claim
ASAP.
See Msg-ID: [EMAIL
Andrew McMillan wrote:
I note there is no Build-Depends: ... in the control file. I guess
there should probably be one which includes a minimum of libxml2-dev,
and probably also jade, openjade, tetex-base, tetex-bin, tetex-extra and
texinfo. Should I work it out and submit a patch? Who
Matthew Flax wrote:
I have a mostly tested release from last year.
It only supports Local DLR (LDLR).
what's LDLR?
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470 Düsseldorf
Tel: +49-211-74845-0
Fax:
Stefan Cars wrote:
Let me correct myself.. it seems that it is not the concatenated that is
the problem it looks like it's sending every other message right..
My setup is as follows
smsc A and smsc B
you have to beware if you use more then one smsc definition to route
the outgoing SMS.
Andreas Heckwolf wrote:
we are using Cygwin's cygrunsrv.exe to install all Kannel-boxes as Windows NT
services. Works just fine.
yep, I can confirm this too.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
Münsterstr. 248
40470
Andreas Fink wrote:
Alex Judd wrote:
Just my luck that I upgrade to a SMPP connection and have lots of fun
trying to get Kannel to run with it :) From my (brief) investigations it
looks like the way that gwthread_create is implemented has changed - so
that the old format of the
Peter Löfman wrote:
Hi,
well I solved the problem by re-compiling with the ton set to 0.
It might be possible that 1 (international) will work also, I have not tested yet.
But with 2 (national) it did not work.
so, how about setting this ton variable by a configuration directive
within
Patrick Mignott wrote:
hello all, i hope i am not in the wrong discussion group, but i
would like to know if anyone knows of a SMS contact provider that
can delver sms news, sports, weather, ect. for the UK and is
compatible with kannel?.
this is *definitly* off-topic.
You may post such
Zhou Ye wrote:
I wanted to know what specific handsets support WAP Push, appreciate it if you can
share your expertise.
Also is any special hardward needed in the telco to handle WAP Push, or can we use
say SMPP or UCP straight to a conventional SMSC and be OK? How should the message be
Zhou Ye wrote:
Also is any special hardward needed in the telco to handle WAP Push, or can we use
say SMPP or UCP straight to a conventional SMSC and be OK? How should the message be
composed?
I did not answer all, so here is the rest.
No, there is no special hardware required. WAP Push
Bjoern Buettner wrote:
I've configured the kannel WAP GW- in version cvs 30-dec.2001.
Previous version of Kannel WAP was 1.0.5, it worked very fine.
With the new version, we have some problems with SIEMENS S35 Phones.
If I try to connect with the SIEMENS S35 to the gw, following error
Richard Braakman wrote:
In either case, Stipe is right in that the panic was from the malloc
checking code, and not from the server running out of memory.
I just wanted to point out that if you get that panic, it still
means there's an actual bug. You can hide it by turning off the
malloc
Nisan Bloch wrote:
I sent you a small patch for the smpp module a few days ago. It should
address this error.
Here it is again.
--- gw/smsc_smpp.c Thu Jan 17 22:51:52 2002
+++ smsc_smpp.c Mon Jan 21 21:01:35 2002
@@ -548,6 +548,7 @@
info(0,DLR =
Bjoern Buettner wrote:
Has anybody a solution regarding my problem?
are you sure your Siemens S35 does *not* receive the WML deck through
kannel?
You may provide my by private email the wml deck that you are trying
to test against, if it is static, and I'll try this using our
dedicated WAP
Richard Braakman wrote:
The SIGQUIT code is in signal_handler() in wapbox.c, and can be easily
copied to the other boxes.
I just added this to gw/bearerbox.c and gw/smsbox.c.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Wapme Systems AG
macky wrote:
is there any way i can execute an external command or a script just incase
a special key X is texted
im pertaining to the smskannel.conf
group = sms-service
keyword=X
text= ANYTHING
unfortunatly not directly as you may intend to.
Ian pointed out about the
Andrew Cowles wrote:
Hi Guys/Gals,
I'm using 1.1.5 in production system for incoming SMS over Wavecom GSM
modems.
This has been working okay - but I have a problem with message time (%t).
Messages sent this morning come wit time time stamps like 1932-01-19 18:36
- which is well out!
For those dealing with debugging of threads, here is a usefull link I
guess:
http://www.informatik.hu-berlin.de/~mueller/TDI/
Has anyone yet resolved the problem we get in
gwlib/thread.c:mutex_unlock_real(), Andreas maybe?!
I'm getting this on a regular basis for a Linux 2.x machine where a
Benjamin Lee wrote:
For what it's worth, I've found that it only happens with --enable-debug.
But I may be quite wrong in my implication...
I get it while having
$ ./configure --with-defaults=speed
which explicity should not include debugging.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Dedy Sutanto wrote:
Dear all,
I am using kannel 1.0.3, the latest stable one and have customize
this version to suit with my SMPP connection..
Currently, I use it to serve logo operator, ring tone and sms-email.
I just wonder how to construct flash sms in this version.
Can anybody
Andreas Fink wrote:
You got to send the numbers to kannel in international format (+...)
to get TON to be set to 1. If you send them in national format
without the +, TON is set to 2 (national), not 0 (unspecified)
Or you might simply patch that part to set TON always to zero.
Depends on
Jaap Bouma wrote:
The site still stays 1.0.3 is production and 1.1.5 is definitely NOT
production.
What's the official status on this, and perhaps it would be nice to say
something more specific on the website.
it's hard to tell what the official status is, IMHO.
I don't know if we will
Andreas Fink wrote:
Ok. well the question is why is it getting into trouble as TON=1 is
definitively a valid setting. TON=2 (national) could be replaced for
TON=0 (undefined). Maybe that fixes 99% of the cases. In my case
TON=0 is not accepted by the SMSC (which I consider a valid
Andreas Fink wrote:
We have encountered a problem using the T68m with Kannel as WAP gw.
The log shows the following entry:
2002-02-04 13:47:19 [6] DEBUG: WTP_RESP: no sar implemented,aborting
transaction
which means the client has requested SAR processing and Kannel refused
that. By
Malmström, Dennis wrote:
The changes I made are:
1) Added three escape codes:
%z, skips a word.
I guess this may be replicated using %s for the next word but without
processing it actually in the CGI environment.
%A, same as %a but without url encoding.
Oded Arbel wrote:
Now decode_deliver decodes time correctly, but I still get bogus time
stamps with the messages - I guess it's date_convert_universal()
fault's. l'll look into it next.
All the patches below are Dennis Malmstrom's, except the smsc_at2 patch
which is my own's.
can you
Olivier Durécu wrote :
PS: for alcatel mobiles, two AT commands are wrong
- AT+CNMI=1,3,0,0 (1,2,0,0 does not work)
- for AT+CMGS, the PDU must begin with extra 00
can you provide us a clean patch of smsc_at2.c for the Aplcatel
support?
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Olivier Durécu wrote:
Hi list,
I am testing Kannel wap push capabilities with Alcatel mobile phones but
not successfully. I use AT2 as SMSC. The execution of the AT command
seems OK...
But no push comes on the target phone... Could someone give me a
complete AT+CMGS command, that has
Patrick Mignott schrieb:
/usr/local/include/libxml2/libxml/encoding.h:30: giconv.h: No such
my /usr/include/libxml2/libxml/encoding.h:30 does:
#include iconv.h
So I guess you don't have any giconv.h in your include path.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alex Judd wrote:
Stipe/Andreas
Can we not just apply the patch I submitted to do this last week? This
allows for manual override or automatic fall back if not used.
Anreas, any objections from your side?
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is anyone investigating the major problem I reported in my mail:
Subject: [summary] HTTP/1.1 client requests causing CPU cycle
bug/problem
Msg-ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
??
IMHO, (and the STATUS file opinion :)) this is a major showstopper for
a stable release.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oded Arbel wrote:
Hi list.
Well - the subject line says it all. it really doesn't - I checked ;-)
The Kannel that we have running with an OIS SMSC is very old but a patch
agains a 1.0.3 or something wouldn't be much help, so here's a port of
our patch to the latest development.
Note :
I have forward-ported Malmström, Dennis [EMAIL PROTECTED]
submission for having an executable shell command sms-service group.
This introduces the ability to have this in kannel.conf:
group = sms-service
keyword = uptime
exec = uptime
as an example.
Please be aware that there is almost
Olivier Durécu wrote:
You can find attached smsc_at2.c containing alcatel as new modem
type. But it seems that Alcatel mobiles only understands 7 bits
encoding, where can the encoding parameter be modified ?
patch applied, thanks.
Stipe
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
101 - 200 of 931 matches
Mail list logo
