you can set ton/npi in the config file. its not a good idea to hardcode this
into the binary as it would dissalow you to send international originating SMS
for non shortcode.
> On 14 Oct 2015, at 14:20, Ahmed Shabana wrote:
>
> Dears at kannel devel mailing list ,
>
> Have a nice day ,
>
> On 08 Oct 2015, at 14:04, Hillel wrote:
>
> Hi Alex and Andreas,
>
> Vodacom says send Latin-1 characters and set your data_coding field to 3 to
> tell the SMSC to translate the characters from Latin-1 to GSM. So that if we
> want to display the curly bracket ‘}’ you have to send the escape
theres no need for having the SMSC do the latin1 to GSM transcoding as kannel
already does this.
you feed kannel with latin1 or utf8 and kannel will make GSM out of it
automatically.
What matters at the end is what the handset receives and the GSM character set
is hardcoded in billions of phone
one possible reason for this is that kannel has an alternate route.
how does your allowed-smsc-id / denied-smsc-id entries look like?
> On 28 Sep 2015, at 11:07, Kirti Mandwade wrote:
>
>
> Hello All,
>
> Kannel does not give expected status codes when an smsc is down, stopped or
> removed.
>
kannel runs without any issues on FreeBSD and Darwin (OS X) which is derived
from FreeBSD.
The errors you see in the log basically mean your sockent connection drops.
This can be a HTTP/1.1 session which closes after timeout or a SMPP connection
which disconnects due to being idle.
So nothing w
> On 08 Dec 2014, at 07:32, Rao, Anil Kumar Brihmavar
> wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am using Kannel Gateway to push SMS messages from my app server to CIMD2
> SMSC. I have following questions.
> Currently I am using the http protocol format to push messages (
> http://localhost:13013/cgi-bin/se
Dear Tanja
Please dont post to multiple mailing lists at the same time.
I looked at your traceilfe 20.11.2014_11_48_08:
There’s a few things which are abnormal.
originator is empty (0x00)
destination is alphanumeric “38970ZZ”
in a DLR the originator and destination should match the origina
on management rather
> than the 'connection per thread' approach we currently make use of (mostly).
>
> Cheers,
> Donald
>
Andreas Fink
CEO DataCell ehf
CEO Backbone ehf
---
Tel: +41-61-330 Fax
nel.org/pipermail/users/2014-November/021632.html
> And I have no idea on how the development organisation is done in Kannel.
>
>
> Thanks for the patience. Any feedback will be welcomed.
>
Andreas Fink
CEO DataCell ehf
CEO Backbone ehf
---
te:1411010631 done
> date:1411010631 stat:UNDELIV err:602
>
> Grateful if you can assist with a full list of these error codes. Example in
> this case is err:602
>
> Best Regards
>
> Joy Ivan
>
Andreas Fink
CEO DataCell ehf
CEO Backbone ehf
--
t; #split-suffix =
> #omit-empty =
> #header =
> #footer =
> #allowed-prefix =
> #denied-prefix =
> #white-list =
> #black-list =
>
>
>
> # SMS SERVICES
>
> #group = sms-service
> #name = nothing
> #keyword = nop
> #aliases = "noppy;niente&q
ards,
> Anjaly Kurian
>
> 21.10.2014, 08:44, "Andreas Fink" :
>> this part hints that AT+IFC=2,2 does stop the modem from sending the data to
>> your computer because the hardware handshake wires (RTS/CTS) are not
>> connected and thus the modem waits on the co
09:00:37 [5744] [6] DEBUG: AT2[simcom]: --> AT+IFC=2,2^M
> 2014-10-21 09:00:44 [5744] [6] INFO: AT2[simcom]: cannot enable hardware
> handshake
Andreas Fink
No. but the problem is gone after a clean rebuild somehow.
very strange...
On 18 Aug 2014, at 13:58, Alexander Malysh wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> did you find anything? I never saw this on our side.
>
> Alex
>
> Am 27.07.2014 um 23:02 schrieb Andreas Fink :
>
>>
Hi folks,
I run into a very puzzling issue with the delivery of DLRs from Kannel.
I have a script which submits SMS to kannel. This script constructs a DLR URL
like this:
callback_url =
octstr_format("http://%s:%d/sms/response.php?priority=%d";,
While we think about changing tlv, we should also think about having a "set of
tlv" which you can apply to a smsc.
In my case I have like 40 instances of the same SMSC and having 20 TLV configs
for every smsc (as you specify smsc-id in it) is creating very long config
files.
What about
group
On 03 Jul 2014, at 10:21, marc.bazi...@orange.com wrote:
> If you want to check this behaviour,
> turned off your mobile , a take a tcpdump trace , and send one message by
> one, until you get an error from the smsc, ( usually teh maximum message per
> subscriber on the smsc configuration are b
FYI, the standard doesnt say how long you have to wait until you retry after
getting a Throttled error.
It only says:
Throttling error (ESME has exceeded allowed message limits).
This type of error is usually returned where an ESME has exceeded a
predefined messaging rate restri
On 03 Jul 2014, at 09:47, marc.bazi...@orange.com wrote:
> Hi
> You can set up the configuration file with sms-resend-freq ( in sec ) and
> sms-resend-retry (number of retry ) in order to change the default value for
> retry.
> You can , by doing this , simulate a retry mechanism that you can
ew SMSC. It has limit 20 sms per minute in test
> mode.
>
>
> From: spameden [mailto:spame...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2014 1:45 PM
> To: Andreas Fink
> Cc: Алексей Мальгин; devel Devel
> Subject: Re: Throttling Error
>
>
>
>
> 2014-07-03
there is nothing to be done about this. Kannel does stop sending if it gets a
throttling error and resumes a little bit later.
This is part of the protocol and does not require any further config settings
On 03 Jul 2014, at 05:08, Алексей Мальгин wrote:
> Hello,
>
> We need help with processi
> ==31087== 4,986,528 (77,472 direct, 4,909,056 indirect) bytes in 4,842
> blocks are definitely lost in loss record 813 of 813
> ==31087==at 0x4027434: malloc (vg_replace_malloc.c:291)
> ==31087==by 0x80970B3: gw_native_malloc (gwmem-native.c:87)
> ==31087==by 0x80A37A1: octstr_creat
wn.
==31087== To see them, rerun with: --leak-check=full
--show-leak-kinds=all ==31087== ==31087== For counts of detected and
suppressed errors, rerun with: -v ==31087== ERROR SUMMARY: 10 errors
from 10 contexts (suppressed: 45 from 10)
Regards
dcs is implemented since a long time
On 08 Jan 2014, at 14:50, Ahmed Shabana wrote:
> Dear Kannel Devels,
>
> I want to patch kannel source but need first to check with you if this
> could be useful or this feature already exist ,
>
> some provider require special Data_Coding fi
d all new server
> sockets to the FD list in 1 iteration.
>
> Maybe I am just really misunderstanding what is happening, but my "hack" did
> fix the problem, so it must somehow be related.
>
> What are your thoughts?
>
> thx,
> Brian
>
>
>
If I understand you right, you have some code to run virtually multiple http
servers which do different things?
You must be aware that gwlib is build the way that it runs multiple threads
polling of the same incoming port. In other words if you run on port 80 a min
webserver to serve documents,
there's two issues to solve here:
a) why are you getting a DLR for a message you have sent but don't remember.
b) why is it bailing out at this time because this should simply ignore the DLR
in that case.
for b) we need a backtrace, a PANIC log or something like that to find out what
is creatin
anyone have a clue why I get this error 512?
Its a wavecom modem. Incoming messages do work and get routed correctly. SIM is
O2 in UK.
The devices worked with the same setting with other SIM cards.
The SIM works in a phone sending SMS.
2013-03-20 21:12:24 [1190] [6] DEBUG: AT2[port02]: send comma
It is recommended to send every SMS individually as if you specify delivery
reports or similar requirements, you need to distinguish every individual SMS
from each other. Those things are extremely difficult if you send one message
with 1000 destination numbers. Delivery reports will acknowledg
please take a tcpdump of the communication. I believe however that your server
is not talking SMPP but something else or that one side is using SSL and the
other is not. The "secure" in the name hints that SSL might be in use but you
have not configured kannel to use SSL. Use of SSL is not part
> 2. Do you think I am missing anything in the kannel config? If yes, can u let
> me see a sample kannel USSD config?
>
> 3. Can I set configure kannel to accept NULL destination address?
>
> Thank you so much for your time.
>
>
> Best Regards,
> Kayode
>
>
>
>
&
there is your error in the log:
2012-11-27 11:38:35 [6369] [6] DEBUG: dest_addr_ton: 0 = 0x
2012-11-27 11:38:35 [6369] [6] DEBUG: dest_addr_npi: 0 = 0x
2012-11-27 11:38:35 [6369] [6] DEBUG: destination_addr: NULL
2012-11-27 11:38:35 [6369] [6] ERROR: SMPP[USSD]: Mallformed de
protocol ID's can be of different kind. There is a PID field in the SMS PDU
which you can set by &pid=... if I'm not mistaken.
But there are also port numbers of WAP which can be considered Port ID's. They
are in a UDH header.
Both are not part of the content by itself and the SMSC you submit it
this is conceptually not possible. If you send multiple SMS in one go, kannel
sees this as one transaction and thus can only acknowledge one.
So the best is to send them one by one.
On 05.12.2012, at 09:36, Steven Nsubuga wrote:
> In the event that I send an SMS to 2 numbers via kannel, ie to=1
I have a similar device in use with kannel. They are wavecom devices tied
together with USB to serial adapters and USB hub. All in one box.
They work well with kannel. Issues you might get into depending on model are to
find the serial port driver.
On 04.12.2012, at 09:27, Willy Mularto wrote:
the phone most probably doesn't support this mode. its a limit of the hardware
you are using.
To receive lots of sms you should use reliable gsm modems or get incoming
messages directly from an operator's smsc or from a incoming proxy provider.
On 03.12.2012, at 06:48, Navdeep Bagga wrote:
> I
On 07.11.2012, at 07:44, Saifullah wrote:
> Hi Wlly Mularto
>
> Thanks for your reply. It help me very much. I have one important
> question. Sppose I am sending SMS from kannel to GSM Modems whick work as
> SMSC what number will be shown on the display of destination user? Will it
> be number
ax-connections = 1
>
> group = dlr-db
> id = mydlr
> table = dlr
> field-smsc = smsc
> field-timestamp = ts
> field-destination = destination
> field-source = source
> field-service = service
> field-url = url
> field-mask = mask
> field-status = status
> fie
On 08.10.2012, at 19:39, virendra bhati wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> I have installed Kannel and working perfectly with Ubuntu 12.04.1 LTS. But I
> am not able to installed BluOcean™ USB GSM / GPRS Modem. Could you please
> help me so that I will configure and used my GSM modem for sending SMS from
On 13.09.2012, at 11:06, khaled mohamed wrote:
>
>
> MR(s);
> we try to get delivery report from kannel i found away on kannel
> 1.4. user's guide using the dlr-mask and dlr-url (in chapter 9 sms delivery
> report).
> i have some questions hope to get answers.
>
if your mask is 31, you ask for values 1,2,4,8,16
Check the doc what they mean.
In other words, you only get what you asked for and SUBMIT (SMS has hit SMSC)
is one of them
If you are only interested in final delivery/failure, then use a value of 3
(1+2 = success + failure)
On 27.08.2012, at 09
READM. All correspondence is forwarded, below.
>
> -- Forwarded message --
> From: "Michael Black"
> Date: Aug 20, 2012 11:29 AM
> Subject: Re: Make Gateway Errors
> To: "Andreas Fink"
>
>
> Also, im using ubuntu maverick
&
did you run ./configure ?
I've compiled kannel on Linux ARM before (on a pandaboard running Ubuntu) and
had no problem with it.
./configure checks for various va_list variants.
On 20.08.2012, at 15:12, Michael Black wrote:
> Hello.
>
> I am currently trying to build kannel from source (on arm
ne Kluwen [mailto:rene.klu...@chimit.nl]
> Sent: Monday, 06 August, 2012 18:46
> To: 'Rene Kluwen'; 'Andreas Fink'; de...@vm1.kannel.org
> Subject: RE: at smsc bug
>
> Output from gdb:
>
> at2_open_device (privdata=0x9d712e0) at gw/smsc/smsc_at.c:2
80d3541 in new_thread (arg=0x9d71420) at gwlib/gwthread-pthread.c:362
> #4 0x009bc45b in start_thread () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
> #5 0x0091423e in clone () from /lib/libc.so.6
>
> From: Rene Kluwen [mailto:rene.klu...@chimit.nl]
> Sent: Monday, 06 August, 2012 18:38
> To: '
Dear Kevin,
The DLR database entry is a temporary one. The Kannel instance which sends the
submit_sm is the entity which also will get the delivery reports. So you should
not have any issues in replication. The only reason why you would have this is
if you have multiple kannel's on multiple mac
rivdata->rssi);
+ if(octstr_len(privdata->imsi)>0)
+ octstr_format_append(privdata->conn->smsc_specific_status,"
IMSI: %s",octstr_get_cstr(privdata->imsi));
+ if(octstr_len(privdata->cardnumber)>0)
+ octstr_format_append(privdata->conn->smsc_specific_status,"
CardNumber: %s",octstr_get_cstr(privdata->cardnumber));
+ octstr_format_append(privdata->conn->smsc_specific_status," Device:
%s",octstr_get_cstr(privdata->device));
+ if(privdata->msisdn)
+ octstr_format_append(privdata->conn->smsc_specific_status,"
MSISDN: %s",octstr_get_cstr(privdata->msisdn));
+
+ if(old)
+ octstr_destroy(old);
+}
sh-3.2#
Also in my setup delivery reports don't work but i have not figured out why yet. Looks like the modems never give them back to me. Anybody seen this working in his setup?Andreas Fink
b&udh=%u&smsc=%f&coding=%c&dcs=%O&ts=%T";
max-messages = 0
On 31.05.2012, at 13:44, Tone Irene Andersen wrote:
> Hi. Thank you for reply.
>
> Could you show me how to setup kannel for this kind of forwarding?
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Tone Ir
is 0 really current time and not 1.1.1970 maybe?
In that case the SMSC is absolutely right in rejecting a delivery in the past.
On 23.05.2012, at 16:07, Alexander Malysh wrote:
> Hi Tanja,
>
> please keep devel@ in CC...
>
> It's not really a BUG of Kannel because in SMPP it's not defined tha
you have to URL encode your bytes.
what you are doing is you are sending a text containing FF 06... characters not
the bytes they should represent
Try with &text= %FF%06%01...
On 04.04.2012, at 07:44, George Karagheaur wrote:
> Dear all,
> I am stuck in a simple i think problem, but already 2 n
there is no absolute limit. All smsboxes would share the incoming MO's in a
load sharing fashion.
On 03.02.2012, at 19:01, zhu shi song wrote:
> I have one application that have many smsboxs. Each smsbox needs connect to
> the same bearerbox. I want to know how many smsboxs can beaerbox can s
<>
This is not really fully correct. Check out GSM 03.38 spec for values of DCS
(http://www.3gpp.org/ftp/Specs/archive/03_series/03.38/0338-720.zip).
Value 216 = binary 1101 100
Which stands for
1101 = Message Waiting Indication Group
1 = set Indication Active
0 = rese
ned. However value 0x10
would be Intermediate notification requested.
Now could it be that either someone uses 0x20 as reserved value for a specific
purpose or simply its a typo and it should be 0x10.
Any comments?
Andreas Fink
SMSRelay AG
On 20.10.2011, at 15:57, Steven König wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i have another question on opensmppbox and bearerbox.
>
> I would like to route two users who connect to opensmppbox via smpp to two
> different smscs in the bearerbox.
> Since i understood the documentation, the routing takes the third va
r as bearerbox is concerned.
>> Multiple clients mean multiple bearerbox connections.
>> What is (in your opinion) the bug in this logic?
>>
>> == Rene
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Andreas Fink [mailto:af...@list.fink.org]
>> Sent: Tuesday
On 18.10.2011, at 17:44, Rene Kluwen wrote:
> Once you look further in the opensmppbox documentation, you will see that
> system-type (or system-id if use-systemid-as-smsboxid is set to true) is
> used as boxcid whilst communicating to bearerbox.
> This is to facilitate the proper return path for
The system type has nothing to do with the box-id.
The boxid is used to connect to bearerbox and is also used to route delivery
reports back.
Oone box can only have one ID which is transmitted initially at connection time
so having multiple smpp users sending this way different box-id's back wou
SMPP per se does not dictate the charset. Normally a SMSC running SMPP simply
passes on to the phone whatever it gets. In other words the bytes containing
the text should be encoded in the charset the client is telling in the DCS
field.
However there are some broken implementations out there wh
hitecture - cannot build
> start-stop-daemon
I presume the configure file doesn't have a setting for i386-pc-solaris but
only one for sparc solaris.
the start-stop-daemon isn't really needed anymore as kannel boxe's all have
built-in daemonization and watchdogs.
>
> Thanks i
there's nothing wrong in the trace you sent.
connection is lost: 2011-01-13 11:46:43 [27081] [45] ERROR: System error 104:
Connection reset by peer
connection is reestablished: 2011-01-13 11:46:48 [27081] [45] DEBUG: Connecting
to <213.139.63.193>
BIND is sent: 2011-01-13 11:46:49 [27081] [45
just dont send two MT's to the same device in the same second. This is the fix.
delay the second part for 2 sec so they can not get the same timestamp.
On 21.07.2010, at 09:23, Alexander Malysh wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2 MT at the same time are just not fixable for EMI due to the protocol flaw...
>
>
this sounds more like your webserver is not able to handle the load.
Kannel can handle 2000 sms per seconds. I have seen that working.
You should look deeper into your logfiles to see what's causing the delay.
On 05.04.2010, at 18:30, andros agena wrote:
> We are in production with Kannel with
UCP implementations of CMG. In
our own SMSC, the TS value is larger and always unique which avoids the issue
(on the other hand we always use SMPP).
Andreas Fink
Fink Consulting GmbH
Global Networks Schweiz AG
BebbiCell AG
IceCell ehf
--
I had this discussion a few days back.
Fact is that 03.38 specifies uppercase cedille
Fact is that Sony Ericsson show uppercase cedille
Nokia shows lowercase cedille however.
The spec is whatever the spec is. its in there since many many years and was
never changed.
The change I did in kannel
WSP and WTP are supported in Kannel
WTLS is a dead end. Its only used in WAP 1.1 while the world uses WAP 2.0 these
days. Today's phones don't support WTLS anymore neither, it doesn't give real
security as the operator can still wiretap to what the user does.
On 14.03.2010, at 17:46, Nikos Balk
On 06.01.2010, at 18:27, bmoyn...@vodafone.ie wrote:
> Hello,
> I cant seem to find documentation in relation to SMPP support in
> Kannel.
> Does Kannel support reception of SMPP operations over TCP?
It supports SMPP client use but not being a SMPP server.
In other words, kannel connects to SMP
you should not use pthread_create but the kannel gwlib functions to create
threads. I presume the thread has no way to find the console. Thats the
additional stuff the kannel gwlib sets up for you.
On 28.12.2009, at 15:45, Esteban Cacavelos wrote:
> Hi there, i have the following problem:
>
>
Why not simply use UTF-8 as the character set to submit? Kannel converts it to
the GSM character set when possible or to UCS2.
On 03.12.2009, at 16:52, Hillel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We are using SMPP version 3.4 with Kannel CVS and Centos and for one operator
> they require the IA5 character set.
php version >= 6.0??
thats not existing yet.
On 25.11.2009, at 14:37, Vincent CHAVANIS wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You have short_open_tag " And *shouldn't* be like this as described in the php guidelines
> for further php releases (eg. >= php 6.0)
>
> Could you please fix this asap?
>
> Then, i think w
uch most of the smscs, if you
> plan to do something more than simple dropping. Or use the smsc-reroute
> option to route it to your application and reintroduce it later on.
>
> BR,
> Nikos
> - Original Message -
> From: Sreekanth GS
> To: Andreas Fink
> Cc
there's an additional issue here.
how to define "spam".
in my case, the customer who sends the message is the originator. He is liable
for any spam complaints. However I can not filter messages away because what I
see as "spam" he might not see as spam and the receiver neither. The receiver
migh
the delivery report is ill formatted:
2009-09-28 17:45:23 [9399] [14] DEBUG: data: 31 30 37 39 38 34
39 33 35 36 30 30 31 30 30 31 1079849356001001
2009-09-28 17:45:23 [9399] [14] DEBUG: data: 30 39 30 39 32 38
31 37 34 35 30 39 30 39 32 38 0909281745090928
2009-09-28 17:45:23 [
MAND
3269 root 15 0 96804 1764 1164 S 0.3 1.4 52:56.07 bearerbox
3285 root 16 0 79504 2068 1120 S 0.0 1.6 5:31.75 smsbox
2009/9/7 Andreas Fink
On 07.09.2009, at 12:03, angela86 walczak wrote:
Hi,
I have a few cases receive encrypted unreadable text messages GSM7
they are binary SMS.
My second question is whether the amount of virtual memory is normal.
Depends on your operating system and use. It can easily be no virtual
memory in use.
Andreas Fink
Fink Consulting GmbH
Global Networks Schweiz AG
BebbiCell AG
IceCel
install the developer version.. libxml2-dev. You probably only have
the libraries without the include files
On 25.08.2009, at 19:20, mahendra panpalia wrote:
Hi,
I am new to Kannel and trying to compile it on Ubuntu.
while running configure file i am facing following error.
Checking for lib
-Nachricht
Datum: Wed, 6 May 2009 17:15:49 +0200
Von: Andreas Fink
An: Beatrice Tamburrino
CC: devel Devel
Betreff: Re: singlethreaded or multithreaded
I think you should for sure be able to accept multiple simultaneous
incoming connections as its in the nature of a webserver. If you
, 6 May 2009 16:23:54 +0200
Von: Andreas Fink
An: Beatrice Tamburrino
CC: devel Devel
Betreff: Re: singlethreaded or multithreaded
What do you mean by DLR request?
Kannel asks the SMSC to report back. The SMSC will report whenever
something is happening and kannel forwards it to http.
On 06.05
What do you mean by DLR request?
Kannel asks the SMSC to report back. The SMSC will report whenever
something is happening and kannel forwards it to http.
On 06.05.2009, at 16:18, Beatrice Tamburrino wrote:
hi,
how does kannel send the dlr-requests? sequentiell? or pararell
multithreaded?
this is simply solvable by having two smsc's with the same ID.
If those two SMSC's are seen as a unified virtual SMSC thats what you
do.
On 04.05.2009, at 21:34, Alejandro Guerrieri wrote:
We were facing a problem when dealing with multiple binds to the
same carriers.
Some of the carrie
in all cases the conection name,is being passed. If I remember right
it was mainly used for logging purposes.
apparently there where cases in EMI where conn->id was empty or so.
unifying it would make sense in my eyes.
Note: I wrote the initial implementation in SMPP and EMI/UCP. The
CIMD2 an
on outgoing SMS:
the splitting happens in SMSBox when the SMS is received from HTTP. A
reply on the submit HTTP would be possible
On 10.04.2009, at 14:27, Stipe Tolj wrote:
Enver ALTIN schrieb:
I think it would be great to tell the split count in smsbox sendsms
reply body somewhere, becau
I'm +1 on gw_calloc. There's a few times I would have used it in the
past so its nice to have it in gwlib.
I see very little optimisation of strdup except we do a strlen twice
(once explicit in the malloc line an done implicity in the strcpy) but
it is never bad to save a few microseconds..
ss, talk to me.
Andreas Fink
Fink Consulting GmbH
Global Networks Schweiz AG
BebbiCell AG
IceCell ehf
---
Tel: +41-61-330 Fax: +41-61-331 Mobile: +41-79-2457333
Address: Clarastrasse 3, 4058 Basel, Switzerland
E-Mail: an
On 13.03.2009, at 06:32, Nikos Balkanas wrote:
Hi Alex,
Solaris is probably not the environment for these tests. After 1
hour of installing many packages, trying to run bootstrap and
correcting paths within aclocal and autom4te, I finally give up:
Server2:~/work/kannel/gateway-> bootstra
PS:
On 25.02.2009, at 16:34, Stipe Tolj wrote:
Hi list,
according to the TRAI, all SMSC in India need to use prefixes in TON=5
(alphanumeric) source addresses since 2009-02-01.
ehm, doesnt that imply that its the carriers work to do on his _SMSC_,
not the gateway?
So kannel would need to
I've read the document of the TRAI and I can only shake my head
That regulator has not understood at all how SMS works. Imagine Mr.
Spammer wants to kill competition, the only thing he needs is to
prefix tons of spam with XY- and everyone will blame XY-. Stupid
excuse for the fact that
g the 2nd
and 3rd part of the concatenated message.
Call Barring active means the subscriber is not allowed to receive ANY
messages (unpaid bill for example...)
This has nothing to do with multipart.
Andreas Fink
Fink Consulting GmbH
Global Networks Schweiz AG
Why change a running horse?
I can understand we can announce "breaking changes" in the NEWS.
But there has to be a good reason for a change. like chaning from
latin1 to utf8 which make's certain things no longer break.
but changing the name of the /cgi-bin/sendsms string to /whatever for
me i
kannel does not create a cgi-bin program. It does run its own
webserver. So cgi-bin is just a "commonly known location".
On 22.10.2008, at 08:31, manas mohanty wrote:
Hi All,
How kannel creates "cgi-bin" program to handle "http" requests from
users??
Please provide the function name where
does that mean your SMSC requests utf8 instead of iso?
On 03.10.2008, at 11:23, Michael Zervakis wrote:
Dear all,
We connect to a SMPP SMSC using kannel and we had problems reading
greek characters when data coding was set to 3. I attached the
modifications to gw/smsc/smsc_smpp.c that s
kannel I can configure without any obstacle in
performance of kannel ?
Andreas Fink
Fink Consulting GmbH
Global Networks Schweiz AG
BebbiCell AG
IceCell ehf
---
Tel: +41-61-330 Fax: +41-61-331 Mobile: +41-79-2457333
On 23.09.2008, at 06:53, jyoti wrote:
I am waiting for any reply, please sugest me,
-Original Message-
From: jyoti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 22, 2008 5:32 PM
To: devel@kannel.org
Subject: Does kannel maintain multiple qeue for each user conected
I am facing pro
Hi Alejandro,
You probably should simply indicate the "alternative" location of
docbook under /opt instead of /usr/share or /usr/local/share as the
Linux and Unix world would expect. "Ports" and "Fink" put the stuff
elsewhere. And those types of problems are exactly the reason why I
don't
newbee's. cracks get access to CVS and do it
themselves :-)
I do appreciate all the hard work that has been put into the
project, but I do think development can be accelerated by opening up
the development to more people. Am I wrong?
Thanks!
Christian
From: Andreas Fink [mailto:[
On 05.08.2008, at 12:57, Vincent CHAVANIS wrote:
Hi andreas,
Andreas Fink a écrit :
On 05.08.2008, at 12:17, Vincent CHAVANIS wrote:
\
- (time(NULL) > (PRIVDATA(conn)->last_activity_time +
PRIVDATA(conn)->keepalive)))
+ (
privdata->priv_nexttrn = 0;
-privdata->last_activity_time = 0;
+privdata->last_activity_time = time (NULL); /* to *NOT* force
keepalive after login */
as I said I would leave keepalive at login.
Andreas Fink
Fink Consulting GmbH
Global Networks Schweiz AG
BebbiCell AG
why dont you simply use the default keyword instead of a regexp .* ?
On 29.07.2008, at 21:26, Ricardo España wrote:
Hi guys,
I just recently installed Kannel and I am trying to setup the sms
feature, to work with sms pull messages and sms-services. I am using
my cellphone (Nokia N73) as GS
drop because of this long
queue, is it correct? TIA Andreas.
This "very long" was the reason why database support was added for
those temporary messages.
Andreas Fink
Fink Consulting GmbH
---
Tel: +41-61-332 Fax: +4
what you mean by "destroyed"?
DLR mask is not keept. A mask says what you expect to get back and
what not.
Whenever Kannel gets back what you requested and is not expecting any
further information to come back, the temporary information is removed
as its the last report it got.
If you as
On 08.07.2008, at 06:16, Bostock James wrote:
From: Stipe Tolj
Sent: 07 July 2008 19:17
Stipe Tolj schrieb:
Can you point out why you need to omit the .depend file creation if
the
compiler is not gcc?
i.e. the Intel CC handles the options and can build without changes.
The native compi
1 - 100 of 364 matches
Mail list logo
