Stipe Tolj wrote:
Kyriacos Sakkas schrieb:
This will happen, but I am holding off for a bit more, as meta-data was
used to implement some new requirements, so I am waiting for a bit to
make sure I am meeting those before making any further change. I will
update when that happens.
Hi,
any
Kyriacos Sakkas schrieb:
I am currently running my full live load via GET request on the version
before the patch fixing the POST method. The wait is until me (or
someone else that can put some stress on it) confirms operation of the
current meta-data cvs under some sort of heavy load via POST
FYI, with the simple tests I had, this patch fixes the problem - I
guess the true test is for Kyriacos to put it into production, and
resume using POSTs, if he feels brave enough :)
Thanks again Alex!
On 25/01/2008, at 12:51 AM, Alexander Malysh wrote:
Hi again,
seems the fix is also
This will happen, but I am holding off for a bit more, as meta-data was
used to implement some new requirements, so I am waiting for a bit to
make sure I am meeting those before making any further change. I will
update when that happens.
Kyriacos
Giulio Harding wrote:
FYI, with the simple tests
Kyriacos Sakkas schrieb:
This will happen, but I am holding off for a bit more, as meta-data was
used to implement some new requirements, so I am waiting for a bit to
make sure I am meeting those before making any further change. I will
update when that happens.
Hi,
any change from our side?
Ok, I've just reproduced Kyriacos' problem - it seems to be an issue
with MT HTTP POST with the TLV HTTP header set.
This is Kannel from the meta_data branch, with a couple of site-
specific patches (though they shouldn't have any effect - I get the
same results as Kyriacos does, and he's
Hi again,
seems the fix is also really simple :) Please try attached patch.
Giulio Harding wrote:
Ok, I've just reproduced Kyriacos' problem - it seems to be an issue
with MT HTTP POST with the TLV HTTP header set.
This is Kannel from the meta_data branch, with a couple of site-
specific
Hi,
patch commited to meta-data branch.
Alexander Malysh wrote:
Hi again,
seems the fix is also really simple :) Please try attached patch.
Giulio Harding wrote:
Ok, I've just reproduced Kyriacos' problem - it seems to be an issue
with MT HTTP POST with the TLV HTTP header set.
My stability issues are in HTTP in both directions it would seem. I get
no detailed error messages but it appears that smsbox dies after either
forwarding more than 2-3 MOs to my app, or after it receives more than
2-3 MTs from my app. It then gets regenerated, but seems unable to talk
properly to
I re-compiled only difference was that is set with=debug, and now that
problem seems to have gone away. still I am at very low volumes.
Kyriacos
Also on submitting a message (MT) kannel no longer returns 0: Accepted
for delivery or anything else. I understand this may be unrelated
changes, but
Hi Guys,
I got the meta-data branch and I am still getting a lot of stability
issues, although they all seem to have to do with the HTTP interface
rather than the patch. I am running on debian with stock amd64 kernels
but I understand that your production machine is 64bit anyway.
Gioulio are
Kyriacos Sakkas schrieb:
2008-01-22 14:05:08 [10986] [7] DEBUG: validity_period: NULL
2008-01-22 14:05:08 [10986] [7] DEBUG: registered_delivery: 0 = 0x
2008-01-22 14:05:08 [10986] [7] DEBUG: replace_if_present_flag: 0 =
0x
2008-01-22 14:05:08 [10986] [7] DEBUG:
I've actually had to back out of using the meta-data Kannel, as we
spotted what looks to be a problem in the way Kannel handles carriage
return characters (ctrl-M) in synchronous responses to MO HTTP
requests - the carriage returns arrive at smsbox fine, but by the time
they leave the
I've been testing Alex's TLV patch with the meta-data branch, with
initial success (able to read and set mblox TLVs for US-specific
bind, as per Kyriacos's mblox TLV config - thanks for that!). It's
been performing perfectly on our test server, with a small number of
test binds, carrying
Ok, after a bit more perusing of the code, I think I found the
problem (line 1460 of gw/smsc/smsc_smpp.c):
...
/* got a deliver ack (DLR)?
* NOTE: following SMPP v3.4. spec. we are interested
* only on bits 2-5 (some SMSC's send 0x44,
and
Hi,
thanks for very good bug report. Please try attached patch that should fix:
1) typo ; 2) the case if dlr is not found in the storage.
Just apply it to smpp-tlv branch.
Giulio Harding wrote:
Ok, after a bit more perusing of the code, I think I found the
problem (line 1460 of
Hi,
And a great thanks to both Giulio Alexander, I have had this
problem too, and had being trying to solve it, but my C skill are fairly
crappy :), I will roll this out tomorrow on a production environment
with a couple of thousand msgs per day, and that should show if its
properly stable.
Hi,
There is some umbiquity in the patch. The new lines are inserted
lower from where the old lines are removed, and specificaly after an IF
statement that would negate this code block:
if (dlrmsg != NULL) {
+if (dlrmsg-sms.meta_data == NULL)
This looks
Also, it looks like there's 2 instances of the same typo, one at
1396, the other at 1460
the 2nd instance at line 1460, should it be something like this?
...
if (dlrmsg != NULL) {
if (dlrmsg-sms.meta_data == NULL)
Hi,
you are right. Thanks!
Please try attached patch that combine fixes for both cases.
It's on top of clean smpp-tlv branch.
Giulio Harding wrote:
Also, it looks like there's 2 instances of the same typo, one at
1396, the other at 1460
the 2nd instance at line 1460, should it be
Thanks, looks good so far! I'll report back in a few hours after
traffic has picked up again, and let you know how the patched-patched-
Kannel is faring :)
Cheers,
On 22/01/2008, at 2:03 AM, Alexander Malysh wrote:
Hi,
you are right. Thanks!
Please try attached patch that combine fixes
Alexander Malysh schrieb:
Hi,
you are right. Thanks!
Please try attached patch that combine fixes for both cases.
It's on top of clean smpp-tlv branch.
@Alex: Thanks! Instant resolving appritiated :)
+1, commited to CVS meta-data branch.
@Giulio, Kyriacos: please update your local CVS
Just a followup on this, we've processed ~12000 MOs over SMPP this
morning, and there's been no further issues - thanks again Alex for
the prompt fix! :)
On 22/01/2008, at 2:21 AM, Giulio Harding wrote:
Thanks, looks good so far! I'll report back in a few hours after
traffic has picked up
23 matches
Mail list logo
