On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 23:28 -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
I don't think it really matters what we call it, I just think that
package maintainers are starting to get a sense of entitlement and I
feel that's counter productive to the open environment we're used to
and are trying to help continue to
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 21:09 +0200, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
I would appreciate if someone else who is NEITHER a co-maintainer NOR
FESCo member don't version bump my packages, without notifying me.
Petr Pisar seems to mess with my packages.
It's simply disgusting !!
You haven't provided
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Net-CIDR-Lite:
12280b3754886b876918f03f53aee4f5 Net-CIDR-Lite-0.21.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Author: pghmcfc
Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/perl-Net-CIDR-Lite/EL-6
In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv31350
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Net-CIDR-Lite.spec sources
Log Message:
* Fri Jun 2 2010 Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org - 0.21-1
- Update to 0.21
- Fix
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 03:46:29AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
It's only in updates-testing yet.
Now this is complete nonsense. The update is required to fix broken
dependencies so it should go to stable IMMEDIATELY.
people make mistakes. it happens, no big deal.
2010/7/1, Chitlesh GOORAH chitlesh.goo...@gmail.com:
Hello there,
I would appreciate if someone else who is NEITHER a co-maintainer NOR
FESCo member don't version bump my packages, without notifying me.
Petr Pisar seems to mess with my packages.
It's simply disgusting !!
Chitlesh !
It's
On 07/02/2010 12:57 PM, Josephine Tannhäuser wrote:
It's seems to me that you have to be an employee of red hat to get the
privilegue to deal arbitrarily with all packages.
Incorrect. Anyone in the provenpackagers group has access to almost all
packages. The one exception being Mozilla.
On 07/02/2010 09:37 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 07/02/2010 12:57 PM, Josephine Tannhäuser wrote:
It's seems to me that you have to be an employee of red hat to get the
privilegue to deal arbitrarily with all packages.
Incorrect. Anyone in the provenpackagers group has access to almost all
2010/7/2 Chitlesh GOORAH chitlesh.goo...@gmail.com:
Hello there,
I would appreciate if someone else who is NEITHER a co-maintainer NOR
FESCo member don't version bump my packages, without notifying me.
It looks like Petr Pisar just fixed some FTBTS bugs in rawhide after
mass-rebuiding of all
On 07/02/2010 01:23 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
The Petr's are apparent newbies/newcomers.
They were granted access to all perl-packages, because they are @RH.
Probably because it is their paid job to work on these packages.
I am not aware of the specifics here. Fedora's sponsorship model
On 2010/07/01 10:46 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 16:44 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Nathanael Noblet wrote:
I presume a fedora account with certs are required for this?
Yes, but for your karma to have any merit, you need a Fedora account.
Non-Fedora account karma
On 07/02/2010 10:05 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 07/02/2010 01:23 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
The Petr's are apparent newbies/newcomers.
They were granted access to all perl-packages, because they are @RH.
Probably because it is their paid job to work on these packages.
I am not aware of
Chitlesh GOORAH wrote, at 07/02/2010 04:09 AM +9:00:
Hello there,
I would appreciate if someone else who is NEITHER a co-maintainer NOR
FESCo member don't version bump my packages, without notifying me.
Petr Pisar seems to mess with my packages.
It's simply disgusting !!
Chitlesh !
On 07/02/2010 11:35 AM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
Chitlesh GOORAH wrote, at 07/02/2010 04:09 AM +9:00:
Hello there,
I would appreciate if someone else who is NEITHER a co-maintainer NOR
FESCo member don't version bump my packages, without notifying me.
Petr Pisar seems to mess with my packages.
Kalev Lember wrote, at 07/02/2010 05:51 PM +9:00:
On 07/02/2010 11:35 AM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
Chitlesh GOORAH wrote, at 07/02/2010 04:09 AM +9:00:
Hello there,
I would appreciate if someone else who is NEITHER a co-maintainer NOR
FESCo member don't version bump my packages, without
On 07/02/2010 01:56 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
That said, I can't avoid having to agree to Josephine. The Petr's hardly
would have been granted this amount of CVS access if they had not been @RH.
It seems Chitlesh was wrong and the person doing the commit was
different. You seem to be
Dne 2.7.2010 09:37, Rahul Sundaram napsal(a):
On 07/02/2010 12:57 PM, Josephine Tannhäuser wrote:
It's seems to me that you have to be an employee of red hat to get the
privilegue to deal arbitrarily with all packages.
Incorrect. Anyone in the provenpackagers group has access to almost all
Matěj Cepl wrote:
b) if you don't like provenpackagers to mess with your packages, go and
make a switch in pkgdb.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Provenpackager_policy
To exclude a package from provenpackagers access, you have to open a
ticket at FESCo issue tracker and explain why
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 13:07:45 +0530, Rahul wrote:
IMO, there is absolutely nothing wrong with anyone
with commit access updating packages in Rawhide
Of course there is. There ought to be prior communication about such plans
to upgrade a package. The primary package maintainer may have good
Dne 2.7.2010 06:28, Adam Miller napsal(a):
I don't think it really matters what we call it, I just think that
package maintainers are starting to get a sense of entitlement and I
feel that's counter productive to the open environment we're used to
and are trying to help continue to grow.
I
David Woodhouse píše v Pá 02. 07. 2010 v 07:08 +0100:
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 21:09 +0200, Chitlesh GOORAH wrote:
I would appreciate if someone else who is NEITHER a co-maintainer NOR
FESCo member don't version bump my packages, without notifying me.
Petr Pisar seems to mess with my
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 10:33:52 +0100, Mark wrote:
ProvenPackagers are there precisely to do what it looks like happened
with : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8618
Wait a minute, it's not that easy. Provenpackagers are not supposed to
jump in every N months, apply a fix,
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 11:40:11 +0200, Matěj wrote:
Dne 2.7.2010 11:34, Michael Schwendt napsal(a):
Of course there is. There ought to be prior communication about such plans
to upgrade a package. The primary package maintainer may have good reasons
for not upgrading the package. Just ask!
Excerpts from Michael Schwendt's message of Fri Jul 02 11:34:38 +0200 2010:
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 13:07:45 +0530, Rahul wrote:
IMO, there is absolutely nothing wrong with anyone
with commit access updating packages in Rawhide
Of course there is. There ought to be prior communication
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 11:40:11AM +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote:
Dne 2.7.2010 11:34, Michael Schwendt napsal(a):
Of course there is. There ought to be prior communication about such plans
to upgrade a package. The primary package maintainer may have good reasons
for not upgrading the package.
Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 10:33:52 +0100, Mark wrote:
ProvenPackagers are there precisely to do what it looks like happened
with : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8618
Wait a minute, it's not that easy. Provenpackagers are not supposed to
jump in
Patrice Dumas wrote:
I think that this is very wrong. I don't know the specifics of this package
either, but I remember that for one of my packages, I had to hold of
correcting a FTBS because it meant upgrading, and I coudn't do that
because of some incompatibilities.
So at least comment on
Kevin Kofler píše v Pá 02. 07. 2010 v 04:06 +0200:
Dan Horák wrote:
I will rebuild wxGTK without the internal crash handler for the the
devel/F14 branch so we can use ABRT to report crashes from wxGTK-based
apps. This will mean a rebuild of wxGTK with --disable-catch_segvs and
this
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=582163
Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
I get the feeling that no one on this thread has looked into
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/403
So this has already been handled by FESCo, mistakes have been made and
most likely will be avoided in the future.
Felix
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 11:42:10 +0100, Mark wrote:
ProvenPackagers are there precisely to do what it looks like happened
with : http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=8618
Wait a minute, it's not that easy. Provenpackagers are not supposed to
jump in every N months,
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Dan Horák d...@danny.cz wrote:
Kevin Kofler píše v Pá 02. 07. 2010 v 04:06 +0200:
Dan Horák wrote:
I will rebuild wxGTK without the internal crash handler for the the
devel/F14 branch so we can use ABRT to report crashes from wxGTK-based
apps. This will
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 03:13:55PM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
On 7/1/10 2:55 PM, Till Maas wrote:
But I guess somehow it boils down to
the majority wants that other people to work for them, which might
even be true. But in a FOSS community I doubt it is very healthy to
follow this too
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 11:34 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 13:07:45 +0530, Rahul wrote:
IMO, there is absolutely nothing wrong with anyone
with commit access updating packages in Rawhide
Of course there is. There ought to be prior communication about such plans
to
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 13:55 +0200, Léon Keijser wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 11:34 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 13:07:45 +0530, Rahul wrote:
IMO, there is absolutely nothing wrong with anyone
with commit access updating packages in Rawhide
Of course there
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 12:03:34PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 11:40:11 +0200, Matěj wrote:
Dne 2.7.2010 11:34, Michael Schwendt napsal(a):
Of course there is. There ought to be prior communication about such plans
to upgrade a package. The primary package
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
On i386:
perl-Pugs-Compiler-Rule-0.37-4.fc13.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
Please resolve this as soon
perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Data-Alias-1.07-6.fc13.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
On i386:
perl-Data-Alias-1.07-6.fc13.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.1)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora
perl-DBI-Dumper has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-DBI-Dumper-2.01-8.fc12.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0)
On i386:
perl-DBI-Dumper-2.01-8.fc12.i686 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0)
Please resolve this as soon as possible.
--
Fedora
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 01:55:21PM +0200, Léon Keijser wrote:
I think you are spot-on with this comment. There probably wouldn't be
such a discussion if the (proven)packager simply stated his intentions
to the package maintainer.
Just to step into this for a moment, but this wouldn't work (in
2010-07-02 03:18 keltezéssel, Kevin Kofler írta:
Dave Airlie wrote:
So I've noticed maintainers of packages in Fedora seem to have a concept
of ownership, and I'm wondering if we could remove that word from usage
about maintainership.
+1
IMHO any sponsored packager should be free
I have just joined as a member and co-maintainer of the Fedora Design
Suite. Apparently, as a member of the Fedora community I am entitled
to the email alias foxmulder...@fedoraproject.org. Whereas
foxmulder881 is my username. Now I can't for the life of me get the
email alias to work correctly
Compose started at Fri Jul 2 08:15:29 UTC 2010
Broken deps for i386
--
BackupPC-3.1.0-14.fc14.noarch requires perl-suidperl
FlightGear-2.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requires libosgText.so.55
FlightGear-2.0.0-2.fc14.i686 requires
On 07/02/2010 01:55 PM, Léon Keijser wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 11:34 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 13:07:45 +0530, Rahul wrote:
IMO, there is absolutely nothing wrong with anyone
with commit access updating packages in Rawhide
Of course there is.
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 2:23 PM, Peter Czanik pcza...@fang.fa.gau.hu wrote:
2010-07-02 03:18 keltezéssel, Kevin Kofler írta:
Dave Airlie wrote:
So I've noticed maintainers of packages in Fedora seem to have a concept
of ownership, and I'm wondering if we could remove that word from usage
On 07/02/2010 01:58 PM, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 13:55 +0200, Léon Keijser wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 11:34 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 13:07:45 +0530, Rahul wrote:
IMO, there is absolutely nothing wrong with anyone
with commit access updating
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 21:58:10 +1000, Dave wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 13:55 +0200, Léon Keijser wrote:
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 11:34 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 13:07:45 +0530, Rahul wrote:
IMO, there is absolutely nothing wrong with anyone
with commit
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 01:33:05PM +0200, Till Maas wrote:
I do not want to be asked for trivial changes to my packages that fix
bugs I neglected or rebuild it because of an update of a dependency. I
am happy for every work I do not have to do and sending extra mails for
such changes reduces
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 02:23:43PM +0200, Peter Czanik wrote:
2010-07-02 03:18 keltezéssel, Kevin Kofler írta:
I think we need to get rid of the concept of ownership entirely, that'd
also
make orphaned or de-facto orphaned packages less of a problem. You see a
problem, you fix it.
Thomas Janssen píše v Pá 02. 07. 2010 v 13:21 +0200:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 12:58 PM, Dan Horák d...@danny.cz wrote:
Kevin Kofler píše v Pá 02. 07. 2010 v 04:06 +0200:
Dan Horák wrote:
I will rebuild wxGTK without the internal crash handler for the the
devel/F14 branch so we can use
2010/7/2 Patrice Dumas pertu...@free.fr:
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 02:23:43PM +0200, Peter Czanik wrote:
2010-07-02 03:18 keltezéssel, Kevin Kofler írta:
I think we need to get rid of the concept of ownership entirely, that'd
also
make orphaned or de-facto orphaned packages less of a
On 07/02/2010 06:46 PM, Patrice Dumas wrote:
In the past we proposed a policy for that kind of issues with Rahul,
but it was never approved (nor really considered).
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/RahulSundaram/CollectiveMaintenance
I had forgotten about this but since becoming
Hello,
2010-07-02 14:48 keltezéssel, Thomas Janssen írta:
+1
I'd like to get syslog-ng updated to the latest version in Rawhide (I
work part time for the upstream developer and I'm also an occasional
Fedora user). I contacted the package owner, no response. Created a
bugreport to get it
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 09:36:34PM +0800, Chen Lei wrote:
I think escalating to FESCo is only suitable for changes which are
controversial between different people, we should have another policy
to treat those non-responsive issues, maintainers should respond on
bugzilla report in time.
I
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 07:15:54PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
I had forgotten about this but since becoming provenpackager I have
helped out in simple rebuilds or even version bumps on occasions and
have gotten positive feedback.
You mean that you didn't only send a patch but you did
On 07/02/2010 07:27 PM, Patrice Dumas wrote:
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 07:15:54PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
I had forgotten about this but since becoming provenpackager I have
helped out in simple rebuilds or even version bumps on occasions and
have gotten positive feedback.
You mean that
On 07/02/2010 07:37 PM, Patrice Dumas wrote:
Ok, this policy was for the other case, a case when the maintainer
does not respond. I am not saying that it happens a lot, but it
happened in the past, and the syslog-ng case exposed in the thread is
another recent case. Maybe a policy is not
Hi,
I have orphaned perl-TermReadKey, for Fedora 11-devel, EPEL 4,5.
Anyone interested, please take it.
Stepan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi all,
I have a pretty simple question:
Is there a way to subscribe to certain packages in bodhi so that I get
a notification via mail whenever updates are queued for it or pushes
happen? That would be pretty useful for monitoring changes of
dependencies, so I have enough time to make sure my
Just a headsup: I've just built webkitgtk-1.3.2 in rawhide, which
changes library sonames, so things depending on it will have to be
rebuilt.
repoquery says that the following packages might be affected:
anjuta
awn-extras-applets
cairo-dock-plug-ins-webkit
claws-mail-plugins-fancy
devhelp
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 16:33 +0200, Julian Aloofi wrote:
Hi all,
I have a pretty simple question:
Is there a way to subscribe to certain packages in bodhi so that I get
a notification via mail whenever updates are queued for it or pushes
happen? That would be pretty useful for monitoring
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 8:06 PM, Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com wrote:
Just a headsup: I've just built webkitgtk-1.3.2 in rawhide, which
changes library sonames, so things depending on it will have to be
rebuilt.
lekhonee-gnome rebuild done.
Kushal
--
http://fedoraproject.org
On Thu, Jul 01, 2010 at 11:28:09PM -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
I don't think it really matters what we call it, I just think that
package maintainers are starting to get a sense of entitlement and I
feel that's counter productive to the open environment we're used to
and are trying to help
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 10:36 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
Just a headsup: I've just built webkitgtk-1.3.2 in rawhide, which
changes library sonames, so things depending on it will have to be
rebuilt.
claws-mail-plugins rebuild done
- Andreas
--
BRef Andreas Bierfert, M.Sc. |
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 09:53:00AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 07/02/2010 09:37 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 07/02/2010 12:57 PM, Josephine Tannhäuser wrote:
It's seems to me that you have to be an employee of red hat to get the
privilegue to deal arbitrarily with all packages.
On 2 July 2010 17:00, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
They were granted access to all perl-packages, because they are @RH.
Probably because it is their paid job to work on these packages.
Ralf, you need to stop repeating this particular line when I have repeatedly
told you that
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 11:26:32AM +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote:
Dne 2.7.2010 09:37, Rahul Sundaram napsal(a):
On 07/02/2010 12:57 PM, Josephine Tannhäuser wrote:
It's seems to me that you have to be an employee of red hat to get the
privilegue to deal arbitrarily with all packages.
Am Freitag, den 02.07.2010, 17:02 +0200 schrieb Andreas Bierfert:
On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 16:33 +0200, Julian Aloofi wrote:
Hi all,
I have a pretty simple question:
Is there a way to subscribe to certain packages in bodhi so that I get
a notification via mail whenever updates are queued for
On 07/02/2010 06:00 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 09:53:00AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 07/02/2010 09:37 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 07/02/2010 12:57 PM, Josephine Tannhäuser wrote:
It's seems to me that you have to be an employee of red hat to get the
privilegue
On 07/02/2010 06:07 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 2 July 2010 17:00, Toshio Kuratomia.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
They were granted access to all perl-packages, because they are @RH.
Probably because it is their paid job to work on these packages.
Ralf, you need to stop repeating this particular
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 06:33 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Fedora Legacy has shown how well this works… not!
I completely agree with Ralf Corsepius and Tom Lane on this subject: this
policy is very unhelpful, and applying it to security updates is just
totally insane. We're going to see
On 07/02/2010 06:20 PM, Will Woods wrote:
The main reasons we want to perform testing are things like: to avoid
pushing updates with broken dependencies, or updates that cause serious
regressions requiring manual intervention / emergency update
replacements. That sort of thing.
Should be
On 07/02/2010 12:09 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
It's in stable now. The time in testing allowed us to fix and add
several more packages to it and confirm that it did indeed fix things.
Maybe it's still being propagated, but when I did update --skip-broken
followed by yum update, right now (Fri Jul
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 06:15:44PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 07/02/2010 06:00 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 09:53:00AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
The Petr's are apparent newbies/newcomers.
They were granted access to all perl-packages, because they are @RH.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/2/10 9:18 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
I had to apply and justify the reasons why I wanted to be a
provenpackager.
I know you did, but the Petr's did not. Their presumable supervisor @RH
(Marcella) rushed them through the process and they had
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 12:41:18 -0400, Przemek wrote:
On 07/02/2010 12:09 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
It's in stable now. The time in testing allowed us to fix and add
several more packages to it and confirm that it did indeed fix things.
Maybe it's still being propagated, but when I did update
On Fri, 2 Jul 2010, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 07/02/2010 06:00 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 09:53:00AM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 07/02/2010 09:37 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
On 07/02/2010 12:57 PM, Josephine Tannhäuser wrote:
It's seems to me that you have to
On 07/02/2010 12:47 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 12:41:18 -0400, Przemek wrote:
On 07/02/2010 12:09 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
It's in stable now. The time in testing allowed us to fix and add
several more packages to it and confirm that it did indeed fix things.
Maybe it's
tibbs added a Fedora EPEL 5 branch for perl-PatchReader
Package perl-PatchReader in Fedora EPEL 5 is now owned by pfrields
tibbs approved watchbugzilla on perl-PatchReader (Fedora EPEL 5) for perl-sig
tibbs approved watchcommits on perl-PatchReader (Fedora EPEL 5) for perl-sig
tibbs approved
tibbs added a Fedora EPEL 6 branch for perl-PatchReader
Package perl-PatchReader in Fedora EPEL 6 is now owned by pfrields
tibbs approved watchbugzilla on perl-PatchReader (Fedora EPEL 6) for perl-sig
tibbs approved watchcommits on perl-PatchReader (Fedora EPEL 6) for perl-sig
tibbs approved
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Julian Aloofi
julian.fedorali...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I have a pretty simple question:
Is there a way to subscribe to certain packages in bodhi so that I get
a notification via mail whenever updates are queued for it or pushes
happen? That would be
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 12:20:21PM -0400, Will Woods wrote:
Therefore: I propose that we choose a few metrics (turnaround time on
security updates, average number of live updates with broken
dependencies per day, etc.). Then we begin measuring them (and, if
possible, collect historical,
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 04:33:20PM +0200, Julian Aloofi wrote:
Hi all,
I have a pretty simple question:
Is there a way to subscribe to certain packages in bodhi so that I get
a notification via mail whenever updates are queued for it or pushes
happen? That would be pretty useful for
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 02:48:26PM -0400, Luke Macken wrote:
For critical path updates to be approved for pushing to the stable
repository, they now require a minimum karma of 2, consisting of a +1
from a single proventester, and a +1 from another authenticated user.
I am just wondering, is
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/2/10 11:27 AM, Till Maas wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 02:48:26PM -0400, Luke Macken wrote:
For critical path updates to be approved for pushing to the stable
repository, they now require a minimum karma of 2, consisting of a +1
from a
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 20:27:27 +0200
Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
On Wed, Jun 30, 2010 at 02:48:26PM -0400, Luke Macken wrote:
For critical path updates to be approved for pushing to the stable
repository, they now require a minimum karma of 2, consisting of a
+1 from a single
On Thu, 1 Jul 2010 13:32:20 -0600, Kevin wrote:
The page Package Change Requests for existing packages is unclear:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/CVSAdminProcedure#Package_Change_Requests_for_existing_packages
Please expand on what explanatory text you want in
On Fri, 2 Jul 2010 21:50:08 +0200
Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
...snip...
- You are not the owner and want to maintain in epel. Did you
contact the fedora owner and wait and/or hear back that they didn't
want to maintain it?
How would I know that this would be relevant?
On Fri, Jul 02, 2010 at 12:48:43PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 20:27:27 +0200
Till Maas opensou...@till.name wrote:
Also they are about the important packages,
which is a subset of critical path.
Superset. :) In any case, the items mentioned there should be
Hi all,
since I'll be entering college soon, I'm revisiting my workload (I'll
continue to work on Sugar and Etherpad). I'm using neither of the
following applications (nodm was originally intended to be used for
sugar-related work) and since both avogadro and nodm have a few open
bugs which I've
Am Freitag, den 02.07.2010, 19:31 +0200 schrieb Thomas Janssen:
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Julian Aloofi
julian.fedorali...@googlemail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I have a pretty simple question:
Is there a way to subscribe to certain packages in bodhi so that I get
a notification via mail
On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 11:28 PM, Nicu Buculei nicu_fed...@nicubunu.rowrote:
I just added him to the Design Team group so his alias should start
working.
--
nicu :: http://nicubunu.ro :: http://nicubunu.blogspot.com/
Thanks. Yes it is now working correctly.
Regards
--
Chris Jones
Will Woods wrote:
The main reasons we want to perform testing are things like: to avoid
pushing updates with broken dependencies
The right way to prevent that is to get AutoQA completed, which will, if it
works as intended, automatically detect and throw out updates with broken
dependencies
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 02 Jul 2010 00:44:29 -0400
Tom Lane t...@redhat.com wrote:
I think it's counterproductive to downgrade that
responsibility, or even worse pretend that it doesn't matter --- and
Kevin's lead statement in this thread is damn close to pretending
that. Sorry Kevin,
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
We need groups, with grouped privileges/acls etc. It's essentially
what e.g. the perl-sig originally was meant to be.
Yes, group ACLs are definitely needed, but in addition to that technical
feature, we also need to make sure that the SIG actually gets commit access
to
Thomas Janssen wrote:
You have to accept the maintainers decision to not update it yet? What
do you think will happen if everyone builds the wishes he has and
breaks a lot of stuff with it? Anarchy? We have processes for that in
Fedora: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MikeKnox/AWOL_Maintainers
David Woodhouse wrote:
In the old days of RHL and beehive, I think we had it about right...
with the obvious exception that it was Red Hat only, but the attitude to
packaging was right, IMHO. There _was_ someone who knew most about a
package and was expected to deal with it most of the time,
On 07/02/2010 08:12 PM, Till Maas wrote:
Btw. on a related issue:How do provenpackagers properly test for broken
deps manually?
Like ordinary packagers should do ;)
The only difference between provenpackagers and ordinary packagers is
them having write access to packages they do not own.
On 07/03/2010 03:49 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
David Woodhouse wrote:
In the old days of RHL and beehive, I think we had it about right...
with the obvious exception that it was Red Hat only, but the attitude to
packaging was right, IMHO. There _was_ someone who knew most about a
package and was
On 07/02/2010 06:43 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 7/2/10 9:18 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
I had to apply and justify the reasons why I wanted to be a
provenpackager.
I know you did, but the Petr's did not. Their presumable supervisor @RH
(Marcella)
1 - 100 of 105 matches
Mail list logo
